Wikipedia talk:Requested moves

This is the talk page for discussing Requested moves and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

WT:RM

NOTE: This is not the place to request moves. Please follow the instructions given on the project page. If you seek instruction on closing existing requests, please see the closing instructions.

To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, most subpages of Wikipedia:Requested moves that are unused have talk pages that redirect here.

This page has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

RM, WP:Requested moves → WP:Proposed moves, No consensus, 7 June 2007
RM, WP:Requested moves → WP:Proposed moves, Not moved, 11 February 2018
RM, WP:Requested moves → WP:Articles for renaming, Not moved, 19 September 2018
RM, WP:Requested moves → WP:Requested title changes, Not moved, 22 July 2024

Enter the title (or part of a title) to search for after "intitle:", then click "search"

Try other variants (e.g. "move discussion") to broaden or narrow your search

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36

Administrators' noticeboard/Move requests (2005)
For why RM was created, see:
- requested moves -- policy change?

Archives by date

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

ChanyanutSawasdee1103701965541 122.155.52.27 (talk) 14:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC) Etuodtiid[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Warriorglance(talk to me) 14:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2025

Hello, I am requesting the move of my sandbox page to the main domain.

Current page: User:Twistkhalifaartista/sandbox New title: Twist Khalifa Reason: This is a valid biography of an artist, well-formatted, with reliable sources, and ready for the main Wikipedia domain.

Thank you for your assistance.

No. This is blatant spam with no evidence of notability. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Florent Marée

I had a request in that didn't seem to be addressed and/or may have been accidentally deleted. This addition was put in as a request, but was removed by Intrisit (talk · contribs) via this edit. It looks like it may have been caught up in another user's requests/edits? Looking for clarity on if this was an accident, if this was rejected, or if I should resubmit. GauchoDude (talk) 15:53, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked on references in the article and none of them used "é". Please use WP:PCM. 162 etc. (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc.: Understood, thanks for the clarification. If you're using the article sourcing, you're gonna have a bad time. It's a terribly written, very substandard article in stub status. I thought the numerous examples I provided would have provided more clarity. I'll move to WP:PCM per your guidance. GauchoDude (talk) 16:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to be WP:BOLD and improve the article with better sources. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. 162 etc. (talk) 16:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update on bot to clerk RM/TR

Hi, RM regulars. Hope you're doing well. Last year, a discussion resulted in consensus to create a bot to clerk WP:RMT (archived discussion). In the past few days, discussion on this bot has been occurring at Wikipedia:Bot requests#Clerk Requested Moves/Technical. Since the original discussion on the bot was a while ago, I thought I'd notify you all. Cheers, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. Just an update on the bot, it has been granted a 7 day trial. If you notice any problems with its edits, please do let me know on the BRFA, thanks. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:13, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move user draft to Draft namespace

Hey! I would like to ask you, experienced editor, to move User:SyanMey/Sigma Software Group to Draft:Sigma Software Group.

This is a new article draft I am preparing for review. I am a new editor and cannot perform the move myself due to technical restrictions.

Thank you! SyanMey (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 20:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! SyanMey (talk) 08:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Change names of "[Ba Đình] + district" to "Ba Đình" + ", Hanoi"

If I write these lines in an unreasonable place, hope someone is responsible not to delete but take it to the right place. Currently, I do not have a comfortable conditions for social networks. I only wish that American friends should pay a little attention to the changes in Vietnamese administration today. Now Vietnam is no longer a district-level, so maintaining it is unstable with open knowledge space, especially with articles with brief content. I tried to call, explain and stated evidence, but many people stopped me by backing up the old information, so I had no other way but to speak up. I did not try to discriminate against anyone, but just wanted to present a truth that was happening in my Motherland. I am really tired because after my efforts are the mercy of those who do not care about Vietnam. (123.24.142.14 (talk) 04:17, 30 April 2025 (UTC))[reply]
Can you please provide reliable sources to back up your claim? If you could then maybe there will be some motivation to move the pages accordingly. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 09:54, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In any article, I provided a full reference source, but someone who came later deleted them made me very hard to recover. This situation repeated dozens of times made me very tired. What can I do to make you see that it is the event that is taking place in Vietnam ? I have to repeat many times, provide many times, but you delete and ask where the source is. I am really angry and tired. 2401:D800:260:38B9:354D:D6E8:62AE:57E3 (talk) 05:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The problem, as I've explained repeatedly to you under your various IP addresses and user name JIlQIM is that you have tried to rename the articles by cutting and pasting the content. That is not acceptable under terms of the license to which you agree each time you publish an edit. I know nothing about the substantive content you might be trying to update, but please STOP renaming articles by cutting and pasting the content. older ≠ wiser 11:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Từ Liêm Ward, not "district"

I tried to explain many times that I had to work hard to provide information with the bad situation of social networks. But no one cares, they just wait for me to insult them to lock me. When I asked them to stop backing, they said they were not related, and when I asked them to pay the right information, they denied that they were not authorized. I do not understand, if Wiki accepts the contribution from the majority, why do it hard for anyone, even if the information has been certified by the law? When will you stop bothering in such a way? I try to release, and you break it, and you say that you are not related, finally you don't allow me to say because you're busy sleeping.
TỪ LIÊM is now a WARD. Someone responsible, please do not reverse this article in the district. I am very tired and angry with this American joke. Why are you just waiting for the opportunity when I offend me, while you always abuse power so that no one can update new information? Where is justice? (2401:D800:260:38B9:354D:D6E8:62AE:57E3 (talk) 05:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC))[reply]

Now in Vietnam there are no more districts, hope that Americans should not compress the revision

DHN comes from California, and that proves that he cannot know what is happening in Vietnam. However, in some way, he was backed to erase all my efforts. I tried to explain that the title of "A + District" should be changed or even "B + Ward" into "C +, Hanoi", but no one replyed. It is ridiculous because Wikipedia always defends the power to provoke the weak people like me. I was very tired of this joke. I tried to provide information and they sat to delete and then accused me of sabotage. Now I offend someone, they will rush out like lions to condemn me, but when I contributed sincerely, they were silent and then locked all my discussion efforts. Is that the true value of the US ? (123.24.142.14 (talk) 01:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC))[reply]

All of you don't read but you always delete and lock, so why do you claim Wikipedia as an open source? 123.24.142.14 (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the fact that the Government has formed a resolution, but I do not lie to anything, but all of you do not read and just like to delete. Plan to arrange and merge administrative units in Vietnam 2024–2025 123.24.142.14 (talk) 01:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed changes you refer to require a constitutional amendment and won't happen until at least July. DHN (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Previous answer. Clerical note: moved most recent discussion to bottom, grouped it and another discussion under an earlier one. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 04:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]