User talk:GoldenBootWizard276

This is GoldenBootWizard276's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

United States Secretary of Health and Human Services

Just a heads up, I reverted your recent changes to United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. Per MOS:JOBTITLES, both the position and the portfolio are lowercase when modified to be a description. Cheers! Woko Sapien (talk) 22:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about L. Wallace

Hello, GoldenBootWizard276

I edit here too, under the username Jlwoodwa and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect L. Wallace, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 30 § L. Wallace.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jlwoodwa}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

jlwoodwa (talk) 23:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Norman Bleehen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Norman Bleehen. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 11:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir Thomas Cooke has been accepted

Sir Thomas Cooke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norman Bleehen has been accepted

Norman Bleehen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hello@GoldenBootWizard276! It's me, from vikidia!;) Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 20:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 04:36, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gomphiocephalus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gomphiocephalus. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gomphiocephalus has been accepted

Gomphiocephalus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Half black half white" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Half black half white has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 20 § Half black half white until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 06:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Friesea grisea has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Friesea grisea. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Friesea grisea has been accepted

Friesea grisea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Graham (musician) (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dennis Graham (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GoldenBootWizard276! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gheus (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leeds Savage Club has been accepted

Leeds Savage Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Women farting" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Women farting has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 3 § Women farting until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:21, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Girl farts" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Girl farts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 3 § Girl farts until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:21, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Girl fart" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Girl fart has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 3 § Girl fart until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:21, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neocryptopygus (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Both GBIF, WoRMS and NCBI have this as a synonym of Cryptopygus & Cryptopygus nivicolus.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neocryptopygus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy template for a species

Hi, we don't create taxonomy templates for a species such as Neocryptopygus nivicolus. In the article, using {{Speciesbox}} means that the taxonomic hierarchy is picked up from the taxonomy template for the genus. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:29, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cryptopygus nivicolus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cryptopygus nivicolus. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cryptopygus nivicolus has been accepted

Cryptopygus nivicolus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GoldenBootWizard276. Thank you for your work on Harry Bōlz. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:48, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Lilmothussy" (and others) listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lilmothussy, as well as several other redirects, have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether their use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 14 § -ussy redirects until a consensus is reached. Plant🌱man (talk) 00:06, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Harry Bōlz

Harry Bōlz, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Harry Bōlz and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Harry Bōlz during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rusalkii (talk) 02:11, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Harry Bōlz" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Harry Bōlz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 17 § Harry Bōlz until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 02:13, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GoldenBootWizard276. Thank you for your work on Schoettella hodgsoni. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:29, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Tufnell (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Tufnell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GoldenBootWizard276. Thank you for your work on Seymour Buttz. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Tufnell has been accepted

William Tufnell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Elianore has been accepted

Joseph Elianore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:15, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Farthing (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What criteria has been met for establishing notability?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Farthing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 23:39, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]