Jump to content

Talk:RMS Baltic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Misdated photograph

[edit]

The broadside schematic of the Baltic is labeled as being from 1903. This is unlikely as the drawing shows the ship configured with a large number of lifeboats which were added in the wake of the Titanic disaster (1912). It is therefor likely that the drawing was made not earlier than 1912. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 April 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 05:11, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


RMS Baltic (1903)RMS Baltic – Although this naming convention has become the norm for articles about ships from the White Star Line, no other article exists about a ship called the RMS Baltic, so this disambiguation is not neccessary. RanDom 404 (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably could just have moved this without controversy. Randy Kryn (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The White Star line were able to prefix their ships RMS from 1877. Therefore the 1871 SS Baltic would also be a RMS from then Lyndaship (talk) 08:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support perhaps add a hatnote to the 1871 ship.
Rafts of Calm (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Support move to RMS Baltic with hatnote
Rochambeau1783 (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:NCS specifically If a ship has had more than one prefix during its lifetime, choose the best-known for the article and create a redirect from the other prefixed names ie a redirect from RMS Baltic (1871) to SS Baltic (1871), The date of launching should be used if there are several ships with the same name so RMS Baltic (1903) should keep its dab and from WP:SHIPMOS If there has been more than one ship with the same name, create a ship index page for the generic ship name this ship index page would be titled RMS Baltic Lyndaship (talk) 06:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If RMS Baltic is an alternative name for SS Baltic (1871), then a hatnote is sufficient. If not, RMS Baltic should redirect to Baltic (steamship) as {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}, but there is no indication there or at SS Baltic (1871) that the 1871 ship is actually referred to RMS Baltic. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.