Wikipedia:Significance is not a formula
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Essay on editing Wikipedia
![]() | This is an essay on notability. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
![]() | This page in a nutshell: Significant coverage cannot be measured by word count. |
For a contrary view, see Wikipedia:One hundred words.
The general notability guideline defines significant coverage as discussion of a topic in reliable sources that "addresses the topic directly and in detail". Coverage that is direct and in detail must cover an aspect of a topic through a description, discussion, or analysis that has enough depth to allow editors to write an article from a neutral point of view with enough context for a reader to understand the topic.
Significance cannot be based on a count of words in a single source. Even several paragraphs about a source might be trivial in context. For example, a gossip column about a celebrity may contain unimportant information or a run-of-the-mill news story might discuss a routine local event, such as a high school band concert.
See also
[edit]- Special:PermanentLink/1277061546#Balderdash – User:SMcCandlish's colorful rebuttal to "One hundred words"