Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2025/01

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2025

01 January 2025

Reason: Repeated insertion of Amazon spam links promoting Matthew E. O'Neill. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If any of the regulars wants PC reviewer, drop a note on my talk page. Katietalk 21:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Doug Weller talk 20:03, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2001:4958:24bf:e001::/64 (talk · contribs). Two-week partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 20:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, see also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Gun Lover. Loafiewa (talk) 23:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vbbanaz05 (talk) 13:03, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: For a third times an IP is introducing redundant text and this time is removing referenced text from the article. It should be semi-protected from further bad editing. Pierre cb (talk) 13:24, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple IPs adding unsourced / false claims for gross - Arjayay (talk) 16:26, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Doug Weller talk 16:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Addition of poorly sourced content Magherbin (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page appears to be targeted by various IPs attempting to downplay subject film's poor reception. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: ECP move protection; move protection should never be less than edit protection 172.56.170.116 (talk) 21:48, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined An argument could be made that your statement is correct but there is no policy or guideline that I am aware of supporting that view. Johnuniq (talk) 01:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite Extended-protection: For months, multiple sockpuppets have been adding persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Multiple sockpuppets have blocked since July 2024 for adding crap like "author of the modern incel ideology". The 2014 Isla Vista killings article was indefinitely extended-protected for the same issues. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting long-term ECP under WP:CT/BLP due to continual BLP violations and sockpuppetry (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Acetyl-CoA35/Archive) since September 2022 including fake sources, fake quotes, unsourced allegations via category edits (see [1] and [2], for example), and more. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Full protection: Highly visible page, no real need to edit anyway. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 00:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined @Heyaaaaalol: It is indefinitely fully move protected and semi-protected for edits. The last problem was on 30 October 2024 and was reverted in 30 minutes. The page has a lot of watchers and is not critical so I'm inclined to not protect without a demonstrated need. Johnuniq (talk) 02:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Over 39,000 transclusions. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined @Heyaaaaalol: Template:Maintenance category has 39,000 transclusions but it is already indefinitely template-editor protected. We don't routinely protect doc pages and Template:Maintenance category/doc only has 2 transclusions. Johnuniq (talk) 02:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Never mind, didn’t check. Sorry lol Heyaaaaalol (talk) 02:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it has been protected for 14 years and is not a very visible page. The protector, Vegaswikian, has not been active for 9 years. I don’t see a lot of edits every year. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:90C8:7FFC:E377:47B8 (talk) 03:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: vandalism and constant editting/removing content. please protect the page and allow changes to edits with only references Hurso77 (talk) 02:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Hurso77: It is not possible to allow only certain kinds of edits. You should discuss issues on the article talk page. Please ask for assistance at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 07:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: From August through December 2024, an IP has repeatedly made bad edits and has repeatedly reverted attempts to correct them. Please prevent further IP edits. Thank you. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, there was one disruptive right after the last protection I imposed expired ... in late September. Editing as a whole has been rather minimal since then. Daniel Case (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism and genre-warring. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have died down a few days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 07:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated recreation of an article for a future football event that was eventually rescheduled to 2026. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem to have been recreated much since the middle of last year. Daniel Case (talk) 07:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism. SugarRatt c 07:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: vandalism and disruptive editing/removing of factual text Hurso77 (talk) 02:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I will leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 07:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: Oops. I was coming down and just semi-protected the article for a week, partly as a favor for the requester so they didn't run into an edit-warring problem. Please adjust if wanted. Johnuniq (talk) 07:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Janufff (talk) 02:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Pease do not request protection for non English articles here. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 02:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Can you help us protect ourselves? Janufff (talk) 02:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
@Janufff: English-language Wikipedia administrators have zero authority on the Hindi Wikipedia. You need to ask at the Hindi Wikipedia's equivalent of this page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 02:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I see no signs of vandalism in the page history, but I have nominated it for speedy deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done. I see you've now made a request on the Hindi Wikipedia's administrators' noticeboard. (There's also hi:विकिपीडिया:पृष्ठ सुरक्षा अनुरोध.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content/vandalism. Sjö (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Long-term disruption by roving IPs of User:Colemanhull/User:Theonomad. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colemanhull/Archive for further info and precedent of using page restrictions. 99.182.240.124 (talk) 13:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Long-term disruption by roving IPs of User:Colemanhull/User:Theonomad. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colemanhull/Archive for further info and precedent of using page restrictions. 99.182.240.124 (talk) 13:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 14:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Malinaccier. Favonian (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Despite two previous protections, LTA User:Jinnifer continues to attempt to make the same repeated edit they have for months, using IP addresses. NJZombie (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 135.84.203.253 (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. These attempts to remove cited information from the lead occur on a fairly regular basis, which is why I'm requesting the period be indefinite ButlerBlog (talk) 16:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Long-term disruption, but sufficiently infrequent that PC should suffice. Favonian (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request unprotection We are unable to create an article for this....... . Janufff (talk) 02:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@Janufff: Make a draft for this.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 02:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please create a sourced version of this article in a subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any administrator to move the page for you. Favonian (talk) 14:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: It was recreated same other page article Cardinals vs Royals closed as redirect at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinals–Royals rivalry (3rd nomination) I think this protection is no longer need because no one gonna use this page anymore since is deleted per CSD G4 applies. 173.219.25.75 (talk) 06:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Insofar as I can actually grok this request, that isn't an argument for unprotection; in fact repeated deletions (of any sort, not just G4) is grounds for a salting. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotectedFavonian (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request that... (The upper range of Bahubali 2's gross is stated as 2500 crore. This is incorrect as only one source mentions it and even there the insinuation is that both part 1 and 2 collectively did this number.) . Darius bactria (talk) 10:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Baahubali 2: The Conclusion is not protected. Favonian (talk) 14:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: BLPCRIME vandalism. Borgenland (talk) 13:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Support temporary semi protection, as all vandalism appears to be from IPs adding uncited info/BLP vios the wildfire update guy that also writes about other weather (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 19:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 18:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 18:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly IP editing with unsourced information. Anwegmann (talk) 17:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of financial figures by various IPs and an ID [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Ongoing class action lawsuit, many unverified and logged out users editing the page to say that Honey is a "scam" and that information is "not true" without citing reliale and verifiable sources, causing disruption and many edit reversions. I believe that protecting this page to a degree would improve the page's medium term quality, as fewer noncompliant edits will be made and therefore would have to be reverted. Wafflerrs (talk) 22:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 21:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OZOO (t) (c) 21:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This redirect was hijacked twice today by two IPs and a (now blocked) new editor, replacing it with an advertisement. ECP or the like for a while might be a useful deterrent to it happening a third time. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear 22:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

02 January 2025

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/AA and WP:RUSUKR, also see this discussion. Aydoh8[contribs] 20:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Page was protected 6 years ago due to sockpuppetry Heyaaaaalol (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – Earlier today, you (very properly) made a request at the protecting admin's talk page. Wait for him to respond. Favonian (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Protected 20 years ago due to a single vandal (according to protection log). The template is still somewhat highly used so reduce it to semi or ECP Heyaaaaalol (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – Template has 3843 transclusions, which makes template protection appropriate. Favonian (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs changing suicide to murder without sources. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 12:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persisent disruptive editing of a BLP by IP vandals due to transfer rumours. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 19:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism Mpjmcevoybeta (talk) 22:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined, no vandalism for three weeks. Ymblanter (talk) 22:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from newly created user account Wafflerrs (talk) 02:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Doesn’t fully-protecting a non-administrator’s user page lock the user out of editing it? If this is not true feel free to keep the protection as Liliana is a pretty heated topic Heyaaaaalol (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Question: How is this your business? An admin has taken action they felt necessary based in evidence not visible to non-admins. I have no reason to believe LilianaUwU has any problem with it; quite the contrary. Please accept occasionally there are things going on most users have zero reason to know specific details about, so long as holders of advanced permissions are accountable within the entire community. BusterD (talk) 23:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done. What BusterD said, but at any rate it doesn't lock the user out of editing it: see WP:UP#PROTECT, third paragraph. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Pattern of disruptive editing has continued since expiration of previous protection. CNC (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit was five days ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continual unsourced editing against WP:FOOTY standards. Anwegmann (talk) 20:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name. Sergiogriffiths (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disrupted in 2024, then previously in 2015. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Create protection: Offensive name. Sergiogriffiths (talk) 20:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

I do not see any evidence that it is going to be recreated. Ymblanter (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism JamesVilla44 (talk) 22:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 78.135.185.214 (talk · contribs) blocked by Aoidh. Please re-request if frequency of disruption increases. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GENSEX. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 01:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Page needs another semi protection. This page was previously protected to prevent an IP LTA (WP:LTA/A5) from editing. Andrew5, the LTA, came back to editing the page today. Semi is being re-requested after the first revert as Andrew5 is an IP-hopping LTA which over 200 IP accounts. The reverting IP is already at SPI, but edit history shows this needs another semi protection round on it. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 19:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Pattern of disruptive editing from IP addresses due to a difference between the final vote certification and a third-party election source (David Leip). Should be protected until Leip updates his results. Mad Mismagius (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent IP block evasion by MAB. ~SG5536B 06:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 06:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 07:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE, IPs keep removing information pertaining to origin of the caste this dynasty belongs to. - Ratnahastin (talk) 08:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism/removal of sourced info from seemingly company affiliated IP's (Examples:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radio_Skid_Row&oldid=1266253347, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radio_Skid_Row&oldid=1264884443) Requesting semi-protection. Pyramids09 (talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of "27 June" or "June 27" as release date despite no official confirmation on such release date yet. The best I could find is simply unreliable sources like on Reddit, forums, etc dicussing on the supposedly leaked date. 🎉🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎉 (🔔📝) 09:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Majority of edits over the past few months have been User:Lam312321321 socks, reverted, with three in the past week. Belbury (talk) 10:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 10:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – BLP violations / edit warring by IP hopping user. FMSky (talk) 11:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLPDS violations (see protection & deletion logs). autoconfirmed is fine, but probably should be permanent given how long this has been going on. IP editors can always @ me from their talk pages if they need to reach me. lizthegrey (talk) 13:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Sockpuppetry by WP:YAYSMAY15. Borgenland (talk) 06:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 08:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Create the page with these contents:

#REDIRECT [[Geba syllabary]]

{{lowercase}}

Gorobay (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@Gorobay: How frequent of a search term is this, and what stops you from being able to create it yourself? You're autoconfirmed. (If you're barred due to a topic-ban, we cannot do this on your behalf barring a compelling reason.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Just to clarify, they can't create it, since it matches the local title-blacklist. Thus, it can only be created by template editors, page movers, or admins. I would do it, but I don't really see the need either here, and despite redirects being cheap, it probably meets WP:RFD#DELETE, with If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. EggRoll97 (talk) 09:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting it because ISO 15924 gives it as an alternative name for Geba. As a search term it is probably rare. It is mentioned in the target. Gorobay (talk) 13:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done – If it's against some guideline, it's a victimless crime, and, for what it's worth, not without precedent: 'Na-'Khi ²Ggŏ-¹baw. Favonian (talk) 14:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

In the first paragraph, the sentence "The The Cambridge Dictionary defines "[n-word]" as "an extremely offensive name for a Black person."" contains a grammatical error. The word "The" is repeated at the beginning of the sentence and should be corrected to just "The Cambridge Dictionary." Ib3275 (talk) 13:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

 Already done as a consequence of this revert. Favonian (talk) 14:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 06:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Constant IP reverts on adding tag. Zinderboff (talk) 12:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Create new page. I want to try making articles in the sandbox mode. There is a subpage at User:Thesuper997/sandbox/Dracodroidic Conlang/Proto-Dracodroidic Thesuper997 (talk) 11:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done You're already working in a sandbox. You will not be permitted to place that content into article space; Wikipedia isn't for things you've made up. And I recommend that you save that content locally or on an appropriate Wikia project, because userspace isn't a home for things you'e made up either. Please do that in the next 48 hours, because it will be deleted after that per WP:U5. Wikipedia isn't a webhost. Acroterion (talk) 13:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Raghavan(Talk) 17:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 18:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Pattern of disruptive editing from IP addresses due to a difference between the final vote certification for the 2024 presidential election and a third-party election source (David Leip). Should be protected until Leip updates his results. Mad Mismagius (talk) 03:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) partially blocked: 174.196.104.0/21 (talk · contribs) (from Letcher County, Kentucky). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
17:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 15:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Page is already pending-changes protected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
17:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent additions of unreferenced content to this BLP since 17:51, 27 December 2024. Alith Anar 18:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Increased level of disruptive IP editing. I am unable to revert any further changes today per WP:3RR. ZLima12 (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – SPAs adding promotional content in the last month. Badbluebus (talk) 19:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator BusterD. Ymblanter (talk) 21:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: high level of vandalism 87.49.43.194 (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Partially-blocked IP keeps removing sourced content. Nswix (talk) 20:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 06:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 15:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

03 January 2025

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Leonidlednev (TCL) 06:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Today's edits were the first to the article in two months. I also see little mention of the subject (none, in fact) in relation to the current conflict. In fact, the article doesn't mention anything at all about him since 2018 (And, the tag on top notwithstanding, neither does the Arabic article. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – History of Jews in Poland and possibly Israel-Palestine conflict. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in over a month. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after semi-protection expired in August. TheDragonFire (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected Three weeks for the article, and a year for the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: To prevent disruptive editing and vandalism in the wake of tomorrow's election. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting this talk page is protected until WP:ARBPIA5 is closed due to heated arguments. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The arguments may indeed be heated, but that alone does not constitute disruption, and I don't see any evidence that protection would be a good idea in the history. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced budget 2001:861:47C0:DEF0:C5B0:21F5:92A5:AC7A (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Constant IP vandalism of his nickname JamesVilla44 (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 23:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring and disruptive edits by anon. Cal1407 (talk) 01:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
If the vandalism is from anon shouldn’t it only warrant semi/PCP? Heyaaaaalol (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
It appears to be a content dispute and as stated in the protection policy: Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred or to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes. and Like semi-protection, pending changes protection should never be used in genuine content disputes, where there is a risk of placing a particular group of editors (unregistered users) at a disadvantage. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring from user hopping between accounts. Requests to discuss their edits in the article talk page have been ignored. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @CurryTime7-24: I also reported the accounts to WP:SPI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. @CurryTime7-24: Sockpuppetry confirmed, users blocked by Izno. Full protection is no longer necessary so the page has been unprotected. Please submit a new protection request if sockpuppetry resumes with newer accounts. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: I noticed that two anonymous users add unsourced actors for the cast of the film. The Media Expert (talk) 23:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual unsourced, unexplained editing from throwaways and/or IPs, many in violation of WP:BLP. Anwegmann (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. C F A 03:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. C F A 03:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. JJPMaster (she/they) 03:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Hoary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs have reverted multiple attempts to keep this page a redirect. A standalone article here would be a GNG failure. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 00:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If the change is disputed via a reversion, an attempt should be made to reach a consensus before blank-and-redirecting again. Suitable venues for doing so include the article's talk page and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple unsourced edits by Anon IPs. Disruptive changes on data, usage of Social Media. Mr.User200 (talk) 00:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 04:38, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Too high traffic for PCP. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 02:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP edit was over two weeks ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear 23:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 88.241.94.127 (talk · contribs). Steven Walling • talk 04:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Several questionable(to say the least) posts have been created on there within the past couple days. There was an LLM issue, but I think that has been fixed. Some trolling. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined WP:ATPROT Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption. Steven Walling • talk 04:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Biju Patnaik

Please Protect This Page = https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biju_Patnaik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vvhhsd25 (talkcontribs) 02:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined. No reason given. --Kinu t/c 02:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been some kind of game of vandalizing medical articles, and this one is not safe. Anonymous 04:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Presumed repeated conflict of interest violations. I'm requesting semi-protection to the article. Picaro31 (talk) 04:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —C.Fred (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistance disruptive editing and WP:VAND from IP user need protection for indefinitely Godknowme1 (talk) 06:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: CTOPS RUSUKR. Split from Timeline of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (1 August – 31 December 2024). Borgenland (talk) 07:00, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Continued edits in contravention of wikinote and talk page discussion, from a variety of IP addresses. When protection was requested about a week ago, some IP addresses were blocked, but the edits have continued, from other IP addresses. DH85868993 (talk) 07:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Proxies redirecting this article without actually blanking any content. - Ratnahastin (talk) 07:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No prior protection history. BusterD (talk) 12:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive addition of unsourced cast members, since line-up of upcoming films were announced. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. And changing information into "JioStar". United Blasters (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent edits by anonymous users deleting info on investments he has made, his political stances, residence, etc. Looking at the article history this has been a problem for about as long as the article has existed. Kingofthedead (talk) 09:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I wouldn't call the edits by IPs frequent. They happen, but the article often goes with weeks without edits at all. Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Lectonar, sorry we must have looked at this at around the same time. I went for indef pending changes given the BLP aspect and the history of protections. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
@Callanecc: no worries, I was mulling over pc-protection too, but decided against it in the end :). Lectonar (talk)
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. BusterD (talk) 12:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unsourced date changes, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 11:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Per WP:RUSUKR. Also recent edit-warring by non-ECP users. Mr. Komori (talk) 11:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page requires protection due to concerns regarding the addition of unverified and potentially defamatory information by anonymous or unregistered users. The current lack of protection allows for the insertion of inaccurate or malicious content, which could be used to harass or blackmail the subject of the article. Page protection is necessary to ensure the accuracy and neutrality of the information presented and to prevent the misuse of the platform for harmful purposes. Klaudia Fagu (talk) 09:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 11:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page requires protection due to concerns regarding the addition of unverified and potentially defamatory information by anonymous or unregistered users. The current lack of protection allows for the insertion of inaccurate or malicious content, which could be used to harass or blackmail the subject of the article, who is in charge of this project and is mentioned within the article. Page protection is necessary to ensure the accuracy and neutrality of the information presented and to prevent the misuse of the platform for harmful purposes. Klaudia Fagu (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Page now nominated for deletion; no disruption which would warrant protection. @Klaudia Fagu: please read the links concerning a possible conflict of interest which have been left on your talk-page, and act accordingly. Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 10:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. United Blasters (talk) 10:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Semi-protection: Indonesia-based IPs resumed disruptive edits after semi-protection (which was requested for this same issue) was lifted. hundenvonPG (talk) 04:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. User partially blocked by Callanecc so I have lifted the protection I previously placed. @HundenvonPenang: If they resume from a different IP range, please feel free to file a new protection request. Also, it can be helpful to mention that you've filed a related report when submitting a request like this one. Please consider doing that in the future. Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks Daniel. Will keep that in mind. hundenvonPG (talk) 08:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
@Callanecc and Daniel Quinlan: I've widened the block to 2400:9800::/36 due to Special:Diff/1267062406. Favonian (talk) 12:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 09:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism from random IP addresses (without a proper Wikipedia account), causing public defamation of the subject person concerned. See editing history and defamation on 24 October 2024. CanadaMaple123 (talk) 13:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Protection expired yesterday and vandalism by IP addresses returned almost immediately. I think protection should be for few months because I don't think election dispute will end soon, so one week protection was not enough. LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent ban evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky who has been using IPs from Turkey. Binksternet (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip hopper posting personal attacks in the article. Knitsey (talk) 18:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Daily disruptive edit from IP-hopping editor. MrOllie (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruptive editing with copyright violations. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) partially blocked: 138.88.222.231 (talk · contribs) (from Paul Pelosi). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Dealer07 who has been using IPs from Greece. Binksternet (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. The activity extends beyond just that article, so a rangeblock seemed more appropriate. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 18:35, 18 May 2021. Alith Anar 18:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Added that page to existing partial block of the more disruptive IP address range. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

04 January 2025

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consensus to delete this article, but IP users trying to revert the redirect back into an article. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 23:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Article has been the subject of concerted attempts by multiple COI accounts to install promotional material in a BLP. Axad12 (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., a couple of accounts were confirmed, these need to be dealt with separately. Ymblanter (talk) 23:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated adding of unsourced airdates by the same IP address, after a different source already confirmed them. 1033Forest (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 23:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 22:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

This has been going on persistently throughout the World Darts Championship tournament. I expect vandalism to increase as the final is ongoing as I type this. wafflerrs talk! 22:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Ymblanter (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Constant IP Vandalism following the final of the World Darts Championship JamesVilla44 (talk) 22:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 23:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent disruption by removing sourced contents. Garuda Talk! 23:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., in 3 days one would need to request the restoration of extended confirmed protection. Ymblanter (talk) 23:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Huge amount of IP vandalism - dozens of edits just today, all either nonconstructive, or partial vandalism fixed. Once the page is protected, I can figure out the last good version. Thank you, 23:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 23:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Move protection: Page-move vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 00:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page reflects biased and incorrect information. It should be removed and/or not protected so that it may be corrected. Md1776 (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – The article isn't protected as you know, considering that you edited it, only to be reverted. Please present your case at Talk:Leandro Rizzuto Jr. Favonian (talk) 22:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism from User:NamayandeBidokht, has used a sock and now WP:LOUTSOCK under 2a02:4540:c060:c5ed:783c:91ff:fec2:12c8. Also continuing same edits on Bahmanabad-e_Jadid, can this be considered also or do I need to report separately? BTW I've not reported on SPI as it's just one IP (so far), but please let me know if you think this would be helpful. Blue Sonnet (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism- primarily sockpuppets/LTA abuse coming from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agt2008fan. May want to semi-protect the article like other AGT season articles currently protected, primarily due to the same LTA. Magitroopa (talk) 19:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Magitroopa: I've just done this one for now given it's the main target. Please add other requests if they target more pages. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent ban evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky who has been using IPs from Turkey. Binksternet (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Lemonade (album) would benefit from the same protection for the same reason. Binksternet (talk) 20:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected @Binksternet: given it's IPs I'm assuming semi protection is enough? If you intended ECP I'm happy to discuss on my talk page. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Oddly a target of vandalism recently. ZimZalaBim talk 00:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:34, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been repeatedly subject to WP:COPYVIO over the last day or so by an IP editor apparently connected to a Commons user who has uploaded numerous national anthems as "own work" where such claim is obviously false. This would be more effective to protect the page temporarily than to take the IP to another forum such as EWN. JFHJr () 00:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC).

