This is an archive of past discussions about Template:Multiple issues. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This question has been brought to my attention on my talk page. I agree that the question needs discussion, as currently we have two tools fighting each other: the AutoWikiBrowser general fixes thinks that the "Expand language" templates do belong inside {{Multiple issues}}, leading to edits like this one; but Cewbot (talk·contribs) has been told that these templates do not belong there, leading to followup edits a few hours later like this one. This is, of course, a waste of server resources and of editor time spent reviewing watchlist entries and page histories.
Personally I think that the "Expand language" templates don't belong inside Multiple issues. They highlight an editing opportunity, but don't represent an "issue" with the article, whose content may be correct and well referenced as far as it goes. Although these templates are currently mentioned in the index of cleanup templates, they were added there only in June this year.
A complication is that AutoWikiBrowser's list of cleanup templates is coded into the program and can only be changed by a software developer. AWB software releases are infrequent. Whichever way this discussion goes, AWB's list needs to be changed, either to remove the 150 "Expand language" templates from the list or to add the 20+ missing ones. (Other parts of the list also need attention - phab:T309090)
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in another language. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is (using German): Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Exact name of German article]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template {{Translated||Error: No language code specified}} to the talk page.
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in another language. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is (using German): Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Exact name of German article]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template {{Translated||Error: No language code specified}} to the talk page.
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in another language. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is (using German): Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Exact name of German article]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template {{Translated||Error: No language code specified}} to the talk page.
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in another language. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is (using German): Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Exact name of German article]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template {{Translated||Error: No language code specified}} to the talk page.
I agree this needs to be resolved one way or the other to end the tool conflict. I'm leaning towards including. While Expand Languages may technically not be a "cleanup" issue, that distinction would be lost on the average reader. The wrapper just says "issues" and expanding is an "issue" of some kind. Combining saves valuable real estate and lets readers get to the text faster. MB14:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
I agree - the docs for {{Multiple issues}} begin Using too many individual article message boxes can distract from the article… (emphasis added) and continue in a spirit that seems less concerned with distinguishing among types of messages and more concerned with limiting visual and focal disruption to the reader. --N8wilson🔔16:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Coming back to review this more closely it looks appropriate to go ahead and revert the change that caused the incongruence in tooling here. That change looks more like a bold edit than a community-supported change to the existing consensus. I note that the referenced discussion took place over 3 hours between 2 editors 1 of which took a somewhat detached tone suggesting wider discussion would be appropriate.
Let's leave this discussion open because the spirit of the revert here isn't to shut down dialogue but rather to fix it yourself instead of just talking about it per WP:BOLD. It looks like we broke something and I think this reversion is a quick fix while discussion continues. This also shouldn't be misconstrued as a criticism of the initial bold change that the revert undoes - in fact the B in WP:BRD is encouraged and welcomed. In this case, it just took a really long time for the community to notice that the previous bold change might not be the best long term solution and should be discussed further before proceeding. --N8wilson🔔14:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Problem with Gini-Simpson Formula Template-protected edit request on 9 July 2023
I believe the formula representing the Gini-Simpson Diversity Index in this article is inaccurate. There are two possible ways to generate this index but the formula in the article is neither. They don't match the cite in the article at the bottom of the page<ref><http://www.countrysideinfo.co.uk/simpsons.htm
>. Slgarry (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template 