User talk:FuzzyMagma/Archives/ 6

Edits

I deleted an irrelevant pic with a false description added to the page by "Tobby" on 24/11/2024, why are you so keen to restore it? 41.68.190.220 (talk) 09:07, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Because the description of the picture match the picture caption. You on the other hand haven’t provided any evidence or discussed the picture with Toby at least. But actually engaged in warring. FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

@Tobby72 you may want to respond FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

please respond at Talk:Nubians#Contested pictures FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

1899 months

If possible please have more month articles for 1899 created. So far we only have December. 2600:100C:A218:9A7B:11B5:10A2:C434:3503 (talk) 14:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Miss International 2006

Hi there! I saw that you marked the Miss International 2006 article as reviewed, even though it had a notability tag on it. Did you find sources to establish notability? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

No, I just looked through the whole Miss International series and it seems borderline. My intuition was if this article needs to be deleted then the whole series should, as they all have the same level of credible coverage in secondary sources (almost none), plus I didn’t see harm in having the article.

None of what I have mentioned is a policy so I will totally understand if you reverted my review but I think tagging the article is enough to warn the reader, and having this article unreviewed will mean other reviewers will spend time to decide on it. FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on 1973 Constitution of Sudan. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on 1956 Transitional Constitution of Sudan. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on MOASS. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day ahead.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you fuzzymagma

Thank you for the creation of the Habib Kambanga page. Even though you did do some errors like say he was an orphan which isnt correct and removed some of the things from the page, I am thankful for your work and hope to work together in the future. Also By the way, The imaged of Dr.Kambanga being appointed was fully allowed to be used by the state house photographers and distributed for free use. It is strange for you to say that it was some type of copyright?!GiganticFishy (talk) 14:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

thanks, let's start with the orphan thing, it is for articles. Read the tag next time before you remove it.

2nd the image, add that information to the image description at commons because you claimed you owned the picture when you did not. FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Review Draft:QuesTek Innovations

I can't as I have a COI. Can you please review it, I noticed that it has been sitting waiting for a while. To me it looks fine, perhaps not GA but OK. Thanks. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Done. You might want to link it and categorise it FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Ta Ldm1954 (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

NPP Awards for 2024

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		This award is given in recognition to FuzzyMagma for conducting 442 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Law of constancy of interfacial angles

I have just written an article on the Law of constancy of interfacial angles. Do you think it should be added to the Crystallography template and if so where? GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 22:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I think it fits, I added to the template FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Your revert to Hemedti

Thank you for kindly reminding me that "you cannot just add information without a source" when in fact the source was already there, and my addition stems from that same source (which surely you would have checked before reverting). My rephrasing also sought to correct the "built an ...forces" which seemed ungrammatical to me. Should you consider to undo your revert you might also look into the accessdate of the cite ref which I am noticing only now. Webmgr (talk) 13:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your version is better, I was conflicted about the phrasing for the livestock part and the removal of "According to Western officials" which was not a good phrasing to start with.

Apologies for the hiccup/mistake and thanks for discussion. FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Appreciate it. Have added date to the source ref, and a link to the non-paywalled version. Webmgr (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Really great to see at last we have a good article about this important topic. Thanks! Mccapra (talk) 23:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

thanks Mccapra. I am originally from Sudan, and I have never been taught this part of our history, so I think I am the one who have benefited the most. FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:28, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Deprodding

Hi there. After adding 6 citations, one of which is a book and a secondary source, I deprodded Regional Association of Energy Regulators for Eastern and Southern Africa. It's part of a series of Energy law articles that I've been working on for 15+ years. I thank you, because without your prod, I never would have found it. Bearian (talk) 02:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

I think it should be the other way around. Thanks for improving the page. Although I cannot see any of the new sources meet criteria one of WP:ORG but I will leave it to that. Thanks again. FuzzyMagma (talk) 06:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Another user jumped in to help. Bearian (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Awlad Rashid

Much appreciated for your help on the page. I had 0 clue on how to create a wiki page but felt that as a race of humans we should be able to learn of anything. With the wars going on in South Sudan I felt that this was exemplified and that more should be able to learn especially about an ongoing conflict. Wikipedia and internet archives thank you for the help. Much appreciated. PineGPonderosa (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on Graduates' General Congress. Another editor, Justiyaya, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the thorough and well researched article. I marked one spot with failed verification because I was unable to locate the person's name in the associated reference. I do think a bit too much of source 2 is used but otherwise the article looks extremely good.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Justiyaya 06:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

I assumed you searched using the name in the page which you will certainly will not find because how Arabic name are spelled. In the article it’s written differently.