I have nominated some of the files in question for deletion, however it appears they have been deleted on at least one occasion in the past, and I vaguely remember dealing with a similar situation over a year ago or more I think. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Move protection: Page-move vandalism. C F A 00:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Move protection: Page-move vandalism. C F A 00:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 20:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear 21:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:10, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive editing (see edit history). Beshogur (talk) 22:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Abuse of multipe ip as well. 83.9.35.43 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) 46.221.152.180 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Reported for vandalism intervention. Nothing. Beshogur (talk) 22:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive editing (see edit history). Beshogur (talk) 22:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – 2603:6080:4700:47F8:B82A:BD8E:7C64:E306 (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – 2603:6080:4700:47F8:B82A:BD8E:7C64:E306 (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of non-constructive IP edits. SatDis (talk) 02:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized of IP Address. Royiswariii Talk! 03:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined IP blocked by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Edit warring and/or vandalism of director's name. Adakiko (talk) 05:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: I'm once again asking for an article protection. After this ip user was blocked yesterday.[8]. A new registered account and an IP user made unreferenced edits.[9][10] The TV series is set to premiere in Monday and could likely attract more ip users/editors making unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 06:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Since mid-December I have been dealing with the said user who uses the (following I.P. addresses: 2601:147:4700:2000:F477:719:678B:F64D, 68.110.32.32 and 68.33.255.195, who keeps disrupting my editing and vandalizing pages I have been contributing to i.e. Rice and peas, Stew peas and most recently Jamaica cuisine. I am still working on the Rice and peas page but I am currently editing Jamaican cuisine. This user who I believe to be Costa Rican is affiliated with the 'Rice and beans' and 'Gallo pinto' pages, has persistently been stalking (yes, stalking) all of the pages I have been contributing to. Not only is it disruptive and malicious, but I feel discouraged from contributing here as a result. I am requesting semi-protection or full protection of the said page(s) as a result. On previous occasions senior editors have intervened to reverse content removal, and in December temporary protection was given to Rice and peas as a result of the actions of the said user. I have tried to report the user for vandalism but I have not seen a change. I am also seeking help with the absolute blocking of this user who continues to abuse the platform. I have tried to engage with the user via open talk, and have also warned them over a dozen times, but to no avail. I do not wish to engage in edit-warring, and it is getting exhausting so I would really appreciate some effective intervention. Thanks in advance. Xaymacan (talk) 21:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks a mill! Xaymacan (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/A5 (Andrew5) socking. wizzito | say hello! 05:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Both recent socks indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting Full protection. High level of disruptive editing and repeatedly adding promotional content and advertisements by user:l5boat. Restore to this version - 13:52, 29 December 2024 Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 08:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IP insists on restoring an edit rife with broken english/grammar/syntax, and assorted changes that aren't an improvement. No response to inquiries requesting some cooperation. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 07:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jolielover♥talk 11:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Favonian (talk) 12:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

x 173.207.112.112 (talk) 00:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

What changes should be made ? Heyaaaaalol (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Empty request. Favonian (talk) 08:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring and/or vandalism of director’s. Wantedly removing the movie name from filmography box. Championdaku (talk) 07:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peaceray (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Permanently full-protect or permanently extended confirmed protect to prevent violations of WP:BFDI. 67.209.130.55 (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. BusterD (talk) 12:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the article is incomplete without a notable person section — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.97.145.234 (talk) 18:07, January 4, 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Tyagi is not protected. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: BLP under attack from an unregistered account skipping IPs. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 19:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Subject's husband has died and currently there are BLP questions (including from tabloid media) about how they passed which aren't being raised on talk but only in edit summaries on both pages; semi-protect to force them over. Nate (chatter) 20:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 21:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP/new user vandalism due to mention and convo on some subreddits, apparently? Bluethricecreamman (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent repeated unsourced declaration of election win for the Venezuela presidency. Including edits from suspected socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jocer Blandino. Jalen Barks (Woof) 21:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding/changing unsourced content since December 17, 2024. Cassiopeia talk 21:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: A bunch of POV edits by IPs in the last week, most of them immediately reverted. Ymblanter (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 08:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing. Vbbanaz05 (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Promotional edits, likely sockpuppetry. Departure– (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Donald Albury. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism (see edit history please), same applies for Flags of the Ottoman Empire. Beshogur (talk) 20:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

05 January 2025

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 12:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been vandalizing the article a lot lately. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 15:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent editing in contravention of policy by IPs. Jfire (talk) 18:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This issue should really be dealt with with another AfD. Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection - IP edit war involving at least one party who appears to be in a conflict of interest. Wellington Bay (talk) 22:34, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Excessive recent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 13:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent mass unexplained content removal by various Indonesian IP ranges. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:58, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent mass unexplained content removal by various Indonesian IP ranges. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:00, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by non-autoconfirmed users to label the entire gang as "Pakistani" in the opening sentence despite the fact that sources suggest that some members of the group were not Pakistani. Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repetitive vandalism about date *despite* that the late actor himself gave 1939 (NOT 1935) in an interview THAT HAS BEEN SOURCED Metamentalist (talk) 14:58, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite Extended Confirmed Protection: For future purpose, so that no IP would add any distruptive edit(s). Raph Williams65 (talk) 18:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. There has been quite a bit of disruptive editing happening on this article for last few weeks. 1keyhole (talk) 20:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one account was involved with the page-move vandalism, and there hasn't been much activity from before that, so I don't think this page should be protected at the moment. Fathoms Below (talk) 21:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry by WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Gun Lover, page SR-3 Vikhr has also recently needed protection for socking by the same user. Loafiewa (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeat vandalism. Also today this article features on main page of Wikipedia so this is going to probably get much worse if not protected. Page of her political opponent Kavelashvili is already protected for similar reasons. LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, we don't protect pre-emptively, really, save in really hot PIA articles. Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Flag of Turkey was protected for IP vandalism, this one is the same. Beshogur (talk) 23:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Since July 2024 [11] the article has been repeatedly edited by a user who claims to have recently become the Lord of Chertsey. The user appears to be unable to support this unlikely claim, but it is unclear whether they are a troll or the victim of an online scam. Either way, page protection would be appreciated to put an end to this nonsense. Axad12 (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Just a note to say that the material has now been removed, I believe, on 6 occasions. Axad12 (talk) 13:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: DaveMac17 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unexplained removal of content & addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 12:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2804:7F0:B080:41DA:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent repeated unconstructive POV pushing by the IP User talk:185.146.112.192/User talk:185.146.112.193/User talk:185.146.112.194/User talk:188.253.217.121/User talk:185.146.112.161 since June 2024, who has been warned numerous times and was temporarily blocked, and his user account User talk:Ibish Agayev was permanently blocked, which he created to evade the temporary block of his IP number. The IP is unresponsive to every warning and will continue with his persistent disruptive edits. He will very likely try to evade temporary blocks either by creating a new user account or via a different IP number. Orattas (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent repeated unconstructive POV pushing by the IP User talk:185.146.112.192/User talk:185.146.112.193/User talk:185.146.112.194/User talk:188.253.217.121/User talk:185.146.112.161 since June 2024, who has been warned numerous times and was temporarily blocked, and his user account User talk:Ibish Agayev was permanently blocked, which he created to evade the temporary block of his IP number. The IP is unresponsive to every warning and will continue with his persistent disruptive edits. He will very likely try to evade temporary blocks either by creating a new user account or via a different IP number. Orattas (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:10, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent repeated unconstructive POV pushing by the IP User talk:185.146.112.192/User talk:185.146.112.193/User talk:185.146.112.194/User talk:188.253.217.121/User talk:185.146.112.161 since June 2024, who has been warned numerous times and was temporarily blocked, and his user account User talk:Ibish Agayev was permanently blocked, which he created to evade the temporary block of his IP number. The IP is unresponsive to every warning and will continue with his persistent disruptive edits. He will very likely try to evade temporary blocks either by creating a new user account or via a different IP number. Orattas (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent repeated unconstructive POV pushing by the IP User talk:185.146.112.192/User talk:185.146.112.193/User talk:185.146.112.194/User talk:188.253.217.121/User talk:185.146.112.161 since June 2024, who has been warned numerous times and was temporarily blocked, and his user account User talk:Ibish Agayev was permanently blocked, which he created to evade the temporary block of his IP number. The IP is unresponsive to every warning and will continue with his persistent disruptive edits. He will very likely try to evade temporary blocks either by creating a new user account or via a different IP number. Orattas (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 94.246.147.217 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case . for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Is controversial, just like COVID-19 is. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 18:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. First, this is not (yet) covered by any CTOPS category. Second, even if it were, outside ARBPIA we do not pre-emptively protect articles on that basis. Daniel Case (talk) 22:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism to this BLP since 05:14, 2 January 2025. Alith Anar 14:00, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – autoconfirmed move-protection doesn't protect it. (CC) Tbhotch 23:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism, subject of article has elevated profile recently. RachelTensions (talk) 03:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Article was EC-protected to prevent recreation. Per this edit summary, the protection can be lifted now so more editors can work on it. Some1 (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @Daniel Case. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
00:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent changes made by unregistered user who has been unresponsive both to edit summary comments and talk page message. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 12:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2806:370:3159:B38:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Case, unfortunately, the "user" has simply switched to using a different IP, and the problem has persisted. I think the page needs protection. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 00:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2806:370:3000:0:0:0:0:0/39 (talk · contribs). IP range blocked from Anyma for 1 month. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Different IP and new editors keep adding uncited DOB. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edit warrIng. 184.144.128.108 (talk) 00:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 64.32.125.197 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding unsourced content, or content with only unreliable sources. Onel5969 TT me 01:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done. @Onel5969: Please attempt to explain the issue on the editor's user talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Two new single-purpose accounts (and now an anon) are repeatedly adding unsourced content and removing maintenance templates. Wikishovel (talk) 01:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done. Please file a case at WP:SPI as I suggested with your previous filing on WP:AIV. If that doesn't resolve the issue, we can consider page protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It looks like sockpuppetry was confirmed and there's enough of it to justify a short protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Many people with and without accounts are adding unsourced and clearly vandalistic information, as well as removing other info that is sourced and accurate. Jacubepedia (talk) 04:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced and promotional content to this BLP by IP editors. Tacyarg (talk) 08:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP disruption again. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 10:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Article continues to suffer from high vandalism from IPs as well as some recently created accounts that target this page. Page for Zourabichvili's political opponent Mikheil Kavelashvili is already protected for similar reasons. Recently protection request was denied for insufficient vandalism but there have since been multiple additional disruptive edits within span of hours which is why I'm asking for reconsideration. LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 11:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 09:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism and adding of unsourced content RowanJ LP (talk) 10:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 18:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Unprotection: I would like to accept Draft:Andreas Murbeck to mainspace. Frost 16:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Unprotected – Muboshgu (talk) 16:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Systematically, set of IPs are pushing. biased agenda and fringe theories. They are using the talk-page as a forum. Jingiby (talk) 06:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also will put CTOPS notice on talk page since it's indef-semi'ed. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent link spam from various IP addresses since 08:34, 3 January 2025. Alith Anar 15:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by non-autoconfirmed users. Uptick in recent disruption due to Elon Musk tweeting about the issue. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by ScottishFinnishRadish. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The IP vandal is back after a four day temp protection expired. Plakosa (talk) 11:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE - IPs edit warring to restore content that has been repeatedly removed. - Ratnahastin (talk) 12:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log as well. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

could do with supergirl woman of tomorrow being removed because while it is true that he is cast in the film, rules on wikipedia state that films and shows are not to be included until they at least start filming. thank you 2.98.147.186 (talk) 02:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Not doneFavonian (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request that... (Your edit request here) . 2.98.147.186 (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Would like to request that Akira be removed from the page as we don’t even know if it’s happening or not and besides rules are rules can’t be included until filming starts.

Not doneFavonian (talk) 17:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Change/removal of sourced content and castecruft by IPs [12] [13] [14] [15]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Gunther :  Talk  13:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. For at least three days since I believe his matches end on Jan 7th. jolielover♥talk 13:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP keeps trying to remove cited information. ★Trekker (talk) 08:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Less Unless (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP addresses continue making politically-motivated biased edits and reversions in her Personal Life section. Yonkel21 (talk) 13:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Continued after recent protection period expired. 142.254.120.227 (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: All content added to the page are from reliable sources. But others keep reverting and deleting my edits even though i provided correct reference links. Its my sister's page and all details enclosed in it are reliable. Gadde.ruthvika (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

I can provide proofs for details that are enclosed in the page. Gadde.ruthvika (talk) 09:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined On Wikipedia we follow strict policies regarding content, especially biographies of the living people. Every claim should be supported by independent reliable source. Even if it's true it's not enough for Wikipedia. Also if you are closely connected to the subject of the article, you are strongly recommended to avoid editing and you should disclose this on the talk page. If you are a sister of the subject please work with other users so the information is neutral and supported by the sources. Less Unless (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 18:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High levels of sockpuppetry. 134.6.109.138 (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Yamla. for one month. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Some1 (talk) 19:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Apparently we still need this. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to recent death Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP disruption. One IP already got blocked for disrupting the article and another IP came to continue it. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: An IP is engaging in disruptive editing by evading their block and altering the party affiliations of members, which does not align with the National Assembly source. This action constitutes a WP:BLPVIO. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk per WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP Vandalisms and arbitrary removal of contents. Of course no ref is added for such things Riktetta (talk) 08:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them the first warning. Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of unconstructive, unsourced & untrue/speculative disruptive editing from IP editors. Semi-protection may help cut this down. BarntToust 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content from IPs. HorrorLover555 (talk) 21:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

06 January 2025

Permanent semi-protection: Continued high level of IP vandalism. Sutyarashi (talk) 13:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 59.103.195.78 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 72 hours. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Subject to WP:CT/A-I restrictions, as the catalyst to the riots was the Gaza War, I believe it relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in two months before yours, and historical events generally have less nexus to the current conflict to justify the kind of protection you're requesting. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. This resolves all these requests. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unconstructive editing from unregistered users for this highly sought-after page. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2.98.147.186 (talk · contribs) blocked by Stwalkerster. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: In the wake of his controversial January 2025 arrest, requesting temporary semi-protection to prevent unregistered accounts and IPs from vandalising or inserting false/misleading information on a high-profile BLP article, until more information is released. Per WP:BLPCRIME. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 18:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It looks like you've got things under control for now. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Just updated this article to add criminal convictions. Based on edit history by multiple IPs and new accounts, I suspect the subject monitors this article and has edited it in the past. ECP for a month or so seems appropriate to prevent edit warring, whitewashing and vandalism. Montanabw(talk) 21:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It also sounds like you're asking for pre-emptive protection, which outside of new ARBPIA articles we don't grant. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Long term vandalism, for months now. Every time protection expires it gets vandalized again. Need longer protection; last time it was like a week. seefooddiet (talk) 23:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
00:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. MHD1234567890 (talk) 00:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. I don't see any IP contributions to that page at all. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
00:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page details an important ongoing armed engagement, and may be at risk of being tampered with by various elements pushing competing narratives. 108.46.168.9 (talk) 00:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
00:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Sean.hoyland (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: BLP issues related to current news story. 217.180.214.53 (talk) 02:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Surname being changed to Analzone instead of Anzalone, height being changed to either 5'3" or 8'3" instead of 6'3" and weight being changed to either 388lbs or 3,888lbs instead of 240lbs MitchBayne (talk) 02:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued unsourced changes by IPs after the previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 03:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Long-term abuse. See WP:LTA/HANOI. HorrorLover555 (talk) 03:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 05:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple users, both IP and registered, have been adding irrelevant and inappropriate things about Koichi Hirose (one of the characters). OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Full protection. Edit warring over possible resignation or expected loss in an the elections that must be called by October. GardenCosmos (talk) 05:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent sock-puppetry, started again as soon as last protection expired. 184.152.68.190 (talk) 06:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism from autoconfirmed vandal accounts over the past year, such as on 02:54, 6 January 2025, 00:13, 4 January 2025, 21:37, 13 November 2024, 23:04, 8 November 2024, 17:56, 19 June 2024, and 04:20, 29 January 2024. Alith Anar 03:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected. Already move-protected, which should put an end to these shenanigans at least. Lectonar (talk) 08:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Dubious changes from auto-confirmed users. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Grand Wailea (talk · contribs) blocked by C.Fred. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant Ip disruption on the page. Noorullah (talk) 04:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:6601:d000::/64 (talk · contribs). Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 05:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Repeated vandalism due to recent social media coverage (e.g. https://bsky.app/profile/thisisbenphelps.bsky.social/post/3lezv2h2kid24) Jokullmusic 02:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Perhaps pending changes is a better way to moderate the vandalism on this article? Either way, definitely needs extending. Synorem (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jolielover♥talk 03:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent test edit spamming on the talk page. GraziePrego (talk) 07:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. IP range partially blocked to stop the edits on that page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:GSCASTE sockpuppetry by Truthfindervert 's proxies. - Ratnahastin (talk) 09:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Main LTA vandal from the main page is now vandalizing the talk as well. cyberdog958Talk 09:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. page has been vandalised recently for atleast 3 times. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 10:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite Semi Protection: Persistent vandalism and hate speech from IP users regarding recent real life issues in talk section. CricketXP (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite Semi Protection: Persistent vandalism from IP users regarding box office collection, daily ip users disrputive editing on article .

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I would like to request long-term protection (~1 year or more) because of UPE/sock activity from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BobVillars. Pinging Izno. Janhrach (talk) 11:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Please also protect Institut Sup'Biotech de Paris, for the same reason. Janhrach (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:04, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
I haven't protected the other article, because editing activity is very low. If another admin sees the need to protect: be my guest. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! Janhrach (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, pages aren't protected preemptively. Are you referring to the right page, there haven't been any edits to this article since October? Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Bigboss19923, same overemphasis on a murder case as led to the previous protection. Belbury (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Some editors have been prematurely editing in that Trudeau is about to resign. To date, the prime minister hasn't made such an annoucement. GoodDay (talk) 12:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
It didn't seem to work, as more editors made premature edits. GoodDay (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user won't stop vandalizing the article. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 11:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism after his recent death. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 12:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined I think this is moot now with his death being reliably sourced. Lectonar (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various ip and new accounts. Blanking, rotation vandal (the ip hopper). Knitsey (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Per WP:GS/CASTE. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of ip vandalism by user Mannargudi Manuneedhi Minakshi Pillai (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Editors are editing in that he's no longer leader of the Liberal Party. Trudeau is in fact leader, until his party chooses a successor, which hasn't happened yet. GoodDay (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP editors are making unconstructive edits, rm'ing content, so it's getting rather bothersome. Semi-protection may help cut back on this disruption. BarntToust 17:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediately resumed after previous protection expired. Taffer😊 💬(they/she) 17:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: New 9 days old account Filmykeedashree420 is disruptive and has been warned twice for changing content of the boxoffice figure and adding unreliable sources. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various new accounts and ip's changing budget and gross. Unreferenced changes. References are in place for budget and gross. Knitsey (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Ip vandalism changing boxoffice figure, been happening for last 2 days. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – just after being unprotected, the page (now linked on the frontpage) has become an endless magnet for IP vandalism. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 14:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Every time the months-long semi-protection gets lifted, the same single-purpose edit-warrior returns sooner or later (this time it took him 3 weeks). Today's disruptive edits by 151.60.221.121 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 37.103.224.114 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) are the latest iterations of the "contributions" by Alebir (talk · contribs), 151.60.177.126 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 151.60.187.14 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (all of them have in common that they target the exact same pieces of sourced information and need multiple edits to remove them), for further details see

Mai-Sachme (talk) Mai-Sachme (talk) 14:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request for "extended confirmed protection" for atleast a year. Continuous vandalism everyday by a sockpuppet from months. Hbanm (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous editors keep using the Talk page to wish people a happy birthday. Woodroar (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. May this please the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Or indef. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. It's been going on for over a year. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: someone try to change the name of Ddnar 49.237.23.126 (talk) 13:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Full protection. Reason: High level of IP vandalism regarding his resignation.GardenCosmos (talk) 15:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @GardenCosmos: The article is already ECP which disallows editing from IP addresses and new accounts. Full protection is not used for IP vandalism. Please read WP:PP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial figure, article has seen a lot of vandalism and BLP violations. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Beginnings of high level of inaccurate edits by anonymous editors, either rumour or vandalism, having to do with Trudeau's resignation; it will get worse G. Timothy Walton (talk) 16:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP user(s) continuously vandalize page on a daily basis; Unsourced material, such as season 2 or 3 renewal, or crossover with Lyla in the Loop, Work It Out Wombats!, and Bluey, despite none of which being announced. Kiff Chatterly (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

07 January 2025

Reason: An IP keeps posting stalking and inappropriate messages on talk page directed towards the subject. Wil540 art (talk) 19:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2601:18d:4900:d40::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Quinlan. IP range is partially blocked from editing Nora Vasconcellos and Talk:Nora Vasconcellos for 6 months for disruptive editing. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced content being added TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits made by various IPs over estimated record sales. TheOnlyOne12 (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. MHD1234567890 (talk) 20:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @MHD1234567890: The article has never been edited by an IP address. Please stop making unnecessary protection requests. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Donald Trump will take office as President of the United States. I fear that this article will be distorted in a manner that favors him and his followers. Americans and people around the world should never forget this event in history. This article should also be protected out of respect for the Capitol Police officers that died during that time and their families. Correditor56 (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Second request: persistent addition of unreferenced genres by unregistered user who refuses to engage in dialogue. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Some users keep making it as an article when it is clearly not yet meet WP:BAND. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 00:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both of you really need to cut this out - the amount of edit and move warring going on here is ridiculous. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In light of recent political events in Canada whole series of articles have had trouble today. Let's lock this up for a couple of days. Moxy🍁 00:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit wars on an article that should normally be extended confirmed protected anyways 2600:100F:B122:7CA5:3BEC:CFEB:EA4:806F (talk) 03:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. — Newslinger talk 07:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Please note that your edit of the article (Special:Diff/1267880279) and your submission of this page protection request are both disallowed by the extended confirmed restriction of the "Arab–Israeli conflict" contentious topic. — Newslinger talk 07:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing in recent months, primarily due to socks coming from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zjholder. Magitroopa (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. charlotte 👸♥ 07:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism and addition of poorly sourced or contentious content. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 00:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Unprotection: sandbox was mistakenly used by main module. Please unprotect. — hike395 (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

@Hike395  Done --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because prevent damage to Teahouse. 2001:44C8:455C:91:C1B3:EC6C:4318:1D05 (talk) 04:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

The protection is only for a few hours and was done to stymie a persistent vandal. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined * Pppery * it has begun... 06:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BLP violations. jolielover♥talk 10:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BLP violations. jolielover♥talk 10:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: There's been multiple IPs over the past day adding something along the lines of "Amik Robertson is the father of Justin Jefferson", which is false and apparently relates to a dispute between the two of them from their game yesterday (source 1, source 2). Iiii I I I (talk) 08:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. Sjö (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

In the lead section change (part of the Israel-Hamas war) to (amid the Israeli-Hamas war). Seahumidity (talk) 09:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – "part of" is standard for infoboxes regarding conflicts etc. Favonian (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I am asking the English Wikipedian administrators to protect the article as it is vulnerable to attack by anonymous ip's who do not like the decision of the Football Association of Indonesia to dismiss Shin Tae-yong. Badak Jawa (talk) 04:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is a serious amount of disruptive editing ongoing from IPs and new IPs keep popping up after getting blocked. CNC (talk) 13:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – not-very-sigma vandals moved this to Ohio 'n' back, which Diddied the page protection and the skibidi vandalism can now resume. Also perhaps move-protect to prevent people who collect substantial fanum tax. JayCubby 13:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also Move protected indefinitely. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit war has kicked up on 7 January - repeated disruptive edits by IP editors repeatedly being reverted as disruptive. Geoff | Who, me? 13:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a0d:6fc0:b5a:fe00::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by C.Fred.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Given this page attracts perennial non-constructive editing, often in a transphobic way, I recommend indefinite grey lock. ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋05:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a regular admin action; if disruption continues, please ping me or post at ANI for contentious topics enforcement. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High volume of disruptions for a new release. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Recurring sockpuppetry (for the second time) by WP:YAYSMAY15. See also Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Yaysmay15. Borgenland (talk) 06:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To match protection settings for other [year] in the Philippines articles targeted by this long-term vandal. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Long and persistent attack by sockpuppets and anonymous IP editors. This page was protected against dynamic IP edit warring for a week in December 2024, but the attack has been going on since April 2023. Requesting protection for a longer period - about six months. Chaipau (talk) 07:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent misgendering of a non-binary BLP. Requesting as a WP:GENSEX enforcement action. Funcrunch (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm reluctant to jump to indefinite protection for an article with no protections in its history. If disruption resumes I will consider it. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Has passed away and is likely to have a lot of edits. A very controversial figure and could invite vandalism. Has seen some non-neutral edits already. Telfordbuck (talk) 12:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I see plenty of IP edits, but not much vandalism. As the death is already reliably sourced, and the page is well watched, I do not think protection is necessary at this point. Lectonar (talk) 15:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Increase of IP removal of sourced information MysticCipher87(alt-account) (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 15:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continous vandalism by IP addresses. Taabii (talk) 13:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 15:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High profile article targeted by several single-purpose editors (WP:COI), without consensus and unsigned. R3ap3R (talk) 14:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I agree. Lectonar (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Sean.hoyland (talk) 05:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: There has been a variety of statements/edits made on this article that are both unsourced and/or WP:OR. A protection would benefit the page, as it would help ensure that only sourced material is added. DisneyMetalhead (talk) 06:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We don't protect pages preemptively or over anticipated problems, only as a result of ongoing disruption. I don't think there are enough disruptive edits happening here to justify protection at this time. Please make a new request if the situation changes. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent non-constructive edits by auto-confirmed editors. ManaliJain (talk) 06:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Protection does not appear to be necessary at this time. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Have warned IP user about their repeated disruptive edits. No response, doubt they even look at their talk page. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 18:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection should be quite sufficient. Favonian (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Every user edit since August has been the insertion or (very quickly) removal of inappropriate external links to promote various sites offering coloring pages. Nat Gertler (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Recurring, but infrequent, spamming makes PC worth trying. Full protection is out of the question. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The case is now closed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 15:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected – a) No compelling reason why IPs or newly created users should edit it. b) The elements who have disrupted the case as well as the article of concern have not retired. Favonian (talk) 16:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism by caste fanatics, who change the facts regularly. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 07:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Perhaps it might also help to heed the {{in-universe}} tag I put on the article and rewrite it to make it clear this is about a fictional character, something the present text only admits in the last graf or so. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing made by several IPs who make changes to the articles such as replacing the word "burusera" with "child porno" which is considered as disruptive to editors who have to revert these changes. Galaxybeing (talk) 09:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under GENSEX. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism, particularly targetting a certain paragraph written under the India subsection. Over Months various different IPs and Accounts evidently have been trying to bury it desperately. I have counted 5 attempts since June 2024 over the span of half a year. Evidently will never stop so it needs a long term block. ContributedEditor (talk) 09:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last clearly disruptive edit I see was from November, and removed the Nigeria subsection, not India. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: keeping adding information from unreliable or without any source. seems like a biased vandalism from a different community against a this particular community. same person also keep adding false information in other article related to this community such as List of Vellalars. Mr.fakepolicy (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Problems have restarted after a one month semi-protection expired. Entranced98 (talk) 17:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism target as appearing in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. Akiaveliara (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, editwarrìng and mass-removal of sourced contents by anon IPs and newly created accounts. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing by probable sock puppets. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 20:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New account and (mostly) ip vandalism. Knitsey (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip hopping and new accounts vandalising the article. Knitsey (talk) 20:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 21:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

08 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry: LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 22:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. Frequent vandalism target. Like every pair of edits is vandalism followed by a reversion. Likely targeted because the main Coca-Cola article is already semi'd. oknazevad (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because their popularity alright died down and the article was indefinitely protected since 2012. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 13:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected The article says that "As of 2024, the channel has over 10 billion views and over 26 million subscribers." That doesn't sound like "died down" to me. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs: [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Annh07 (talk) 06:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Multiple autoconfirmed accounts adding the same statements that are not even definitive about the gulf. (CC) Tbhotch 07:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

In the lead section change (part of the Israel-Hamas war) for (amid the Israel-Hamas war). The notion the Gaza genocide is “part” of such war is controversial/lacking in evidence; but that it’s happening “amid” the war is not. Seahumidity (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined The parenthetical (part of the Israel–Hamas war) is not referring to the genocide, but instead to the immediately preceding "its ongoing invasion and bombing of the Gaza Strip ". * Pppery * it has begun... 05:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – it's being targetted by single purpose accounts that are either misrepresenting the sources (to include factually incorrect information) or removing content without explanation. None of them is remotely interested in the talk page discussion that I started. M.Bitton (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated recent vandalism from IP/non-confirmed users. Sigma440 (talk) 01:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism and random unfunny jokes referencing Puff Daddy. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 01:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent POV removal or distortion of sourced material. Khirurg (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as previous protection. All but one IP edit to this minor US town article in the past couple of years has been trying to make the Simpsons joke, probably because it's the top autocomplete article result for "sneed". Belbury (talk) 09:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP disruptions and edit-warring. Jingiby (talk) 09:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a02:1406:59:8251::/64 (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This article was protected in 2015 to prevent vandalism. This was nearly 10 years ago now, which is a long time for vandalism protection to persist - likely overlooked because it's not a big actor or highly trafficked page.

