Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 69.73.35.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 128.92.98.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 69.94.32.95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 117.20.116.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 138.204.66.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 209.152.151.134 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 260 five times in the last 5 minutes (Common vandal phrases, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thunderbirdxx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2404:c0:7050::2:64e0:286e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Webdesigndubai92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – spam-only account. 71.59.186.230 (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thunderbirdxx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. See edit filters, that's some imagination. WP:NOTHERE. Knitsey (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ligmadosidsodiodsssa (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "LickFoo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:20, 27 April 2025 (UTC)- Looks like a false positive. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure; "Ligma do-si-dso-dio-dsssa", and only edit thus far was an empty talk page comment on Talk:Sigma, as in, "What the sigma?" –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'd keep watching this one for now, per LaundryPizza03 — The Anome (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Beloved midget (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- WM Morocco (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Promotional username that implies shared use, an intent stated on their User page. Jusdafax (talk) 02:49, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Jusdafax and thank you for reporting. We would like to provide clarifications regarding this account. As mentioned in Meta, this account is a shared account for the Wikimedia Morocco User group board and staff, as we have updates and pages we create on Meta, and it is not always comfortable to do it with our personal accounts. It is not intended to be used to edit Wikipedia or any encyclopedic content. You can see an example of our intended uses here. As a professional organization, we believe that we have the right to such an account, that is independant of people who come and leave, the same way other chapters have their accounts (see Wikimedia Austria, Wikimedia Colombia, and Wikimedia France ). Actually, we would like to rename the account to "Wikimedia Morocco", but were not allowed. Can you help us with that? -- WM Morocco (talk)
- WM Morocco was renamed to Wikimedia Morocco (talk · contribs) by Hide on Rosé. The email address for the account given at m:User:Wikimedia Morocco doesn't match the email given at m:Wikimedia MA User Group... maybe I'm being hypercautious about giving an account the air of official legitimacy?Under normal circumstances I'd block the account on enwiki as shared accounts aren't allowed on enwiki. In this case the user only came here because of a premature report by Jusdafax. Other opinions...? Cabayi (talk) 13:25, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well, let's deal with it as per other premature reportings. If the account does another edit, it will then be liable for a block. – robertsky (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello – robertsky and Cabayi for your interaction. We are sorry for the confusion. Since we have received a grant, we were able to use a more professional email in addition to your gmail address mentioned in Meta. If you would like to be more sure, feel free to send us an email on either of the addresses and we can confirm to you our identity. Also, we ensure you that this account will not edit encyclopedic content but will rather update any content related to organizational matters. Thank you for your understanding. Regards -- Wikimedia Morocco (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- I won't take any action on this account, only on the basis that I am running the Singapore user group, and one day my user group may choose to walk the same path of having a shared account (although I won't be the one encouraging it). Nonetheless, concerns of shared accounts among editors here are valid, and there is no specific carve outs at WP:Username policy even for this specific use case of contacting editors to partake in the Wikimedia affiliate activities or sharing updates of a Wikimedia affiliate in non-mainspace venues. Out of the three other accounts listed here, one is blocked, one was briefly blocked, one still remains unscathed. I think allowing shared accounts for Wikimedia affiliates on enwiki may be a question best determined at either WP:AN or WP:RFCN. What say you, @Cabayi? – robertsky (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello – robertsky and Cabayi for your interaction. We are sorry for the confusion. Since we have received a grant, we were able to use a more professional email in addition to your gmail address mentioned in Meta. If you would like to be more sure, feel free to send us an email on either of the addresses and we can confirm to you our identity. Also, we ensure you that this account will not edit encyclopedic content but will rather update any content related to organizational matters. Thank you for your understanding. Regards -- Wikimedia Morocco (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well, let's deal with it as per other premature reportings. If the account does another edit, it will then be liable for a block. – robertsky (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- WM Morocco was renamed to Wikimedia Morocco (talk · contribs) by Hide on Rosé. The email address for the account given at m:User:Wikimedia Morocco doesn't match the email given at m:Wikimedia MA User Group... maybe I'm being hypercautious about giving an account the air of official legitimacy?Under normal circumstances I'd block the account on enwiki as shared accounts aren't allowed on enwiki. In this case the user only came here because of a premature report by Jusdafax. Other opinions...? Cabayi (talk) 13:25, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple IPs/ new users. Ʀasteem (talk) 03:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC). Ʀasteem (talk) 03:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:10, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:36, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:42, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking and edit warring. User in question has ignored multiple warnings. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 08:51, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I am requesting for a protection of this page as there has been High level of IP vandalism. BBM!SKM (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- (+1) — i think a couple of days of semi-protection would be nice. The Seal F1 (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 11:25, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism likely committed by the same individual using different IP addresses. Zdremon (talk) 13:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: genre warring by several MariaJaydHicky's IP socks. --Blueberry72 (talk) 14:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Second day of being hit hard by new accounts and IP editors adding nonsense. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relevant to WP:ARBPIA, media about Gaza war. Smallangryplanet (talk) 16:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The topic is not yet notable for standalone article. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 16:22, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Article relates to a topic concerning both the Houthis and Israel. ShallowC (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I would like to make a request for both the Strasburg Rail Road and Canadian National 7312 articles to be protected indefinite please. Because for the past couple of years and months there is this IP address user that keeps constantly spamming and adding in false info in both articles about 7312 being retired and scrapped. Additionally he keeps deleting 7312 from the Strasburg Rail Road article itself. If you go look at the edit history on both articles, he has done this multiple times before. The user has been told multiple times to provide a reliable source for his edits, but refuses and keeps making up claims for his edits saying he spoke to the COO of Strasburg Rail Road about 7312 being retired, but just by talking to an employee there does not make it a reliable source. I manage to revert his edits multiple times, but has continued with this nonsense edit spamming. So I would like it ask kindly for both these articles to be protected indefinite for now on, because even if the protect last for a few months and expires, he will just keep constantly add the false info back all over again. This time, it should be protected indefinite this time to prevent this from happening again. Please and thank you. 2601:188:C405:F440:3D29:4960:4C5C:D16E (talk) 16:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism by an IPV6. Koualska (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/College Football Data Warehouse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonstop disruption. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 78.184.87.93 (talk) 18:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Upgrade to extended-confirmed protection and extend - We have an apparent autocon-buster account (PutushPutush (talk · contribs)). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: The protection was transfered. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I can't submit my article Carolineearley (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- You created a redirect to Cave paintings and parietal art in terms of Human Cognition in your sandbox. This shouldn't be in mainspace so quickly. I've moved it to Draft:Cave paintings and parietal art in terms of Human Cognition as someone had already put a PROD on it, to be removed. Please go to the Draft and put that in your watchlist, and probably do some kind of edit to it, so it will show up in your contribs, and you won't lose it again. I also put a link in your ACTUAL sandbox, User:Carolineearley/sandbox, as Carolineearley/sandbox would be a subpage of a main article, as the "User:" is missing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 07:13, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:42, 6 May 2025 (UTC) |
| 10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Have created more than 250 articles with only 1 merged/deleted. I have 15 GA and participated in over 100 AfD with 88% convergence rate. So I am fairly familiar with policies FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
I came across Bgrus22 while doing new page patrols. These short bios are always well-sourced, compliant with core WP policies including WP:N and WP:V, compliant with the MOS. Only two deletions; one was a U1, the other was a five-year-old AfD and recent history shows full grasp of notability. Creates talk pages. With continued page creation in the works, Bgrus22's do not need to be reviewed by patrollers. (Note: the Xtools dates are not accurate because Bgrus22 reuses sandbox pages to prep pages before moving them to mainspace, so the date for the newly created articles in Xtools shows older dates of creation. Bgrus22 continues to be active, and the use of sandboxes is another reason to grant autopatrolled since kinks get worked out before mainspace.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC) Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Sunflower798 (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Hi, I won the 2014 Englsih Wiki Stub contest making many contributions with Autowikibrowser. I've had a very long Wikibreak and I might try more editing when I am not too busy. Snowman (talk) 18:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I want to use WMF's semi-automatic content translation tool to translate Daniela Ambrosoli's English Wikipedia page (which I wrote) into German. I am making this request because I don't think I have 500 edits yet. I am a German-English translator. Thank you in advance for granting this request. WWtext (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
For translating pages from Tamil to English. Chathirathan (talk) 12:26, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights: I'm participanting in a project called Wikipedia:Proyecto educativo/RUID-Cada libro su publico Premio 2025 in the spanish Wikipedia and I translated the article I made with the Content Translation tool but I don't have permision to publish it because I don't have the requirements. It is already finished, I only need permission. Amarope2 (talk) 12:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator
Hi! I will be coordinating Wiki Loves Pride 2025 campaign on behalf of Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, starting on June 1st and ending on June 30th. I need the Event coordination permission in order to use the Event Registration Tool, on this page: Wiki Loves Pride / 2025 If you can accept my request asap, I can create the page and run the Event properly. You can revoke my permission by August 1st, so I can send evaluation forms and info related to prizes during July. I am a "new editor" on EN Wiki, but not that new on ES Wiki :) Thanks a lot. Vic Sfriso (talk) 19:14, 3 May 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I would like to request temporary rights to contribute to Wikipedia by reviewing new pages as there is a huge backlog. I have been working on Wikipedia for past few months as an active user. During this time period, I have learnt a lot of things and learning something new every time I work here. Before these 2 months, I had a little experience on creating pages and within this time period, I started contributing by expanding older or creating new articles mostly within similar topic base. I would be glad to contribute to Wikipedia by reviewing new pages and also, learn along the way. I will also be working with the editors of new articles which might be notable but lack sources or other requirements. Thus, I am requesting a temporary grant of this right and I will prove for further grant by doing worthy work. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
