Template:WikiProject Measurement/sandbox
 | Measurement (defunct) | |||
| ||||
 | This WikiProject banner template uses Module:WikiProject banner, a meta-template for easily creating and maintaining project banners. Please report any errors or feature requests to Module talk:WikiProject banner. Information or warnings about the template are below:
|
 | This is the template sandbox page for Template:WikiProject Measurement (diff). |
Usage
[edit]The {{WikiProject Measurement}} project banner template should be added (not subst:ed) to the talk page of every article within the scope of the project. While the template does not require any additional parameters, it has a number of optional ones that add various extra features to the banner. The full syntax is as follows:
{{WikiProject Measurement
|class=
|importance=
|FA=
|FL=
|GA=
<!-- B-Class checklist -->
<!-- Referencing & citations -->
|b1= <yes/no>
<!-- Coverage & accuracy -->
|b2= <yes/no>
<!-- Structure -->
|b3= <yes/no>
<!-- Grammar & style -->
|b4= <yes/no>
<!-- Supporting materials -->
|b5= <yes/no>
<!-- Accessibility -->
|b6= <yes/no>
}}
Parameters
[edit]- FA – "yes" if the article meets the featured article criteria. This adds the talk page to Category:FA-Class Measurement articles.
- FL – "yes" if the article meets the featured list criteria. This adds the talk page to Category:FL-Class Measurement articles.
- GA – "yes" if the article meets the good article criteria. This adds the talk page to Category:GA-Class Measurement articles.
This is available only for unrated articles and articles rated as "Stub-Class", "Start-Class", or "B-Class". See the assessment department for more details.
With any of these classes, the banner will automatically display directions on how to use these parameters.
For an article to qualify for B-class it must meet 6 points. Each one of these points has a corresponding banner variable. For each of these points, assign "yes" if the standards are met, and "no" if not. Leave blank if uncertain.
- b1 – Is the article suitably referenced, and are all major points appropriately cited?
- b2 – Does the article reasonably cover the topic, and not contain major omissions or inaccuracies?
- b3 – Does the article have a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content?
- b4 – Is the article free from major grammatical errors?
- b5 – Does the article contain appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams?
- b6 – Does the article contains the appropriately accessible way?