I think it should be safe to remove the protection now. I am unable to ask the editor who applied the protection to remove it as their page sadly shows they are deceased. Thank you. 2A02:C7C:CC80:8200:B4FF:FC7A:8941:66A3 (talk) 00:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have done what I always do in these cases: I have downgraded to pending-changes protection fpr some months, and watchlisted. If there is no great disruption, this protection will just fade out. Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: A similar request that was sent last night, was rejected. However, there continues to be unsourced information added which may or may not be Wikipedia:Vandalism. Some level of edit protection would prove beneficial and help prevent these continued edits. DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 04:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Consistent addition of irrelevant images to infobox and vandalism from IP addresses and sock accounts. Would be better if semi-protected for some period to check this. M2 (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Falsification of sources, constant removal of content, unsourced statements, several reversions through the years from multiple users and anons. Where is the source claiming she has a new name? Not even her Instagram says that. Skemous (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially one user, Writersluck777. It's always better to engage single users directly than to shut down the page. Lectonar (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Adding controversial infos and undiscussed edits by new users. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 22:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Home Lander (talk) 23:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Disruptive edits are months apart. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Home Lander (talk) 23:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA, as the article relates to the recent Israel-Arab conflict. Badbluebus (talk) 23:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes it does, but the last disruptive edit was about a month ago. Lectonar (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sutyarashi (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Sutyarashi: Please take care to not violate WP:3RR when reverting edits. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent Vandalism - Removal or changing of content that might be considered as vandalism. Galaxybeing (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Also BLP violations by insinuating one of the cast members is transgender, presumably in a derogatory way. jolielover♥talk 13:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandal, despite talk page warnings. Vestrian24Bio 10:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. BusterD (talk) 11:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This article about a for-profit university is the target of repeated additions of promotional text, and removal of sourced critical information, by IPs and new accounts. Maybe semi-protection would be appropriate? I'm editorially involved and can't do it myself. Sandstein 14:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated efforts by IP editors ([23], [24]) to restore article against recent AfD consensus for a redirect. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. This is equivalent to EC creation protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The article has been repeatedly vandalized by unregistered users and IPs, causing unnecessary disruption. Given that it's a new and controversial topic, the constant editing wars and vandalism are making it difficult to maintain its integrity. Semi-protection would help ensure that only more experienced users can contribute, preserving the quality of the content. Bolly ka Badshah (talk) 10:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection provides a limited, but essential, layer of security, offering protection for a period of time to prevent vandalism or disruption, while still allowing for contributions from a broader range of users. Bolly ka Badshah (talk) 10:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Toxic:_A_Fairy_Tale_for_Grown-Ups page is here now Bolly ka Badshah (talk) 12:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined You just created that article today. It seems premature to protect it. As an aside, unregistered users and IPs are the same thing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Presisting adding of unreference info. Myrabert01 (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent efforts by one or more likely COI IP editors to add non-NPOV content/whitewash existing content. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 15:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. The subject of this article has sued Wikipedia over this page's content; we need to be careful to make sure our content accurately reflects the sources in use, and the IPs going back and forth aren't helping. I'll make a post at BLPN. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism alleging that the company is a scam, while providing no reliable source to back up their claim. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 15:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wikipedia is not Yelp. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: In addition to this article, which gets nearly 500,000 page views yearly and was recently promoted to featured article status, this article receives high levels of vandalism mainly from IPs. Here are some of the examples: [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]. These are only some of the examples. Keep in mind, the article looked like this before i gave it a massive revamp, due to the number of unsourced additions from IP addresses as well as a large amount of missed vandalism added by IPs which remained in the article until i revamped it. Protecting this page, which again gets 500,000 annual views, would shield vandalism and help us experienced editors see and revert vandalism from newer editors quicker. Best, 750h+ 16:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's a bit of vandalism recently, but it's hard to untangle from what seems to be a gang of editors owning the article and reverting any edit made by an IP or new account at any time for any reason or no reason at all. If featured article status brings more actual vandalism then an administrator may consider longer-term protection, but it does not appear to be justified at this time. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
@Minakshi Pillai and Mr.fakepolicy: I looked deeper since I recall declining a request on this topic yesterday, and I see that both of you seem to prefer edit warring to discussing the changes you disagree about on the article talk pages. Both of you need to start discussing your disagreements or trying other forms of dispute resolution. If you continue edit warring instead, I will block you both. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry from User:Legende Legende Legende since the expiry of the last protection level on 2024-05-15. Alith Anar 16:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. IP range blocked for 10 years. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 16:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent de-stabilization and please restore this stable version [37] if the edit warring constant. Mr.Hanes Talk 14:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined. Pages will not be full protected indefinitely, period. The article was full protected 5 days ago because of edit warring, and the same editors resumed edit warring as soon as that protection expired. Our only remaining recourse is to block those editors. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Then, I am requesting temporary full protection for the page because it is being disturbed repeatedly. Mr.Hanes Talk 15:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I agree that we usually do not fully protect indefinitely. But: there seems to be a (rough) consensus on talk on how to proceed... which is ignored by a single user; better to deal with this on a direct base instead of locking the whole page down. Lectonar (talk) 15:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Okay Mr.Hanes Talk 15:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: IP editor's consistent disruptive editing, use of WP:OR, and being WP:POINTY all without even attempting to open a discussion on the talk page. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 16:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

  • I'm going to leave this for another admin, but from what I see nobody, including yourself, has attempted to open a discussion. At a glance, the edits you are reverting as "disruptive" are also adding citations from publications that are generally considered reliable, sometimes the same ones that you are using, which suggests to me that this is a content dispute. In these situations I would look for a discussion on the talk page to determine a consensus on how best to reflect the information in the article, and would determine who is being disruptive and edit warring inappropriately based on that. In the absence of such a discussion, I would be using admin tools to prejudice one side of a content dispute, and I would prefer not to. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Ivanvector: I share your concerns about the most recent content dispute. I believe there is enough recent history of sockpuppetry on the article to justify protecting the article, though. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Given recent reporting that The Heritage Foundation plans to dox Wikipedia editors, Heritage's own page will likely be an attractive target for unhelpful edits. Trivialist (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal/tampering of sourced info. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was a flurry of disruptive activity that seemed to die out more than a week ago. Please make a new request if sufficient disruptive activity resumes. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Not long after the article came off semi-protection, vandalism resumed. They’re making accounts for the express purpose of repeatedly making the same disruptive edits. Logs show this has been going on for several years. Asking for indef. protection. Sinclairian (talk) 19:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite protection would be premature here, see WP:PREEMPTIVE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinitely Extended Confirmed Protection: – Repeatedly created by a sockpuppet account as AFD closed as redirect at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinals–Royals rivalry (3rd nomination). 67.222.244.117 (talk) 20:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... 67.222.244.117 (talk) 20:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinitely Extended Confirmed Protection Repeatedly created by a sockpuppet account as AFD closed as redirect at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinals–Royals rivalry (3rd nomination). 67.222.244.117 (talk) 20:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... 67.222.244.117 (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 20:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 20:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 20:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Heyaaaaalol: The page hasn't been edited since 29 July 2024. Please stop making unnecessary requests until you have more experience as recommended by Callanecc on your talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... 67.222.244.117 (talk) 22:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Very strange edit war that's been active for around a month. Dawnseeker2000 18:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, one of the main accounts involved in the edit war has been blocked indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... 67.222.244.117 (talk) 22:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Already done : Requesting immediate archiving... 67.222.244.117 (talk) 22:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

09 January 2025

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Tons of vandalism/OR. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP hopping WP:GENREWARRIOR is back removing sourced content based on their original research on music genres. Also made the same kind of edits to Matenrou Opera and Kamijo (musician). I hate to say it, but it seems like long-term protection or pending changes protection is needed. Xfansd (talk) 22:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Constant unsourced info being added by IP vandals. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 22:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism and blanking. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 23:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/CAM. Daniel Case (talk) 23:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: This page us a highly visible guideline. There is also a history of IP making unconstructive edits after it was temporarily protected. Vitaium (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is under very rapid attack. Is likely to be a repeat target so might as well protect indefinitely. DanielRigal (talk) 03:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC):

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We can reassess after a week. Acroterion (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection, persistently being redirected by IP vandal. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 07:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection, persistently redirected by IP vandal. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 07:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page heavily under attack by IPs. TLJ7863 (talk) 03:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: High level of ip vandalism Marincyclist (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unsource and disruptive addition by IPs. FA article have been protected multiple times already. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 03:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 07:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Template-protected redirects to semi-protected template doesn't make sense. Nobody (talk) 08:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ixfd64: last protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done - protection removed from both redirects. I've kept the target page semi-protected. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 07:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping user has been persistently edit-waring over the same MOS:OVERLINK edits. Attempts to engage with user at their various other IPs, such as this and this one, have been ignored. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is not unambiguously a case of overlinking. Even within the article, "gorilla" is linked in the first instance. Steven Walling • talk 06:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping user has been persistently edit-waring over the same MOS:OVERLINK edits. A warning to cease their edit-warring was ignored. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Steven Walling • talk 07:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High Level of Vandalism Fellowcommish7 (talk) 02:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 07:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 54rt678 (talk) 04:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing about transfer rumours from IP users. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 03:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Andre🚐 03:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Per WP:GSCASTE, persistent addition of unsourced/poorly sourced AI generated content by IPs. - Ratnahastin (talk) 03:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits. The series is about to premiere in Monday. It would likely attract more unreferenced edits in the few days. Hotwiki (talk) 07:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High amount of recent vandalism (8 edits from 4 IP addresses) including foreign vulgar language and patent nonsense, previous blocks + revision deletion per WP:BLP FamiliarFlareon (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism, unreferenced edits, pov push and disruptive editing from IP users. Rajeevs91 (talk) 09:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Incorrect statistics adjustments by various IPs. FromCzech (talk) 11:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Literally on the exact day that the page goes back to being unprotected, the incomprehensible talk page spam starts again. This page needs a very lengthy protection. GraziePrego (talk) 12:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits. The series is airing on Monday, and would likely attract more unreferenced edits in the next few days. Hotwiki (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Footballnerd2007talk13:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please correct the article with reliable sources to indicate who is currently the president, or whatever coalition is filling that role, or whatever is going on. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism as soon as he was elected Prodrummer619 (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has a history of vandalism and disruptive editing. Srf123 (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted three times, deliberate redlink from Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 09:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined: Hasn't been created in more than 2 years and not in the 4 years before that. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 15:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Rosguill. Favonian (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption by IPs. - Ratnahastin (talk) 12:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined - your reverts are restoring a BLP violation. If you fix it with a proper inline source, and other editors disagree with your edit, please discuss on the talk page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unexplained change of the city's name contrary to consensus. Sjö (talk) 14:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. As the IP is the only editor editing disruptively, protection is not needed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target for extremely poor taste vandalism Special:Diff/1268385834. DarmaniLink (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Wasn't isolated either, it's becoming a problem. Special:Diff/1268368521 Special:Diff/1268289592 DarmaniLink (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Tons of political edits regarding handling of the California wildfire crisis, also just good ol' vandalism. While I do agree the wildfire handling controversy needs to be added, it needs to be sourced and NPOV, unlike what those IPs are doing. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It recently got unprotected, and it's already being vandalized by IP users. I believe it should be indefinitely semi-protected so its good article status doesn't get revoked from all the vandalizing, though you have every right to say that it should only be temporary. OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Borgenland (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Block Evasion by ip's. Untamed1910 (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Untamed1910: Please make sure you follow the guidance about explaining the exemption if you are exceeding three reverts at the bottom of WP:3RRNO, which applies even for obvious vandalism. You could end up blocked under WP:3RR otherwise. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request for semi-protection because a vandal using different IPs keeps returning to the page to make multiple unconstructive test edits inserting original research, reverts, and then returns again to repeat the process. Mr Fink (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2606:9400:ae00::/40 (talk · contribs). 3 months. Favonian (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism, persistent disruptive editing, high-risk page due to subject. Requested protection level: Semi-protection or extended protection due to some logged in users seemingly disruptively editing the page, the hist. of the page looks reminiscent of an edit war due to constant reverting, with some normal edits and vandalism in between. RaschenTechner (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Note: @RaschenTechner: If the level of disruption doesn't reduce to a more manageable level with pending changes protection, someone can file a new protection request and we'll consider it, but it looks like most of the disruption is from new and unregistered users. If there's only occasional vandalism by autoconfirmed editors, please warn the user(s) appropriately then report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Since, I am using this device from a Cyber Cafe. There are many people who also use this device, I don't want any one to, by any chance log in to my Wikipedia account. Prevent IP Vandalism. I only, want my ownself, to be able to edit my own Wikipedia User page- User:VSOian Thank You. VSOian (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined - pages are not protected preemptively, and an edit filter already prevents edits by IP and new users to other users' user pages. Also, protecting your user page will not prevent anyone else using your account if you leave it logged in on a public computer. Please remember to log out when you are finished editing on a public computer, and please see Wikipedia:User account security. If your user page is being vandalized, please make a new request or report at WP:ANI. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

10 January 2025

Reason: Too many unconstructive edits by IPs over the last 2 months Sparkbean (talk) 18:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Both IPs have been blocked, and since they have targeted a multitude of movie articles with the same type of vandalism, protecting a single page is unlikely to have much of an effect. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done as per Ahecht. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pending changes failing here. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 21:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under AP. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing addition of unsourced content to this BLP as the subject is in the news regarding a potential transfer. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:15, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion + all edits by IPs were reverted. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 22:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 23:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: I believe this article now falls under WP:ARBPIA as the subject has co-founded the Hind Rajab Foundation, and should have ECP. (Possibly always should have given his activism in the region.) Smallangryplanet (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA topic, should automatically qualify. Smallangryplanet (talk) 22:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Some troll is continuously trying to change the city’s name to its name from the colonialism era and break sections, for example about the etymology. Please protect the article using the latest version by Ponyo. Gqeberha is the official name since 24 February 2021. 2A02:8071:5840:A0C0:EDC5:31A3:2E21:2736 (talk) 23:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Just your basic, textbook edit war: EC users declaring on the talk page that their preferred version has consensus and reverting the article accordingly, while discussion is still ongoing. I am involved. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ivanvector: It's been 4 hours since the last edit that seems to be part of the content dispute. Is this still needed? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Quinlan: no, probably not. Cooler heads are prevailing on the talk page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done. As per above discussion. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing. Vbbanaz05 (talk) 21:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I have already warned them (which hadn't been done). Since this is clearly in a contentious topic area (WP:CT/KURD; I will be putting a notice on the talk page), they haven't much maneuvering room. Daniel Case (talk) 23:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent additions of unsourced content by IP addresses and new accounts since 03:58, 31 October 2024. Alith Anar 22:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 183.83.239.174 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. after report at AIV. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I have also added CTOPS and GS/CASTE notices to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High amount of IP vandalism very shortly after being unprotected, is there any way this article can be protected for more than two weeks? Cheers! Johnson524 02:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 02:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 00:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 38.18.98.64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Discospinster. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Apocheir (talk) 02:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – December death of noted homophobe reported today, and a lot of grave-dancing IP editors are vandalizing. TJRC (talk) 02:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A social media celebrity has claimed on X that he had "created" this person out of "thin air". The claim is false but we are seeing efforts by IP editors and others to vandalize the article. Upd Edit (talk) 01:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jolielover♥talk 04:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. @Jolielover: Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Based on the edit history, the article almost certainly needs to be reviewed at this point if you're familiar with the series. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I agree, I patrol the recent changes and very often see nonconstructive/subtle vandalism on pages related to the series, however I am not familiar with it and do not know Hindi so unfortunately can not help there. jolielover♥talk 04:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is vandalism on the page currently. I am fixing it, but it seems to stem from College Football fans. The first paragraph currently says that "Drew Patrick Allar (born March 8, 2004) is an American college football quarterback for the Penn State Nittany Lions.He enjoys throwing the football to the wrong team.". Batgirl-Awsomeness (talk) 04:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 54rt678 (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2400:2200:682:bd58::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. 54rt678 (talk) 04:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Actually, the page will return to semi-protection.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: There is forced hatred towards the movie and there is frequent changes made to the page without any valid information. Dean sam (talk) 05:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The continued and persistent additions of IPs and new editors commenting about attempting to contact Miller, or trying to confirm if they were actually contacted by Miller from Facebook (who were contacted by clear scammers) is getting to be fairly disruptive, and the clear warnings against posting such is not working and has been going on for multiple years. Requesting indefinite talk page protection of the lowest level to combat this. I don't think the article needs any protection since these commenters never seem to do anything else and don't edit the article, but not against equal protection either. Zinnober9 (talk) 06:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption. Edits every few weeks or days aren't enough disruption. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yuvaank (talk) 07:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Synorem (talk) 07:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Recent vandalism and disruptive editing. Might be subjected to the same problems again by other disruptive users/or IPs if page isn't protected. Galaxybeing (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Ip vandalism on the page changing boxoffice figure and making change without a reliable source. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 10:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf🐉 11:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism M.boli (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Abo Yemen 10:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: BLP that is being vandalised amid divorce rumours, short period of semi-protection requested. JP (Talk) 12:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kfact1only. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Note this has been going on for almost a year; indefinite or at least longer-term protection will be necessary, at least until this sockmaster gets over whatever issue they have. RachelTensions (talk) 12:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Ip vandalism on the page changing budget and boxoffice figure and removing source. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. BusterD (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Due to recent social activism and political criticism of Islamic Republic government of Iran and occupational nature, there has been frequent incorrect information changes to this page. Iamtehran (talk) 11:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit before yours was last year, almost 2 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Nicholas Maduro's inauguration has prompted a multitude of IP editors to appoint González as president of Venezuela. Burrobert (talk) 13:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf🐉 12:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2001:e68:545a:1e8e::/64 (talk · contribs). Without talk page privileges. Favonian (talk) 13:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been persistently vandalized and even moved to articles with redundant or inappropriate names. OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Move protected I do not think that more will be necessary. Lectonar (talk) 15:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

The whole page is just incorrect. This is an indie animation series and not a meme. Maybe it was a meme 2 years ago but now it is a proper animation series with a deep storyline and intricate details. If you don't believe me, watch one of the newer episodes. The evidence is there. Do research and fix this page and show how it is a proper series which it is instead of lying by saying it's a dumb meme. I know a lot about this series and I know what I'm talking about. Do your research and watch one of the newer episodes. Aeraxe (talk) 08:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Aeraxe: We couldn't cite those episodes as sources. What we would need is professional reviews of the animation series in order to cover it in that regard. (Or, to use another popular series with about the same status as Skibidi Toilet, see WP:BFDI; much of what applies there would apply to Skibidi Toilet as an animation series.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined See above, also not an edit request as such. Lectonar (talk) 12:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Trump said something about a fish. GMGtalk 13:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 16:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated vandalism and POV pushing by IP users and new accounts for the past 2 years. Glennznl (talk) 13:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No prior protection history. Please reapply for longer protections if this behavior repeats itself. BusterD (talk) 16:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism. Hate statements are added. NAUser0001 (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Note: WP:HAND. Favonian (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Unprotection: to match article move per RM. Frost 14:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done – talk page moved to correct location. Favonian (talk) 14:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. persisent vandalism by IPs/new editors Footballnerd2007talk14:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism by multiple accounts/IPs who I strongly suspect to be sockpuppets Footballnerd2007talk15:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. Favonian (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vbbanaz05 (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Rueth1989 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent introduction of factual errors to |years_active with no new supporting citation by various IP ranges since 19 December 2024. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 19:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: many unsorced changes, this page was already protected last year for the same reason--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Talk page history is basically nothing other than reverts. All IP edits to page for the past month are either spam or nonsense. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 15:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Footballnerd2007talk16:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA, WP:BLP. Leonidlednev (TCL) 16:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

11 January 2025

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Skitash (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Continuous additions of non-existent articles by IPs; in this case, redirected pages about media franchises, which if more of this type were added would take up unnecessary space for the purpose of the template BrookTheHumming (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I concur with Brook for temporary semi-protection; this navbox is only meant to have full-fledged franchise articles, not section redirects. An IP user has recently been trying to add Anastasia (franchise) to the navbox even though it only redirects to a section in the article for the 1997 film, which is not the intent of the template. –WPA (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Daniel Case (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent disruptive IP editing when unprotected Firecat (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent addition of a non-existent "Kageff Fire". EF5 23:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 - Archer and Granada also questionable at best. Maybe a CU would be good here. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Let's lock this up and get all these IPS to the talk page discussing why we use this terminology. Ongoing problem for months.... Moxy🍁 23:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 00:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users continued doing edit tests. WiiUf🐉 00:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected due to persistent issues with unsourced changes. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – A globally locked, highly disruptive sock who is known to use IPs from this geolocation keeps violating WP:BLP. M.Bitton (talk) 01:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple edits due to transfer rumors to Aston Villa which is unannounced, Requesting edit protection until end of transfer window 1st February IrishReader1996 (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one edit today after a couple of reasonably quiet weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 23:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Mixture of vandalism, good faith nonconstructive editing, and the occasional constructive IP edit. Has been semi-protected on and off for the better part of five years - might be time for a long-term solution. Entranced98 (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article apparently being vandalized by students. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Anonymous editor hopping between multiple IP addresses, dating back to 5 January 2025. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined First, the user appears to be on a /64, which should not be taken to imply by itself they are deliberately hopping IPs. Second, they haven't been warned in five days—contrary to what too many people here may think, it is not self-evident from being reverted that you're doing something wrong, at least not to new editors. Third, not all of their edits have been reverted (although you are right that most of those have been on the article in question. Fourth, if they are a sock, who are they a sock of? Being on a /64 where your ISP dynamically assigns your IP address does not, as I said above, make you a sock. Daniel Case (talk) 23:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 19:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request indefinite extended confirmed protection, same thing with The Blooodline, WP:OR, disruptive editing and constant vandalism. [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] If you have nay question please let me know in the reply below. Lemonademan22 (talk) 19:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption is not as severe as what led me to put the Bloodline article on ECP, and it hasn't been heavily protected prior like that one. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Put GS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandal adding homophobic jokes. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 02:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Will need longer protection this time. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 02:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: IP editor keeps removing content from the page. O.N.R. (talk) 22:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. It looks like they have stopped, but please report it if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism changing boxoffice figures without any source. RangersRus (talk) 06:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent introduction of factual errors without providing new inline citations by various IP ranges and newly registered user(s). Paper9oll (🔔📝) 07:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf🐉 10:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. BethNaught (talk) 10:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Sockpuppet vandalism. WiiUf🐉 11:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 11:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Transfer-related vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 12:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous different vandals entering information in different languages. Mamani1990 (talk) 13:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:51, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – There is persistent vandalism because of conflict in POV. Rickyurs (talk) 02:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Looking at the page's history, there are two suspected disruptive users, both of whom have less than 20 edits. It would be more appropriate if temporary semi or extended protection is enforced, or even better, user blocks. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 04:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – POV nuisance editing still not going away. Dronebogus (talk) 04:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Not something we do lightly, but the threshold has been reached here IMO. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. Semsûrî (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism by user using multiple different IP's. Has some type of fixation on the phrase "B57" and repeatedly replaces it with nonsensical phrases like "Sch-b570 sch-b640 sch-w810" across multiple articles, but mostly on BMW B57. A temporary page protection would be enough I think.

If an admin could also assist in banning that would be appreciated. G3560 (talk) 10:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  10:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Individual is subject to news regarding allegations of sexual offences. Given BLP violations being made, request page protection. Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Semi-Protection: BLP vandalism due to photos published on social media alleging criminal activity. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent changes to surname from "Im" to "Yim" by various IP ranges since 8 January 2025. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent, persistent, ongoing vandalism from multiple unregistered accounts. Possibly could be a single IP-hopping SPA/LTA. Can we please just go ahead and give it permanent or a year-long WP:SEMI?. Shearonink (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; editing while logged out; WP:CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent changes to surname from "Im" to "Yim" by various IP ranges since 8 January 2025. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent, persistent, ongoing vandalism from multiple unregistered accounts. Possibly could be a single IP-hopping SPA/LTA. Can we please just go ahead and give it permanent or a year-long WP:SEMI?. Shearonink (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; editing while logged out; WP:CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Petty vandalism by IPs; subject is taking part in the 2025 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 16:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unconstructive edits (either unreferenced or incorrect information). A new season of the series is about to premiere this month, and the article would likely attract more unreferenced edits in the next few weeks. Hotwiki (talk) 17:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moderate Vandalism throughout the page's history- also an edit war occuring a few days ago that was triggered by an autoconfirmed user 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 18:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Left CTOPS notice on talk as well. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page was previously protected from Jan 4 until Jan 11 (today); the vandalism started up again soon after it expired. Iiii I I I (talk) 19:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended-protection: Continued long-term abuse after page protection set in. See WP:LTA/HANOI. HorrorLover555 (talk) 21:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: High-risk template or module. Wikan Boy 123 (talk) 02:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – No need for User:Belteshazzar ip accounts to edit this next time around. Moxy🍁 05:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: A lot of recent spam. Requesting temp protection. Imcdc Contact 09:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf🐉 10:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly 50% of the last 500 edits have been vandalism or reverting vandalism. Page has seen about this same level of vandalism for over 20 years, and has been semiprotected 10 times during that period. Was protected for 30 months from Sep 2017, expiring Mar 2020, which helped a lot during that period, but vandalism returned in full force afterwards. I believe it needs indefinite protection to permanently solve the problem. Plighting Engineerd (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Awami League kept being removed and BNP's leader being changed to Tarique Rahman despite a whole notice being placed warning users not to change anything until further confirmation. Ilhamnobi (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

12 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP addresses and new accounts since 01:43, 4 January 2025. Possibly WP:CTOP enforcement due to topics regarding India and caste. Alith Anar 05:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User:Supporter33 has persisted in adding unsourced and fringe information into this article. They have been reverted by four editors and refuses to address the concerns brought up on the article talk page. They have now resorted to attacking me by deleting my user page and attacking me on the article talk page. freshacconci (✉) 12:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Supporter33 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended content

Reason: re: Mass Deletion of Holocaust Survivor Quotes & Images from Witness: Passing the Torch of Holocaust Memory to New Generations

hello,

I have a few important issues to raise with this latest deletion. I'm addressing this post both to the author of the deletions as well as to any neutral observers will be viewing this at a later date.

