User:Fabrictramp/Dashboard
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Moh Miqassa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:8003:641D:2A00:642A:6E28:B4E3:36FC (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Migration (2023 film) was changed by 2001:8003:641D:2A00:642A:6E28:B4E3:36FC (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857423 on 2025-05-10T00:28:14+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- SnazzyWags (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 166.198.38.23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 115.130.62.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:42, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2406:3003:2007:1c78:5080:eded:8d72:6477 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Liugoma Akil Gonzales (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:10, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:569:BA63:3C00:8C8C:8BD3:B85F:1CE4 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - PinkPantheress was changed by 2001:569:BA63:3C00:8C8C:8BD3:B85F:1CE4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918318 on 2025-05-10T06:23:53+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 06:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 123.202.72.113 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 46 five times in the last 5 minutes ("Poop" vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 122.173.80.40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:31, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 0701ysy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:39, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 121.44.215.37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Littlest Pet Shop (2012 TV series) was changed by 121.44.215.37 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877491 on 2025-05-10T06:48:46+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 103.56.4.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 175.141.133.100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 216.114.255.58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Doug Henwood was changed by 216.114.255.58 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967321 on 2025-05-10T07:09:39+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 07:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 116.87.80.136 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:16, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 46.1.184.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:34, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Kungfu23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Fanzi: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 00:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Shahmoien (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Clearly WP:NOTHERE. PepperBeast (talk) 01:26, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Fuzheado | Talk 01:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 128.148.204.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Tron: Legacy: vandalism after final warning. Massive overlinking despite prior warning for said conduct and multiple other warnings for unconstructive editing. DonIago (talk) 03:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- User40678 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. [1] hate speech. See extensive filter list. WP:NOTHERE. Knitsey (talk) 06:56, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 121.44.215.37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 06:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 216.114.255.58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:13, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- HickoryBoughtSkirt?4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Impersonation HickoryOughtShirt?4. Also created ~riIey~ and Ksœstm Dªmªged GWarfare MacBººk. Knitsey (talk) 08:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- And Junk usərname³ Knitsey (talk) 08:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- and Ærturo (your friend) Knitsey (talk) 08:30, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- And Junk usərname³ Knitsey (talk) 08:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Arisgoeswiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) WP:ORGNAME violation, promotional name + promotional edits (created Draft:Akademische Raumfahrt Initiative Schweiz). Toadspike [Talk] 12:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- SrMediaSpecialist (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username changed from "CityOfTitusville" to a role account, which isn't allowed, either. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Dopheiacorp (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:53, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- FazielahWonderCommsSA (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. "WonderCommsSA" sounds like a comms or PR agency. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Colly Industries (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Seems like a company name. I can't say whether the edits they've made break any rules. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 15:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- COVinfo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:CORPNAME, promotional sandbox. Username isn't an exact match to the name of the company they're promoting, but close enough I believe to warrant a block. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:13, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Sunday Times (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See The Sunday Times. Referentis (talk) 00:49, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Adelaide36ers (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Inappropriate user name, conflicts with Adelaide 36ers – username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy. DaHuzyBru (talk) 01:54, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Stussyclub475 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See user page. Referentis (talk) 02:05, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- GODSUPREME SCIENCEHEAVEN (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an promotional username. See their talk page. Pibx (talk) 04:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Cshatto (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See their sandbox. Pibx (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. PhilKnight (talk) 05:47, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Official-ISPR (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. It appears that this user is representing themselves to be the official account of Inter-Services Public Relations, the public relations branch of the Pakistani military, and has added an "official casualities update" adding unsourced information about Indian losses to Operation Bunyanun Marsoos. MCE89 (talk) 08:02, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- 5k tymz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Just the name of a music studio, as indicated by the userpage QwertyForest (talk) 08:29, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Aintabli (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. As at least one of the editors are autoconfirmed, extended confirmed protections would be needed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:15, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. High risk article. Has been a target of persistent vandalism as per edit history. Requested protection as per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 02:51, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Three different IPs mass-overlinking country names, in the past couple of days. Belbury (talk) 09:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors edit warring. Mellk (talk) 11:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 11:59, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Tonyy Starkk (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The article has been subject to repeated vandalism and the insertion of unsourced or misleading content, including defamatory claims. These edits appear to come from accounts or IPs pushing a political agenda, disrupting the neutrality of the page. Despite prior reverts, the pattern continues, affecting the integrity of the article and violating Wikipedia’s content policies. Temporary protection is requested. Bacon2025 (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of IP and throwaway accounts vandalising this page. Arso0628 (talk) 19:36, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP addresses adding the same POV content over and over for months. Eg. Special:Diff/1289595254 Special:Diff/1269628508 Special:Diff/1269628781 Special:Diff/1279893080 Special:Diff/1281263117 Special:Diff/1285491622 Special:Diff/1289448583 Special:Diff/1289456232 (non-exhaustive list). BugGhost 🦗👻 20:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Happening again since logging this - Special:Diff/1289625760/1289628420. I haven't reverted because I've reverted this stuff several times recently and don't want to wade in 3RR territory. BugGhost 🦗👻 21:53, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of continued IP vandalism over battle figures. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:23, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recent removal of Zionism section Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring. Involved are a number of IPs & SPAs inc. 324jhafdsoubr233, UOKHelicopter4870, Oakwoodarms, & WillOnlyRelyonFacts Adakiko (talk) 22:55, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and BLP violations – about 10 instances in the past week. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:52, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: People keep changing my details 172.56.221.25 (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 04:45, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Arb Enforcement, ECP - WP:ARBIPA 2601:646:4200:9240:64BE:5E4C:3C8D:9A6 (talk) 04:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA targeting this page has been gaming the system to gain autoconfirmed status in order to resume vandalizing this article. Alith Anar 04:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Filming not started yet but added future films. I am revert edits but neet to protect article.Sush150 (talk) 06:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Continual edit warring by an IP editor or editors. Mark and inwardly digest (talk) 07:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:39, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:53, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Blocked user socking Roxy the dog 08:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Unprotection: This article has been semi-protected since 2011 due to apparent vandalism. I doubt this low-profile article of an unremarkable town will be the target of a lot of disruption after 14 years have passed. I wasn't require to contact the protecting administrator; he's been dead since 2019. (and it's ironic how the higher profile Bell and Liberty Bell articles are not protected to begin with!) BriDash9000 (talk) 02:10, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: No longer necessary. Not much vandals since protection six years ago. I am requesting this here since the admin who protected this left Wikipedia. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 06:53, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page should be unsalted, because it would be a good redirect to Ninja (gamer)#Low Taper Fade. Xoontor (talk) 07:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC) |
| 11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
This user has created a huge number of articles, mostly to do with football in Switzerland. A cursory review shows that the articles often need copyediting and could use more inline citations, but the subjects are consistently notable and the articles are generally well-researched and -referenced, so I don't see much for NPP to do here. Toadspike [Talk] 15:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Hi, I won the 2014 Englsih Wiki Stub contest making many contributions with Autowikibrowser. I've had a very long Wikibreak and I might try more editing when I am not too busy. Snowman (talk) 18:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights ⋆⁺ ཐི Wakabenga ཋྀ ⁺⋆ (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to remove the link List of NBA regular season records (and its redirect NBA records) which was added en masse by a user in 2023 to hatnotes and "see also" sections across articles in a manner that is unreasonably tangential and irrelevant. Doing it manually would be far too arduous for me. I believe the AutoWikiBrowser right would be a valuable asset in helping me do this. Thanks for considering this request. Left guide (talk) 07:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Hello, I am already autoconfirmed, but I was wondering if an administrator could add me in the conformed user group so a template on my user page will display that I am apart of the autoconfirmed user group. Thank you for your consideration. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 22:57, 8 May 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I want to use WMF's semi-automatic content translation tool to translate Daniela Ambrosoli's English Wikipedia page (which I wrote) into German. I am making this request because I don't think I have 500 edits yet. I am a German-English translator. Thank you in advance for granting this request. WWtext (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit] |
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender[edit]
I believe that I should have Mass Message Sender permissions as I am WP:X’s newsletter (Ichthus)’s chief editor, and I will be sending various newsletters to the people of WP:X, as I have already done. Having this permission will help me fulfill my duties. Thank you! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I would like to assist with reviewing new article drafts to help ensure they meet encyclopedic standards. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I have over 500 mainspace edits, currently at 1041 mainspace edits while checking on Xtools. I am a rollbacker and have experience with the guidelines of Wikipedia, and I also had experience with AfC reviewing (but decided to remove myself from the AfC reviewer list after I could not find as much time to AfC review) I have made many redirects, and made a couple of articles. I also have a lot of experience with AutoWikiBrowser, (using JWB at some cases). I also have experience with CSD's. You can find logs on my userpage. I am actively working to make my first PROD. I also have experience with XFD Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 15:46, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
I am retired and enjoy using my free time to contribute to Wikipedia and make it more enriching. GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
I had to withdraw my previous request due to academic reasons, but my exams are over, I'm ready to contribute actively to reviewing new pages.[6]. Chronos.Zx (talk) 07:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm still unsure if this is the right time for me to apply but, I trust my gut enough in this situation. I'm a current student in the CVUA, currently going through a trainer switch. I've taken the past several weeks to familiarize myself with CSD and AfD. Although I haven't written any articles, I do like to take the pride on looking at ongoing AfD's, which has helped in my study in different polices. I also do a good amount in copyvio work, using CopyPatrol. I work well with other editors and I hope to reduce the NPR workload. I love to welcome new users, when I come across them, as I member of the welcome committee. I'm civl and I always apologize and fix my mistakes with haste. I've never been blocked, nor any restrictions, although I've made a few mistakes (i.e accidental reverts, which only really happened in the beginning of my RCP experience), which I fixed, apologized, and most importantly, moved on. I only took the pride to apply (even though I wanted to before) because of the May 2025 backlog drive. I'm eager to help in the backlogs and, I also think this will be a great chance for me to connect with other editors. If you don't feel as if I'm ready, I understand and I'm OK if I'm placed on a trial aswell. Thank you! twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 22:11, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
