User talk:Cicero Azazel

This is Cicero Azazel's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel J. Richardson III (First Lieutenant) (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel J. Richardson III (First Lieutenant) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Idoghor Melody (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cicero Azazel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Idoghor Melody (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am working on the references and sources now. I wanted it up and in draft format. Then was going to come back in and edit all the technical aspects. Cicero Azazel (talk) 04:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Daniel Richardson, from its old location at User:Cicero Azazel/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ~Liance^talk 21:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel Richardson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel Richardson. Thanks! ~Liance^talk 21:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the draft should be title Daniel J. Richardson III to not conflict with the current wiki article of creation here Daniel Richardson. Cicero Azazel (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Richardson (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Richardson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 00:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, OpenAI was used for some parts. I'll work on humanizing the article and resubmit soon. Cicero Azazel (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ethical Philosophy of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence in Warfare (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://a.co/d/bDBLLm3. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

Draft:The Ethical Philosophy of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence in Warfare may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 12:39, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ethical Philosophy of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence in Warfare (April 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CF-501 Falcon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is just a listing of the book (promotional too). Please see WP:NOTDIRECTORY.

CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 19:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]