1.⁠ ⁠This page has been up for many years (since 2015) with no objection to the quotes and images that were up prior to January 2, 2025, despite having been seen by thousands of people, including Wikipedia editors.

I have seen a lot of pages being unjustly attacked or ones with content deleted without proper explanation, and I have noticed that some pages get some protection from this. On Jan 2 this year, a user (Moxy) deleted over 13,000 characters and some pictures with no explanation except "mass copy and pasting," which was untrue. Over the last decade, this content has been filled with survivor testimony and was wiped out in seconds.

2. The editor who deleted over 13,000 words claims these quotes were mass copied and pasted. This is untrue. Each quote was sourced and excerpted from a different review and was pasted individually

3. The editor who deleted the 13,000 words also deleted all the references below (under "See Also"), including the references to the USC Shoah Foundation, among other references. This organization is intimately tied to the book because every picture of a Holocaust survivor or Righteous among the Nations in the book is linked to the testimony found on the USCSF website. One of the significant features of the book is that the testimony on the printed page becomes alive when one uses a smartphone (hovering over the image in the book) to access the testimony on the USC Shoah Foundation.

4. All the quotes and images from the Holocaust survivors (Elie Wiesel etc.) and other individuals (Steven Spielberg (founder of USC Shoah Foundation), Pop Francis, Pres. Barak Obama etc) mentioned in the book have been removed.

One of the stated goals of the book is to keep the memories and stories of the Holocaust survivors alive. So it is indeed ironic that whoever is removing these images is doing the exact opposite of the purpose of the book.

The title of the book is: Witness: Passing the Torch of Holocaust Memory to New Generations. By deleting these crucial testimonies to the Holocaust, the editor is, in fact, extinguishing the "torch of Holocaust memory" for current readers and generations to come if these deletions are allowed to stand.

To put this point as succinctly as possible - directly to the editor - why would you or anybody else want to remove a picture of a Holocaust survivor from the book whose entire family was murdered in the Holocaust? To end and to what purpose does this serve?

My last point:

This is not the first time that Holocaust pages have been unfairly targeted, even after the pages were up for many, many years on Wikipedia - seen by thousands without objection.

One has to wonder if there is a political agenda at play or if some individuals are simply intent on disrupting the flow of human understanding of significant events in human history, and this case, the history of the Holocaust.

It is beyond frustrating when one is trying to educate the public with pure knowledge and help people understand the enormity of events like the Holocaust when individuals come along randomly, for no apparent reason - or perhaps even worse - and delete these important sources of the history of humanity. Write this now.

As this is becoming a worrisome trend, especially in this hyper-politicized environment, I am wondering if there's a way we can get protection for this page to forestall these kinds of unjustified mass deletions.

When I wrote on the person's wall and explained these points, the user wrote back, " This is not grade 7..."

As someone whose own great-grandmother was deported to Auschwitz in 1944 at 84 years of age, this is not just a question of academic knowledge but deeply personal to me as well. But I keep things subjective for Wikipedia. Is there some actual help Wikipedia can provide to stop people form erasing 3/4 of a page that has been up for a decade instantly?

thanks you so much

Uiaeli (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined If you're writing something this long, it's better to take it to AN/I. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – temp'rary protectikon as a result of pock suppetry is requested. JayCubby 23:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:16, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – No need for User:Belteshazzar ip accounts to edit this next time around. Moxy🍁 05:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing a lot of disruption since the last IP was globally blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – No need for User:Belteshazzar ip accounts to edit this next time around. Moxy🍁 05:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Again, not seeing much of it recently. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The IP user keeps adding something which is not supported by the sources and he also doesn't answer in his talk page. just reverting edits. Sports2021 (talk) 15:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I have warned them already to that effect. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by adding controversial additions [46] constantly edit warring, instead of taking it on talk page. Garuda Talk! 15:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since the user was only just alerted to CTOPS, and there does seem to be some discussion on talk, and imposing ECP when Tiipu is the only participant without that access level so doing that would essentially grant victory (albeit temporarily) in the content dispute, I am reluctant to protect as of yet. Daniel Case (talk) 21:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same case here as well, the recent controversial undue additions [47] are nowhere near to constructive. Garuda Talk! 16:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And for the same reasons I have declined at Nanda dynasty. Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf🐉 23:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:46, 11 January 2025 (:
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. @Voorts: I already protected it, it looks like these disruptive edits have been a long-standing issue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
My bad; I didn't reload the history page before declining so I didn't see your imposition of protection. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:51, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
No worries! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent content change by ip. BlueboyLINY (talk) 18:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Next time please bring this to AN/I. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:53, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Ed Oppty (talk) 21:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A04:4A43:84AF:FE24:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). This is all occurring within one IP range. Next time, please bring this to AIV. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Subject 2600:1700:F991:9E50:F923:CBAA:724D:8AFE (talk) 04:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Previously page did not meet musical notability criteria but after winning a grammy with Tennesse State Marching Band title meets said criteria 2600:1700:F991:9E50:F923:CBAA:724D:8AFE (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
I believe Robert McClenon's response to you at Del Rev (11 Jan) was along the lines of "create a notable draft first, then we'll deal with unprotection". Zinnober9 (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please create a sourced version of this article in a subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any administrator to move the page for you. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 continues vandalically reversing several of my edits in the Dafne Keen article after the dual nationality thing was corrected without having touched it manually, it is a WP:DUCK that had been blocked earlier this month and apparently it is evading the blocking by restarting a modem of the Internet connection from Greece. 64.32.109.113 (talk) 00:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

IP that made the report made undiscussed nationality change to the aforementioned article under another IP, something they did also to other articles if you check their range. 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 (talk) 00:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Oh yeah, tell that to someone who has had a long history of long-term abuse. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dealer07/Archive 64.32.109.113 (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 continues vandalically reversing several of my edits in the Karsu article after the dual nationality thing was corrected without having touched it manually, it is a WP:DUCK that had been blocked earlier this month and apparently it is evading the blocking by restarting a modem of the Internet connection from Greece. 64.32.109.113 (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

IP that made the report blatantly violates MOS:ETHNICITY despite already having been reverted by other users. 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Oh yeah, tell that to someone who has had a long history of long-term abuse. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dealer07/Archive 64.32.109.113 (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
And why should I be associated with this user anyways? 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
You'll see 64.32.109.113 (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Can someone lock this page please --FMSky (talk) 02:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Not until you revert a valuable edition as it was, as I added the dual nationality that I want and ordered the categories in alphabet instead of thanking me for reverting several editions for this another vandal IP whose was evaded by Dealer07. 64.32.109.113 (talk) 02:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I refer to this review for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karsu&diff=prev&oldid=1268894056 64.32.109.113 (talk) 02:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
For the 3rd time, that's a different person. Stop spreading false info and changing nationalities to your preffered ones. 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 continues vandalically reversing several of my edits in the Shaggy article after the dual nationality thing was corrected without having touched it manually, it is a WP:DUCK that had been blocked earlier this month and apparently it is evading the blocking by restarting a modem of the Internet connection from Greece. 64.32.109.113 (talk) 00:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Unexplained removal of one part of subject's nationality by the IP that made the report. 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Oh yeah, tell that to someone who has had a long history of long-term abuse. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dealer07/Archive 64.32.109.113 (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Don't make accusations you are not able to prove. 2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
You'll see 64.32.109.113 (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Is not even a real thing it is just a fictious project as other pages such as celebrities WolfeReAds (talk) 04:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

@WolfeReAds:I highly doubt this will be done as you have provided no legitimate reason to lower the protection. Dronebogus (talk) 04:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
@WolfeReAds: Did you read the article? Even the preview popups I use make it clear the article is about works of fiction. This is like arguing a page about a celebrity should be unprotected because the article states the guy was only popular in Oak Grove, Kentucky. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. (Used the wrong template.) Declined no rationale for reducing protection has been provided. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content and unexplained removal of refs. Waxworker (talk) 01:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. WiiUf🐉 01:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I have heen trying to remove unsourced content per BLP policy but have been reverted by editors unaware of WP:Verifability and now i am baselessly accused of sockpuppetry. —This comment was sended by  115.189.90.21.

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper hijacking redirect since Christmas. Jalen Barks (Woof) 01:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: An user is editing the article by removing different sources with baseless arguments. Adrikshit (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice per WP:CT/IPA on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Again. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 02:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Alex_21 TALK 00:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks very much for doing these, Newslinger - much appreciated. Here's hoping the pest loses interest after a couple of weeks! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
No problem! If the disruptive editing does reoccur, please submit another report. IP range blocks tend to be more effective than page protection when many articles are affected, so if any future disruptive editing comes from an IP address that looks close to one of the previously blocked IP addresses, a report on the vandalism noticeboard might be the best solution. — Newslinger talk 04:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks - I have reported some of the individual IPs, and someone did block some related to a sockpuppet account, I think. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Reduce the protection to pending changes, as all vandals that triggered the temporary semi-protection are all ip users. It would be greatly appreciated if the semi-protection is reduced to pending changes for the remainder of the duration. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 18:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: User is changing sources and including fictional names to spread his propaganda by giving false information. Adrikshit (talk) 02:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I will be giving them a CTOPS alert. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Pending Changes for some time - Over the last year, it seems like there has been a fairly substantial amount of IP vandalism, but I don't think it's quite enough for semi-protection. 2601:343:4100:1E90:B913:2CAA:C102:E92A (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not really much editing to begin with over the past year. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. related to the Arab Israeli conflict Abo Yemen 09:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Unprotected TFA Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 07:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 08:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism against WP:RS figures. Happily888 (talk) 08:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Maybe it is better to return back to allow admin only to move page as it is a common Wikipedia policy. Vitaium (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Move protected as it was until accidentally removed in July 2023. Favonian (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry attack. Vbbanaz05 (talk) 11:15, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf🐉 05:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High IP vandalism happening on this page for few days with unsourced changes to boxoffice figure, Cast and introduction of unreliable Twitter sources. RangersRus (talk) 10:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plasticwonder (talk) 11:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf🐉 05:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WiiUf🐉 05:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users kept adding factual errors. WiiUf🐉 05:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 11:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Some serious / egregious BLP violations recently. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring on what content to include. Sariel Xilo (talk) 06:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Disruptive editing whilst an ongoing discussion at the project page. Vestrian24Bio 11:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry attack. Vbbanaz05 (talk) 12:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

although they have no account of their Rajput origin or prevailing Rajput traditions.

They have there Rajput tiers as Maharani Avantibai Lodhi (16 August 1831 – 20 March 1858) was a queen-ruler and freedom fighter. She was the queen of the Ramgarh (present-day Dindori) in Madhya Pradesh. An opponent of the British East India Company during the Indian Rebellion of 1857, information concerning her is sparse and mostly comes from folklore. In 21st century, she has been used as a political icon in Lodhi community. Siddharthaavermaaa (talk) 10:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Lodhi (caste) is not protected. Remember to include reliable sources for your claim. Favonian (talk) 10:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Ongoing excessive editing of criminal conviction section nearly a week after his death. Wikipedia is not the news nor the morality police. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 04:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 54rt678 (talk) 05:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of maintenance templates by various IPs. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism, making changes to text and bio picture 473Camerhogne (talk) 12:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been subject to persistent disruptive editing by IP users. Editing has been to the entire page, removing all existing sources and replacing it with something entirely unsourced. This has been ongoing and the page has had protection temporarily as a result. As the page protection expires, the disruption resumes. Unfortunately, it may need to be protected for an indefinite period, and for that reason, I am requesting pending changes protection be considered. ButlerBlog (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. IPv6 range 2607:F380:8C9:3000:0:0:0:0/57 pblocked for 6 months. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per WP:GSCASTE. - Ratnahastin (talk) 16:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 17:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Grossly offensive vandalism recently (threats of personal harm), and disruptive editing. jolielover♥talk 14:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
There was vandalism prior to that IP too, can't link some due to the edits being revdel'd, but see edits on December 23, January 2, January 4, January 7, January 8. jolielover♥talk 17:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Actually, just read the online abuse section of her page; it details that she regularly receives such abuse online which is identical to the kind of edits I've seen. I think the page should be indef semi protected due to this being a persistent issue @Isabelle Belato: jolielover♥talk 17:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the issue persist after the protection ends, we can indefinite. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 16:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

This includes some BLP violation. Knitsey (talk) 17:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
30+ vandalism edits, can I ask for a check on all those edits for the need for rev/del please, thank you. Knitsey (talk) 18:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently, a controversial statement regarding the BOP was made by a member of the Indian Government, leading to a surge in content removal. We are seeking temporary protection for a month or two to prevent further vandalism of the article. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 17:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Daniel Quinlan. Indef EC, in fact. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs, namely User:88.119.97.119, User:176.169.151.71, and User:80.209.65.84 keep adding Maciej Nowicki as married to Eve, which is based on a meme. Heythereimaguy (talk) 15:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion by User:Dealer07 from Greece. Recently blocked as Special:Contributions/62.74.24.244, Special:Contributions/2A02:85F:F0DC:1CBA:E06E:9D08:A856:D9F6 and Special:Contributions/2A02:85F:F070:E175:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple ips. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruptive editing as experienced in the past. Marincyclist (talk) 04:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Per AIV. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and other registered editors

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For the second time in a few days can we lock this up so people know what to do with the shock puppet edits. Moxy🍁 19:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

13 January 2025

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant exhausting disruption for years now. Semsûrî (talk) 13:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No prior protection history. BusterD (talk) 02:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – created by a LTA who also repeatedly created the similar now salted page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congestion pricing in New York City. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 21:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent commentary from random IPs. Mamani1990 (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism from new accounts and IP addresses since 02:04, 6 December 2024. Alith Anar 02:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: User is repeatedly adding outdated information, misusing sources (such as using a source to cite material it contradicts), and removing cited information from reputable sources. User is showing inherent nationalistic bias. Skeptical1800 (talk) 06:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

See the talk page: Talk:Urartu#Recent_changes Bogazicili (talk) 15:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined The two users are edit-warring. Bbb23 (talk) 01:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: There have been numerous cases of soapboxing and vandalism by IP addresses, many of which have no edit history other than warring on this article, and at least one single-purpose user account - this has occurred on a monthly basis since last September, when 2 such incidents occurred, in addition to last May, several times in 2023 and a significant edit war in June 2022. Due to the relatively niche nature of the article's subject, I would suggest WP:PCPP or WP:SEMI at most, so as not to exclude too many editors from participating. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Since the new year, there have been 17 edits (10 by IPs and 7 by registered editors). Of these, 7 are egregious IP vandalism; 2 are IPs reverting IP vandalism; 1 is a marginally constructive IP edit (a wikilink); 5 are registered editors undoing IP vandalism; 1 is a registered editor undoing a good-faith mistake by an IP editor; and 1 is a registered editor fixing a small grammar mistake. Thus, in the past 12 days, 82% of edits solely exist as or because of IP vandalism. It's obvious this will continue to be a contentious subject. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 14:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial athlete, sees a lot of IP vandalism. Nswix (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs continually changing the cast list to their preferred version. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR, IP's attempting to introduce incorrect losses of the vehicle. TylerBurden (talk) 20:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 20:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We think someone/somewhere a joke is being pulled on the project. see Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Toronto/Wikipedia Day 2025Moxy🍁 21:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined The consensus on the talk page is to not protect the page. You are the only one in favor. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism by alternate accounts of the account now blocked for vandalism in the same page Junsik1223 (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism Rainsday (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Recent violations of BLP policy from various IPs that remove sources and do not add their own. I think pending changes would be appropriate. Ultraodan (talk) 04:14, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We could probably go to PC after then. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – MAB. NightWolf1223 <Howl at meMy hunts> 04:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator BusterD. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vandalism by new user 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 18:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced material. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 00:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If they continue after being warned today, please report to WP:ANEW or WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting permanent semi-protection because the individual is no longer in office or a candidate for political office. There is a much lower risk of vandalism or disruption to this page for a former member of the U.S. House who is not particularly controversial. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 23:15, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @Daniel Quinlan:, the protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged under WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Latest sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremiah Caquias/Archive gaming autoconfirm. Wikishovel (talk) 19:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Up2up (talk · contribs) blocked by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Indef. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 21:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2605:8D80:560:2972:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Increasing amounts of IP vandalism MrEarlGray (talk) 22:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There were only three problematic edits, which were caught almost immediately. Please re-report if the problem is persistent. Diannaa (talk) 04:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous style-warring and attempts to remove the most-common definition of the Droop quota by an unregistered editor. (Who has kept this up from many different IPs.) IP has repeatedly ignored attempts at explaining this on both the article talk and in a conversation I had with them on my user talk. (The Droop quota is sometimes defined vk+1 and sometimes v+1k+1; user keeps deleting the first definition.). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The user hasn't edited since the beginning of the month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of Sockpuppetry of User:Alon9393 IPs trying to AFD the article. Protoeus (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 190.219.101.128/25 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi protection: Persistent IP block evasion by MAB. ~SG5536B 08:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator David Eppstein. Favonian (talk) 09:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Can be reduced to indefinite pending changes protection, as i believe its unnecesarry so that we can give non-vandalising ip users a chance 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 10:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Pinging Anarchyte. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping Ahecht. I would decline this. The article has a long protection history and the recent talk page edit requests don't instil me with hope that lowering it will result in more constructive edits. I would also hesitate given the recent political scandal. Anarchyte (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive editing and WP:COI. New editors continually remove controversial sections and replace them with positive but unsourced information. The article was protected two months ago for this reason but expired three weeks ago. Annh07 (talk) 04:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Required Semi protect atleast for a month, Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and other registered editors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musamar (talkcontribs) 09:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Jaamieupendra (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High 'edit warring' activity. Other users involved are not cooperating and discussing on the talk page despite multiple requests to do so. Protection necessary for a while at least. ParvatPrakash (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: High level of vandalism and Edit warring by probable sock puppet users already under investigation. Addition of unrealiable sourced content. Livingstonshr (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC) Livingstonshr (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The alternative would have been to block both of you for edit-warring. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2-methylbutane is tasty (talk · contribs) blocked by EPIC. Locked, actually. Favonian (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 11:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Multiple IP editors keep vandalizing the article. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 12:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – additions of poorly sourced content as subject is in the news regarding a potential transfer - requesting earlier than expected as this has happened very regularly to other football pages ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 12:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive edits. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 11:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last protection expired three weeks ago, and anon editors plus a new SPA are once again vandalizing references, or removing them altogether. Wikishovel (talk) 14:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as previous protection which expired a few days ago; nearly all IP traffic is people typing brain rot style phrases into the article text. Belbury (talk) 14:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:09, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Full protection: Frequent removal of the page content Post-postmodernism is a neo-trend and it needs a special care. Few scholars are active in this field, and researchers who wish to do research in this field need to see the active scholars and publications. I suggest that all scholars who had been mentioned on the page are re-added and protected. Supporter33 (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
What's your reason? After some discussions, another editor asked for protection, and we did. Supporter33 (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
The article wasn't protected – you were blocked for edit warring. Unless you are able to get consensus on the article talk page, your proposed changes won't be included in the article. Favonian (talk) 13:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
The block was for 24 hours, and after the block was removed, I proposed the Protection. It was my supposition that we reached a consensus there, didn't we? Supporter33 (talk) 15:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean by "we reached a consensus" with relation to protection of the page. Content issues must be discussed in the article's talk page. This noticeboard deals exclusively with protection of pages, and I declined as I see no need to protect it according to our policies. I recommend simply dropping the issue here and continue discussion at that article's talk page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you. In fact, I have revised and sent the following addition to Post-postmodernism, but no editors, who were earlier engaged with this, has replied. Is that ok? Can I add it to page Post-postmodernism:
Ghasemi's Hyperhybridism and Heterolinationalism and Cyberculturalism
In his 2023 book chapter Paradigms of Cyberculturalism in Post-postmodernity[1], scholar Mehdi Ghasemi introduces "Cyberculturalism" as a successor to postmodernism, arguing that contemporary society has entered a new artistic, literary, social, media, and economic period. He posits that cyberculture dominates at the intersection of real and virtual spaces, influencing literary and artistic production, publication methods, communication, and economic systems. Ghasemi identifies key paradigms of cyberculturalism, including artificial intelligence, multimediality, social media omnipresence, Twitterature, cybercommerce, and cryptocurrency, which impact art, culture, and economics.
In his 2022 paper Post-postmodernism and the Emergence of Heterolinational Literatures[2], Ghasemi introduces "Heterolinationalism" as another post-postmodernist paradigm. He explores concepts such as post-academia, postnationalism, polyliterature, polyvocalism, plurilingualism, self-publishing, social media, multimediality, transtextuality, and fanfiction as defining features of heterolinational literatures.
In his 2020 paper Hyperhybridism: Postmodernism is Old but not Old Fashioned[3], Ghasemi introduces "Hyperhybridism," which he describes as a post-postmodernist phenomenon coexisting with postmodernism. He characterizes hyperhybridism as multidirectional, recalibrating some of postmodernism's foundational assumptions while synchronously engaging with its predecessor.

References

  1. ^ Ghasemi, Mehdi (2023). Paradigms of Cyberculturalism in Post-postmodernity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. ^ Ghasemi, Mehdi (2022). "Post-postmodernism and the Emergence of Heterolinational Literatures". Contemporary Aesthetics. 20.
  3. ^ Ghasemi, Mehdi (2020). "Hyperhybridism: Postmodernism is Old but not Old Fashioned". Academia Philosophical Studies. 65.
Supporter33 (talk) 15:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Sure, it is based on the required format as I see. Now can it be added? Such info would help researcher new to the field of post-postmodernism to know what is happening. Supporter33 (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Regarding the scope of this noticeboard, the page will not be protected. As per the discussion at the article talk, it appears the next step there is WP:Requests for comment, to get more input from independent editors—which will need to be done via Talk:Post-postmodernism, not here. —C.Fred (talk) 16:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
OK. Thank you. Supporter33 (talk) 16:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Note: This article will require continued monitoring, as there is now behaviour consistent with use of multiple accounts taking place. —C.Fred (talk) 17:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Update: Now confirmed sockpuppetry. —C.Fred (talk) 18:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Actually it might be wise to put the page (and article talk) at semi-protected-EC for a little while as the socking editor seems very willing to just roll up a new account every time one gets blocked. Simonm223 (talk) 19:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:JasonS.Black. Persistent date disruption from multiple IPs in the UK. Binksternet (talk) 16:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page previously protected due to addition of unsourced content (player is in the news regarding a potential transfers); protection has just ended and the same editing has re-ensued immediately. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting pending changes protection due to long-term persistent disruptive editing. RachelTensions (talk) 05:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page per WP:BLPGROUP. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IPs persistently making legal threats and committing BLP violations. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Falls under WP:CT/AI, and should be extended-confirmed protected; since the last request, page has received contentious edits from an IP editor and a single-purpose account Reconrabbit 14:47, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: PLEASE APPROVE MY PAGE Muffiactor (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: Seems to be a spurious request 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done – No article of that name ever existed. You probably shouldn't be the one to write it, as explained in WP:Autobiography. Favonian (talk) 17:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Recent disruptive editing from IPs hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 16:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last surge was more than seven hours ago. When/if it resumes, protection will happen. Favonian (talk) 17:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

+2 Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry - LTA target. --Leonidlednev (TCL) 21:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring for several months, including by Wikipedian with potential conflict of interest. No documentation of edits; no discussion on Talk page. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Jgibr (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 18:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Warwick, England, IP Special:Contributions/2A04:4A43:56BF:B8A4:BC1F:ABD9:1069:11F8 is continuing the disruption from Special:Contributions/Neil Garton 12 years ago. Binksternet (talk) 17:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a04:4a43:56bf:b8a4:bc1f:abd9:1069:11f8 (talk · contribs) blocked by Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: It is already semi-protected, but it should be protected more because it's a critical piece of modern history. MrPurrs820 (talk) 18:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively.. Please review our Wikipedia:Protection policy before filing RfPP requests. signed, Rosguill talk 18:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumption of the same IP/sock Bigboss19923 block evasion as merited the previous protection, adding fake voice acting credits. Belbury (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Many instances of vandalism since last October (50+ edits?), including a dozen in the past week. See page history filtered to reverts. Iiii I I I (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

14 January 2025

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA4 - Attracting conflict related disruptive editing. --Seawolf35 T--C 18:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Single user causing problem. Given CT template notice. If problem continues, consider reporting user. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced, and puffery material by IPs, also WP:NOT. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 20:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm assuming you meant the main 2025 Prayag Kumbh Mela page and not the talk page? Iiii I I I (talk) 21:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The same person, under different IPs (one, two, three), has been trying to add the same (fake) information for the past week. Edits generally include "King Mart", which is not a character in the film, and "Keith Beraingham", who is not a credited actor. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism restarted, by IPV6 editor in same range as the earlier vandal, as soon as the prior protection expired 10 January 2025. Geoff | Who, me? 23:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce as WP:ECP under WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just because it is in Israel does not automatically put it under ARBPIA. There is nothing in this article that even mentions any connection to not only the current conflict, but any aspect of that conflict at all. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism by remove season 2 cast of Whyatt Beanstalk. 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:38C5:705F:4F84:5521 (talk) 03:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Give a good report for User:EvergreenFir. 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:38C5:705F:4F84:5521 (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Redirect page unlikely to be in need of editing is a recurring target by an LTA. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Gelasin (talk) 04:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Gelasin (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: repeated instances of being made and unmade redirect page due to sockpuppet user Magicalr2d2 (talk) 05:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple instances of vandalism or bad edits coming from IPs or new users while it's featured in DYK for the day. PrimalMustelid (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. For the record, the same level of protection was required to stop disruptive editing at List of presidents of Bangladesh, some years ago. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 15:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Ra rai23487 (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. and Raka rai by myself ... both indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent recent IP vandalism. -SlvrHwk (talk) 00:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them a level 2 warning. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Constant page blanking by IPs recently Cyrobyte (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Queen of Hearts. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1001:B129:3A84:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by TheresNoTime. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP disrupting editing 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DD3D:B74C:2265:CF85 (talk) 02:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits at all in five days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP disrupting editing 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DD3D:B74C:2265:CF85 (talk) 02:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 172.85.214.198 (talk · contribs) blocked by C.Fred. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP disrupting editing 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DD3D:B74C:2265:CF85 (talk) 02:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 172.85.214.198 (talk · contribs) blocked by C.Fred. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – presistent vandalism by IP addresses. dotXK 03:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 70.166.192.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 06:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 06:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection for redirect. Frequent attempts by IP vandals to expand to a page of its own when Greater China is sufficient. MimirIsSmart (talk) 04:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Entranced98 (talk) 10:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High IP and new account vandalism changing boxoffice and budget to unsourced figures and this has been going on as late as December 2024 to now. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 11:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High IP vandalism changing boxoffice figures without any source mostly since January 10 till now. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 12:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. arcticocean ■ 16:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps requesting speedy deletion due to supposed "false information", yet refuses to elaborate or specify a valid CSD criterion. It's likely a conflict of interest. Aydoh8[contribs] 14:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator GB fan. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy🍁 15:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ivanvector. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

I believe that the Δ δ underneath the paragraph 'The uppercase and lowercase forms of the 24 letters are:' as well as in the table is italicised incorrectly. I think the italisisation should be removed.