HilssaMansen19 (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Given the ongoing New Pages Patrol backlog drive, I was wondering if it would be possible to allow NPP permission. I'd greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute and help alleviate the backlog. Your consideration would mean a lot to me! TheWikiholic (talk) 03:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
I think I'd be able to help with the backlog! I have experience with WP:AFC and I can apply similar skills here. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 21:33, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
I believe I meet most of the criteria for obtaining NPP rights. I am interested in contributing to the May backlog drive and assisting in reducing the number of unreviewed pages. Therefore I would like to request the NPP flag to support this effort. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 08:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
Hello Admin! I was granted a temporary page mover right twice about a years ago and again I would like to request the page mover right. I have read the WP:PMCRITERIA and familiar with Wikipedia policies. If I got a chance to gain this right then, it allows me to move pages on my own and without leaving redirect. Hope for positive response. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 16:00, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I pass the WP:PCCRITERIA as far as I know, and the right would allow me to help even more to build the encyclopedia by making sure only acceptable edits are approved. Thank you for your consideration. loserhead (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
I am eager to work enthusiastically to help reduce the backlog of pending changes by reviewing and maintaining edits. I have read and understood WP:VAND, and I will issue procedural warnings and welcome new users who edit articles under PCR protection. AɭʋaKʰedək (talk) 21:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
to help out and to contibute |possible (talk page stalker) Willbill6272 (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
I am applying for pending changing reviewer rights to help fighting in vandalism. I am familiar with all the pending changes/page reviewing/AfD policies. I have been very active in AfDs and have seen continuous vandalism there. I am aware about the vandalism, as the pages I have worked on and expanded, several occasions of sp vandalism have been there. Recently, one sp-vandal with a long history of doing that was blocked as I requested an admin to intervene. I am very active on Wikipedia now and will work along with fellow editors adhering to the policies. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 14:19, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
As part of reviewing questionable changes for vandalism, it would be helpful to be able to approve valid pending changes. Celjski Grad (talk) 16:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog whenever I can. MacaroniPizzaHotDog (talk • contribs) 02:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I've been here for over a year with over 1500 total edits and I've been recently getting into watching recent changes and new pages and I want to contribute to the pending changes process too. I've read all of the material and I think I pass all criteria. Laura240406 (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Hi, I have been on Wikipedia for over a year and have made over 1k edits. I mostly edit and monitor history articles. Several articles are sometimes disrupted knowingly or unknowingly by editors for which I have to revert. Having Rollback right would make the patrolling work easier and help to combat vandalism. I am aware of most of Wikipedia polices (WP:OR,WP:NPOV,WP:RS,etc.) I have also authored few articles like Bajirao I see [5]. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins, I’m respectfully requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Huggle. Patrolling recent changes is what I enjoy most on Wikipedia, and I’ve found that it’s where I can make the most impact with the time I have available. I've made 1840 edits since January. At present, I review edits by right-clicking the diff link to open changes in a new tab in Chrome and then use RedWarn to revert and warn users when appropriate. While this process works, it's time-consuming and not ideal for high-volume patrolling. Having rollback rights would allow me to use Huggle, which would significantly increase my productivity and responsiveness in handling vandalism. Earlier, I made two requests for different user rights but withdrew them after realizing that my interest lies more in patrolling and counter-vandalism than in article creation or extended content curation. That said, I have written one article and contributed to creating another recently, and I do plan to continue helping in content areas where I can. I also take direction well and am open to feedback. Thank you for considering my request. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 21:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have been on wikipedia for a few years & I've made over 1600 edits on the english wikipedia, and I've made over 7700 edits on wikimedia commons. I have reverted many vandalizing edits on a varierty of articles, and I've left many notices of these reverts on their talk pages. I've also made a few pages, mostly redirects, but I've also created other articles, including List of Agriotes species, Choristostreptus, and 1854 in Mexico. Having rollback privileges would make it much more efficient for me when undoing vandalism. No matter the decision, thanks so much! -Fneskljvnl🪱 (Contributions, Talk) (stay silly forever) 02:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted rollback rights on enwiki to make it more convenient to rollback here. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 10:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reapplying. When I applied around 2 weeks ago I didn't have that many mainspace edits and was declined based on that (but given PCR) - [[6]]. I haven't used PCR that much, but I've made contributions elsewhere with CSD, AfC and files. I still believe Rollback will improve my ability to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm fine with waiting longer though if I need a bit more experience elsewhere. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
I've been fighting vandalism a lot, and would like to make the process more efficient in the case of obvious vandalism so that I will not need an edit summary to revert many disruptive edits by a single user. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 15:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |