User talk:BEFOR01

Welcome!

Hello, BEFOR01!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 06:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Valorrr. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft talk:Battle of Mandali (1822) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 06:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Baghdad (1821). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. That was for your second round of WP:ASPERSIONS against me. Again, if you think something is up, report me to WP:ANI. If you have nothing, do beware that I can use your diffs of attacking against you in a ANI thread. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to the policies you presented, my behavior does not seem to violate them. I would also kindly ask you not to use policy references as a way of applying pressure.

Regarding the ANI matter, it has come to my attention that your name has appeared in some ANI-related discussions recently. This is concerning because, from an outside perspective, your recent actions may appear to be escalating tension and potentially contributing to an environment of conflict.

Specifically, by initiating deletion discussions on articles created by certain users, and those users subsequently facing blocks or their pages being deleted, it could give the impression of targeting or creating a battleground-like scenario. Please remember that this is not a war zone.

My goal is not to attack you but to raise genuine concerns that I believe should be addressed in the interest of Wikipedia’s collaborative spirit. I hope we can de-escalate and focus on improving content constructively... Dear @HistoryofIranHistoryofIran BEFOR01 (talk) 20:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be blunt. You're not following our policies. You were even told to stop WP:BLUDGEON by two users (yours truly being one of them), even an admin said "you've probably made sufficient comments here now", yet you still keep commenting. And I have already asked you to stop casting WP:ASPERSIONS thrice, and now for the fourth time (please stop). So by no means are you in a position to indicate that I am "escalating tension and potentially contributing to an environment of conflict." (more WP:ASPERSIONS). And again, if you think you have proof of me violating our policies, report away, but do beware of WP:OUCH. This is not a way of pressuring you, I am telling you kindly stop attacking me, otherwise I will report you to WP:ANI, and then you're welcome to try to convince the admins that your behaviour does not violate our rules. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't going to argue at first but I guess circumstances push people to do that?

Look, looking at the tone of your messages, it seems like threatening messages. A situation like going to ANI won't change the outcome. I think we are both wasting our time arguing with you. Because the officer warned you before she warned me. In the fourth incident you mentioned, you are considered to have slandered me because you thought I was slandering me. Your question has nothing to do with slander. Despite me giving you the right answer, you keep messaging me again and again and I am defending Wikipedia rules and we are forced to argue with you for no reason.

Please adjust the tone of your messages and don't attack me in your messages and make threatening statements

+We need to close the discussion on this topic because we are not getting anywhere. If I am seriously breaking policy and am making a threat to you, I apologize. BEFOR01 (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not here to argue, I’m simply here asking you to cease the attacks, it’s really not that hard. Your last sentence also contradicts your whole comment. Feel free to have the last say, prefferably without any attacks. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

-(If I am seriously violating policy and posing a threat to you, I apologize.)- -There is no contradiction in this sentence. If you analyze it, you will see it. What I want to point out here is the sentence of ending a discussion by adding your thought and your idea.

We can close this topic here. 👋🏻 Good night and Good day- BEFOR01 (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siege of Baghdad (1821) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Baghdad (1821) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Baghdad (1821) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoryofIran (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was an automatic message. I guess deletion is the way rather than redirect. Though same same basically. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We can talk here if you want 👍🏻 1 BEFOR01 (talk) 01:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello BEFOR01! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Have a nice day!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

<3 BEFOR01 (talk) 05:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]