Also underneath that paragraph, Γ's lowercase form appears incorrect and instead uses Latin lowercase 'y'. The correct character has a vertical bottom stroke and looks like a smaller form of 'Y', although it looks like this may be a font issue since the character appears as 'γ' as well, so if anyone can make a workaround that could be an improvement.

I would also like to point out that there might be a better approximate western European equivalent for Χχ that could be a situation in which 'ch' is used to represent 'k^h^' or 'kh' literally appears, but I can't think of any besides names such as 'Charise' or 'Khan', so I think that can stay. Kappa-to-mizu (talk) 08:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Moved to: Talk:Greek alphabet
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Increasing amounts of vandalism MrEarlGray (talk) 13:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. arcticocean ■ 16:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: vandalism. Persistent vandalism from IPs over and other editors on boxoffice, Please protect page for temporary atleast 6 months for semi protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imanshun (talkcontribs) 14:20, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. arcticocean ■ 17:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. intforce (talk) 14:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. arcticocean ■ 17:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Clearly a target for left-wing vandals Footballnerd2007talk14:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection is  Not done - this is a high-profile article on a subject who has recently died, so we should try to avoid closing anonymous editing if still possible. arcticocean ■ 17:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Lots of unverified accounts making edits to contentious article, which are frequently reverted HenrikHolen (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 17:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Nagore Dargah Kalifa (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

 Requesting immediate archiving... Page draftified. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer news causing vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent vandalism from IPs over the last week. qcne (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – the recent anon editor is now blocked and there was little other disruption before today. If more occurs, please do request again. arcticocean ■ 16:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBPIA, pages in this subject area should be ECP. Smallangryplanet (talk) 16:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. SilverLocust 💬 19:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. St4rr3y3y3s (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: vandalism. Persistent Heavy vandalism from IPs over on boxoffice and content in everyday made as continueous topics page, Please protect page for indefinite semi protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imanshun (talkcontribs) 13:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. arcticocean ■ 16:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

The talk page is protected. How are we to make edit requests if the talk page to the article is also locked. Thank You. 2600:1003:A011:E677:C1DC:C29F:5BA7:AC64 (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

By asking them here, at WP:Requests for page protection/Edit. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 11:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Not an edit request. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 12:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined arcticocean ■ 16:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page is experiencing repeated disruption by anonymous IP users (block evasion maybe?). They continually change the successor flag despite being referred to the article text and its cited sources. Additionally, they alter the text to contradict the sources, seemingly based on personal bias, and refuse to engage in discussions on the talk page. This has been a long-term issue, with similar disruptive behavior persisting over time. Therefore, I request long-term page protection to prevent further issues and ensure the integrity of the article. Gooduserdude (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is currently 2 edits in 2 weeks on a major article. Please request again if the disruption continues and refer in your request to this comment. arcticocean ■ 16:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated anonymous and straw accounts being created to edit specific sections (NourishingHappiness) 37and7 (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Favonian (talk) 16:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated inclusion of copyrighted image(s) by a new editor who has been warned multiple times. Anwegmann (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Less Unless (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
@Less Unless: There has been repeated sock puppetry every few weeks for several months, always after uploading a copyrighted image and so as to add the image into the article. There has been a lot of editor time already wasted on detecting and reversing this. I would apply a 3-month semi-protection. As you reached this request first, I'm happy to defer to you, but I wanted to make sure that you had noticed the context. arcticocean ■ 17:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi! Before making a decision, I have looked through the history and have noticed only a couple of small issues in November and mid October. They however have nothing to do with uploading a copyrighted image. So I am afraid I do not understand what you are referring to and to me it seems the protection is not justified. Maybe pending changes? But if you believe 3-month semi-protection is suitable, please do so. Less Unless (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply! Let's leave this as declined and should more socking occur, a fresh RfPP can be filed. arcticocean ■ 17:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 17:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 17:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear 20:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Related to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, needs to be Extended-protected indef CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 19:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ex-husband Neil Gaiman recently accused of sexual assault, worth protecting this related article as vandalism has already occurred. Cerebral726 (talk) 21:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
22:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP nonconstructive editing. WP:NOTAFORUM; WP:NATIONALISTM; WP:NOTHERE, WP:SPA. Jingiby (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing started up again after two years of semi-protection. Entranced98 (talk) 19:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Entranced98 (talk) 19:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since 22 Oct, there have been multiple IP editors trying to remove the infobox image at Dave Upthegrove (a politician). They don't all geolocate to same place. Article was previously protected on 2 Nov, 5 Nov, and 14 Nov (for a month), but as soon as protection expires, they start up again. Due to the long-term persistent blanking, requesting long-term protection. Schazjmd (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: WP:RUSUKR, recent IP vandalism (see edits of 19:09, 19:10 UTC 14 January 2025) SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 21:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

15 January 2025

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. No reason for IPs to edit this archive, and they often attempt to add their own stuff. Aaron Liu (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
What does this mean? "They often attempt to add their own stuff."? Followthe$cience (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Looking at the history over the last few years, almost all IP edits had to be reverted. This isn't a super high traffic page, but it's the sort of financial topic that's a magnet for EL spam. Requesting pending changes to get some eyeballs on those questionable IP edits that sometimes slip through unnoticed. Mlkj (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Disruptive editing by new user and article is related to zionism and the arab-israeli conflict. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 22:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined I don't see enough disruption for me to protect an article currently at AFD. Daniel Case (talk) 23:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page is filled with misinformation or extreme political bias surrounding a highly-politicized topic. There are statements made that also say "citation missing." It misleadingly labels us as "right wing" which is categorically incorrect, as the stances of ZOA have been pretty much exactly the same since 1897, especially for the past 30+ years, and the ZOA used to be equally engaged with both U.S. political parties. It was not until the past decade or so that one party has flipped and its members will have nothing to do with us, leaving the ZOA to only be seen with Republicans, as if this is the organization's intention, which it is not. We have photos of Joe Biden speaking at a previous ZOA Gala, years ago. The Zionist Organization of America has a plethora of history and current work that is skipped over on this Wiki page, and the public should be able to access historical documents that we are able to provide. Followthe$cience (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@Followthe$cience: You shouldn't be editing that page or the topic area it is in (including this request). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 23:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 23:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock/vandalism resumed soon after protection expired. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:37, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse from Dominica IPs. Inhale Exhale and Bury Me Alive (album) need the same protection. Binksternet (talk) 00:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Apparent User:Elchezinazo socks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 90.173.233.195 (talk) 02:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The article is currently experiencing a high volume of vandalism and disruption. Immediate protection is requested to prevent further damage. 90.173.233.195 (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Someone has been hijacking certain portions of the Wikipedia page, and changing population figures, as well as other facts that are verifiable, and sourced. TerradiseBC (talk) 02:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Not done Not enough recent activity. Drmies (talk) 02:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
  • TerradiseBC I don't know what you are looking for. I see an IP editor and a new account, but neither of them have any welcome messages or other notes on their talk page. Both are editing and explaining what they are doing. The only one who isn't explaining what they are doing is you. Drmies (talk) 02:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
    • I literally wrote the Wikipedia entry, and have posted numerous comments explaining my edits. The IP editor continues to change population figures, and add in nonsensical edits that quote things like "2024 Census" when there isn't one, and add in figures in the "Population history of Kitimat-Stikine Area E (Thornhill)" table that contradict Census data. The new user — I'm guessing you're referring to JDogBT — has been reverting the IP user's changes, and has posted in the Talk page suggesting that he's adding in incorrect, and misleading statements, in order to further his own agenda. If you fact check what I'm talking about, specifically about population, you'll see what I mean. TerradiseBC (talk) 02:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
      • You asked for semi-protections, and that's what we do here, but fact-checking to see who's right is not what we do. Your last few edits (reverts) are unexplained, and if there is disruption that's one thing we look for. If I look in the history I don't see obvious disruption, and if I look on the talk page I see that the two are talking to each other, but I don't see you there. So no, I don't see any disruption that warrants denying one of those two editors the capacity to edit. If they are hijacking articles and spreading agendas, you should probably start by explaining that to them on their respective talk pages. Drmies (talk) 03:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
        I agree with you on that, but this is a pattern of IP user, and what I can presume is their other account, continuing to change population figures to "5,000+" with no source, and then reverting another editor's reverts. TerradiseBC (talk) 03:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
      • And please don't throw the term "vandalism" around lightly. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Various IPs have repeatedly redirected this page to TF1 since November 2023. GTrang (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - jc37 08:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP jumping editor repeatedly blanking sourced content without explanation or discussion. Escape Orbit (Talk) 07:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - jc37 08:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

BFDI is a good show and i wanna make a Wiki page bout (and is 13 or 15 years old) HendrixanBFDIfan (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

No.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
@Jéské Couriano Good job telling him that. For @HendrixanBFDIfan, BFDI is not allowed on Wikipedia since the topic is not notable for inclusion (See WP:BFDI). Due to persistent abuse, any titles with the phrase "Battle For Dream Island" are on the Title Blacklist and the original article got deleted and Create-Protected since the article was repeatedly created since the topic is not notable for inclusion. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 01:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Not doneFavonian (talk) 06:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated introduction of promotional links. Recent examples: [48][49][50][51][52][53][54]Bri (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Done – OK, so it's PC rather than semi. Favonian (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued socking/block evasion, less than 2 days after the page was last unprotected. Loafiewa (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Recent disruption from LTA socks hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 16:05, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some protection should be added till the next presidential elections happens or till the next president gets elected so till May 2025. AK (talk) 02:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Already pending changes protected, but IPs and new accounts are contributing nothing but vandalism, which often happens several times a day. Entranced98 (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced additions by IPs and new accounts since 12:34, 8 January 2025. Alith Anar 15:19, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Permanent template protection: High-risk template. New CSD template for existing sub-criterion. ToThAc (talk) 23:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Template protectedFavonian (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: User:Hermes_Express. There is a high level of vandalism by the user. The user reverts several changes even after several warnings. The user gives unsourced and low-quality citations and removes several resources aiming to propagate misinformation. The user also adds sources that aren't related to the article. The user keeps changing the page even after several warnings. Adrikshit (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Page was vandalised several times by User:Hermes_Express to propagate misinformation. Several changes were reverted by the user. Adrikshit (talk) 07:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 05:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP-hopping vandal. Other pages affected by this vandal have been protected for a week or so, vandal returns as soon as protection expires. Maybe longer protection would help. — Chrisahn (talk) 07:26, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: They are literally removing content with references ShrimanBhakt (talk) 08:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: vandalising article even after warning Adrikshit (talk) 10:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plasticwonder (talk) 15:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: History of the page being vandalised with rumours and slander directed at a local family, sourced from low quality tabloids who over time have retracted their "stories" or heavily edited them. This detracts from the pages focus being on the house and grounds. SummersRising (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Lectonar, can you look at this again? The user that keeps editing the page only has activity in trying to place slander / rumours into wiki articles about the family that lived there, using "sources" that do not meet Wikipedia's standards. They've had multiple edits rolled back and warred to keep them in both wiki pages (the stately home and the page about the title attached the to home). SummersRising (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined The decline is good, and you did not ping Lectonoar correctly. Bbb23 (talk) 17:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC) And neither did I, Lectonar.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continual addition of unsourced material. Doug Weller talk 16:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2001:4958:24bf:e001::/64 (talk · contribs). Once again p-blocked from the article in question, this time for a month. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 17:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – An ongoing engagement during the Israel-Palestinian conflict that is related to WP:PIA. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: As has become standard with any children's network closing (channel closed on Sunday), IP vandalism trying to change the article to say the network is still on the air by changing from past tense to present tense. Nate (chatter) 20:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent, on-going disruptive editing by anonymous editors, as well as continuous (re)addition of unsourced content. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User keeps replacing "is" with "was" without a reason. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple editors introducing NPOV violations and editing disruptively. Day Creature (talk) 12:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

I think indefinite semi-protection would make sense. The page attracts a lot of silliness by wrestling fans. It had been protected for two days half a year ago. Since the page became unprotected, there has been about one edit per day on average, but I estimate that only 10% of the edits were useful. The rest was vandalism and cleanup. That's a waste of our time. — Chrisahn (talk) 14:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We can reassess after that. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

16 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip editors kept on adding unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 03:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:17, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost immediately after the last page protection period ended, the vandalism of this page began again from several different IPs, adding clearly fake movies that are non-sensical like "Mohamed the Movie". Last protection period was for a month, so I'm requesting indefinite protection this time. λ NegativeMP1 05:37, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 103.100.175.128/25 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Let's see how they take that. Daniel Case (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Seen multiple anonymous edits that are about this event that appear very partisan and inaccurate. Also Kosovo is a protected topic if I am correct. A person of sorts (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Previous protection was for three months. I think longer protection would be in order. — Chrisahn (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP-hopping vandal. Other pages affected by this vandal have been protected for a week or so, vandal returns as soon as protection expires. Maybe longer protection would help. — Chrisahn (talk) 07:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Chrisahn - The above 4 requests (Tom Morello, Slash (musician), Zakk Wylde discography, Zakk Wylde) appear to be about removing the word "best" or adding the word "featured". Can you more fully explain the issue, or is this merely edit-warring? - jc37 08:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
It's a long-term IP-hopping vandal, messing with various stuff. Currently 75.127.12.181. Previous IPs (among others): 103.152.255.235, 190.90.160.164, 130.195.216.22. I think it's a disgruntled blocked user, possibly User:TyMega, who is now trolling these pages. Blocking an IP helps, but not for long, because the vandal returns a few days later with a new IP (VPN). That's why we need page protection. — Chrisahn (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Here the issue does seem to be chronic, and as a BLP I will be logging this one at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit-waring from different sides of the political spectrum and from IP and registered users. Sushidude21! (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of anonymous IP deletion of information Remember (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Guess who's back?. CRBoyer 22:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 In addition, it looks to be one LTA/sockmaster with a bunch of accounts. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – People from various IPs have been arguing against Baalbek being a Hezbollah stronghold without providing any counter-sources to back up their claims. It's been going on for a while now... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:33, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by User:Legende Legende Legende, see since 14:20, 10 November 2024, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Legende Legende Legende. Alith Anar 15:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High risk article, I have already reverted vandalism on it. Requesting pending changes protection. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 16:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Constant unsourced additions from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Petty vandalism by IPs resumed after last protection expired. Subject running for the 2025 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election: recommending protection until March 10. Northern Moonlight 17:19, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last weeks. Xexerss (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP keeps introducing false info, into the lead. Been doing so, for several months. GoodDay (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: WP:CTOPS as IPs continuously vandalizing a specific content(s) of the article after the last protection expired on January 14. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 22:37, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs to be upgraded to extended protected confirmed due to persistent vandalism from autoconfirmed accounts since 00:01, 4 January 2025. Alith Anar 00:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: A months/years long campaign of adding defamatory (rapist, pedo) content and other crude changes, etc. Suggesting a lengthy period of protection this time. signed, Willondon (talk) 00:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – User:Anji19jisa along with some other users frequently attacked this page for a longer perios of time. Rocky Masum (talk) 02:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High visibility contentious template that seems to get routine drive-by IP vandalsim over time. Requesting semi-protection indefinitely. This is not a template that is really in any way regularly edited. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 02:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Full protection needed, edit warring by multiple extended confirmed editors. - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:51, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Arbitration enforcement and a contentious topic. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 03:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism from autoconfirmed accounts 42.113.4.191 (talk) 04:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of the remaining time, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Myners dying in 2022. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should at least be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Dervin dying in 2022. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP-hopping vandal. Previous protection was for a week. I think longer protection would be in order. — Chrisahn (talk) 07:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since PC was imposed there has been one disruptive edit, and that IP has been blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP-hopping vandal. Other pages affected by this vandal have been protected for a week or so, but the vandal returns with a new IP (VPN) as soon as protection expires. Maybe longer protection would help. — Chrisahn (talk) 07:26, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection due to recent IP vandalism over the past few days Reconrabbit 12:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have been more serious three days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High IP vandalism changing boxoffice figures without reliable source and changing the title of the existing source. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I know it's getting a lot of attention right now but I do not see much reverting going on. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 16:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't think we need to shut down every project page that this LTA posts on. At least this one makes it easy to spot the latest IP they're using. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
22:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Financial vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Should be ECP due to being relevant to WP:ARBPIA. Smallangryplanet (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This isn't vandalism, but a content dispute, and you didn't abide by WP:ONUS: "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." — Chrisahn (talk) 21:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Again inflow of ips vandalizing the page (46.112.114.3 and 46.112.92.134, seem to be the same person) Polish kurd (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And those IPs could well be the same person, yes—on a dynamic IP assigned by their ISP. The use of different IPs does not always show intent to deceive.

Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Oops, I did that a while back. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 22:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There were just two edits today and they haven't continued since their level 2 warning. Really, AIV would be better if they keep going.

But, I will leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by same editor at varying I.P addresses. Flat Out (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:100F:B1E8:38BF:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued vandalism; see 1, 2. Happily888 (talk) 02:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Those seem to be the only two incidents. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plasticwonder (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And since it's been nominated for deletion, it would need to be pretty blatant disruption as we usually want to make it possible for editors to do what is necessary to get it kept if they want. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying! Plasticwonder (talk) 04:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I know talk pages are rarely protected, but this talk page has been a constant target of nonsensical and disruptive editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism Point of Presencetalk 10:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism 3 weeks after last page protection expired. –twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 06:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 09:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Far too popular with the socks with disruptive mass changes/multiple changes. Zinnober9 (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page has been attacked several times, by several IP and newly created users. The intention and reason is clear that the topic area the page belongs to is pretty contentious. Requesting a permanent semi protection for the artcle. Imperial[AFCND] 07:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:43, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This article has recently been targeted by vandals. I request that the article be given immediate protection until July 2025 to prevent any further vandalism from happening. Galaxybeing (talk) 08:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Footballnerd2007talk11:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user has been disrupting this page since 2022, with continual additions of unsourced trivia, WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE and WP:NOTDIRECTORY sections. They have been reverted by me and several others, but always return after a while to readd it anyway. Valenciano (talk) 12:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:45, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taffer😊 💬(they/she) 13:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Vbbanaz05 (talk) 14:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - Ratnahastin (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Santos dying in 2022. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined as you have not discussed this with the protecting administrator. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Benedict dying in 2022. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined as you have not discussed this with the protecting administrator. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:14, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to add more information regarding his legacy. KiddKrazy2 (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Edit requests should take the form, for example, of change X to Y. What specific edit would you like to be made? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Saddam Hussein is not protected. Favonian (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Continued sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! — Chrisahn (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. A user is persistently removing all the refs and added informations about kajri. Aman8188 (talk) 17:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

 Requesting immediate archiving... — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Carter dying in 2022. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined as you have not discussed with the protecting administrator. As it says at the top of the page when you edit, this section is for removing or reducing the protection level of a page if the protecting admin is inactive or you have already asked them. Please stop posting requests like this when the administrator is active and you have not asked them first. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
I have had dozens upon dozens of requests approved without the need to ask the protecting administrator. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Please follow the directions moving forward; the requirement to do so is highlighted in bright yellow both at the top of this page and at the top of the instructions in the editing window.-- Ponyobons mots 18:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: There has been an increasing influx of vandalism from unregistered users. I request the implementation of semi-protection for this page. ItsFeL (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., per WP:GS/PAGEANT. Daniel Case (talk) 21:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopper from Russia keeps adding unsourced information about Sony making a deal with StudioCanal. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs changing height parameter after protection lapse. Nswix (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent misgendering of a nonbinary BLP. Funcrunch (talk) 21:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IPs are repeatedly removing sourced content from the lead section, along with reliable sources. Aryan{Talk} 17:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced additions by IP addresses since 13:37, 12 December 2024. Alith Anar 18:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and WP:SPA vandalism (removing material without explanation). The page was just protected for the same reason but now that the protection is gone, the issue has continued. GuardianH (talk) 21:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocked and anon socks. Wikishovel (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editor posing under multiple IP's keeps restoring same disruptive edits. Armegon (talk) 19:05, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Article has been the subject of extensive edits by a user claiming to be the owner (now extending back over a considerable period in time). These edits are frequently having to be reverted. A user similarly self-identifying as the owner was blocked for 3 years back in April 2024, here [55]. Issue is currently back at COIN, here [56]. Maybe time for some form of page protection to prevent further sock puppetry / block evasion. Axad12 (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. As the admin who made that 3-year block, I am shall we say rather displeased that this "person" has not taken the hint. So the hint will have to take them. Daniel Case (talk) 22:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

17 January 2025

Reason: Repeated IP edit warring and parts of the article falling under WP:ARBPIA. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP has been blocked since it last disrupted the article several weeks ago. Daniel Case (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High traffic and common amounts of IP vandalism. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most of the IP edits being reverted look to me like good-faith attempts to contribute. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent edit warring in the last few days by a new user. Insanityclown1 (talk) 19:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and new account User_talk:Adarsh_Chinnadan making same disruptive changes of boxoffice number without citing reliable source. Please protect page. IPs and new account have been warned but continue to vandalize again. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous style-warring and attempts to remove the most-common definition of the Droop quota by an unregistered editor. (Who has kept this up from many different IPs.) IP has repeatedly ignored attempts at explaining this on both the article talk and in a conversation I had with them on my user talk. (The Droop quota is sometimes defined vk+1 and sometimes v+1k+1; user keeps removing or obfuscating the first definition.) Update: unsurprisingly, despite previous decline of page protection because the user hadn't edited for a week or two, they've gone right back to it within 2 days, as they have for the past year—Special:Diff/1269731590.– Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This exchange between the two of you is complex enough that I am not comfortable granting even pending changes on that basis. I also see very little evidence of this user being reverted on this page or others. Yes, I'd prefer that they engage more the warnings they've gotten, but there's no requirement that they do, and I should note that they have a clean block record. This is the sort of dispute that needs consensus behind its resolution before we can sanction an editor over it, IMO. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. has a moderate to a high level of vandalism throughout its history. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 21:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: New user EvandorX created on 16 January, who has only edited this page, is performing large changes to improve the bio and tone down a very long list of (recent) allegations of scientific misconduct (despite their edits, the allegations appear serious and have not been justified I believe). Some of the edits are fine I think, others less. Lots of reverting happening and typos they keep adding back. Happy not have access anymore as IP user as long as more experienced editors can have a look and ensure useful information stays there. Generally not very convinced that this page meets NPOV either, but that's another issue. 81.109.86.251 (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined, protection is not going to hep in this case. You would need to discuss with the user, if they are not responsive ask for sanctions against the user. Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, will do! 81.109.86.251 (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. PopPunkFanBoi69 (talk) 01:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP edit 1 month ago. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Even shorter TLDR - temporary semiprotection Talkpage spam (mostly IPs) repeatedly making edit requests/new discussions about Trump's new picture. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 02:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Longer reason: See Talk:Donald Trump § Duplicate edit requests/discussions for the discussion I opened on this issue. Long story short, ever since Trump's "official" inaugural photo was released, there has been a plethora of users attempting to get it replaced/added on many pages - the most prevalent being his page, for obvious reasons. The issue is that there is no evidence whatsoever this image is a free image, and there is actually evidence that the image is non-free (either copyrighted, or barred by a NC restriction). See, for example, the current deletion request on Commons. For historical reference, this also happened in 2017 - Trump "hijacked" a private photographer's image (including posting it on whitehouse.gov claiming it was public domain after his inauguration) without their permission, and the photographer confirmed to VRT/OTRS on Commons (confirmed by multiple VRT members in that discussion in 2017) that they never permitted such. It seems likely that the same is happening here, as a user on Commons has claimed that they spoke to the photographer who wants a NC restriction on this image.

