Talk:Classical reenactment

Military history: Culture / Roman & Byzantine

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force

Reenactment (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reenactment, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ReenactmentWikipedia:WikiProject ReenactmentTemplate:WikiProject ReenactmentReenactment

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Roman legion#Late Empire|Late Roman legion]] The anchor (#Late Empire) has been deleted by other users before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Untitled

I would like to see this article expanded. I added: "The Roman Army did not remain static and, whilst sometimes demonstrating these changes in displays of the evolving equipment and appearance of the legionary, most groups also focus on a particular time period. The most popular period is probably the 1st-2nd century, with legionaries wearing the characteristic segmented armour illustrated on Trajan's Column. However, some groups portray the Late Roman legion, after the army reforms of Diocletian."

I would welcome something on Greek & 'Celtic' re-enactment, if you're out there. Salvianus 09:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed renaming

I propose that this article be renamed to Classical antiquity reenactment, Classical period reenactment or Classical reenactment since that's what it actually deals with. "Ancient" in this context is so vague as to be meaningless. Compare Classical antiquity (dealing with the period of Greek and Roman dominance of their area) with Ancient history (everything from the first recorded history circa 3300 BC to the early Middle Ages). Thoughts? Cmadler (talk) 19:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]