User talk:Atulkumar.1990

Welcome!

Hello, Atulkumar.1990, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Thomas.W ^talk 17:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Indira Gandhi National Open University. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 17:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Education in India. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 17:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Suvigya Sharma -- A Short Bio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Suvigya Sharma -- A Short Bio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qxukhgiels (talk) 17:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suvigya Sharma

The article Suvigya Sharma has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Shrikanthv (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Suvigya Sharma.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Suvigya Sharma.jpg, which you've attributed to http://content.indiainfoline.com/_media/iifl/img/article/2014-09/30/full/1412070388-8651.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Suvigya Sharma. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eclipsed was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Atulkumar.1990/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 16:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Atulkumar.1990, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 16:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Real Estate Expo 2015

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Real Estate Expo 2015, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 03:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Real Estate Expo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Real Estate Expo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Atulkumar.1990/sandbox

Hello, Atulkumar.1990. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

International Real Estate Expo

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of International Real Estate Expo, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.onlineprnews.com/news/652946-1451459716-international-real-estate-expo-irex-2016.html.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Real Estate Expo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Real Estate Expo, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.onlineprnews.com/news/652946-1451459716-international-real-estate-expo-irex-2016.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cetpa Infotech concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cetpa Infotech, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cetpa Infotech

Hello, Atulkumar.1990. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cetpa Infotech".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepali Bhardwaj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deepali Bhardwaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 01:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello Atulkumar.1990. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Atulkumar.1990. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Atulkumar.1990|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 12:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bina Modi

Hello, Atulkumar.1990. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bina Modi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bina Modi

Hello, Atulkumar.1990. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bina Modi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at AMD, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Annh07 (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how you are saying this is inappropriate external link. AMD HUB is official version of AMD India vertical.

May I know in what context you are challenging this???? Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 13:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know what document you are looking for. This is official website of the India. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 13:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atulkumar.1990,

Is this really AMD's India website? I don't see any announcement from AMD about it. Annh07 (talk) 13:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Annh07 that's why I am telling you what documentation you are looking for. this is official website of India. I was really surprised to see you are challenging. I know Wikipedia is not a vehicle to drive the carp things. being a long user of this, I know we should maintain things properly over here.

Let me know what documentation you need to verify / justify this is official website of India Location. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 13:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

to show the genunity, you just click on https://amdhub.in/about-us/ and contact button in the bottom. You will get re-directed to amd.com website.

However if you need any document, let me know. I will get that arranged. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 13:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it is indeed AMD's website, you can add it back to the article, preferably in the External Links section. Annh07 (talk) 13:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't. MrOllie (talk) 13:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any official announcement from AMD is fine. Annh07 (talk) 13:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Annh07 this is official anoucement from the AMD: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ankush-verma-10494914_businessesloveamd-amd-ryzen-ugcPost-7283374019137957888-7eZW/?utm_medium=ios_app&utm_source=social_share_send&utm_campaign=copy_link

is this something valid and can be good to comment. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 08:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an official announcement from AMD. It's just an advertisement from a Linkedin account of someone who introduces himself as an AMD employee. Linkedin is not a reliable source, please see WP:RSPLINKEDIN.

If AMD really set up a new website in India, there should be an official announcement from them, or it should be reported by the media. If there is no source to confirm that it is AMD’s website, then you shouldn't include the link in the article. Annh07 (talk) 14:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Atulkumar.1990. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Atulkumar.1990. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Atulkumar.1990|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cornitos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cornitos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornitos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chanel Dsouza (talk) 13:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chanel Dsouza Hi, may I know why this is nominated for the deletion As per my understanding this was reviewed 3-4 months and after meeting the policy this was approved. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please visit the deletion discussion to understand why your page was tagged for deletion. Keep your comments brief and to the point, and avoid adding long comments. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 12:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Cornitos, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Atulkumar.1990, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Atulkumar.1990|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:28, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Spiderone, can you slightly explain what exactly you need from my side. for wikipedia page creation, I was not paid. just to prove this what exactly you need from my side. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 17:17, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have not properly answered any questions about COI editing in the article's talk page. If you were not paid for writing this article, then who are you? Are you a company employee? Chanel Dsouza (talk) 12:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chanel Dsouza I appreciate your concerns regarding COI editing. To clarify, I am not a paid editor for this article. My interest in Cornitos stems from its industry relevance, and my goal has been to improve the article by ensuring it aligns with Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing standards.

Looking forward to constructive input. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 13:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Secondly, you mentioned keeping responses concise. I always strive to do so, but given the nature of the questions raised, I felt it was necessary to address each point thoroughly. Apologies in advance if my response is lengthy, but since multiple concerns have been brought up, I want to ensure that I provide a clear and justified explanation while adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Additionally, I have a concern regarding the repeated assumption that I am a paid editor. While my account has been active for a long time, if this were a professional engagement, it would be expected that I would have contributed to far more than just 3–4 pages. My contributions stem from personal interest rather than any commercial motive.

Furthermore, some concerns have been raised regarding the authority of the sources cited. I’d like to clarify whether publications such as Business Standard, The Economic Times, Business Insider, and Business Today are not considered authoritative under Wikipedia’s guidelines. I’d appreciate any clarification on this matter.

