This is an archive of past discussions with User:Maxviwe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi, KuwarOnline,
It looks like that List of hotels in Delhi article is written to advertise about an organization.However, If you feel that it is wrong, then you should put {hangon} tag on top of it.
best.$Max Viwe$ (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to create a list about organizations.You should make sure that there must be an article of organizations in the list.Not of all.but, six or seven is great.Take a look at the List of hotels in Dubai, 31% of organizations in the list have there on article, while in your article there's very few.That's why I nominated it.If you feel any offence, then sorry.
Best.$Max Viwe$ (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, I will later add/create articles links/articles this list I created it today so let some time go, let it grow ,there are lots of names need to added just like List of hotels in Dubai article. If you remove the db promo tag, I will be more great full, Thanks KuwarOnlineTalk13:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, KuwarOnline,
Thank you very much for your support.I am very happy to know that you've understand Wikipedia's policy.Wish you best of luck in creating good articles.Now, As you've requested me to remove the deletion tag, I am sorry to tell you that I don't have the right to remove it.Only Administrators can remove it after reconsidering it.So, better ask an Administrator.You should not remove it yourself.
$Max Viwe$ (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I m really sorry i shouldn't have said that, But when today i tried to open the page List of hotels in Delhi and i saw it was deleted, certainly i really got angry over that, which is really bad i know. In anger it wrote that, Also if u visit Edit Counter Its shows u when u joined/how many edits etc. Again I apologies for that world i used. Hope you understand that it wasnt meant heart you. Hope we will be good friend on Wikipedia. KuwarOnlineTalk07:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, wasn't sure if you already know, but some articles can be deleted without discussion under the criteria for speedy deletion. Where articles clearly fall under one of these criteria, you don't need to take them to AFD, Regards, --BelovedFreak10:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your advice, but you know I previously nominated three articles for deletion under criteria for speedy deletion.And you will be amazed that Other Wikipedians criticized me and eventually my Rollback and Reviewer rights were removed for don't knowing the deletion policy.That's why now i'm fearing to put a deletion tag.So, I think that It'll be better to nominate an article for discussion to delete.If I'm thinking wrong then please help me.Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 10:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Oh, ok. Sorry for telling you what you already know then! If you've had problems with speedy deletion tagging before, then you're right, it's better to take things slow, and AFD if in doubt. Just be careful of attack pages though; "<somebody's name> is a <attack word or insult>" shouldn't really be left hanging around. Regards, --BelovedFreak10:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
(edit conflict):Yes - Evie dennison just now would qualify for {{db-person}} - no indication of importance or significance - but more importantly, as an attack page, for {{db-atk}} or {{db-g10}}. Those have the advantage of putting it in a high-priority queue for admin attention, and generating a suitably fierce warning to copy to the attacker's talk page. With an attack page, you should blank it before adding the db tag, to get the attack off the screen as soon as possible.
Next time mark a foreign language contribution with prod if it is not elsewhere, or if you are keen you can translate to English! You could also find someone at fr.wikipedia to see if they want this article, or talk to creator into putting it there instead. Once it is in there it can be removed from en.wikipedia speedily. Anyway it was deleted as a copyvio, When I checked I could not find another web copy of it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
You have new messagesHello, Maxviwe. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template. File:Ico specie.png
Thanks on the speed deletion on Misr El-Maqasha. I created this article by mistake and wanted to delete it, but I was not sure how. However, could you please help me to redirect all the links of Misr El-Maqasha to the new article Misr Lel Makasa. I left a question about the same thing in the Help desk, but did not get an answer yet. --Osa osa 5 (talk) 17:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
It's quite ironic actuallly. I removed a db-person tag from an article to replace it instead with a db-copyvio, explaining in the edit summary that the copy-vio was probably more important than the notability issues. But by the time I left this message, the page had already been deleted under G12. The article in question was Dj k black. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 07:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Hatim bin Ibrahim has been given speedy removal tag, I think it has been removed also.
Message
Do you know the man,he is a man of islamic history ,a jewel and third Dai of Ismaili/Fatimid/Mustaali/Tayyibi/ Dawoodi Bohra and has reference in all of these articles of wikepedia and many more in Institute of Ismaili studies,and many other literature written on his name.;
e.i.
DETAILS: "The Dai Hatim ibn Ibrahim al Hamidi and his Book `Tuhfat al Qulub'," Oriens XXIII/XXIV (1974): 258-300
Publication Type Journal Article
Year of Publication 1974
Year of Publication 1974
Authors Hamdani, Abbas.
Volume and Pages SERIES: Oriens ; VOLUME: XXIII/XXIV ; PAGES: 258-300
Key Words English; Bibliography
Notes .