I’m still reading couple of sources so will update the article more but thanks for the kind words FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edemariam Tsega

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edemariam Tsega you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:42, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Aluminium–silicon alloys

Hello! I happened to read the Aluminium–silicon alloys article and noticed a confusingly worded part:

"Hypoeutectic alloys (also hypoeutectic) have a silicon content of less than 12%."

It's in the pure alloys section. The part in parentheses should probably say something else but I don't know enough about the subject to guess what.

Have a nice day! Soulful potato (talk) 05:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Micro-cantilever fracture testing

Hello, FuzzyMagma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Micro-cantilever fracture testing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Sudan

Thanks for adding me to the project and thank you very much for the complements. I am trying to keep things as accurate and up to date as possible for conflicts and disputes around the world, but as a non-Arabic speaker, I am relying on English language sources and translations. Please feel free to make any corrections if you think I have slipped up.Dn9ahx (talk) 18:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

you are doing a stellar job and I think many in the WP:Sudan, including myself, will learn alot from an experienced editor like you. TC FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Confusion on Sennar offensive revision

Hello, I was confused on your recent edit in the Sennar offensive. The Egyptian Air Force is not part of the battalion so what was the point of the revision? I saw a mistake which was Egypt was not involved directly so like other articles I put it in a support section, but I saw that it was removed as well. Is there an explanation? SDUpdates32349 (talk) 11:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

support does not make a combatant, see Template talk:Infobox military conflict#RfC on "supported by" being used with the belligerent parameter FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi Fuzzymagma

On the kerma culture page I posted a Genetic section on the middle nile valley which includes the Kerma culture which i thought was an important in looking at the Genetics of the Kerma culture, an author (skallygook) who has it out for me for YEARS decided to remove the entirety of the Genetics section I wrote (with citations from Nature.com), an important look in understanding the genetics of the kerma culture, there are 2 pages on kerma, one that deals with the city itself and another that deals with the "Kerma culture" which includes the middle nile valley, anyways I thought the Nature magazine study on the Genetics of the middle nile valley can shed light on the people & genetics of the Kerma culture, he could have edited and corrected the claims that he felt were innacurate but instead removes the entire section with stuff i cited with Nature.com, anyways whether I am right or wrong can you be a 3rd objective party to all of this if you can Thank you. Jedorton (talk) 22:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Correction his/her name is skllagyook Jedorton (talk) 22:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

I’m not familiar with the difference between Kadruka and Kerma or Kushite so it might be better to establish a link between the two before delving to genetics.

I understand your frustration, but as you can see Karduka is not on Wikipedia, so if you have time, you can create the page also, so we can all understand the link between the two. Sorry if you felt that an editor is targeting you but some times that just comes with the territory as both of you are interested in similar content.

I am sure @Skllagyook has nothing against you but just protecting the page, and their edit they explained the issue with your edit which you can address either here but better on the page talk. FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

I did address it on his page talk, part of the confusion (possibly on my part) comes from the Nature article itself that talks about "kerma period individuals" which may have confused me as being from kerma, but nonetheless these kadruka samples are likely identical to what the Kermans were genetically like as they're both from the Middle Nile Valley, I am going to read into it again and word it better. Jedorton (talk) 00:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

When you say “likely” this means you are doing original research. That’s why we prefer using secondary sources that interpret primary sources.

If I have time by the end of the month, I will look to writing the Kadruka page just to help me also understand the link, and it’s seems like a historical site. I would appreciate your help as we did in similar pages or you can draft the page and I jump in to help as soon as I can FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Jedorton Kadruka is a site in Sudan considerably north of Kerma, close to the Egyptian border (in northern Nubia), while Kerma is located further south (in what might be called "central Nubia"). The Kadruka sample was from the same period that the Kerma culture existed (and could have had some link to it) but we dont know what that link was, if there was one, or whether or not it was a Kerma culture individual, and the source doesn't state as much. Thus I don't think it can be assumed that a single Kadruka individual is necessary representative of the Kerma population, especially given that archaeologists and linguists (e.g. Rilly and Cooper) have posited that different cultures/ethnic groups/language families existed in/along what is now Nubia/north and central Sudan at the time (some Cushitic/Afro-Asiatic, some Nilo-Saharan), perhaps also varying genetically. Skllagyook (talk) 19:31, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

@Skllagyook I admit I made a mistake confusing the article's"kerma period individual" with people from kerma itself, the article was kind of worded that way, I agree with you especially on your latter point (that upper Nubia was a melting pot of Eastern Sudanic & AA cultures), the article does end with the possibility of pastoralist groups from kenya & Tanzania having their origin in the Middle Nile Valley. Jedorton (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Rizvi article sources

