User talk:Tbhotch

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetch comms 04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Low to moderate level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

2.98 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 11:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rescatemos a David y Miguel

On 5 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rescatemos a David y Miguel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Rescatemos a David y Miguel memorial was installed seven years ago today in response to a kidnapping that occurred thirteen years ago today? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rescatemos a David y Miguel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rescatemos a David y Miguel), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about "Label" or "distributor"

Hi. The discussion remains no further comment since last year. If you're interested, feel free to give your input, as well as Simplifying "Release history" tables discussion. 2001:D08:2951:5D13:181B:6FF1:4587:5831 (talk) 09:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Colonia La Cuarta Transformación

On 20 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Colonia La Cuarta Transformación, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that streets in a neighborhood in Mexico were renamed after concepts and projects associated with Andrés Manuel López Obrador? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Colonia La Cuarta Transformación. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Colonia La Cuarta Transformación), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexico City Metro overpass collapse

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mexico City Metro overpass collapse you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexico City Metro overpass collapse

The article Mexico City Metro overpass collapse you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mexico City Metro overpass collapse and Talk:Mexico City Metro overpass collapse/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 02:01, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexico City Metro overpass collapse

The article Mexico City Metro overpass collapse you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mexico City Metro overpass collapse for comments about the article, and Talk:Mexico City Metro overpass collapse/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Antimonumento +65

On 19 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Antimonumento +65, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Antimonumento +65 (pictured) bears the names of 65 miners who were trapped 19 years ago today and died during the Pasta de Conchos mine disaster? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Antimonumento +65. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Antimonumento +65), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth

You had time to type out "IP vandal" in your unfair attack on me where you showed you misunderstood what I said. That's a bummer because those two words in an edit summary would have been enough to keep me from bothering you in the first place. Revert me with another snotty edit summary this instant. City of Silver 04:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Emos vs. Punks

On 16 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emos vs. Punks, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that emos and anti-emos confronted each other, but Hare Krishna members de-escalated the situation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emos vs. Punks. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Emos vs. Punks), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,729 views (1,060.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Status

Hello! @Tbhotch. Give me status! And explain about it and its functions! (V12U253 (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Curious about Peso Pluma

While patrolling recent changes, I noticed your addition on the Peso Pluma article [1] of {{For|the weight class|Featherweight}}. My instinct was to revert it, as when I checked the Featherweight article, there was no mention of peso or pluma. When I checked your contribs and talk page, I saw a seasoned and respected member of the community, who knows what they're doing. So I left it be, but I'm still curious. (RCPatroller with zero knowledge of weight classes or the Mexican performer) _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:27, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't speak Spanish, but I got to thinking "pluma is probably feather", and peso is money, right? Also weight as the translation software told me. Never mind. _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Peso means Peso or, in this case, weight. Pluma is feather. I added it because Peso pluma doesn't redirect to the singer. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:24, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Notability (music) has an RfC

Wikipedia talk:Notability (music) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Flip^and Flopped ツ 02:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi, you will probably want to update your signature. The correct format is CC BY-SA, not CC-BY-SA. Right now it uses the wrong hyperlink. Regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:10, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Escalated disruption warnings

Unless an editor has been blatantly and egregiously disruptive with clear "malice aforethought", you should always escalate through the structured warning template. See Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings.

This level 4 warning was unreasonably excessive and even a level 1 warning would have been questionable. The IP editor is making a serious and creditable point and should not be threatened with being blocked just because they have not gone the right way about making that point.

@JMF: Ironic, since the only person that "threatened with [a block]" here was you, a threat to an IP that wasn't even within a limit of the 3RR. You might be unaware of this, but Twinkle provides the levels by default. Giving a 3RR gives a Level-3 warn. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:07, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Since {{uw-editwar}} says that an explicit 3RR/24hr vio is not required for a caution to be issued, I hadn't realised that it pressed the alarm button too. I tried first to issue a {{uw-editwar1}} to de-escalate matters, but it doesn't exist. Now I know why.

But I still assert that the IP editor was not being disruptive, just not playing by the rules that they are not aware of. The points they are making are certainly arguable and defensible, just not presented properly. I see you reverted my reversion and I accept your rationale in doing so, but I suggest you consider self-reverting now that you are aware of the broader context. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{ewsoft}} was what you probably intended. Not knowing the rules is not a justification even for newbies; when editing the webiste, you receive the disclaimer: "By publishing changes, you agree to the WP:Terms of Use". The level of warns were added for the patrolling bots and tools. file:Huggle3 kde ubuntu.png gives you an idea how Huggle perceives this (left column); silver is clean user, dark gray means something else (I haven't used Huggle in a while, possibly it means previously reverted, not warned), and the numbered squares the level of the warn. Whitelisted people won't appear in the tool. Twinkle doesn't use this system, but when warning it defaults to the next warn level. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rats. Yes, I knew about {{ewsoft}}, just didn't remember it when I needed to. Thanks for the jog. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And I see now that you have been an editor for a very long time, so I struggle to understand what motivated your action in this case? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Máximo Bistrot has been accepted

Máximo Bistrot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LTA

Please just stop reverting ten times in a row: just report them. You're only making more cleanup for us. Drmies (talk) 23:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: ?????????????? (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honey I've been dealing with this person for hours today because admins cannot see this person is targeting all the blue links from Yuri Gagarin. yet, somehow this is my fault. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly. I'm glad you reported them; I didn't see that. But my point stands: there's no point in reverting them. No, it's not your fault, but the more you revert the more we have to clean up. Drmies (talk) 23:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zzuuzz (talk · contribs) was the active admin, then ESkog (talk · contribs). If it is already known that this user is editing the links at Gagarin, and it is already known that this person is currently at Yuri Gagarin#Awards and honours. You can see my name at the reports I sent as soon as I detected the IPs, and a report at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Cairo. This is caused due to the lack of admins and this person wants the pages protected, so protecting the pages here is evidently helping their cause, because the disruption resumes as soon as the protection ends. I don't see how me going to ANI to create a long-list of reports (when the same admins are assumed to be watching AIV) will reduce the disruption. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And don't call me "honey" please. Just report or find an active admin. This is MidAtlanticBaby, who craves attention. Drmies (talk) 23:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, and they're still at it of course, but there is something you can do cause you been watching a while: it may be that some are targeted more than others--you could report those for protection. I'll do a few but I gotta run. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]