User:Ronhjones/Adminship
| Toolbox |
| »Vandalism → UTM • RC • HUG • TW |
| »Wikipedia → AfD • BL • DYK • FAC • FAR • GAN (vg) • GAR • RfA |
| »Admin → DASH • AIV • AN • ANI • RAA • RFPP • UAA • RM • AC/N • IANB |
| »Tools → AP • ATS • CIU • ELC • GLBCON • IPL • OEC • PHS • PROJ • SQL • WCHKR • WLH • WHOIS |
| »Other → COPY • CSD • DEL • NP • NUL • PARSE • UBX (vg) • UW-warn |
| Toolbox format |
Administrative backlog
Reports
- Xjx921 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:34, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- 68.118.58.219 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 425 five times in the last 5 minutes (Magic/astrology spambots, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Stale. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- VissanuAmpaipet.- (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Warned. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2607:f430:358:b4f6:34a5:f613:6af2:bfc0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1340 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user changing times, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- MRSBRETAMOKO (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2600:1700:D280:DA00:8C50:873F:F996:ED58 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Cate Caplin: vandalism after final warning. The person who loves reading (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Editor is communicating now, gave a COI welcome. Will need monitoring to see if unsourced COI editing resumes. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- I also protected the article for a couple days with the hope that we can avoid blocking a likely BLP subject. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Editor is communicating now, gave a COI welcome. Will need monitoring to see if unsourced COI editing resumes. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- 1.39.18.9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Diana Penty: Vandalism in multiple pages with edits with no sources. Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. ~Lofty abyss 19:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- 93.150.230.79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Latest sock of the Italian Sikh - Arjayay (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Arjayay, please mention at least one currently-blocked address making the connection obvious for such reports. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Please see this list - if you need a specific account see User:RiccardoBallarotti - Arjayay (talk) 20:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Arjayay, please mention at least one currently-blocked address making the connection obvious for such reports. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- 74.80.50.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 74.80.50.86 still making wp:unsourced edits despite 4th warning. 74.80.50.86 make numberous small wp:unsourced and improper formatting edits for the past 12 hours continously. Significant cleanup had to be made as the result. - Calmira90 (talk) 20:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- 142.167.213.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On [[:]] ([{{fullurl:Talk:Pope Leo XIV|diff=1289468411&oldid=1289468411}} diff]): IP left disruptive and offensive comment on talk page; don't know if this is worth pushing for a ban but thought I'd report it :). JacobTheRox (talk) 20:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| Attack pages | 0 |
| Copyright violations | 1 |
| Hoaxes | 0 |
| Vandalism | 0 |
| User requested | 4 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 4 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 5 |
| Other candidates | 27 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 151 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 106 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Sunflower798 (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Hi, I won the 2014 Englsih Wiki Stub contest making many contributions with Autowikibrowser. I've had a very long Wikibreak and I might try more editing when I am not too busy. Snowman (talk) 18:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights ⋆⁺ ཐི Wakabenga ཋྀ ⁺⋆ (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights : I am requesting the confirmed user right as there are several articles I need to rename. I believe that obtaining this right will allow me to make more significant contributions to improving Wikipedia's content. I have been an active and constructive editor, and I am committed to following Wikipedia's guidelines, i also need to rename some pages because in real life they have changed. Bestgamer 229 (talk) 06:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I want to use WMF's semi-automatic content translation tool to translate Daniela Ambrosoli's English Wikipedia page (which I wrote) into German. I am making this request because I don't think I have 500 edits yet. I am a German-English translator. Thank you in advance for granting this request. WWtext (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
For translating pages from Tamil to English. Chathirathan (talk) 12:26, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights: I'm participanting in a project called Wikipedia:Proyecto educativo/RUID-Cada libro su publico Premio 2025 in the spanish Wikipedia and I translated the article I made with the Content Translation tool but I don't have permision to publish it because I don't have the requirements. It is already finished, I only need permission. Amarope2 (talk) 12:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender
I believe that I should have Mass Message Sender permissions as I am WP:X’s newsletter (Ichthus)’s chief editor, and I will be sending various newsletters to the people of WP:X, as I have already done. Having this permission will help me fulfill my duties. Thank you! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
Given the ongoing New Pages Patrol backlog drive, I was wondering if it would be possible to allow NPP permission. I'd greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute and help alleviate the backlog. Your consideration would mean a lot to me! TheWikiholic (talk) 03:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
I believe I meet most of the criteria for obtaining NPP rights. I am interested in contributing to the May backlog drive and assisting in reducing the number of unreviewed pages. Therefore I would like to request the NPP flag to support this effort. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 08:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
I would like to assist with reviewing new article drafts to help ensure they meet encyclopedic standards. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I have over 500 mainspace edits, currently at 1041 mainspace edits while checking on Xtools. I am a rollbacker and have experience with the guidelines of Wikipedia, and I also had experience with AfC reviewing (but decided to remove myself from the AfC reviewer list after I could not find as much time to AfC review) I have made many redirects, and made a couple of articles. I also have a lot of experience with AutoWikiBrowser, (using JWB at some cases). I also have experience with CSD's. You can find logs on my userpage. I am actively working to make my first PROD. I also have experience with XFD Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 15:46, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