Hope ,it is by mistake the removal is done,may pl. rethink and immediately restore.Article is in very short,a beginning and books and books can be written on the person.--Md iet (talk) 04:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Sorry but I am not an Administrator who can restore deleted article.If you think that there had been a mistake,then you should consult an administrator quickly.I know one very well.His name is H J Mitchell.Ask him about your article.Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 07:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
A request
Please read Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Please read it thoroughly, once. Having done that, please stop harming Wikipedia by scaring users away. Do not nominate articles for deletion or slap tags on them within mere minutes of creation. And under no circumstances should you re-add a speedy delete tag that has been removed by any user — this is against the guidelines. I wish you would find constructive ways to edit Wikipedia rather than deletion, but if you get your kick out of deleting articles, please start with articles that are a couple of days (or at least a few hours) old, not instantly after some newbie's first attempts. Regards, Shreevatsa (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Actually, a speedy tag may be re-added if it was removed by the article's creator - because the user who created the article is not allowed to remove a CSD tag from it and is only allowed to use a 'hangon' tag. Nsk92 (talk) 19:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Plus, at least according to my understanding of WP:DEL, if a CSD tag for a particular CSD criterion is contested, that tag should not be re-added. However, if the article in question satisfies another CSD criterion, it may be re-tagged with a CSD tag for that other criterion. Nsk92 (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for above comments ,genuine/important material and attempts to have these in Wikepedia may pl. always encouraged, deficiency can always be removed any time.
Notice has been placed again on the same article,which is now very much substantiated and having link to important articles and categories.Dear Themaxviwe,would you please elaborate ,what is the further problem you have with this article, and how can I or wellwisher of Wiki can solve it.--Md iet (talk) 03:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I think that you are completely misunderstanding Wikipedia Policy.I patrol New pages and there are many new pages that contains vandalism or unambiguous advertisement.This can't be considered to keep for more time.That's why I nominates them for deletion.You know what, Most articles which I nominate for deletion are deleted in few hours after reviewing by admin.This shows that An administrator also thinks article is worth for deletion.I don't nominate an article which contains even few lines which are well sourced and informative.So, Please take a look at my contribution and then tell me did I bit Newcomer?Best.Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 07:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
My edit was intentional. It was logical to move the page as the product's branding was changed. I am a warehous manager in Illinois, so if you want to challenge this, go right ahead. But it makes logical sense to leave it as is. 173.22.25.40 (talk) 13:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
That joke almost got me (the "new message" orange bar) . Anyways, welcome to Wikipedia. I see you around, so I'm here to say hello . Nice work reverting the vandalism. Davtra(talk) 11:23, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Also, Willy vandalised several other wikis, including a small wiki run by the Los Angeles Times, many other languages' Wikipedias, Wikitravel, and others. Wikiquote's page on Ray Charles he moved to "Ray Charles on wheels on wheels on wheels on wheels on wheels on wheels on wheels". Nyttend (talk) 19:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Maxviwe. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk. Message added 12:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello Themaxviwe! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the feedback. I see that you have the page I have created Alex_Williamson for speedy deletion. From looking at the deletion history there may have been an inadequate version of this page created last year, but the two versions before that (2005) seem to be unrelated. I have contested all assertions that it meets the criteria, and made my case in the page's Talk page. Is it not reasonable to expect that further discussion should take place on the talk page? I can see that someone else has now commented in my favour but I am unsure as to where to go from here. Can you advise please? Straphanger510 (talk) 20:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, buddy.First of all, I have not requested the speedy deletion of Alex Williamson, but the User:The-Pope had.I have just reverted previous edit that had removed the speedy deletion tag.As you have contested the speedy deletion template, You should now wait for an administrator to come up and take a look at your side.I suggest you to take a look at the Wikipedia's policy WP:ARTIST.For now, I would recommend to visit WP:RFC/ARTICLES to get a wide respond relating to the content of your article.Wish you Best!Max Viwe | Your Turn 20:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello Maxviwe. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alex Williamson, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not substantially the same as the deleted version. A new deletion discussion is required. Thank you. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk04:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, buddy.I think you have got misunderstood.See this revision [1].I didn't tagged the article for speedy deletion. but User:The-Pope did.I have just reverted some IP-edits that removed the speedy deletion template.Wish you best!Max Viwe | Your Turn 11:14, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Buddy.I read this link and it said me that schools must also meet same notability guidelines that the companies and organizations do.[[2]].While the A7 says that it does not applies to schools.What's the correct interpretation?Looking forward for your reply.Max Viwe | Viwe The Max 18:06, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello Maxviwe - basically what that means is that whether or not a school is notable, you can't use A7 to speedy delete it. I would suggest going to WP:AFD instead. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: The deletion template.
Re your message: Yes, it could have qualified under G3, but sometimes I will change my deletion reasons to a kinder, friendlier deletion reason if something else also applies. It still gets deleted, though, and I think that is what is the important part. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
. Anyways, welcome to Wikipedia. I see you around, so I'm here to say hello 
. Nice work reverting the vandalism. Davtra (talk) 11:23, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Previous issue | Next issue 
