Talk:DataTAC

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Networking

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Shouldn't this be merged with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DataTac ?

Re: Merge

I agree with that. Simply move the paragraph over to the other article. They both contain good information...

merge, references

I merged DataTac into this page; the consensus from google seems to be that DataTAC is preferred. I also took out the external link, which pointed to an expired domain; I didn't find a good replacement link. The content of this article in general seems to be outdated; it doesn't mention Motient, which comes up in googling. phoebe 07:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DataTAC and Ardis are two completely different wireless data networks. Completely different technologies. Developed by two different engineering teams - ARDiS by Motorola Schaumburg, Illinois, and DataTAC by Mobile Data International, Inc. Vancouver, Canada. MDI was later purchased by Motorola, and product management merged. Archimedes of Syracuse (talk) 05:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cached copy of MobileData Link

Telstra was reorganizing their site at this time, so he's a link to Google's cached version until it's completed. Telstra & Mobility 124.148.86.17 05:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]