Looking forward to your thoughts. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 13:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior in AfD

There are some concerning patterns regarding your behavior in the recent AfD on Cornitos. I noted in my comment on the AfD for Cornitos that you shouldn't be using LLM to generate responses to AfD discussions. You then decided to use ChatGPT or another LLM to build a response to my comments. I can only speak for myself, but this gives me the impression that you're WP:NOTHERE. And then you continued spamming responses with irrelevant, LLM-generated replies. Your tendency to spam every link you could find on the topic, regardless of whether or not it was appropriate or even related, is at best WP:DISRUPTIVE. It also is counterproductive, as you are forcing editors to sift through tons of chaff to find one or two useful articles. Honestly, most would just give up after the first two or three and decide that it wasn't worth it, then suggest deletion. nf utvol (talk) 13:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nfutvol,

It’s really surprising to hear that I’m using ChatGPT or any AI tool to generate my responses. I’m only sharing my thoughts here—something AI can’t do in a human, intent-driven way.

I don’t think anyone should give up on this discussion, and I certainly won’t. My only two main concerns are:

Being Paid for the Content – If I were doing this as a paid gig, I’d probably be creating dozens of pages, not just a handful, and many of them would have been taken down. That’s clearly not the case.
Source Credibility – There’s a lot of talk about PR sources not being reliable, and bla bla. But if I’m not using PR sources, what’s the issue? I’m getting broad, generalized responses instead of direct feedback on what’s actually wrong with the citations I’ve provided. Of course, I’m going to challenge that.

I just want to have a fair discussion about this. Hope we can keep things focused on the actual concerns.

Trust me I am not generating any thing from chat GPT. ChatGPT will not address what I am thinking in my mind :-) rest your decision. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you know @Nfutvol everyone is asking me different set of questions and that's why my response is going longer. I know no one has VALID points just trying to keep me revolving around and around and everyone is trying to distract the overall discussion, you are being paid, you don't have to use PR (where I have used tell me, I will not even contest with anyone, I will delete myself). Trust me. I will for sure. I am 100% sure people keep sending messages just based on other and that's it.

Why I am saying this, earlier when I made the actual content, that's even not the half of that currently available and that moment the actual work was done by different set of people. I really respect those Guys.

Now its all JUSTIFCATION to contest on invalid points. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 13:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First off, it's extremely clear which portions of your replies are written using an LLM and which are not. For instance, this entire edit here is clearly generated using ChatGPT. You didn't even take the time to remove the source tag in the URL showing that the links were all generated by ChatGPT. It's one thing to use an LLM to help improve your writing, especially if English is your second language...I wouldn't really encourage it, but it's understandable nonetheless. In this case, you almost certainly used an LLM to create from whole cloth a reply to the AfD. And the pattern of your replies has largely shown the same syntax and wording indicating an LLM was used to generate it.

Secondly, I never mentioned the paid content...but if you want to talk about that separate issue, then sure. Your behavior in spamming replies to people who *are actively agreeing with you that this should not be deleted* is part of what is leading everyone to think you have some sort of ulterior motive. The second part is the fact that nearly every single one of the list-spam of sources you pushed is clearly a re-published press release by the company laced with promotional language. Perhaps this is something that should just be left to an AN/I discussion, since you don't seem to grasp the issues with your patterns of editing that multiple people have called out.

Again, please take the advice that I and others have given you. Read the WP policies and essays at WP:RS, WP:GNG, WP:LLM, and WP:COMPETENCE, take them to heart, and then return to editing. Otherwise, this will have to be escalated. nf utvol (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Nfutvol is the section you have highlighted (referred to as "entire edit here") on the live page or talk page? every pointer has been taken from the talk discussion? is this really very important whether talk discussion is chatgpt or human written? As I have nothing to justify this is human written. You may even say this content is chatGPT.

I have clearly stated that no promotional content has been included. However it seems there is a strong indication to categorize this as AI generated or I have been paid for this work.

This assumption is evident from your comment that English being my secondary language- what does that have to do with the main focus of the discussion?

Once again we are shifting from the main agenda.

I have nothing further to add. I got everyone's perspective rather here than improving things better, just dominate and prove or justify you are wrong.

that's why I just added above we are circling back and forth and everyone is coming with new set of agenda.

Now I have new topic - english is your secondary language. so better to just have a silence and respect what you are saying.

thanks and good by :-) 103.208.68.179 (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I'm not really sure what you're talking about here. The blue text is a link to your edit that is fairly obviously LLM-generated content, and I suggested you read the policies and essays linked above (again, the blue text). nf utvol (talk) 17:49, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Nfutvol is the content on this page is generated using LLM or chatGPT [1].

it's quite obvious that this is the main page and it matters a lot. 103.208.68.179 (talk) 18:03, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to be, but it does have substantial issues with promotional tone and sourcing. That being said, and as I previously stated in the AfD, there are a couple of sources that do lend notability, they're just buried in the link spam you posted. nf utvol (talk) 18:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

that's great to hear @Nfutvol and I genuinely appreciate this feedback. this really help me refine and improve the content. My intention is never been to include anything misleading or promotional.

If you could help highlight specific areas that need improvement, I'd be more than happy to work on them. Your guidance is much appreciated. Atulkumar.1990 (talk) 18:46, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]