Talk:Lazarus sign
![]() | A fact from Lazarus sign appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oops
[edit]The two IP editors who've changed the wording of the "awareness of this and similar reflexes" sentence were right - I was getting my double negatives confused. Sorry! Olaf Davis (talk) 10:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lazarus sign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206010138/http://aan.com/professionals/practice/pdfs/pdf_1995_thru_1998/1995.45.1012.pdf to http://www.aan.com/professionals/practice/pdfs/pdf_1995_thru_1998/1995.45.1012.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Picture
[edit]Has permission been given to use the picture of this brain dead child? If that were my child, I would not want this image freely circulated. Jeffguhin (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please read the description of the file before asking. 83.22.84.4 (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Can we use another video instead?
[edit]I find the video of a brain-dead kid inappropriate in this context. I understand that disturbing videos or images are sometimes necessary in articles about medicine, but here it's not at all necessary tu use a kid instead of an adult (possibly old). 37.102.121.83 (talk) 08:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- According to the original youtube video the male human is 19 years old (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nty6bICZlyA) so not a kid. 185.104.143.40 (talk) 17:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class Physiology articles
- Mid-importance Physiology articles
- Physiology articles about neurophysiology
- WikiProject Physiology articles
- Start-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages