Talk:Normalization (people with disabilities)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Normalization (not Normalisation)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lorenapreston.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Criticism
[edit]I was hoping to read some criticism of the idea, which I'm sure exist; but I don't know the field well enough myself. Can anyone update the entry with such information? 96.49.46.198 (talk) 00:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Take a look at Social model of disability. It looks to like this concept is simply the process of acting upon the consequences of accepting the Social model of disability - i.e. once the Social model is accepted Normalisation is the logical consequence. Strangely this article didn't even have links to either the Social model of disability or the Medical model of disability articles until I inserted them a few minutes ago. Roger (talk) 16:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Definition of normalization
[edit]I was wondering if any of the first paragraph of this definition of normalization is a direct quote because it reads like one. If not I would like to make an edit to it. Is this a direct quote? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattokamagic (talk • contribs) 20:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Mattokamagic, the first sentence is marked as a direct quote and referenced, so better not to edit that part. Rather add your edit elsewhere in the lead paragraph, and don't forget to cite your source. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Misconceptions
[edit]Can someone change this section to either list misconceptions (like mentioned) or change the title completely to summarise the topic. It doesn't make sense.
title
[edit]Idk if to be changed to "(disabled people)" or "(disability)"
--Luhanopi (talk) 13:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's what I was thinking. Anthony2106 (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 16 April 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Normalization (people with disabilities) be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the name being decided below. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log | ![]() |
Normalization (people with disabilities) → ? – The disability page uses more Identity-first language then person-first language and I think it sounds much better. But it could also be (disability) as well witch would be a good middle ground. Anthony2106 (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 12:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Move to Normalization principle per WP:NATURAL. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)