Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/ICC Future Tours Programme/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC) [1].[reply]
ICC Future Tours Programme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 11:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My previous FLC nom has 3 support votes now, so here's the second FLC in the ICC topic. Vestrian24Bio 11:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
History6042
[edit]- Is there any consensus that Scribd is reliable, especially considering that both of its sources say AI-enhanced and are user generated?
- For Wales and Ireland why do the links go to the countries and not the teams like all other ones?
- "with an objective of each team" -> "with the objective of each team"
- "it also schedules ICC tournaments over a period of 4 years known as an "ICC Events cycle" since 2024.", the tense is wrong, it should be "it has also scheduled ICC tournaments over a period of 4 years known as an "ICC Events cycle" since 2024."
- The CLT acronym should be told what it is on first mention.
- Ping when done please. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:54, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @History6042:
- Replaced with better sources.
- Ireland is linked to the team, Wales don't have a national (ICC-recognized) team.
- done.
- done.
- Champions League Twenty20 is the article title but CLT20 is the WP:COMMONNAME.[2]
- Vestrian24Bio 03:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Aright, support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:22, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source review from TheDoctorWho
[edit]The following comments are based on this revision
- Ref 2: Link ESPNcricinfo; missing listed author; missing date published
- Ref 3: Appears to be a bit iffy, it took me 6 tries to successfully access the source content, the first 5 attempts redirected me to other websites
- Ref 5: Same as Ref 2
- Ref 6: Same as Ref 2
- Ref 7: Same as Ref 2 (except for author)
- Ref 8: Same as Ref 2
- Ref 9: Remove ICC as an author; change www.icc-cricket.com to International Cricket Council
- Ref 12: Same as Ref 2 (except for author)
- Ref 14: Link ESPNcricinfo
- Ref 16: Same as Ref 2 (except for author)
- Ref 17: Missing date published
- Ref 19: Dead link
- Ref 20: Same as Ref 2 (except for author)
- Ref 24: Same as Ref 2
- Ref 25: Link India Today
- There are several citations missing archives
- All of the "General references" should be archived
- Spot-checked references 1, 5, 7, 11, 15, 18/19/20 (in the table), 23, 29
- Ref 1: Doesn't appear to support the cited material; I see no mention of "full members", "associate members", etc.
- Ref 5: Makes no mention of "UAE" (United Arab Emirates), "security", "mutual agreement", "neutral venue", etc.
- Neither 18, 19, or 20, appear to confirm that an Asia Cup took place?
- "
Although an FTP wasn't released between 2012 and 2014, these events are included here for comparison; Based on the 2011–2020 FTP Draft
" - is there a source for this?
TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @TheDoctorWho:
- Ref 19 (now 20) isn't a dead link.
- Ran iabot twice, that's all it archived.
- All else done. Vestrian24Bio 13:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Strange, 19 was giving me a 404 error last night, but seems to be working as 20 now. Regardless, source review passes TheDoctorWho (talk) 17:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
IntentionallyDense
[edit]- Wikilink cricket on first usage.
- 4 years spell out four
- Spell out "UAE" in full on first usage
- and it featured 10 nations remove "it"
- Wikilink COVID-19 Pandemic also I don't think pandemic needs a capital
- This article has a lot of very short subsections which is a violation of MOS:LAYOUT however I'm not quite sure how this can be fixed
- I may just be tired after work but I had a hard time understanding the lead as a non sports person. This is something I will come back to when I'm better rested
Ping me when you can back to me! IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @IntentionallyDense: made some changes now to address these; let me know if it's enough. Vestrian24Bio 11:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately I believe some of your edit (the usage of semicolons instead of subsections) is a violation of MOS:PSEUDOHEAD. Sometimes there really isn't an easy fix to some of these issues, but I'd much prefer an accessible list over one with minor violations of the MOS.
- Does "ODI" stand for anything meaningful? if so I would spell it out in full on first usage
- Once you can get back to me on those two points I should be able to cast my vote! IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 20:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @IntentionallyDense: how about now... Vestrian24Bio 03:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support On the prose, thanks for being so patient. Good luck! IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 23:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! Vestrian24Bio 02:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support On the prose, thanks for being so patient. Good luck! IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 23:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @IntentionallyDense: how about now... Vestrian24Bio 03:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately I believe some of your edit (the usage of semicolons instead of subsections) is a violation of MOS:PSEUDOHEAD. Sometimes there really isn't an easy fix to some of these issues, but I'd much prefer an accessible list over one with minor violations of the MOS.
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 21:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.