User talk:ZDRX/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions with User:ZDRX. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

→

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi ZDRX, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Sohom (talk) 22:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ultraviolette Tesseract

Hello ZDRX, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ultraviolette Tesseract, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 05:46, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Actually the page was just having lead and a cited source that time, but the author later added content on it. I will take care of this from next time. ThankYou THEZDRX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 03:42, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Even at the time of tagging, there was sufficient context to know what was being written about. -- Whpq (talk) 03:43, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

My bad, I will review the tags again. Thanks for your help! THEZDRX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 03:46, 29 April 2025 (UTC)