Sorry for the length of this request, but TLDR: there's tons of talk page spam (edit requests or otherwise) from mostly IP editors trying to get this almost-certainly-copyrighted image replaced in his page. I know talkpages are rarely protected, but I'm requesting temporary (maybe a week, to cover the inauguration itself) semiprotection of the talkpage to see if it may help. Any alternative ideas are welcome on the talkpage itself. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 02:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

As one of those dealing with the problem firsthand, I'm mixed. In my view, the copyright issue isn't really relevant here; that's just background. Rather, it's the recent onslaught of drive-bys who (1) are misusing the edit request facility because they are too fucking lazy to read the information put in front of them during the edit request path (a continuous problem not unique to this situation), and (2) for some unfathomable reason assume they are the first to think of proposing the new image, so don't bother to look for an existing discussion before edit-requesting. (At the Trump article and other well-attended articles, the edit request facility is always far more trouble than it's worth—probably 95%+ of edit requests at Trump are "not done", and the other 5%− could just as easily use the normal "New section" path—but that's a different discussion.) Ultimately, I think the question is how much useful contribution is the ATP getting recently from IPs and brand-new accounts, and I think the answer is not a lot. I guess I'd lean toward supporting temp semi. ―Mandruss  06:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am normally loath to protect article talk-pages, but we need to get some respite on this one here. My hope is that it will somewhat die down aftter inauguration has taken place. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page protection for the article just expired few hours ago, and it appears the sockpuppeteer behind two recently blocked accounts, is restoring their unreferenced edits once again. Hotwiki (talk) 03:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 06:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated WP:SUSPECT violations following his recent arrest: [57] [58] [59] [60] [61]. Badbluebus (talk) 03:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP Users. Kurogaga (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 08:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by I.P editors. Flat Out (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Significant portion of edits are either vandalism calling the subject of the article a scam or replacing the founder's name with Hindi swear words, or reverts of said vandalism. Requesting 6 months to 1 year of protection. Tube·of·Light 08:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 09:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Continued BLP violations/vandalism after previous protection expired. – Recoil16 (talk) 05:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:12, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 22:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 54rt678 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalised once in one month. Sdrqaz (talk) 08:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An ip address mislabeling the film as a 'slasher' even though no reliable film sources label it as such. (note: this is my first time using Twinkle). Clammodest (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This last occurred in November, which is too long ago to consider protection now. Please report again if it recurs. Sdrqaz (talk) 08:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Bluethricecreamman (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2001:0:0:0:0:0:0:0/20 (talk · contribs). Partially, from the article. This takes care of most of the recent disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 08:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Footballnerd2007talk10:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

In paragraph 4 is this assertion: "In private, White House staffers and Biden's family took measures to conceal and compensate for apparent declines in his acuity." There is no source cited for this consequential claim. The "apparent decline" of mental acuity in Biden, a lifetime stutterer, is a topic of contention. Rnperry (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done Removed. We must source EVERYTHING, especially in BLPs. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

What? Nothing is directly sourced in the entire lead for that article, it generally follows the practice of citations in body, not lead, from MOS:LEADCITE. There is however, an entire section in that article that backs up that point. Does the OP think that:
A tight-knit group of select staffers and Biden's family emerged during his presidency that insulated him from others. Biden's staff routinely adapted his schedule and activities to accommodate his needs as he aged and conceal signs of declining cognitive ability. White House staffers took on unusually strong roles as gatekeepers for Biden, limiting meetings with cabinet secretaries, lawmakers, and other officials, and restricting the information made available to him. Events Biden attended were tightly scripted and limited.
was because he had a stutter? There are multiple sources backing it up, from the NYT, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and Axios. KiharaNoukan (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Not all of those sources seem entirely reliable (one's reporting on a poll, another calls the endlessly-harped story "underreported"), and the sentence in question is not very neutral. Keep the rest of the paragraph, just remove that. It was fine before it was added. And frankly, some outlets need their reliability re-assessed. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
I've put it back for now, with a "disputed" tag. In the meantime, we really need to re-evaluate the reliability of sources in regard to US politics, especially given how the owners of some outlets have inserted themselves in the decision-making process. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 09:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Edit warring again shortly after PP expired Adakiko (talk) 11:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Oluwamoruranyo (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of one more year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request that... in the highest grossing films by year section , the highest grossing film of 1986 should be edited , because it is Muddat instead of Karma.

Source : https://www.imdb.com/list/ls561310428/ ) . ZemonZeh (talk) 08:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined See WP:IMDB. Lectonar (talk) 08:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm taking a university course on Wikipedia edits. As I study translatology (en-cs), I would like to ask for permission to create a czech version of this page. SarSchmi (talk) 09:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done@SarSchmi: you will have to contact the administrators on the Czech Wikipedia, which is outside the jurisdiction of us on the English language one. Favonian (talk) 09:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Betoota44 (talk) 00:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 10:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have protected the article for 2 weeks, though. Lectonar (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@Lectonar: I didn't get it. I asked for semi protection (time limited or indefinite any) and I got one, what did you decline? ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 11:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@ExclusiveEditor: You asked for protection of the talk-page of the article; this I did decline. Lectonar (talk) 11:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Oh, I've just used twinkle once before this to RPP. Thanks for protecting the page. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 11:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Change the word 'Les Wanyka' to 'Nova Flow Boyz' VDJSMART (talk) 12:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Remember to include reliable sources for your claim. Actually, the article isn't protected, but if you change the name with supplying sources, it's bound to be reverted. Favonian (talk) 12:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: To prevent edit warring between a me and another user, while 3rd opinion is being sought EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I suppose you two are reasonable human beings, and so should be able to refrain from editing back and forth while a solution is being sought. Lectonar (talk) 12:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request semi-protection for redirect. Frequently reverted to article by IP-hopping vandal. MimirIsSmart (talk) 16:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Joe Biden declared that the amendment has been ratified. This has no actual effect of law, but the page has already seen - and will likely see - incorrect additions. Requesting temporary semi-protection to reduce the risk of incoming edit conflicts . Toa Nidhiki05 16:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:12, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent in Additional of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — 64.18.11.5 (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Excuse me everyone this request protection page article is not protected yet can anyone protect this page Jesse Winker please they continued to add unsources information it needs to done by the way. Pipetttttttt (talk) 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vbbanaz05 (talk) 14:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unsourced and badly sourced additions [62][63][64][65]. This article has a long history of being protected due to BLP violations. Badbluebus (talk) 17:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term persistent vandalism by IP editors. Apocheir (talk) 23:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request semi-protection, regular IP vandalism of high profile BLP. Orange sticker (talk) 12:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of racist vandalism. Spaceplaces (talk) 16:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done. Article is already indef semi and I don't see enough vandalism from autoconfirmed accounts to upgrade the protection level. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated nonsense vandalism (quadruple-second cousin twice removed, etc.) from IP hopping user. MrOllie (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Being the star of one of Netflix's biggest shows (and a massive meme), I believe this page should have indefinite semi-protection - or at the very least, long-term semi protection for at least 1 year, given that the third season of Squid Game is due to release later this year. jolielover♥talk 14:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by IP editor has resumed since protection expired 12/31/2024. Geoff | Who, me? 14:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: A dozen instances of vandalism from different IPs over the last two days. Iiii I I I (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request for new page protection: continuous unmotivated changes and acts of vandalism by unregistered users. Report already made in the past Podgoričano (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep removing source requests. The Banner talk 14:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. (Babysharkboss2) 14:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent addition of unsourced speculation. Page was protected for a week but bad edits are continuing after protection expired. Wburrow (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

18 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content increased by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor is disrupting article with POV and modern politics. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent removal of sourced materials by various South Korean IPs. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 10:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced information BlameRuiner (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: BLP who is getting recent attention for criticizing US support of the Israel-Hamas war during a press conference and being dragged out. There have been multiple IP vandalism attempts [66] [67] [68] in the past 12 hours. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This seems to be primarily coming from one IP who has not vandalized after their most recent warning. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 16:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism on this BLP since 05:14, 2 January 2025. Alith Anar 19:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: The last couple days on this page look like a vandalism free-for-all. I'm not sure what's happening with this particular article, but counter-vandalism isn't winning. Perhaps a few days of protection until it passes?. Mlkj (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – presidents cannot unilaterally declare constitutional amendments: see recent edits. Will120 (talk) 20:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 22:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 22:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: add semi protection Filmijhankar (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content regarding a transfer which has not been completed yet. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: user after being blocked, created new account and now continues to disrupt article. Adrikshit (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Mirzapurawadh (talk · contribs) blocked by Girth Summit. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism, false claims. It's Berlusconi's private network. gtp (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP edits claiming incorrectly that he has a new role. Seasider53 (talk) 01:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and name changing, as can be seen in the edit history Surayeproject3 (talk) 23:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism and low level of constructive edits. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:02, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. C F A 01:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs being WP:SNEAKY with credits. Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. While there are several users causing problems, the most recent was from a IPv6/64 range that has been blocked several times in the past. Reblocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Entranced98 (talk) 01:06, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The article meets WP:GNG. I have also moved it to Santosh Bhartiya (journalist). Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 01:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Unprotected. JzG is no longer an administrator. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Single IP causing the problem. However, if issue recurs, re-report for possible further action. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:06, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Ratnahastin (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 06:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: tons of people have been changing the pronouns to he/him, which is against wiki policy. Even more egregiously, people are blatantly adding their own opinion to the article that trans women are men. Regardless of how you feel on this, this is completely inappropriate for the wiki and has no place here. its been a consistent problem in the edit history and protection would be well suited Leah2356 (talk) 03:46, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persisting in changing the name of the island back to its defunct old name. GraziePrego (talk) 12:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Question: What is the WP:COMMONNAME of the island? Lectonar (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
The common name is K’gari. All results when googling “Fraser Island” show reliable sources that refer to the island as either just K’gari or “K’gari (Fraser Island). The name was recently changed so there are some older sources still using the old name, but practically all new sources use the correct new name of K’gari. Example from the Queensland gov website and from UNESCO GraziePrego (talk) 07:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
@GraziePrego: Please see above question. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sock puppetry (by IP-hopping) is the reason for this semi-edit-page-protection. If the anonymous editors begin discussing the article title, this will fall to be treated as a content dispute and semi-edit-pp may no longer be appropriate. arcticocean ■ 17:05, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. While most of the disruption is coming from one user in particular, there are more diffs with disruptive content added today further back in the history. Relativity ⚡️ 04:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 06:39, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism, IP is claiming non-vandal edits as vandalism and removing content. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 05:40, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — Newslinger talk 06:45, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

In 'sexual assault and alleged misdemeanors section': change "made her perform oral sex while his penis had urine on it, causing her to vomit, which he then made her eat" to "forced her to perform oral sex and other abusive acts" - young kids don't need that visual!! Older readers know to go to references for the gory details 2600:4040:52F7:C600:941C:5C8:8333:5E11 (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done We are not censored, but that entire sentence lacks a source and so I have removed it wholesale. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:39, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:23, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 2 month. Adnan (ᵀᵃˡᵏ) 09:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 19:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Per Talk:Raegan_Revord#They/Them_Pronouns there is some unconfirmed social media thing going on, and people are editing the article because of it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Checking to see if protection is necessary. arcticocean ■ 17:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. arcticocean ■ 17:24, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: There has been a large amount of IP vandalism at this page in the last 48 hours. Requesting a period of page protection to hopefully bring and end to it. Shrug02 (talk) 15:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:48, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism. Pelmeen10 (talk) 00:23, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Exceptional uptick in disruption by new/sub-500 accounts in last 24 hours. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with this. Ymblanter (talk) 22:23, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High vandalism level... how is this page not protected? NYPD (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2025 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.129.153.161 (talkcontribs)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. arcticocean ■ 17:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple disruptive IP edits over the past two weeks. -- Alex_21 TALK 22:03, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

19 January 2025

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Nswix (talk) 02:59, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined, seems to have stopped. Ymblanter (talk) 22:25, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – edit-warring restoration by anon sock of unsourced and redirected article. Wikishovel (talk) 09:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. C F A 22:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. PC protection until April. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Any reason we can't just semi-protect it? All the LTA vandalism is clogging up the page history. There hasn't been a constructive edit in months. C F A 01:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP-disruptions. Jingiby (talk) 05:39, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 06:46, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism over the past 3 weeks in the box office section. Continuous addition of unsourced or poorly sourced box office data. Also updating collections when updated numbers have not been published by any sources. Requesting semi protection for about at least 2 weeks. BhikhariInformer (talk) 08:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Addition of long plot and also addition of lengthy information in cast section by IPs again and again. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 11:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS, not for any content reasons but just because of how long this has been going on. Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive editing to this article after a screenshot of its infobox appeared on Twitter. See: [69]. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 12:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – unsourced and disruptive edits by IPs and new accounts. Sid95Q (talk) 14:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 07:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Oriental_Aristocrat. - Ratnahastin (talk) 12:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Note to admin: the OP has to explain why they are redirecting an article edited by multiple editors. Also, I see it was created by some editor (Mfarazbaig) when they weren't under any block or ban sanction. 39.34.145.168 (talk) 13:05, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. How many editors worked on the article, and who created and whether they were blocked at the time, has no bearing on whether an article is redirectified or not. Daniel Case (talk) 07:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: So you are saying the article is not notable? The redirection is done entirely based on some non-existent policy and that's okay. 39.34.146.22 (talk) 07:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
See WP:INVOLVE. Daniel Case (talk) 07:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
That's an essay. Please state a policy to justify your action. 39.34.146.22 (talk) 07:28, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 16:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP has been persistently trying to add a non-notable building to the infobox without any discussion. This has been ongoing for several months. See examples here:

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 17:35, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 07:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, request of more extended or permanent protection Aldebaran69 (talk) 17:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS per BLPGROUP. Daniel Case (talk) 07:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 02:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP users vandalizing page today. Wburrow (talk) 18:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:33, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term IP vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Short periods of protection, like the 3 days last month, have little protective effect. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:45, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring from newly-extended confirmed users, with inappropriate and to some level dubious info about other people at a BLP that is currently one of the most-visited on WP. Users ignore warnings and discussion requests, one petulantly. Kingsif (talk) 00:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Editors keep updating in Vance's infobox, that Jon Husted is Vance's successor as US Senator. Husted is still Ohio lieutenant governor. GoodDay (talk) 15:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article's already at ECP anyway. The only place we can go from here, really, is 1RR. Do you think that's necessary? Daniel Case (talk) 07:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page becoming a time sink, IMO.   Aloha27  talk  18:37, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Ramihasib (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 07:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 54rt678 (talk) 19:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined We don't just do that. Daniel Case (talk) 07:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Highly disruptive vandal which uses these IP addresses 68.33.255.195 and 2601:147:4700:2000:b8d3:bbb5:f93:3e37 (same person). User has a history of this behaviour since last year, which led to a temporary block on another page and temp. protection of 2 others. I do not wish to edit war. The user has done this on at least 6 other pages which I have observed and/or contributed to. Warnings and attempts to discuss have been exhausted, therefore I am requesting temp. protection and an absolute ban on the user. Xaymacan (talk) 03:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Daniel Case the vandal which I complained to you about a couple weeks ago is back at it. This user 68.33.255.195 was blocked from the Jamaican cuisine page by another Admin. Last December you temporarily protected Rice and peas from the same user who uses these IP addresses 68.33.255.195 and 2601:147:4700:2000:b8d3:bbb5:f93:3e37. Below I saw where he/she has also requested protection of the same page, by falsely accusing me of what he/she has been doing. I've exhausted attempts to discuss the issue and warnings, but to no avail. I look forward to some effective intervention from you or another admin. Thanks. Xaymacan (talk) 05:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Rsjaffe I've been using the article's talk page and even the user's talk page to come to a consensus by discussing the issue, but the user has never responded until now. I even asked other editors to chime in. I appreciate that here is not the place to discuss it, but the user which has a history of vandalism has no intention of actually resolving the matter. The only thing that has worked in the past is temp. protection of the pages or temp. block of the said user's IP address (as was the case in early January). While it might seem like a content dispute which in essence it is, this user tends to follow the pages I contribute to and remove/change content. There is a clear pattern of stalking, vandalism and edit warring, which I have been enduring for the last few months. It is also done to other editors on certain pages, and the edit summaries that they write and claims below are false. This is creating a disruptive and hostile environment, all for the sake of writing and improving articles. I tend to request the protection to avoid engaging in edit warring. By the way, moments after you denied the request, the user returned to the page with random citations, including the book source I provided on the talk page to support the distinction which had been previously discussed by other editors. He/she has been wantonly adding sources (including my book source) which actually do not support the sentences where they had been placed. Xaymacan (talk) 06:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 68.33.255.195 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – It looks like the person behind this indefinitely blocked account is now evading that block and continuing to disrupt its talk page using IP addresses. — AP 499D25 (talk) 23:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Jpgordon. Favonian (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism, left unremoved for hours, following recent controversial NFL playoff match that Martin officiated Toffeenix (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I don't want this page being protected....... . 113.165.167.192 (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Thanks for demonstrating the continued need for keeping the redirect protected. Favonian (talk) 11:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 20:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. This page has a lengthy protection history, most recently for 2 years but previously for 1, and expired. I feel that this page should be indefinintly to prevent vandalism. Thank You. 50.100.44.204 (talk) 00:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal started harassing me on my talkpage after I reverted their edits. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 02:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shadow4dark (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 02:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Salmoonlight (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

20 January 2025

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – This page suffers from persistent vandalism or unconstructive edits. This is the second time I have personally seen this in RC patrols. This article should probably be considered for permanent protection. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 20:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Now with 16,000 transclusions, used by {{Cite wikisource}} which itself is TE-protected. — hike395 (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator MusikBot II. ECP, since last June. And there have been only two non-problematic edits since then. Daniel Case (talk) 23:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A LTA keeps reporting User:CFA over and over using multiple accounts for a false claim of edit warring on a deleted article. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 22:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't like having to semi-protect this page, but in this case this LTA hasn't learned the lesson yet. Daniel Case (talk) 23:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editor. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Repeat IP vandalism 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 22:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Persistent Vandalism. 54rt678 (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Current permanent EC protection seems ok. Minimal vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs and new accounts with inappropriate names have recently vandalized this article. Given the similarity of the recent editing behaviour, could this be grounds for an SPI to be opened too?. Entranced98 (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Trump inauguration fallout. Entranced98 (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary cascade protection: It is a protected photo of the day and it will be main in under 48 hours 54rt678 (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Already covered by cascading protection of all mainpage elements. Daniel Case (talk) 23:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and repeated disruptive edits compromising the accuracy and neutrality of the article. 5.29.97.182 (talk) 13:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent sock vandalism over the past week. Generalrelative (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it was a single episode of several socks that stopped a couple of days ago. Not chronic. Report again if it resumes. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:RUSUKR. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 22:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And I don't see much nexus with the war. Daniel Case (talk) 23:22, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have a non English editor. Let's lock up the page see if we got to translator and them to talk. Moxy🍁 00:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – For three days straight. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 02:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 02:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: ARBPIA. Split off from Timeline of the Israel–Hamas war (27 November 2024 – 18 January 2025). Borgenland (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 02:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Leonidlednev (TCL) 01:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Also this article is constantly being vandalized by IPs. This article should be protected urgently. Kajmer05 (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-Protection: Disruptive editing of IP address and non-login account. Please, I request to protection this article. Panda Arun (talk) 05:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism69.193.154.106 (talk) 02:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism69.193.154.106 (talk) 02:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 05:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP editing that's been amplified since September, even spreading to the Simple English Wikipedia Surayeproject3 (talk) 06:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS per WP:CT/KURD , As for simplewiki, you'll have to request action from either the admins there or a steward. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. moderate to high level of vandalism throughout its history, according to redwarn. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 07:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 08:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism by caste fanatics. I had reverted the spam edits made by fanatics. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 08:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 23:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. GnocchiFan (talk) 23:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Presistent uncited infobox editing by IPs. UtoD 08:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  09:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  09:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism over the past week - various IPs claiming (without source) that this footballer is Malaysian, which is not backed by his former club's profile. Iiii I I I (talk) 09:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page has become subject to edit warring by various IP editors and is in a resulting state of general instability. Request semi-protection to alleviate this. BarntToust 15:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent edit warring by a blocked new user now resorting to a sock account. Possibly PAs used, but I don't speak nursery-talk. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 15:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP adresses keeps changing the pronouns used for the subject to "she/her" Trade (talk) 19:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. High amount of vandalism and BLP violations Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Disruptive editing , edit warring, WP:IDHT and zero participation on talkpage by autoconfirmed accounts over slurs specific to India , Pakistan and Afghanistan topic , please protect the page under WP:ARBIPA. - Ratnahastin (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Vandalism and unsourced changes to the BLP article. MŠLQr (talk) 18:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – String of recent vandalism. Amigao (talk) 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page per WP:CT/AP. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – previously protected, returned to IP vandalism (including revdellable content) instantly. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 18:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Constant target of vandalism (and now socking), requesting longer protection. TylerBurden (talk) 20:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:NOTFORUM started again after the previous protection expired. Some IPs are treating the talk page as if we're Amazon Support. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 20:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Page covers disputed and politically sensitive history surrounding Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa (both ARBPIA protected), and is currently subject to POV and disruptive editing. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Page covers disputed and politically sensitive history surrounding Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa (both ARBPIA protected), and is currently subject to POV and disruptive editing. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Someone has been changing the birth date of this fictitious character without supplying a reliable source. This is often done from a different IP address each time. Anita5192 (talk) 23:22, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. unconstructive edits. 50.100.44.204 (talk) 00:27, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:A5B5:5300:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous IPs Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 11:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 109.173.147.169 (talk · contribs) blocked by Rsjaffe. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: From January 13 to 19, IP submits statements without citations despite being reverted. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 12:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I gave them their first warning. Newer users often don't realize why they're being reverted, or even that they are. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple IP link/reference removal. Possible disruptive edits are from an IP hopper. MysticCipher87(alt-account) (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have gotten to a level 2 warning with this user. We'll see what happens, and if we get past 4 we will block the /64. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, IP(s) have been warned multiple times about not adding unsourced false information and continues to add it. Multiple IPs have been adding it but I suspect they're the same person because it's all the same edit. Di (they-them) (talk) 15:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2001:448A:2061:AE22:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing after previous page protection expired. HorrorLover555 (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A04:4A43:950F:F300:0:0:0:0/56 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 21:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined We don't just do that. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. user hijacking to promote spam DACartman (talk) 23:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Hrithikavena (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely as a spam-only account. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flat Out (talk) 02:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A01:4B00:D10A:6700:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. I have also left a CTOPS notice on the talk page per WP:CT/HORN Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has recently started being vandalised, probably as a symptom of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vvrsjd. SunloungerFrog (talk) 13:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People from various IPs have been editing this page (even after it was protected) to talk about how they got hacked or they hacked someone else. The comments have been irrelevant, and I believe the only way to stop this is if the page was indefinitely semi-protected... OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by IP editors started again as soon as temporary protection lifted. Probably needs temp protection for an extended period. Geoff | Who, me? 15:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 07:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – As previous protection: ongoing block evasion by User:Bigboss19923. Nobody else has been editing this obscure article. Belbury (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Change the lead paragrpah, and subsequent infobox to talk about his inaugration as US president Arav 13:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined I have no doubt this will be done almost exactly at noon EST on 20 January 2025. Lectonar (talk) 13:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

21 January 2025

Reason: Frequent unilateral page moves. The title on this delete request is 2025 TikTok refugee crisis, someone moved the page to 2025 TikTok–REDnote migration and the talk page is Talk:2025 TikTok–REDnote mass migration. Queen Douglas DC-3 (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

This might not need protection but needs a fix. I'm not knowledgeable about this so I've posted it here. Queen Douglas DC-3 (talk) 05:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined per our conversation about this on my talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 06:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of undue weight, not news material. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: I request semi-protecting this page again, this time permanently. The subject is prone to vandalism due to his controversies in recent years, and the recent events do not help either. The page has been temporarily semi-protected a few times but the problem still persists. Vgsa001 (talk) 12:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive editing. HorrorLover555 (talk) 12:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. As you last tried to do two weeks ago. Since this is a dispute over sourcing, you might want to bring in some editors who specialize in that to look at it. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request for semi-protectionfor atleast 6 months. High level of repeated IP and new account vandalism. Hbanm (talk) 13:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article barely edited at all, one disruptive edit in about 6 months. Lectonar (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit warring over infobox image. Noah, BSBATalk 17:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:1RR. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
I enforced 1RR (and will log it now), I do not think the protection is needed at this point. Ymblanter (talk) 22:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 18:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/AP Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since Gulf of Mexico is protected this page has been getting spillover from the "Gulf of America" crowd. I see at least four separate accounts adding in the proposed name in the last day. Rusalkii (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP along with WP:CRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inevitable vandalism given today's news. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since 1 December, a very persistent IP user, using about a dozen different IPs, has added the name of a non-notable individual to multiple sections of this list article. They have been particularly active during this past week; there is one unrelated, constructive IP edit since 15 Jan, the rest of the IP edits are all the same namedropping spam. bonadea contributions talk 20:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Template protection: High-risk template. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: change hasnt been made official Legzxy (talk) 21:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Doc Strange (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of massive amounts of unsourced fancruft by IP addresses since 17:55, 10 December 2024. Alith Anar 21:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Hello, IP user (46.112.80.216) continues to persistently remove valuable information from the lead of this article which summarizes this Lithuanian origin noble family's struggle for the independence of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and its crucial role in preserving the Grand Duchy of Lithuania as a separate state in the 16th and 17th centuries. Edits where this IP user (46.112.80.216) removed valuable content from the lead of the article: 1, 2, 3. In a short period of time this IP user removed the content three times already and by ignoring another experienced user Flat Out's request to stop doing this he performed the 3rd removal of content (see warning to him by user Flat Out here: 4), so clearly this IP user will not stop by himself. Consequently, I request administrators intervention with protection of this article in order to prevent further disruption by this IP user. -- Pofka (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Apparent IP vandalism [73][74][75]. Page eligible under WP:GS/PAGEANTS. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:22, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 23:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Some vandalism persisting since previous period of semi-protection expired.

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse. NightWolf1223 <Howl at meMy hunts> 23:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: No one edits it, 104.33.106.81 (talk) 21:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) No one edits it? You definitely are not correct. Every Wikipedia page receives at least one edit every so often. MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) This is clear data to the contrary, people DO edit the page, and the four edits this year are evidence enough to argue against any lowering. Two Extended-Confirmed editors disruptively blanking the page for "nothing-ness" and restoring a moment later? I can't imagine the disruption of shit edits if the page protection were to be lowered. Zinnober9 (talk) 21:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined Not a valid reason for lowering protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

include "convicted felon" in the first sentence of description and last sentence of introduction, as well as details of conviction to be added in general. available sources: public court announcements/ various media Mystique9558 (talk) 13:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined There's an ongoing discussion at Talk:Donald Trump#Proposal to supersede consensus #50 which hasn't been closed yet. Lectonar (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Change part of the final sentence in the third paragraph from "becoming the second president in U.S. history following Grover Cleveland to serve to nonconsecutive terms." to "becoming the second president in U.S. history following Grover Cleveland to serve two nonconsecutive terms." Phyxiseagle (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

 Already done – Muboshgu (talk) 21:11, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Done. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request that... (Simply a factual edit/addition) "Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is a convicted felon, a American politician, media personality, and businessman who has served as the 47th president of the United States since 2025. ) . 64.121.234.225 (talk) 20:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Declined See two sections above. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite Full Protection: High level of persistent edit warring (vandalism). CricketXP (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't think full protection is needed, semi protection has always been enough to stop the LTA. Nobody (talk) 06:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent unconstructive edits from various IP editors. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 04:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP edit warring re addition of non notable awards with no citations QubeChiba (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism SatDis (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:14, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Longer protection is preferable, every time it lapses, it just picks back up again. Nswix (talk) 05:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Innacurate edits/maliciously made edits of Justin Chart's wikipedia page by user Rift. Label was changed from "Universal Music/records" to "Chart records" which is a defunct label. This page needs protection as asked by Justin Chart to preserve his prestige and works accurate. It is currently in semi protection and it should be fully protected. Angelbbkira (talk) 02:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's been considerable edit warring from both IPs and newish accounts as consequence of Trump's inauguration. TarnishedPathtalk 06:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks TarnishedPathtalk 07:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 06:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry that this is happening and I hope this helps. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:16, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Rapid editing conflict due to recent political events. Atmois (talk) 09:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IPs keep changing his cause of death to "Homicide", even thouogh RSs say "Suicide", IPs cite no reliable sources. Possibly related to online 'conspiracy theories' [76]. Very few watchers on the page, it's just been me reverting them for almost a week. Wikiuser815 (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 10:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page has been fully protected from creation since 2007, which was a very long time ago. I don't know why it should have permanent full protection for almost 18 years, that's just overkill. Anyways I wanted to do something with this category, connect it with Category:State-sponsored terrorism, either as a super-category or at least a category redirect. So yes, may someone please unprotect this page? AHI-3000 (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined No longer exists. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
@Dr vulpes: The request is to undo a creation protection, which is still present on the title. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Uggg thank you @Jéské Couriano, I'm still getting my bearings after a wiki-break and some nasty antibiotics. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I sympathise. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request protection for the Wikipedia page [Kundalpur Jain Temple (Bade Baba)] due to persistent vandalism and misinformation being added by certain individuals. The temple is a highly significant religious site for followers of the Digambar sect of Jainism, yet the page has repeatedly been altered with incorrect information, likely motivated by sectarian bias.

Nature of the Issue

1.Misinformation on Managing Body: The temple is managed by Shri Digambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Kundalpur Public Trust, but vandals have changed this to Shri Shwetambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Kundalpur Public Trust, which is factually incorrect.

2.Religious and Cultural Sensitivity: The temple holds immense importance for the Digambar Jain community. The repeated alterations appear to stem from hate or jealousy, which disrespects the faith and beliefs of millions.

Evidence of Vandalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bade_Baba_Temple&diff=1270028436&oldid=1268410418

16:28, 9 January 2025 User12231

15:40, 17 January 2025 Uts v Jain

Request for Protection

Given the sensitivity of the topic and the repeated vandalism, I kindly request:

1. Semi-protection: Restrict edits to registered and confirmed users.

2. Long-term protection: Given the likelihood of continued attempts at misinformation, I request protection for an extended period.

This will help ensure that the article maintains its accuracy and neutrality, in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Protecting this page would not only prevent further disruption but also respect the sentiments of the Jain community, particularly the Digambar sect.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if further details or evidence are needed.

Sincerely,

Anonymous 92.99.127.127 (talk) 12:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Forgiving the format and length here, you do realize that you will be unable to edit the article if it gets semi-protected? Daniel Case (talk) 07:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Week long edit warring by 2 parties. Reported at ANI here. Tarlby (t) (c) 18:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see revision history. article is being terrorized by an IP making the same edits over and over again for years. FMSky (talk) 11:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough disruption for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed after last protect expired. Multiple IPs, likely same person, copying article into its talk page. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. CRBoyer 00:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:08, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - Requesting 90 days of semi protection, repeated entries (in particular IP entries) of Trump's inauguration despite consensus that the inauguration of world leaders is not notable enough FactsheetPete (talk) 07:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Have an IP changing colours dispite set colours and a map with same colours. Trying to talk to them to no avail User talk:2806:108E:18:843A:4893:1F52:B270:E194. Moxy🍁 07:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP edits requiring reverting as people don't check whether US withdrawal is already mentioned in article (it is). Given media attention, this is unlikely to stop soon. AncientWalrus (talk) 07:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Since filing this request I discovered that executive order withdrawing US from WHO was added at least 4 times in different places in a span of 6 hours. I can't keep the page orderly alone due to 3RR. The edits are well intentioned by editors making them but still create issues requiring at least semi-protection, ideally extended protection. It's not just IPs but also new editors making these mistakes (not checking if order is already mentioned), hence my suggestion to do extended protection. AncientWalrus (talk) 08:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Misuse of talk page for stuff unrelated to the actual article. M.C. (talk) 08:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: There is a user without a Wikipedia account consistently changing the age of this person from 1972 to 1962. This has been occurring since 2022. Hoggough (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No prior protection history. Please request again if this persists; protection length may be increased as necessary. BusterD (talk) 12:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A highly visited page about an ongoing event, attracting significant public interest. It has been subjected to frequent edits by random IP users, often introducing poor grammar and inappropriate language, which affects the page's quality and reliability. To ensure the information remains accurate and well-maintained, an 8-week semi-protection would be ideal during this period of heightened activity. - The9Man Talk 08:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. But also attracting IPs/new accounts which correct mistakes and improve the article. Page well watched, overall disruption not too heavy. Lectonar (talk) 11:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent crypto-related promotion related to current events. czar 03:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. BusterD (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP editors keep vandalizing the page. There is a very persistent IP editor who keeps adding the name of a non-notable individual to it, and it persists despite blocking the offending IP address. Chemtamengineer (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No misbehavior on the page in the past 48 hours. BusterD (talk) 12:18, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of fake phone number spam, some of which has had to be revdeled. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
15:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Potential meatpuppetry ongoing at 4Chan(Talk:Denali#Possible_meat/sock_puppetry...?), trolling ongoing(already at ANI). I understand it's quite rare for talk pages to be protected, but I feel this is necessary. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 17:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting PC protection, Good Article getting vandalism from IPs Ovioas,wo (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 2607:FEA8:FF01:4FA6:2C16:7AB6:96EB:857A (talk) 14:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Gulf of Mexico talk page - why is a talk page protected? The article yes, but the talk page?

Not unprotected – Too many IPs/new accounts got "carried away". The protection expires in approximately four hours, but you may have to type quickly. Favonian (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: IPs edit warring to restore a character's first name (which is not used in the film's dialogue) and some excessive "slashes his face down to his neck with a knife, pushes him down the stairs, then stabs him to death" detail to the plot summary. Belbury (talk) 17:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear 18:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

remove For example flag of "Gitler". Or apelьsin as plate .. ? 2001:2012:1882:E900:9709:D459:4B9B:9B09 (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mike Allen 11:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Assadzadeh (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting temporary full protection due to likely disruption over very recent (Jan 2025) content that raises WP:NOTNEWS and WP:UNDUE concerns. Recent additions involve ongoing political events that would benefit from a cooling period to allow for proper sourcing and discussion. D0TheMath6.28 (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

@D0TheMath6.28: Pages do not get protected pre-emptively. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:48, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
This is not preemptive - I am actively removing content that fails NOTNEWS/UNDUE, which is likely to trigger edit warring given the controversial nature of the content and subject. The protection request comes alongside content removal to prevent the disruption cycle, not before any action. D0TheMath6.28 (talk) 18:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
@D0TheMath6.28: Apologies; you led with "likely disruption", which read differently to me than what you intended. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Done due to multiple IPs edit warring. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. some sort of "memecoin" thing going on right now. req'ing 3 or 7 days pp protection. Explodicator7331 (talk) 17:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Loads of IP vandalism KeyzCar (talk) 19:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Edit warring over recent national championship selection by Peter Wolfe, an NCAA-designated major selector, that was different than the winner of the 2025 College Football Playoff National Championship game. PK-WIKI (talk) 19:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Continuously unsourced changes (plus sometimes vandalism which can be seen from the page history) to the article by IP/newly registered users who do not intend to reach the talkpage for their changes after getting reverted. MŠLQr (talk) 19:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Good ol' name changing comments that go nowhere. IPs/new users not understanding COMMONNAME. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Also, there appears to be support for temporary semi-protection at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gulf_of_Mexico#Talk_semi'd_one_day Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:41, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Valereee. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

I am NOT suggesting the title be changed to "Gulf of America". I am requesting that the article introduction to say "The Gulf of Mexico, called the Gulf of America in the United States,...". And this is because some Arabian countries decided to offically change the name of the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Gulf and Wikipedia said Persian Gulf OR Arabian Gulf, but it's not being done here for whatever reason. This was actually done but reversed for whatever reason. And there should be a formal RFC not 5 different discussions about the topic. Rc2barrington (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

If there should be a formal RFC then this page cannot help. Read WP:Request for comment and start it on Talk:Gulf of Mexico, if you are able. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Earlier today, you participated in discussions regarding this topic at Talk:Gulf of Mexico. That's where the matter will be decided. Favonian (talk) 17:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:GSCASTE, persistent sockpuppetry by open proxies who are trying to redirect it to inappropriate targets. - Ratnahastin (talk) 08:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Ymblanter (talk) 21:18, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs persistently inserting unsourced birthdate. Taffer😊 💬(they/she) 13:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. •Cyberwolf•talk? 17:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

22 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:54, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. •Cyberwolf•talk? 19:48, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Rsjaffe. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Date of death not confirmed but anonymous IP users keep changing the date to January 20, which was the date of the announcement. DrKilleMoff (talk) 23:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There have been useful edits by IP users as well. Hopefully date of death will become known shortly. Brief protection in meantime. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Per WP:RUSUKR Mr. Komori (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: CTOP - AMPOL sanctions. Don't know what the normal protection level is for AMPOL. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 18:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

AP2 does not have a blanket 500/30 restriction to my knowledge. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not logging as a CTOPS action yet but I will leave a notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Sockpuppet user constantly adding hoax information. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Top_Gun_X_4. CoconutOctopus talk 21:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit waring. Discombobulates (talk) 22:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Cryptid. For a week. In full. Wow. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The flags on this page have been changing back and forth since October. In December 2024, IP users (or user) started getting involved and continued to change them without reason. Catalyst GP real (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Note: article is subject to WP:1RR per WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent vandalism and bad editing on article as well as reverting reminiscent of an edit war. Vandalism on talk page Sushidude21! (talk) 13:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism, likely by the same person. Sushidude21! (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Oh boy, it's me again. The questionable salute has led to heated debate and is a contentious topic at the moment. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 23:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism, due to recent events (J6 pardons). This and other J6 pages likely to be targets for forseeable future -FactsheetPete (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For now, given that the article has not previously needed protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – consistent changes (unsourced) from multiple IPs over time. It is constant disruption of the article. ButlerBlog (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Isabelle Belato. for a month. Semi. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High Level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs making similar disruptive edits. Wburrow (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term vandalism spanning several years. -FactsheetPete (talk) 00:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – has been going on since November. Kajmer05 (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of the rest of the time on the current protection, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on page per WP:CT/CID. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or improperly sourced content. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 02:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Already extended-confirmed protected, but should also be move-protected while the redirect discussion regarding "Gulf of America" is still underway. Ithinkiplaygames (talk) 02:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: A number of IPs have been vandalizing the talk page, either treating it as a forum post to talk about their reactions to her sermon, and a partially blocked IP calling The Rt Rev. some pretty crass & gendered insults (namely demanding that there be a section added calling her [derogatory term removed]). This is pretty plainly not the point of a talk page and is disruptive & harmful. 96.231.129.14 (talk) 02:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Ah, my apologies for repeating the term, I shouldn't have done that, that's my bad! Figured it was useful for documentation purposes in the moment but it's on the talk page after all, and best not to have that floating around here too, thank you for that! 96.231.129.14 (talk) 02:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
I endorse the report by the IP that the attack language at the talk page has gotten out of hand and violates BLP. However, it has not reached the any-reasonable-admin threshold where I feel comfortable acting, as I have a borderline COI with TEC. —C.Fred (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – String of recent vandalism. Amigao (talk) 02:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After disrupting Kabyle people to the point where it needed EC protection, the highly disruptive SP master Noname_JR moved to this one, first by using Special:Contributions/Dotabetterthanlol and now, resorting to IP socking (their IP range is known). M.Bitton (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Require semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism. Hbanm (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 09:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/IRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Is there any disruption to the article? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As implied above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Continuous unreferenced edits from IP users.[77][78][79] Hotwiki (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No reverts on article for a couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting temporary protection (extended confirmed) due to recent edit warring between multiple users. Likely the product of his upcoming birth anniversary. Yue🌙 22:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: SuvGh (talk · contribs) blocked by The Bushranger. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long history of COI editing and promotion. See username of this editor, [80], [81], [82], recent edit warring [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88]. --Richard Yin (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I think it's worth considering protecting the page anyway, given that this has gone on for years across multiple accounts/IPs. --Richard Yin (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined for now as, since I blocked the account causing trouble today, it was the first significant editing to the article in three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Preemptive measure due to rampant J6 related vandalism. -FactsheetPete (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered users keep removing the 'anti-colonialism' from the infobox, while keeping the reference intact. therefore I request semi protection, most useful edits have been done by registered users. – Nar 260802:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article gets light editing as it is; it seems like the editors are handling the disruption well enough for now. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent edit warring by (multiple new users? Multiple socks?) Users have been repeatedly asked to go to the tp and discuss, but so far 'no go'. Thanks - \\'cLf 07:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 08:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The edit includes a source from the Department of Defense Inspector General and the page isn't allowed to include that source. Airman79 (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

@Airman79: This request is a request to lower protection on a title that isn't protected, and reads more like an edit request. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
There is no Wikipedia page for Dave Isaacson. Most likely the requester intended to refer to David Isaacson. Still, that is not a page under any form of protection. EdJohnston (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Page is protected from 2018. I am trying to publish the draft I wrote, but I keep getting blocked. Please help me lift this protection. Tashialala (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined @Tashialala: I suggest you run your draft through the WP:AFC process. We can unprotect if it gets accepted. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Remove: "Historians and political scientists rank Bozo as above average in historical rankings of American presidents."

Way too soon to suggest that in the main text of the article! He has barely left office, its going to be at least a few months before such a bold claim can be made. Is there really enough historians and political scientists saying this to justify this claim? BlunanNation (talk) 08:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

 Already done Ultraodan (talk) 12:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 13:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

this website is using wrong prime minister sor sokha picture please delete for purpose to not let other see the wrong picture and confuse about it StvenZzz (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done by the person who submitted the request in the first place. (It would have been declined in the first place as the page isn't protected.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 13:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 12:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 12:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 12:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection for one day. The article is the main DYK on the front page today and the topic-matter is inviting more anonymous vandalism than is usual or expected. Yue🌙 07:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP continues to make unsourced edits. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 07:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Frost 09:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

@Gotitbro: Do you want it protected? In any case, I removed the personal attacks from view, for the time being. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've just gone ahead. They've kept coming back for a couple days, using multiple ranges, including the latest one's /64 being not blocked at the time of writing, so could have just kept going. El_C 13:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A great combo of sockpuppetry (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mindirman Jaloliddin) and IP (possibly a sock as well) persistently disrupting the article. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:30, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry since November by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mindirman Jaloliddin. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 08:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit was about 6 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Article has been subject to unsourced edits by several Malaysian (probably related) IPs, possible violation of WP:PROMO. hundenvonPG (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one disruptive IP atm; the other disruptive edits were some time ago. Lectonar (talk) 15:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AntoniaRoumeliotis23 (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

You literally used People.com as a resource. Are you sure you're NOT the ip troll? DACartman (talk) 17:45, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
This account needs to be locked FROM AntoniaRoumeliotis23 and fellow trolls MWikiEdits (talk) 17:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Are you talking about me? I just said that people.com is not a reliable source. DACartman (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
See example of harassment above. I will not engage. AntoniaRoumeliotis23 (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
I am not harrassing you, I am saying what you did and asked you a question. DACartman (talk) 17:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Plus, if you were/are Luke's girlfriend, then you have a conflict of interest. DACartman (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
This. The user is either a troll or the real Antonia. Either way, neither one should be the authority to update the page. MWikiEdits (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Continuous troll activity.MWikiEdits (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Troll account AntoniaRoumeliotis23 keeps logging in to update personal life section to reflect “she” is dating the subject of the page. User is a troll. Additionally, other anonymous trolls are making derogatory comments about main subject in both main section and personal life. Account should be protected to prevent continuous troll updates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MWikiEdits (talkcontribs) 18:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High IP and new user accounts vandalism changing boxoffice figures. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Rosguill. Favonian (talk) 19:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Rosguill. Favonian (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Rosguill. Favonian (talk) 19:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content. Ccai2053 (talk) 19:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Hey man im josh. Favonian (talk) 19:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Reality TV show with only the final episode to go, lots of IP edits pushing their preferred winner and just being disruptive. A week a peace would be helpful to the regular maintainers. Ravensfire (talk) 06:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous IP users. Areaseven (talk) 12:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still frequently vandalized despite many protections dating back to 2007, looks like it's time for a permanent solution. Entranced98 (talk) 14:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Immediate resume of behaviour (addition of unsourced content) following page's previous protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This article is related to the Israel-Palestine/Arab-Israeli conflict, a CTOP. Articles that fall under this CTOP are to be bluelocked if I remember correctly. Thus I am requesting for extended protection to be applied to the page. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 19:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Problematic IP-edits on the 22nd. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 21:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous IP addresses Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 109.173.144.0/21 (talk · contribs). 3 months. Favonian (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 12:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 185.185.179.8 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 12:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2603:7000:863e:c5a4::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Isabelle Belato. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page has a WP:Editnotice that is commensurate with an Extended Confirmed protection. I am not necessarily seeking Extended Confirmed protection, just consistency. Please either remove the WP:Editnotice, or apply Extended Confirmed protection. --The Mountain of Eden (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Sometimes people don't realize that they need to actually request the protection; they think the templates automatically make it happen. Daniel Case (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This article frequently gets edits from multiple users with low edit counts that add content of a highly promotional tone, as well as claims without proper citation. The only available resource for some of these claims are written by the company themselves. Pattersonuwu (talk) 18:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One problematic user already blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CRYSTAL violations and some outright vandalism over the past couple of weeks. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High IP vandalism going on for a week now. Some new user accounts are also disruptive. Reverts on these persistent vandalism happens every day but IPs come back to change boxoffice figures without sources. Submitted request twice before but was declined. RangersRus (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP edit war over national championship selection. PK-WIKI (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry occurring over the past few days within the article. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 22:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. El_C 22:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Excessive disruptive editing from new and unregistered users. Funcrunch (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:GENSEX. El_C 22:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

23 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 19:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 192.119.232.130 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More edits with no reliable source, most recently (since December 27) from an IP-hopper in New Jersey. A New Jersey IPv6 even tried to use a Google search as a source. Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: "2600:4040:A07C:F800:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic target of IP vandalism recently per history. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep changing death date and removing source [89] [90] [91] [92]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2001:E68:540F:0:0:0:0:0/49 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks, from article. Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The Wikipedia page for Invicta Racing talks about Virtuosi Racing's history, but Invicta Racing purchased the team from Virtuosi, that's why it is discussed in Wikipedia. Someone is continuing to flag the website and say that we are using their sources and it's not original. This is false, we are just talking about the history of the team. The users name is MSport1005. They have been doing this for a while now because we had edited the page originally and they continued to make changes. We need this resolved asap. AviLalo (talk) 17:05, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Continued disruptive editing by a single editor. Someone has created a new page to discuss the Invicta Racing, their sponsorship and achievements since purchasing the Virtuosi Racing Team. The original content I tried to update on Virtuosi's page was consistently being removed by this user turning it into a content dispute. Someone has now made a page exclusively discussing Invicta and the same user has followed asking for it to be taken down showing there must be a significant conflict of interest on the users side to keep following this topic to shut it down. Psf3397 (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's fairly new, and really this dispute sounds like something better handled at WP:AN/I or (better) WP:COI/N Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sneaky vandalism. JayCubby 18:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing too many reverts among the heavy recent editing. Daniel Case (talk) 22:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Troll is targeting Estelle Asmodelle's social media, he seems to be searching for anything page on this person to deface and post disgusting things. I think he will soon start playing with her Wiki page as well. Can you please lock this page for a month or so till he moves on to another target. Pammylove (talk) 21:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined, we do not protect paged preemptively. Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and edit-warring to by a user editing from multiple IPs. User engages in style-warring and tries to remove the most-common definition of the Droop quota by an unregistered editor. IP repeatedly WP:IDHTs when I've explained this on both the article talk and user talk. (The Droop quota is sometimes defined v⁄(k+1) and sometimes v⁄(k+1)+1; user keeps removing or obfuscating the first definition.)

Update: unsurprisingly, despite previous decline of page protection because the user hadn't edited for a week or two, they've gone right back to it within 2 days, continuing a year-long edit war.

Update 2: Despite a clear consensus on the talk for the presentation I suggested, they've continued edit-warring. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Consider Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 22:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because YOU NEED TO UNLOCK THE GULF OF AMERICA PAGE NOW!! TOO MANY LIBERAL NUTJOBS ARE SAYING ITS CALLED THE GULF OF MEXICO AND IT IS NOT! PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS CHANGED IT EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY!