Hello,

Thank you for adding your feedback to my draft on Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi. However, not only have one of the two sources you left as a recommendation already been cited and used in the work, but I've used the Toronto Star, MEMRI, Ontario provincial archive, and the independent Iranian Islamic journal Safinah al Nejat as sources. I'm not sure if you've reviewed them or not, but I am unsure as to why the article doesn't qualify. I have more sources to add in the meantime, but since you commented one I've already used I thought it would be good to ask. BurimKazimi (talk) 15:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

but you wrote one source (or all of the sources) in promotional tune. That why I am waiting to see how are you going to use the 2nd source, to establish if you have a conflict of interest or not. FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

That's fair, but I wouldn't necessarily categorize that sentence as promotional. It mirrors what was written in a journal article by MEMRI, otherwise it wouldn't be there. "His views on the Apollo 11 mission are that science allows one to appreciate the power of God, and that denying space travel stems from the same mindset as those who have historically rejected the physical reality of the mi'raj of the Prophet Muhammad."

It's only relevant because there are many people, both non-Muslim conspiracy theorists and people within the Muslim community, who speculate the moon landing and think it's a hoax.

I do see you've added some footnotes, so I will tend to those as well. Thanks. BurimKazimi (talk) 16:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Ok I have tagged the article line by line for you at Draft:Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi. Hope that helps. FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

On the website Al Islamː "The Al-Islam.org site and the DILP are entirely supported by individual donors and well wishers. If you regularly visit this site and wish to show your appreciation, or if you wish to see further development of Al-Islam.org, please donate online.

IMPORTANT : All content hosted on Al-Islam.org is solely for non-commercial purposes and with the permission of original copyright holders. Any other use of the hosted content, such as for financial gain, requires express approval from the copyright owners."

The only self-published parts of the site are Q&A forums. Books and Youtube sermons are taken from the Internet. BurimKazimi (talk) 17:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

I have edited the template to reflect that. I see you have shorten the bad coverage! FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

@BurimKazimi generally you should not edit other users' talk but I must admit that I am not proud of our interaction or the semi-warring that ensued, and given my level of involvement, I believe it's best for other editors to assess your draft to maintain impartiality. Good luck. FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

just unsupported ;) Help is always appreciated

Thank you

Thank you for your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Leodo. There are literally over 10,000 Olympian stubs. LibStar (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for helping se to see this, simply I am from Europe so i was too late already, but I already answerd this --Miki1234568 (talk) 07:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edemariam Tsega

The article Edemariam Tsega you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Edemariam Tsega and Talk:Edemariam Tsega/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 00:44, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edemariam Tsega

The article Edemariam Tsega you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edemariam Tsega for comments about the article, and Talk:Edemariam Tsega/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Al-Bara' ibn Malik Battalion

Hi, just letting you know, I have fulfilled your request to revert an undiscussed move via Al-Bara' ibn Malik Battalion. For future reference though, request to revert an undiscussed move needs to be placed under "Requests to revert undiscussed moves". I know its difficult to actual see in the page with all the amount of floating texts, buts its there. Doing so will make your request to revert much faster, anyways, happy editing and cheers. Jerium (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Jerium and noted. FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Godwin Obasi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Godwin Obasi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 01:04, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brian Chira.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brian Chira.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Hello thank you for thanking me for my edits I also thanked you!! I recently been following sudan's civil war non stop and before syrias but i didnt edit anything. I decided to now start editing because I'm feeling better mentally and yeah. <33 PersonFromPoland (talk) 11:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Hey have also this award its the first time im sending awards here :)) PersonFromPoland (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Yooo I didnt know I can send so much awards lmao but lets gooo!!! Btw in my school I signed for Africa Olympiad and I got to the second second stage, the questions were mainly historical and maps but also political so yeah. also you deserve all these awards brooo PersonFromPoland (talk) 11:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Lol many thanks and hope to see more of your work around Sudan. Take care and please ping me if you think I can help FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Sudan Countryball for yuo huehue

	Sudancountryballexe
	Countryballs rule PersonFromPoland (talk) 11:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Supporter of Sudan

	Sudan Wiki Commando
	For constant updates on Sudan PersonFromPoland (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Reversion of edits on Sudanese civil war (2023–present)

Please explain your reversion (with twinkle and a canned summary) of my sourced edits that clarify the position given by Amnesty International. 142.157.211.245 (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

The Yemen and UAE part is already included in UAE section. for the embargo you did not provide a source. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

and also is not supported by the sourced that you (re) used. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

It is supported by this quote: The UN Security Council imposed an arms embargo on non-governmental entities in Darfur in 2004, to which the PRC is a member of. Warmly,142.157.211.245 (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

this is 2023, not 2004 FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

from where did you get the quote? FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Arab supremacy has been nominated for deletion

Category:Arab supremacy has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)