Talk:Rank-finiteness for fusion categories
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 7 May 2025
[edit]
 | It has been proposed in this section that Rank-finiteness for fusion categories be renamed and moved to Rank-finiteness. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Rank-finiteness for fusion categories → Rank-finiteness – While this subject does seem notable, the title does not cover the full breadth of the category. The section Positive results on rank finiteness
gives two examples that do not specify fusion categories. A Google Scholar search for Rank-finiteness for fusion categories 1 returns no results. Better to broaden the subject of the article to full cover the topic, as any subsection of 'Rank-finiteness' is likely not notable on its own. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have background in mathematics but I am not a category theorist, so I will be posting this to WikiProject Mathematics to get input. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 7 May 2025 (UTC)