Jump to content

Talk:Garbage Offensive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Darth Stabro talk 04:23, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source: The Garbage Offensive was a community service initiative that evolved into a series of protests occurring throughout the summer of 1969 in East Harlem, New York City:
"On Sunday, July 27, the Lords of New York blocked the avenue of El Barrio. This action grew in size through the summer, as the frustrated, forgotten mass of Puerto Ricans joined in barricading the avenues and streets. Soon the garbage action turned into a confrontation with police, and the YLO became experienced in street fighting, in basic urban guerilla tactics, the hit and run. For the first time in years, the pigs came into the ghetto with respect and fear in their eyes. This period of the summer of 1969 is referred to as the Garbage Offensive." (Enck-Wanzer 2010, p.31)
"What they called “the Garbage Offensive” demanded adequate neighborhood sanitation services but implied much more." (Fernández 2020, p. 91)
  • Source: Garbage-dumping protests continued throughout August, with one demonstration on August 17 resulting in garbage being set on fire at multiple intersections across the neighborhood:
"As the protests drew more people, they grew more spectacular. Through word of mouth, the Young Lords put out a call for a “mass action” on August17. On that night, as Young Lords assembled the garbage at the intersection of110th Street and Third Avenue, crowds gathered and grew quickly. Some of the onlookers pushed the protest in a new, more flagrant direction. Several men poured gasoline on the refuse heaps and set them aflame. In later recollections, several Young Lords said that they were not involved in lighting the garbage on fire, but they purposely did not try to stop their neighbors. And when someone planted the Puerto Rican flag atop one of the garbage heaps, the sense of solidarity, pride, and rebellion grew appreciably." (Fernández 2020, p. 103)
"Protests escalated when the police arrested Ildefenso Santiago, a Puerto Rican driver whose car was blocked by the garbage bonfire burning on 111th Street and Lexington Avenue." (Fernández 2020, p. 104)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Main hook feels more... Hook-y... while alt is more specific.
Created by Spookyaki (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Spookyaki (talk) 02:19, 2 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Nice work on this article. I agree with you that ALT0 would be more hooky. Epicgenius (talk) 14:06, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Copied text

[edit]

Just a heads-up, I have copied some text (that I wrote) from this page to the Church Offensive page. Spookyaki (talk) 14:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And copied text from this article to Young Lords also written by me. Spookyaki (talk) 18:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Garbage Offensive/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Spookyaki (talk · contribs) 17:57, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 02:13, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments to follow. Dracophyllum, (1 PR) 02:13, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1a)
  • 1b)
  • 2a)
  • 2b)
  • 2c)
  • 2d)
  • 3a)
  • 3b)
  • 4)
  • 5)
  • 6a)
  • 6b)