I am retired and enjoy using my free time to contribute to Wikipedia and make it more enriching. GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
I had to withdraw my previous request due to academic reasons, but my exams are over, I'm ready to contribute actively to reviewing new pages.[5]. Chronos.Zx (talk) 07:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
Hello Admin! I was granted a temporary page mover right twice about a years ago and again I would like to request the page mover right. I have read the WP:PMCRITERIA and familiar with Wikipedia policies. If I got a chance to gain this right then, it allows me to move pages on my own and without leaving redirect. Hope for positive response. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 16:00, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Hello. I've been here for over a year with over 1500 total edits and I've been recently getting into watching recent changes and new pages and I want to contribute to the pending changes process too. I've read all of the material and I think I pass all criteria. Laura240406 (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to request this permission. I'm reviewing the Special:Recentchanges, & I often see articles protected by the pending changes protection. I've read the both necessary articles about this feature and am familiar with the most important policies, including WP:BLP, obviously. Besides, I got the rollback a couple of weeks ago, so I can use it if necessary. The Seal F1 (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Holla, It’s been over a month since I last requested for Pending changes right, I’m sure I meet the requirements now, I actively patrol the recent changes feed and I want to help. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Sunflower798 (talk) 08:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Hello I am requesting the pending changes reviewer right because i would like to review the edits of new users making sure that they comply with the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia i feel like i meet the requirements i have read most of the major policies and guidelines including the ones mentions in the criteria section on the reviewing pending changes page Isla🏳️⚧ 19:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 5,700 edits. I’ve also been reverting vandalism using twinkle for a while so I am familiar with the guidelines. SKAG123 (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Hi, I have been on Wikipedia for over a year and have made over 1k edits. I mostly edit and monitor history articles. Several articles are sometimes disrupted knowingly or unknowingly by editors for which I have to revert. Having Rollback right would make the patrolling work easier and help to combat vandalism. I am aware of most of Wikipedia polices (WP:OR,WP:NPOV,WP:RS,etc.) I have also authored few articles like Bajirao I see [9]. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins, I’m respectfully requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Huggle. Patrolling recent changes is what I enjoy most on Wikipedia, and I’ve found that it’s where I can make the most impact with the time I have available. I've made 1840 edits since January. At present, I review edits by right-clicking the diff link to open changes in a new tab in Chrome and then use RedWarn to revert and warn users when appropriate. While this process works, it's time-consuming and not ideal for high-volume patrolling. Having rollback rights would allow me to use Huggle, which would significantly increase my productivity and responsiveness in handling vandalism. Earlier, I made two requests for different user rights but withdrew them after realizing that my interest lies more in patrolling and counter-vandalism than in article creation or extended content curation. That said, I have written one article and contributed to creating another recently, and I do plan to continue helping in content areas where I can. I also take direction well and am open to feedback. Thank you for considering my request. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 21:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have been on wikipedia for a few years & I've made over 1600 edits on the english wikipedia, and I've made over 7700 edits on wikimedia commons. I have reverted many vandalizing edits on a varierty of articles, and I've left many notices of these reverts on their talk pages. I've also made a few pages, mostly redirects, but I've also created other articles, including List of Agriotes species, Choristostreptus, and 1854 in Mexico. Having rollback privileges would make it much more efficient for me when undoing vandalism. No matter the decision, thanks so much! -Fneskljvnl🪱 (Contributions, Talk) (stay silly forever) 02:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted rollback rights on enwiki to make it more convenient to rollback here. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 10:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reapplying. When I applied around 2 weeks ago I didn't have that many mainspace edits and was declined based on that (but given PCR) - [[10]]. I haven't used PCR that much, but I've made contributions elsewhere with CSD, AfC and files. I still believe Rollback will improve my ability to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm fine with waiting longer though if I need a bit more experience elsewhere. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
I've been fighting vandalism a lot, and would like to make the process more efficient in the case of obvious vandalism so that I will not need an edit summary to revert many disruptive edits by a single user. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 15:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins, I’m requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Twinkle. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I would like to request for rollback rights to fight and detect the vandalism and revert unconstructive edits more easily. I am familier with the relevant policies related to vandalism and also with WP:Rollback. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I currently hold Global Rollback rights, but I’m requesting local rollback permission on enwiki to demonstrate active use of the tool here as well. I understand that the right may not be technically necessary due to redundancy with global rights, but I was previously declined local rollback. If the request is accepted this time, even without the flag being granted, it tells me that admins appreciate my works, and encourage me to participate using the rollback tool locally as part of the community. Thank you for your consideration. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting rollback rights as I believe they will improve my ability to counter vandalism. I spend a decent amount of my time patrolling Recent Changes, and I am familiar with the policies concerning vandalism and other types of unconstructive editing. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 19:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello 🙏 My temporary rollback rights is expiring soon. I’ve used rollback right responsibly to revert vandalism. Would kindly like to request permanent rollback permission to continue this work. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |