Jump to content

User:Thingg/dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 88
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 88
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 174
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 18
Open sockpuppet investigations 125
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 1
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 3
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Other candidates 12

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing BLP vandalism from IP editors. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 54rt678 (talk | contribs) 21:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. Zinderboff (talk) 23:19, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 23:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The disruptive editing (by the same IP) restarted as soon as the page protection expired. M.Bitton (talk) 23:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Many users over the past couple of years have added test edits and/or began drafting on this page. Since this page is easily accessible through the article wizard, I suggest it be protected. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 02:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism from different IPs—Myasuda (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: No need to move (highly visible page. GloryToCalifornia (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: @GloryToCalifornia: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rapid vandalism from rotating IPs. Seercat3160 (talk) 05:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:49, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Lado85 (talk) 06:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs, possibly a single person, repeatedly adding deliberate spelling mistakes. Belbury (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: The extended confirmed lock may no longer be necessary. A semi-confirmed protection may be enough for the article. (Prince Anders (talk) 06:51, 25 April 2025 (UTC))

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

0 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
10 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-02-03 08:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Video game reviews (request) 2025-03-28 10:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 02:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-02-17: "Highly visible template: More than 7500 transclusions"
Template:Merged-from (request) 2025-04-02 03:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 03:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by Newslinger on 2020-06-14: "Highly visible template"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-04-02 23:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox station (request) 2025-04-20 20:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:AfC submission/declined (request) 2025-04-24 21:39 Template-protected (log) From Template:AFC submission/declined: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-17: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Code (request) 2025-04-24 23:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Customer service (request) 2025-04-25 08:40 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)


RFA= Requests for adminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 19:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

RFP= Requests for permissions

Autopatrolled

[edit]

New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

One thing that immediately jumped out at me is some biographical articles created (e.g. Kim Na and Son Se-bin) have unsourced biographical information, such as the date of birth. This information should be sourced to ensure compliance with WP:DOB. - Aoidh (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Ah I've misinterpreted that personal website policy, though it does fall under WP:ABOUTSELF, I've now also directly sourced it. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right. MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} with whichever user you're nominating. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, I really appreciate your fix for this nomination and your tip for next time! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)


Confirmed

[edit]

Good day,

As a new editor, I am eager to contribute by editing articles without distractions and addressing vandalism. However, due to the autoconfirmed status restriction, I am currently unable to access those pages.

I would appreciate it if you could review my contributions to assess whether I am qualified to hold these rights. Thank you for your time and consideration. Arc Rev (talk) 05:49, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File mover

[edit]

I am informed by a courteous bot that my extendedmover rights expire in a few days. This is a useful capability especially for correcting article titles that do not conform to WP:MOS and to move Draft young articles which are unsourced but capable of improvement. Thanks  Velella  Velella Talk   20:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

@Velella Are you asking for filemover or extendedmover? Your request is in the section for file mover. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
17:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover

[edit]


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 25 days. MusikBot talk 07:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I'm Tyloxs, and I'd like to request editor permissions. I've already created several articles and made over 100 manual edits. Tyloxs (talk) 12:01, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 49 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
@Tyloxs (Non-administrator comment) Thanks for volunteering! But, unfortunately you have 100 total edits. You are expected to have at least a 100 mainspace edits for pcr. If you don't know where to find them, you can see it here. Also, it would be better to request permissions after you are extendedconfirmed as you will be experienced enough for these userrights. (It's not compulsory to be extendedconfirmed but advised) saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs 13:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
 Not done * Pppery * it has begun... 17:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

I have read policy on vandalism and understand what is vandalism and what is not, Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I have also read the guideline on reviewing. I would like this right to help clear the pending changes backlog. I am a current rollbacker. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 17:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I pass the WP:PCCRITERIA as far as I know, and the right would allow me to help even more to build the encyclopedia by making sure only acceptable edits are approved. Thank you for your consideration. loserhead (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to request the pending changes reviewer permission. I have read most of Wikipedia’s core policies. I have also read the guidelines outlined for the Reviewing pending changes. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 08:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 17:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

I want to become a PCR due to my recent editing and how I can continuously do repeated tasks. Starfall2015 (talk) 08:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC) Starfall2015 (talk) 08:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 28 days and has 15 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 12:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Only 15 mainspace edits is nowhere near enough experince for this right. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
You're slightly wrong. I have an old account with about 65 mainspace, which pushes me up to 80. So all I need to do is get 20 more. Starfall2015 (talk) 08:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I am requesting the Pending Changes Reviewer permission. As a Rollbacker, I frequently handle vandalism, and this right would allow me to review edits on PC-protected pages, addressing subtle disruption and helping clear the backlog at pending changes backlog. I understand the responsibilities and core policies involved (like WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:BLP) and will use the tool carefully. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 04:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)


Rollback

[edit]

Valorrr (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)

I wish to have Rollback permissions to revert vandalism as I've been doing for at least a month with 500+ main space edits I wish to use like WP:HUGGLE and a lot more programs to help prevent vandalism. Valorrr (lets chat) 22:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 22:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
I know this, and I believe I improved. Valorrr (lets chat) 22:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
 Question: Valorrr: I'd still like to see you get some more experience before granting you the rollback permission as it will allow you access to some fairly powerful automated tools, as you have indicated. I can see that you have gained some experience though. To show that you understand when you can use permissions to help in a related area that usually has a backlog I'd be happy to grant you the pending changes reviewer permission so that you can help review Special:PendingChanges. Would you be okay with that? Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm perfectly okay with that, do you want me to notify you when I come back for rollback? Valorrr (lets chat) 16:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
@Callanecc: Just notifying. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
I have granted PCR per Callanecc's comment, since Callanecc has gone AWOL, and am marking this  Not done for the bot. Feel free to make a new request here, and ping Callanecc (which they may or may not see depending on their level of activity), when it's time. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I've been patrolling, creating, and monitoring articles on Wikipedia for months, but recently i've been able to be more active. I would like to request the rollback right - having the right would make my work patrolling Special:RecentChanges easier, as I wouldn't need to manually undo edits, but rather just be able to rollback edits directly. I use tools such as WP:RedWarn and WP:Twinkle, so having rollback rights would help me combat vandalism easier. Not to mention, I am aware of Wikipedia's core policies - such as WP:N, WP:NPOV, etc. As a newcomer myself, I am very well aware of WP:BITE and try to be as friendly and welcoming to new editors as possible. WormEater13 (talkcontribs) 00:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 192 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 00:40, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
{{not done}}. I've just granted you the Pending Changes Reviewer permission from your request there. Let's see how you get on with that first and then we'll take another look again when you've made a few more edits. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Understood. Thank you so much! WormEater13 (talkcontribs) 11:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Callanecc! I apologize if disturbing, but would I be able to ask for a re-review? Since you replied, i've made about ~300 more edits (60%), and have been able to review quite a few articles with PCR. I would love to utilize the rollback feature, especially since a lot of my contributions as of right now are towards combatting vandalism. WormEater13 (talkcontribs) 21:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I just want to inform that I mistakenly added all requests at once I am sorry I just want to apply for rollback rights so to prevent vandalism and disruptive edits, this will help me to gain a new experience so I can contribute my best.... Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 15:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

 Not done No experience in this area - please first spend some time (a few weeks to a month) doing recent changes patrol using non-rollback-based tools and only then request rollback. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

I feel like rollback rights will help me fight vandalism more effectively here on the English Wikipedia. I generally meet the guidelines on the top of this page (I've patrolled actively for the better part of a month now) and I believe it would help me more efficiently fight back against vandalism than being limited to Undo and base Twinkle. I try my best to correctly warn editors as well. Nahida haii 17:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 196 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Nahida I've liked how you've been patrolling so far after a review of your contributions and warnings, though your main space edits are a little on the low side. I'd probably be comfortable with starting you off with pending changes reviewer and you can return to apply for rollback in a few weeks/months once you've used PCR a bit to show your understanding of other important policies such as Copyrights. Does that sound fair? Any other admin can opine here if they think this isn't the best approach that I'm taking. Fathoms Below (talk) 00:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Fathoms Below! I'm okay with PCR if that's the more comfortable option right now. I understand the lower edit count. Nahida 🌷 01:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Granted that permission, marking  Not done here for the bot. Fathoms Below (talk) 01:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I've been dabbling with antivandalism for a bit now. I think using rollback would be helpful for this. I already have it on another project (Commons) so I understand its usefulness. Thank you for your consideration. CutlassCiera 19:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done Mz7 (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I request rollback rights primarily to get Huggle, AntiVandal, ORES and similar tools to fight and detect vandalism and revert unconstructive edits more easily. I currently have an edit count of 928 and have patrolled recent changes (mostly around January-February). RaschenTechner (talk) 11:58, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

I’ve been patrolling and working on a lot of Pakistani BLP and other no-protection articles on MNAs, MPAs, and programs. Several IP vandals have made changes which I can’t undo. Particularly on the Sehat Sahulat Program, I need a rollback. Titan2456 (talk) 02:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Template editor

[edit]

I already had these rights in the past, and I'd like to help with the large amount of pending edit requests. You can check my previous activity at User:Est. 2021/contribs#Edit requests. – Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 08:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

I am inclined to decline this; you have been granted the right twice on a temporary basis, and yet have made almost no template-related edits during those periods (and zero template edits during the previous 2024 trial). You have also not made any TPERs since your last trial. What makes this time different from the previous two? Primefac (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
@Primefac: Well, I didn't easily use these rights unless there were valid pending requests. During my trial, I performed 3 and declined 2 of them. None of them has been contested. Yet I'm not going to eagerly engage in unneeded protected edits just to increase my edit count, I only engage in the ones I'm sure about. If you expect me to abuse TPERs and TE rights, it's not going to happen. I just saw there are currently 19 pending requests and I thought I could be helpful, nothing more. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 12:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Yes we do need more editors who are willing to look at these requests (currently 25 now), and you could help with this. I think Primefac is asking why you requested the right in Feb 2024 but then made no edits to templates in that period. We would normally expect to see more edits so we can make a decision about applying the right permenantly — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
@MSGJ: Well, I usually don't talk about my personal life here, and I would like to continue on that path, but I also understand why some context may be helpful for you, despite it being private. Unfortunately, as you know, that period you mentioned was few months right after the beginning of the genocide in Gaza, with war crimes to be documented everyday and countless starving families and kids needing help to survive and escape bombings, so as a human rights activist and project manager for the Human Rights Watch on Palestine, I had to focus on that. Besides it being my life-mission and job, human lives obviously came first. So, going back to the question: Wikipedia is very important to me, but you know, we all real-life have priorities. That's all. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 23:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
That is completely understandable and satisfactory for me. (Sometimes we take ourselves too seriously and this is only a website.) Thanks for offering your services — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
 Done for another trial. For what it's worth, this is not about the intersection of real life vs Wikipedia (but thank you for that explanation), but rather that multiple trials have not shown that you really need (or will use) this permission; if you are busy to the point where you are not doing much TPER-related editing, it makes it hard to justify granting indefinitely. Primefac (talk) 09:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    DYK

    [edit]
    Count of DYK Hooks
    Section # of Hooks # Verified
    February 13 1
    February 20 1
    February 25 3
    February 26 1
    February 28 1
    March 7 2
    March 8 1
    March 9 2
    March 10 1
    March 12 2
    March 15 1
    March 16 2
    March 19 1 1
    March 21 1 1
    March 22 1
    March 23 3 1
    March 24 9 4
    March 25 6 5
    March 26 5 5
    March 27 4 3
    March 28 8 7
    March 29 7 5
    March 30 5 4
    March 31 10 10
    April 1 8 8
    April 2 14 10
    April 3 8 7
    April 4 6 5
    April 5 10 8
    April 6 7 3
    April 7 5 4
    April 8 14 12
    April 9 16 11
    April 10 2 1
    April 11 11 6
    April 12 8 3
    April 13 6
    April 14 3
    April 15 4
    April 16 4
    April 17 5
    April 18 8
    April 19 5
    April 20 6
    April 21 10
    April 22 4
    April 23 9
    April 24 7 1
    April 25 2
    Total 260 125
    Last updated 08:23, 25 April 2025 UTC
    Current time is 08:50, 25 April 2025 UTC [refresh]