Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Simca Vedette/1

Simca Vedette

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of uncited statements, including the entire "Models (Brazilian market)" section. Z1720 (talk) 15:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720 I have resolved your concerns. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 17:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove GA. Brazilian market section had one citation, I will gradually add more, but not with the intent of regaining the rating. Mr.choppers | ✎ 18:35, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.choppers would it be ok if I hid the Brazil section under a hidden comment? Then it would be a compromise because you want the Brazil section and I want the article to retain its GA status. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 17:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CosXZ: Gutting an article to make it "Good"? Part of a "Good" rating also implies that the article addresses the "main aspects of the topic", of which the Brazilian production is one: the Vedette range was built for seven years in France and for seven years in Brazil. Two references were already added, btw. Mr.choppers | ✎ 19:45, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist there are still several unsourced statements. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 11:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - the section about Brazil is still in quite poor condition, and work appears to have stalled out here. Hog Farm _talk 04:42, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.