I am currently an AFC reviewer and is familiar with the deletion processes such as AfD, PROD, and CSD. I would like to help clear the backlog. I believe I meet the criteria for this right. Thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:10, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello. I've been here for over a year with over 1500 total edits and I've been recently getting into watching recent changes and new pages and I want to contribute to the pending changes process too. I've read all of the material and I think I pass all criteria. Laura240406 (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to request this permission. I'm reviewing the Special:Recentchanges, & I often see articles protected by the pending changes protection. I've read the both necessary articles about this feature and am familiar with the most important policies, including WP:BLP, obviously. Besides, I got the rollback a couple of weeks ago, so I can use it if necessary. The Seal F1 (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Holla, It’s been over a month since I last requested for Pending changes right, I’m sure I meet the requirements now, I actively patrol the recent changes feed and I want to help. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Sunflower798 (talk) 08:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Hello I am requesting the pending changes reviewer right because i would like to review the edits of new users making sure that they comply with the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia i feel like i meet the requirements i have read most of the major policies and guidelines including the ones mentions in the criteria section on the reviewing pending changes page Isla🏳️⚧ 19:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 5,700 edits. I’ve also been reverting vandalism using twinkle for a while so I am familiar with the guidelines. SKAG123 (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, my first request was not done a year ago, I am reapplying today. I have read the review guide. Sometimes I look at the pending changes but I cannot accept good edits. Leotalk 16:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hi, I have been on Wikipedia for over a year and have made over 1k edits. I mostly edit and monitor history articles. Several articles are sometimes disrupted knowingly or unknowingly by editors for which I have to revert. Having Rollback right would make the patrolling work easier and help to combat vandalism. I am aware of most of Wikipedia polices (WP:OR,WP:NPOV,WP:RS,etc.) I have also authored few articles like Bajirao I see [10]. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins, I’m respectfully requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Huggle. Patrolling recent changes is what I enjoy most on Wikipedia, and I’ve found that it’s where I can make the most impact with the time I have available. I've made 1840 edits since January. At present, I review edits by right-clicking the diff link to open changes in a new tab in Chrome and then use RedWarn to revert and warn users when appropriate. While this process works, it's time-consuming and not ideal for high-volume patrolling. Having rollback rights would allow me to use Huggle, which would significantly increase my productivity and responsiveness in handling vandalism. Earlier, I made two requests for different user rights but withdrew them after realizing that my interest lies more in patrolling and counter-vandalism than in article creation or extended content curation. That said, I have written one article and contributed to creating another recently, and I do plan to continue helping in content areas where I can. I also take direction well and am open to feedback. Thank you for considering my request. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 21:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have been on wikipedia for a few years & I've made over 1600 edits on the english wikipedia, and I've made over 7700 edits on wikimedia commons. I have reverted many vandalizing edits on a varierty of articles, and I've left many notices of these reverts on their talk pages. I've also made a few pages, mostly redirects, but I've also created other articles, including List of Agriotes species, Choristostreptus, and 1854 in Mexico. Having rollback privileges would make it much more efficient for me when undoing vandalism. No matter the decision, thanks so much! -Fneskljvnl🪱 (Contributions, Talk) (stay silly forever) 02:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted rollback rights on enwiki to make it more convenient to rollback here. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 10:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reapplying. When I applied around 2 weeks ago I didn't have that many mainspace edits and was declined based on that (but given PCR) - [[11]]. I haven't used PCR that much, but I've made contributions elsewhere with CSD, AfC and files. I still believe Rollback will improve my ability to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm fine with waiting longer though if I need a bit more experience elsewhere. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
I've been fighting vandalism a lot, and would like to make the process more efficient in the case of obvious vandalism so that I will not need an edit summary to revert many disruptive edits by a single user. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 15:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins, I’m requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Twinkle. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I would like to request for rollback rights to fight and detect the vandalism and revert unconstructive edits more easily. I am familier with the relevant policies related to vandalism and also with WP:Rollback. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I currently hold Global Rollback rights, but I’m requesting local rollback permission on enwiki to demonstrate active use of the tool here as well. I understand that the right may not be technically necessary due to redundancy with global rights, but I was previously declined local rollback. If the request is accepted this time, even without the flag being granted, it tells me that admins appreciate my works, and encourage me to participate using the rollback tool locally as part of the community. Thank you for your consideration. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting rollback rights as I believe they will improve my ability to counter vandalism. I spend a decent amount of my time patrolling Recent Changes, and I am familiar with the policies concerning vandalism and other types of unconstructive editing. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 19:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello 🙏 My temporary rollback rights is expiring soon. I’ve used rollback right responsibly to revert vandalism. Would kindly like to request permanent rollback permission to continue this work. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
I am request this right because lately, there has been a lot of vandalism during the evening to night hours. I could not revert all of it because I had to click the article, go to view history, and undo. With this, I could much more easily revert vandalism. Please note that my account is pretty new, but I had an account before with around 1 year experience; that account was when I lived in Chicago, the reason I cannot access the account is because I forgot the username and password (it was a created a while ago). Thank you for your consideration of this request. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
|