User talk:Ivanvector

SCAM WARNING! If you have been contacted or solicited by anyone asking for payment to get a draft into article space, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article, such offers are not legitimate and you should contact paid-en-wpwikipedia.org immediately. Please see this page for more information.

Welcome to my talk page!

If you are adding a new comment section, please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
If your comment is about an article, please consider adding the comment to the article's talk page, instead of adding it here. Wikipedia is a community effort, and other editors might have valuable opinions. You could add a comment here to let me know about your comment on the article's talk page. If I think your comment is about an article I may move it there and leave a note here saying I did so.
I absolutely hate conversations that thread across multiple pages. If you add a comment here, I will reply here. If I left a comment on your talk page and you reply here, I will move your reply back to your talk page. Please add this page to your watchlist to be informed when I reply.
Thanks for stopping by!

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Click here to email me. Emails sent through this form are private, however I may share their content privately with other users for administrative purposes. Please do not use {{ygm}} on this page: if you email me I will have already received an on-wiki notification.

Archives: Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Query

Hello, Ivanvector,

I was looking into User:Shubhamgawali1 and found you blocked this editor for using multiple accounts and for paid editing. But there was no notice on the editor's user talk page so I couldn't look into the reasons for the block. Are they connected to an open SPI investigation? If so, could you provide me a link to it? Thanks for your help. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz! I listed the accounts this account is confirmed to at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joyland2017, but I think that this group is not technically related to that case. Their suspected paid editing focuses on Patrick Treacy and Draft:Patrick Treacy, which has also been created under several other different names. Their deleted contribs have more evidence. I didn't put much effort into figuring out which specific sock farm they belong to because their network is so spammy anyway, but now that I'm looking more closely I think they are Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dorothygordz, a sockfarm focused on whitewashing Vinny Troia. I'll add some more notes to that SPI. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 11:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sales taxes in Canada

I had read the source which states: Transitional rules, which would be implemented by way of regulations made under the federal Excise Tax Act (Canada), would determine whether the current 10 per cent rate or new 9 per cent rate would apply to transactions that straddle the April 1, 2025 effective date. No indication if it would be implemented on Apr 1st or later. Adakiko (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko: yes, that language is confusing, but I'm an accountant and deal with HST rate changes pretty often. The source is confirming that the tax rate changes to 14% effective at midnight on April 1, 2025. So for example if you walk into a store and buy a pack of gum today, you'll pay 15% tax, but if you buy the same pack of gum tomorrow, you pay 14%. But say you're buying a house, and you agreed to the purchase last week but your sale isn't going to close until April 10, then which rate applies to the sale? That's an example of when the transitional rules come in, and they're weird. But even with transactions where the transitional rules apply, the tax rate is still 15% on March 31 and 14% on April 1, so that's what our article should report. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actions of the drmies

I mentioned your admin actions in an ANI thread [1] but I botched the ping. You deleted and salted the SPI in question twice but it came back. Meters (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, the OP's already been blocked. Meters (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Meters, glad it's dealt with. I'm sure you know that pings do not satisfy the notification requirement for AN[I], but I suppose that's what this message is for. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not an attempt to make an official ANI notification, since the IP was not opening an ANI about you. I simply pinged you since I thought you might want to comment on the socking that lead to your salting. Meters (talk) 21:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About 2025 Election

Ghost of Dan Gurney believes RebeL News is "far-right." What is far-right? Hitler? The far-right politics page on Wikipedia does not describe any independent news media or Party I know of in Canada. Some people do not think the 'spectrum' is even relevant as Parties are syncretic. What were the other right wing news media 'dominating' the scrum? Wouldn't that 'domination' been a result of poor planning by the committee?

I read the NPOV. You seem to be in violation of it. I was striving for neutrality. Far-right, far-left...these seem like outdated terms, and subjective.

On reverting edits: "Before performing a revert, carefully consider the consequences of dismissing another editor's contributions, as well as any subsequent edits linked to the original change. Assess the specific elements of the edit that are problematic and contemplate the editor's intentions. Rather than reverting entirely, consider improving the edit to enhance the article's quality. If only a portion of the edit is objectionable, a partial reversion may be more appropriate; complete reversions should be used sparingly and are effectively executed using the undo tool."

After you, Ivanector, dismissed my good faith edit, I incorporated your efforts into a new edit.

I'm willing to work with you on finding a brief, clear passage that leads readers to source links. But, you must know that many people do not follow the old spectrum anymore. JayElk33 (talk) 18:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS. This incident shouldn't dominate the page or importance of the 2025 Canadian federal election. Perhaps you could create a new page devoted to the incident if you feel inclined. Just an idea. JayElk33 (talk) 18:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're overthinking my motivation, I just pulled "far-right" from our Rebel News article, where it's described in the first sentence as "a Canadian far-right political and social commentary and media website", and where "far-right" is cited to a fairly long list of sources. If you disagree that Rebel News should be described as "far-right", you should take it up on the talk page for that article. As for the debate incident and neutrality, NPOV means that we follow the point of view of reliable sources, not that we artificially alter our articles' points of view to be more middle-of-the-road. All of the sources that I consulted for this, even the National Post which is often considered a right-of-centre source, described the events as Rebel News specifically and other right-wing outlets disrupting the events, so that's what I wrote.

Courtesy ping GhostOfDanGurney and McSly; this discussion should continue on the article talk page, not here. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and agree. Phrases like "But, you must know that many people do not follow the old spectrum anymore." Certainly give me pause, though.

I have made a thread on the talk page about it, but in this instance, I'm not sure how much time we should be allowing ourselves to spend on it when I'm quickly losing my good faith about this editor being here to build an encyclopedia. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" _(hihi) 18:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]