User talk:Stuxnet.02

Welcome!

Hello, Stuxnet.02, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Stuxnet.02, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Waqar💬 20:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rule says, "Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals"

I think I just copied the dynamic front page of Wikipedia. If its against the rule, then I accept it humbly. Stuxnet.02 (talk) 22:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Stuxnet.02

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Stuxnet.02 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waqar💬 20:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Army ranks of the Bangladesh (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Army ranks of the Bangladesh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 14:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please point out what i am doing wrong?? Stuxnet.02 (talk) 14:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stuxnet.02! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tavantius (talk) 14:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shackleton's Captain has been accepted

Shackleton's Captain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 06:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stuxnet.02, did you by any chance fabricate non-existing sources about that film? I can verifiy but one of them. -Mushy Yank. 13:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i did not fabricated any link. Stuxnet.02 (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good! Thanks! Can you tell me the date of’the reviews in FT/Guardian/NYT/Sydney Morning, so that we can add them? -Mushy Yank. 23:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Stuxnet.02! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 20:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Shackleton's Captain (TV Movie 2012)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Shackleton's Captain (TV Movie 2012). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Shackleton's Captain. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shackleton's Captain. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shigeru kayama

Hello, Stuxnet.02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shigeru kayama, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muscle confusion moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Muscle confusion. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Muscle confusion, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. None of the sources you added in Fazilatunnesa malik exists. You cannot create articles referring to made-up sources. bonadea contributions talk 12:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shackleton: The Greatest Story of Survival moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shackleton: The Greatest Story of Survival. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald C. Petersen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ronald C. Petersen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cranial control moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cranial control. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The ABC Of moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The ABC Of. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anterior lenticonus moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anterior lenticonus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:10, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muscle confusion (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft is a bit of a mess. Some of the information is repeated twice or thrice with almost identical wording, and some of the sources have no connection to the topic. Whether that is because it's AI generated or for some other reason is immaterial.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muscle confusion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anterior lenticonus moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anterior lenticonus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and The sources in the draft are bogus. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 15:42, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add hoaxes, such as bogus sources, to Wikipedia. --bonadea contributions talk 15:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fazilatunnesa malik moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fazilatunnesa malik. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and The sources do not support the content.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 15:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Important: Do NOT use ChatGPT or any other LLM to write Wikipedia articles. Fazilatunnesa malik has no sources, since none of the sources you added actually exists. She clearly exists, but several of the claims you had added to the article were verifiably incorrect, and none of the claims has a source – so how can we possibly know if they are correct or not? This is a typical result of using a chatbot. I will return Fazilatunnesa malik to draft space once more, and you should not restore it to mainspace yourself. You must remove all claims that are not verified by real, reliable sources, and all sources that are not real. --bonadea contributions talk 19:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fazilatunnesa Malik (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fazilatunnesa Malik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hello, Stuxnet.02. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@Stuxnet.02 thank you so much for your time, and have a great week! Phoebezz22 (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neuronal ectopia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Neuronal ectopia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and The "sources" do not exist.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 18:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fazilatunnesa Malik (February 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: All sources are fake.

bonadea contributions talk 18:32, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. .

You keep creating articles and draft pages with 100% fake sourcing. Are you using AI tools? You may absolutely not use LLMs of any kind to create any Wikipedia pages. bonadea contributions talk 18:34, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Intestinal hypoganglionosis moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Intestinal hypoganglionosis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because All the sources are fake.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 18:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bogalusa Heart Study moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bogalusa Heart Study. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because A mix of fake sources and existing sources that do not support the content. Probably LLM generated/hallucinated.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 18:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shackleton: The Greatest Story of Survival (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hallucinated sources, screwed-up formatting. Stop using LLMs to generate drafts. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shackleton: The Greatest Story of Survival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 21:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shigeru Kayama (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all the information is unsourced, since the sources don't support the content. Source 3, for instance, only mentions his birth and death dates and says he was a screenwriter for the Godzilla films. The draft text is almost certainly generated by an LLM and thus the claims in it cannot be trusted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shigeru Kayama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:43, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think i made a mistake trusting ChatGPT. I will be more carefull from future, i will check every reference i am getting from ChatPTt Stuxnet.02 (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for acknowledging this! But don't use GhatGPT at all, please. Don't ask it for information, don't ask it for sources, don't ask it to generate any pages for Wikipedia. It creates so much extra work, not only for yourself but also for your fellow editors when you use ChatGPT. --bonadea contributions talk 19:53, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will stop using ChatGPT, it made some bogus source and ref, now I am feeling bad. I apologise. Stuxnet.02 (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Army ranks of the Bangladesh

Hello, Stuxnet.02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Army ranks of the Bangladesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shadhin Khosru moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shadhin Khosru. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intestinal hypoganglionosis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Colon and Transition zone. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Stuxnet.02. Thank you for your work on Intestinal hypoganglionosis. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page for Intestinal hypoganglionosis, a disorder closely related to other, but sufficiently distinct in the literature that it probably does warrant separate coverage. Perhaps one day we'll merge it with Intestinal neuronal dysplasia! Looking at the way the article was initially constructed, there was a little too much repetitive linking (you only need to link something once per page), too much bold (see MOS:BOLD), some missed list formatting and odd spacing. It wasn't linked form other articles, and the citation format, while clear, doesn't make use of the citation templates (like template:cite journal). The citation templates can help to keep formatting consistent, and also to help link rot problems.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muscle confusion moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Muscle confusion. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and No attempt to fix the issues – it's unacceptable to add LLM hallucinations to Wikipedia . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 14:02, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shigeru Kayama (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the sources again. They do not appear to support the information, and a few of them don't exist or are dead links.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shigeru Kayama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Salaar: Part 2 – Shouryanga Parvam has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Salaar: Part 2 – Shouryanga Parvam. Thanks! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Devara: Part 2 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Devara: Part 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the film has yet to enter production, per WP:NFF. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BOVINEBOY2008 09:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salaar: Part 2 – Shouryanga Parvam (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON. Better to wait till close to release date or till release date for significant coverage and multiple critical reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salaar: Part 2 – Shouryanga Parvam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 12:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I understand. I am a film buff and a nerd. I like to know everything you know. I totally understand. "Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back." That's what I am. Stuxnet.02 (talk) 13:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delhi Crime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Titli (film).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muscle confusion (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still contains nonexistent sources, presumably LLM hallucinations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muscle confusion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:58, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... but i checked those link.... pubmed,webmd.... but i understand, i will double check now....

hanks for your feedback.T

eriously, i appriciate it, i am learning so much....when to use LLM or when to write by your own and i read so many rules....i sincerely appreciate your feedback.S stuxnet.02 My edits 08:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Please note that per WP:USERNOCAT, pages in your personal sandbox, such as User:Stuxnet.02/sandbox, are not allowed to be filed in categories alongside articles. The page must stay out of any categories while it's in sandbox, and can have categories added to it only if and when the content has been moved into mainspace as a finished article. As I've had to remove the page from categories three times in the space of just one week, please don't readd it to categories again, as I'll be forced to report you for disruptive behaviour if it continues. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 14:28, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I thought its hidden from user's view.... ok. And sorry for putting you in inconvinience. stuxnet.02 My edits 14:59, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]