LET US PATRIOTS CHANGE IT NOW! IT IS A VIOLATION OF AMERICAN LAW TO CALL IT “THE GULF OF MEXICO” (SIC) FROM THIS DAY FORWARD....... . 74.118.126.34 (talk) 00:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting permanent semi-protection due to high level of IP vandalism. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:44, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Too much incorrect information from individuals who know nothing about Miss Tennessee and who intend to turn attention away from the candidates and tarnish the legacy of the Miss Tennessee/Miss America organizations. 2601:483:4584:CB20:296A:DDD2:9FFA:CCCA (talk) 01:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Feel free to come back if this issue expands. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socks. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protectedC.Fred (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Change Denali to McKinley https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-names-that-honor-american-greatness/ Fyndoro (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: An EO doesn't override the MOS. As they've said on the talk page four times already. Sumanuil. (talk to me)
Declined. I think you mean Denali not Mount Denali. You are autoconfirmed. Make an edit request on the article talk page. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring. But no time for this, DisneyEditor1 did this also. 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DC08:9C1F:E2D0:2CFC (talk) 00:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 06:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Kiranpawar3210 is a user page, I want protect my page from threats. Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined See WP:UPROT. Lectonar (talk) 06:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is constantly faced in persistent IP Vandalism and disruptive, unsourced editing. Aaaas216& (talk) 11:40, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This list is very badly maintained, imho. I have left a suggestion on its talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A IP changing user thinks this event led to Kenya's independence. It did not. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 04:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE, large scale blanking by IPs and autoconfirmed editors without any policy based rationale. - Ratnahastin (talk) 07:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll start with 1-month of semi, and can revisit if that's not sufficient. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The former president of Sri Lanka. IP uses have persistently vandalised and made unconstructive edits on a number of instances. Requesting page protection through Pending changes review process. QEnigma talk 13:47, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Someone keeps moving this page to the title with a disambiguator. It may be possibly an LTA. — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Tested account (talk · contribs) blocked by Black Kite. Favonian (talk) 11:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Amakuru move-protected the page for two days (diff). Thanks, both of you! — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:42, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 14:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:NPOV. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:55, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: No longer necessary. This article should be reduced to semi-protection per consistency with articles, such as Barack Obama and George W. Bush. Biden is also no longer the president so it makes sense to make this happen. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 04:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Have you discussed this with the protecting admin on their talk page as it says above? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
I have already done that. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 09:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
They haven't answered yet to your question. Fwiw, I would wait some time before lowering protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
I assume that's me, whereas I only added +move protection (which I suggest remains regardless). Technically the edit protection dates from Aug 2020 and belongs to MelanieN, who is not currently an admin. With that in mind I'll throw it open to the floor, whilst offering my own incidental soft temporary decline opinion. I think it's too recent, him having left office only this week (and bound to reappear in the near future). We are also currently seeing elevated waves of political enthusiasts in a vigoured state trying to throw POV everywhere. How long to wait? I can't say. Over to others... -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – At present, the climate (political and physical) shows no signs of cooling. Favonian (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request that the update to Nicola Coughlan’s personal life section is removed. Relationship never confirmed by Nicola or her team. The citations used are from People.com which also have no source aside from Deuxmoi and other gossip sites. This should be removed until confirmed by team. MWikiEdits (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done by another editor based on threads on the article talk page. (For future reference, if you can edit the talk page requests here will be summarily declined.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 16:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being vandalised to include Dhanush as director; that made headlines. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full move protection: Full-move protection should be restored after ECP for both move and edit was added. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 04:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism and addition of scam phone numbers. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:40, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – frequent vandalism involving scam phone numbers being added restarting as soon as protection ended, may need a longer term protection. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:50, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Rsjaffe. Favonian (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:41, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – much like other airline pages recently, undergoing repeated vandalism including addition of scam phone numbers. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Rsjaffe. Favonian (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:41, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. by the IP users. MŠLQr (talk) 12:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Currently, the lede states "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, taking 251 captive, against which Israelis responded applying the controversial Hannibal Directive, resulting in the death of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, among which 815 civilians.". This implies that the majority of the casualties were caused by Israel applying the Hannibal Directive, and despite some cases of casualties due to this, no credible source has made the claim that the majority of casualties originate from it. I suggest changing the lede back to what it was before it was randomly edited to the current lede without any discussion on the talk page about it, to "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, killing 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals and taking 251 captive." Aradkipod (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done 40 minutes after the edit request [93]. Kenneth Kho (talk) 18:50, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done. Already pending changes protected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:08, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from a school IP. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 14:42, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:08, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 15:45, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The IP's global block expires then. Favonian (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JJMC89. Favonian (talk) 19:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

In the section labeled "Initial Israeli counter-operation (October 2023)" it states the following: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used, killing many Israeli civilians and soldiers.[181][182] An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri."

These sentences are incorrect and not supported by the sourced references. First off, the word "many" in the first sentence is gratuitous, misleading, and, perhaps most importantly, not supported by the Haaretz article it references, which never concludes that any citizens were killed as a direct result of a so-called "Hannibal" directive. Nowhere in the article does it state that the Hannibal directive can be tied to *any* deaths, let alone "many" deaths. Any reference in the article to potential deaths caused by a Hannibal directive are stated as questions, or that investigations are forthcoming. (e.g., "Haaretz does not know whether or how many civilians and soldiers were hit due to these procedures, but the cumulative data indicates that many of the kidnapped people were at risk, exposed to Israeli gunfire, even if they were not the target.") Either way, it certainly does not conclude that "many" deaths were tied to the use of the "Hannibal directive" which is highly misleading.

Similarly, as to the second sentence, the ABC News (Australia) does not conclude that " at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri". It discusses a tank shooting at a house in Kibbutz Berri , but never states that there is evidence that the IDF tank fire resulted in the death of 13 civilians -- as opposed to the 40 Hamas gunmen who were holding them captive and engaged in a "firefight" with the IDF at the time of the tank fire. The 40 Hamas gunmen could just as easily have killed them as opposed to tank fire. Indeed, an eyewitness stated "Mr Shifroni's aunt Ayala and her grand-niece Liel and grand-nephew Yanai were all killed at Pessi's house — he believes by terrorists", not by the IDF and ""There are a few others that we still don't know and we may never know what exactly killed them." Later on in the article, it states "The team determined that most of the hostages were likely murdered by the terrorists, and further inquiries and reviews of additional findings are necessary.".

I propose that the sentences be re-worded as follows: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used at three locations, putting the lives of some Israeli civilians being held by Hamas at those locations at risk.[181][182]. An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that after a prolonged firefight in Kibbutz Be'eri with around 40 Hamas gunmen who had been holding 15 hostages inside and outside, 13 of the hostages may have been killed by either the Hamas captors or IDF tank fire."

Apndrew (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done 4 hours 37 minutes after the edit request, UN report which substantiates both claims were added [94], although I am unable to open the paywalled Haaretz article and not think ABC article is the correct reference for this. Kenneth Kho (talk) 19:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:11, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Page protection expired about a week ago. New IP spam started showing up almost immediately: [95]. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:11, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jfire (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Note: User given level 4 warning. Report to AIV if recurs. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:26, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: It was previously protected, and right after protection wore off, the "please rename it Gulf of America" comments from new editors are back. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 19:38, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:50, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High IP vandalism with changes to boxoffice figures, not backed by source. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 20:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

24 January 2025

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. CricketXP (talk) 00:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: persistent disruptive editing through sockpuppetry by cbanned user on various ip ranges. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 21:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Since I cannot reply to my original request on this, I am starting a new request with a different source for the request and a revised sentence:

In the fourth paragraph of the entry, it states."A case accusing Israel of committing genocide is being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,...."

This should be changed to "Cases accusing both Israel and Hamas of committing genocide have been lodged with or are being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,..."

This change is supported by multiple references: https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-bereaved-israeli-families-bring-icc-war-crime-genocide-complaint-against-hamas/ "The families of nine Israeli victims of the October 7 Hamas massacre have lodged a complaint at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for suspected war crimes."

and

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20231103-israeli-families-bring-war-crime-complaint-to-icc-lawyer)

The change is necessary for accuracy, balance, and neutral point of view.

Apndrew (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done This sentence is about International Court of Justice (ICJ), not International Criminal Court (ICC). Only Israel is respondent before ICJ, as it is a UN member state. ICC indictments are a separate matter where both sides have received it. Kenneth Kho (talk) 19:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA relevant article Smallangryplanet (talk) 08:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Done. El_C 01:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA relevant article. Thanks! Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Done. El_C 01:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Super controversial currently — views on this article may differ as it is being constantly being changed Wcamp9 (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jet Pilot (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  09:40, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  10:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EC not necessary as most new socks get blocked quickly. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is currently facing a large amount of vandalism, both from IP editors and from new accounts. These edits are made immediately after each other and in rapid succession, making it hard to remove all vandalism from the page. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 22:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unregistered users making various unsourced claims about current event. wizzito | say hello! 01:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  10:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting protection due to spam. Imcdc Contact 10:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting permanent semi protection again. The article has been attacked several times, and will be undoubtedly further attacked by newly created/IPs, as the TA falls under such category. Imperial[AFCND] 10:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – my talkpage is constantly trolled by sockpuppets. Kadı Message 18:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. CNMall41 (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Combination of sockpuppetry and disruptive IP editing. IP problems are mostly Manual of Style issues regarding sub-national flags, but also sourcing issues endemic to pageant articles. The history of the article since January 1 is self explanatory, but here are some examples:

CU-confirmed socking since January 1
contra-consensus editing by IPs since January 1

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?*title=Miss_Supranational_2025&diff=1267345960&oldid=1267321876

Bri (talk) 21:38, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request one week semi-protection for article due to on-going IP vandalism. There has been recent controversial news concerning Weigel Broadcasting. Msw1002 (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to Israeli-Arab conflict, sees some edit warring. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. recent vandalism by ip users, and is a contentious article, as it's linked to the Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 02:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: vandalism, page has increased attention due to recent pardon. Attempts to replace the loaded term 'abortionist' (a term specifically discouraged by MOS:NEO) with the neutral 'abortion provider' are being edit warred by IP addresses. FactsheetPete (talk) 03:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting WP:ECP to stop an edit war until the RfC (hopefully) resolves the issues. Sariel Xilo (talk) 03:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of the remaining protection, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the RfC establishes clear consensus it can be lifted. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 01:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Done for the bot again. Swatjester, you need to use the RfPP templates, or the bot would not archive the request. El_C 04:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 01:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Done for the bot. El_C 04:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism likely to continue over the next few days in the lead up to Australia Day (26 January) Cabrils (talk) 03:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. atop the existing indef PC. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred (so this is inconsistent with the Protection Policy WP:PP). In-addition, 6 months is also excessive. The article is already very hostile to new users with the permanent pending changes protection (which in itself, is meant to be used very rarely and doesn't seem justified either). So, rather than just make a summary decision, you should justify why it has been done and provide evidence for it, and explain why the length of protection time was selected. 185.218.127.37 (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High levels of vandalism. Marc Elias is a progressive voting rights and elections attorney. This page is intentionally being targeted by people who oppose his politics. They are misleading readers regarding Donald Trump's 2020 election loss to Joe Biden and spreading disinformation about Trump associates’ connections to Russian officials and interests. This page needs to be fact checked by serious fact checkers and protected from vandals. 2600:8805:250C:3200:BD90:3AAA:4171:CA5C (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: High levels of vandalism and false information. The 2016 Trump campaign was linked to Russian officials: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868/. Attempts to add context were reverted by other user(s). Marc Elias has many followers on social media, and this page could be used to intentionally spread falsehoods. पर्वत चोटी (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For now it looks like the editors have things under control. I have no doubt that this page could be a target, but we don't pre-emptively protect pages. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring by IPs from Malaysia and Turkey since end of December. Despite heroic efforts by an editor to revert these, there were so many bad IP edits that the article still has subtle remnants. Edit warring/vandalism done by at least 3 different IPs from 2 countries so can't just block a single one unfortunately. AncientWalrus (talk) 03:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see two actual reverts this month. The problems you describe might be better dealt with by reverting to a version predating those edits entirely and adding to it anything you think the IPs introduced that was worthwhile. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of "Gulf of America" by new users. Jfire (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

The tile of this article should be changed from "October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel" to "October 7 Hamas-led Genocide on Israel".

There is numerous support for this change:

  • On October 7, 2023, Hamas waged the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust — slaughtering babies, committing sexual violence, burning whole villages, and taking over 200 people hostage. In total, Hamas murdered over 1,000 Jews, in multiple locations.
  • Various legal experts and genocide studies scholars argue that the 10/7 attack was a genocide as the victims were targeted for their Israeli-Jewish identity.
  • A legal complaint that Hamas committed genocide on 10/7 is currently pending before the ICC.
  • ICC issued arrest warrants for Hamas leaders alleging war crimes
  • Hamas killed more Jews on 10/7 than any other massacre since the Holocaust.
  • Hamas has made repeated statements of it's intent to eradicate the local Jewish population to reclaim "their land" both before and after 10/7 the attack. It was their stated intention for the attack to kill as many Israeli Jews as possible and steal their land.
  • Hamas's previous governing charter including language that has been characterized as incitement to genocide and, according to several commentators, "mandates the killing of Jews".
  • Hamas' official spokesperson promised to commit 10/7 "again and again and again."
  • Hamas official stated that Hamas will carry out attacks over and over again "until Israel is annihilated"
  • Various publications have called October 7 a "genocidal massacre"


The above is all supported by multiple sources. Here are some:

https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/hamas-official-vows-repeat-attacks-on-israel-this-is-our-legal-right-196999237771

https://web.archive.org/web/20240124055724/https://engelsbergideas.com/notebook/hamas-genocidal-massacre-on-october-7-has-deep-historical-roots/

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2023/10/hamas-covenant-israel-attack-war-genocide/675602/

https://web.archive.org/web/20240311111155/https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/hamas-intending-nothing-less-than-a-second-holocaust-niall-ferguson/video/248ab4e66a7ed0b5ac3180537e065024

https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-bereaved-israeli-families-bring-icc-war-crime-genocide-complaint-against-hamas/

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20231103-israeli-families-bring-war-crime-complaint-to-icc-lawyer

https://www.dw.com/en/october-7-hamas-attacks-on-israel-a-year-later/a-70399696

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/hamas-october-7-attack-repeat-israel-annihilated-ghazi-hamad/

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/16/middleeast/israel-hamas-gaza-war-crimes-international-law-explainer-intl/index.html

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/honest-voice-israel

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-and-hamas-officials-for-war-crimes

Apndrew (talk) 02:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done. This isn't an edit request, it's a move request (see WP:RM), and not the right place to discuss it. If you can find an extended confirmed editor who participates on the talk page who agrees that replacing "attack" with "genocide" would pass a WP:RM discussion, then go right ahead. I don't think it would pass, even if you find a few sources that refer to it this way, more can be found that refer to it as "attack". ~Anachronist (talk) 03:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism and current controversial topic Mechanical Keyboarder (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing it yet. I will add a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 00:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, relevant to the topic but hardly a nexus to the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Seraphimblade. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wburrow (talk) 05:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Possible vandal bot attack. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 06:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppets are trolling User:Dr. Coal's talkpage. Kadı Message 10:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: I am writing to respectfully request the removal of the edit protection on the "Foundational Black Americans" page. I believe that the current state of the page does not accurately represent the term and may inadvertently mislead readers.

Issue at Hand:

When searching for "Foundational Black Americans," the page redirects to an individual, which does not provide a definition or proper context of the term. This is concerning because:

Misrepresentation: "Foundational Black Americans" refers to a lineage of Black Americans whose ancestors were enslaved in the United States and have developed a distinct cultural heritage over generations. It is not a term beholden to any single person or leader.

Ethnogenesis and Cultural Significance: Black Americans have undergone a unique process of ethnogenesis, evolving from labels such as "Negro" and "Colored" to "African American," and now embracing "Foundational Black Americans" to acknowledge their specific historical and cultural identity.

Potential Misinformation: Redirecting to an individual's page may contribute to misinformation and does not align with Wikipedia's commitment to providing neutral and accurate information.

Request:

I kindly request that the edit protection be lifted to allow for collaborative efforts in:

Creating a Dedicated Page: Developing a comprehensive article that defines "Foundational Black Americans" as a lineage, supported by reliable sources.

Ensuring Accuracy and Neutrality: Providing readers with accurate information that reflects the collective heritage and contributions of Foundational Black Americans without unintended bias.

Commitment to Wikipedia's Standards:

I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. My intention is to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia and enhance the quality of information available to the public.

Conclusion:

Thank you for considering my request. I believe that updating the page to accurately reflect the term will greatly benefit those seeking information on this important aspect of American history and culture.

I look forward to your response and the opportunity to contribute to this article. 2601:983:4600:7230:8D69:264C:225A:3C55 (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

We do not entertain requests made via chatbot. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Change test runs scored from 1766 to 1798 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Change test Batting average from 55.18 to 52.88 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IPs repeatitly vandalizing the article GoodDay (talk) 04:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Recent repeated disruptive editing Cabrils (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent misgendering and vandalism of a trans BLP. Requesting as a WP:GENSEX enforcement action. Funcrunch (talk) 05:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 10:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IPs vandalizing article GoodDay (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: There was an involved protection request here that failed to mention that several of the users edit warring are extended confirmed. Requesting full protection until the RfC concludes. BMWF (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Given that all of the extended-confirmed users are in favor of the current version while I wouldn't have done that protection this way if I were the responding admin the effect of increasing it to full would be to deny others the ability to edit while not obviously helping anything. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full move-protection: Contentious topic restriction. Should be full-move protected per Netanyahu and Israel articles. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 05:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nixovel (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Change FC batting average from 64.03 to 62.40 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nixovel (talk) 08:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Nixovel (talk) 08:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JJMC89. 2-hour protection, now expired.
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs pushing a pseudohistorical fringe POV. - Ratnahastin (talk) 08:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: I would like to request the unprotection of the Gangwar surname Wikipedia page. Currently, the page is semi-protected, which limits editing to more experienced editors, but this has hindered efforts to improve the page. The page lacks crucial information about the Gangwar clan and its historical background, including details from Vedic texts and other historical references.

As the Gangwar clan's history is deeply rooted in Vedic literature and other historical texts, it requires the expertise of scholars who are familiar with these sources to update the page. Normal editors may not fully grasp the significance of these references, and the semi-protection of the page could delay the process of incorporating the necessary academic and historical context.

It is important to include information about the Gangwar clan's regional distributions, its connections to other communities, and its role in historical events to improve the page’s accuracy and quality. Additionally, updating the page with proper citations and references from respected sources will greatly enhance the credibility of the article.

I respectfully request that the page be unprotected so that scholars and experts can contribute to the article and provide a more comprehensive and accurate account of the Gangwar surname and its historical context.

Thank you for your time and consideration. 4rju9 (talk) 04:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

@4rju9: We do not entertain requests made via chatbot. Discuss it with Daniel Case, who protected it under the auspices of WP:GS/CASTE. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Daniel Case The page was semi-protected due to edit wars, which are no longer an issue. It needs updating to include historical information about the Gangwar clan, referenced in Vedic texts and historical sources. The page currently lacks information about the Gangwar clan, including historical context, regional distribution, and connections to other communities. Unprotection will allow me and the other scholars to contribute citations and improve the article’s quality and credibility.
if possible, i would appreciate temporary unprotection or the opportunity to work collaboratively to improve the page.

4rju9 (talk) 07:33, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined The page was semi-protected due to edit wars - no, it wasn't, it was extended-confirmed protected instead. which are no longer an issue - which means the protection is working. If you have a request for an edit to be made, use {{edit extended-protected}} on the talk page. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
the current page has zero historical information about the gangwar clan, and when i tried to add new information with all the source and vedic books. the editors continuously rejected the request even after me providing the sources. the extended-confirmed protected protection is limiting me to update the page. there are no reference nor any information it has basic information about their cast which is kurmi and no vedic information as mentioned in the books. they were part of so many wars and their relation with their ancestors is not mentioned nor the editors are allowing me to update. what is the solution of it. because when i share the historical references from vedic and historical books they are getting rejected.@Pppery @Daniel Case 4rju9 (talk) 08:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
so many historical and vedic information can be added to the aritcl but the editors are not putting any efforts in updating it or finding about it. nor letting anyone else to update it. 4rju9 (talk) 08:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from a block evading IP range and sockpuppets, blocks seem to have no effect PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from a block evading IP range and sockpuppets, blocks seem to have no effect PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Pronoun vandalism and edit warring by illiterate, WP:CIR and probably homophobic IP despite sources. Borgenland (talk) 10:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Block evading ip repeatedly restoring poorly sourced promotional content in a BLP duffbeerforme (talk) 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AravPerfectlyEdits 13:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done There's been one edit to create that page and that was by you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Ye olde IPs swarming to an article about a supposed new hiring and adding info without it being formally confirmed anywhere, in violation of WP:SPORTSTRANS. The Kip (contribs) 15:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Bagumba. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Previous one-month protection expired in late December. All edits since then have been vandalism and cleanup. Waste of time. Longer protection seems necessary. Chrisahn (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: No Protection 2A00:1FA3:50D:CEAD:0:2A:567D:9701 (talk) 09:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: Do you have a reason why? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 10:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – It would require a very persuasive rationale, given the persistence of the sock master in question. Favonian (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Because it is not necsessary to protect it 2403:6200:89A7:1616:F977:ED1F:EB82:4209 (talk) 10:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: Do you have a reason why it's not necessary? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 10:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected. The page was necessarily protected due to persistent vandalism. The talk page is not protected and you can suggest improvements to the article there and if there is consensus, make an edit request. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 16:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected indefinitely. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits since 2021 have been an IP edit war over what his nickname is and other unsourced additions. Zinnober9 (talk) 17:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism, POV pushing or misinformed editing. Please restrict to autoconfirmed editors until (say) 3 February (Chinese New Year is on 29 Jan). 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JJMC89. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request that... (in discussion: talk page: there was opposition to changing the name of the article (“Gulf of Mexico”) because there are no reliable source currently using “Gulf of America”. The status has changed. The Coast Guard is officially using the new status: “Gulf of America”.) . JaneDoeSelvidge (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JJMC89. Favonian (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

'Reason: Decrease to Semi-protection: its nothing have to do with consigned enforcement likeably for just oriental dispute in less than 1year gap which is not enough curable for at least WP:GSCASTE sanction, as far as I can tell, the information should be reduced a little because if it becomes too strict or protective, it might stop people from editing articles in the future. The whole idea of making this platform human-driven WP:Independent and encyclopaedic could get lost. I’ve noticed this happening over the past few days, and I feel it’s better to make things a bit simpler so new users can actually understand and contribute properly. 114.79.136.104 (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FactsheetPete (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If this becomes an issue later on please feel free to come back and rerequest. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Mellk (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit waring and unsourced Dubious info being added. Sushidude21! (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent low-level IP vandalism for more than five years. Page has previously been protected. Meticulo (talk) 14:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in two weeks. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not clear what arbitration decision requires ECP-ing this page. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: prevention of edit wars over whether the Euromaidan revolution counts as a coup d'etat Bird244 (talk) 15:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several unconfirmed users, potentially socks, have repeatedly changed "Gulf of Mexico" to "Gulf of America" without Wikipedia consensus on what should be done about this change. AnotherWeatherEditor (talk) 16:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This movie is based on historical novel, I want to protect page to prevent incorrect information. Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Question: We don't preemptively protect pages. Is there disruption now? What type and by what users? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined * Pppery * it has begun... 18:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism and revert-warring Sushidude21! (talk) 08:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection. HanTsî (talk) 08:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. ARBPIA 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 13:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined I don't think this article actually qualifies as related enough to the conflict to warrant protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: An IP range block would suffice, in the meanthime. GoodDay (talk) 18:12, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Same as Coen protection above - IPs rushing to add unverified info about a reported hiring. The Kip (contribs) 18:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 12:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-confirmed protection for 1 week due to disruptive editing from IP due to developing events related to the subject. [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] If you have any questions let me know in the reply. Lemonademan22 (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. نعم البدل (talk) 22:33, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

25 January 2025

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
They already have been blocked for prior vandalism after a final warning, plus I took the IP vandal to AIV before you left that comment. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious target for persistent vandalism. Ormewood (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake. Please ignore this Ormewood (talk) 20:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor – Favonian (talk) 21:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

colombo12 103.21.164.20 (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done This article does not exist, and the request is incoherent. --Kinu t/c 22:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. Zanahary 23:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:52, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: I don't think there's a reason why this redirect should be fully protected, since preemptive protection is discouraged here. Kurnahusa (talk) 00:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Unprotected – Muboshgu (talk) 02:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:08, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive changes from Chile-based dynamic IP after prior protection expired. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Silence of Lambs – Why do they continue to allow an IP to re-establish the unnecessary list of Notable personnel in the section below next to the photo of some of the voice actors that once used to work in that studio located in Houston, Texas, with his own long-term abuse. 190.166.242.220 (talk) 22:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High likelihood of vandalism given the recent Israel-Hamas war. MagyarNavy1918 (talk) 23:18, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Today is the 4th day of the Trump administration. It paused health the release of agency information, took down the Office of Gun Violence website, and denied access to the DOE's Office of Equity & Justice website. Pages referencing these agencies may need some level of protection as orders to remove all references to former agencies and placenames from databases are being issued. It seems this has now become a controversial topic. https://www.newsweek.com/white-house-gun-violence-prevention-website-offline-2018801 WhyIAddA (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Please also enforce WP:CT/AP and WP:CT/GC. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. (edit conflict) If and/or when it happens, we'll respond then. Also, It paused health the release? I'm not sure what you were trying to say there, WhyIAddA. El_C 01:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Apologies, that was poorly phrased. The release of health agency reports and online posts. Don't mean to be alarmist, was just seeing many disappearing government documents and URLs.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-health-communications-cdc-hhs-fda-1eeca64c1ccc324b31b779a86d3999a4 WhyIAddA (talk) 03:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism RaschenTechner (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two IP edits in total this month. El_C 01:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Because it is not necessary to protect the page 2403:6200:89A7:1616:F977:ED1F:EB82:4209 (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined I imagine it is necessary, right protecting admin User:Discospinster? – Muboshgu (talk) 02:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
If you look at the history and the protection log you'll see my reasoning. ... discospinster talk 02:09, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Zinnober9 (talk) 01:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 03:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JJMC89. Favonian (talk) 11:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incessant attempts by IPs and single-purpose editors to add a cover that doesn't exist.  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 05:08, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:16, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 05:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Might be worth a year on this one. Remsense ‥  05:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If you think this should be longer just let me know. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

No protection: Testing whether long-term protection is still needed. Nixovel (talk) 04:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Protection expires 04:51, 25 January 2025. Johnuniq (talk) 04:52, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Same issue as led to the November 2024 protection, a variety of IPs trying to remove/overwrite sourced content from a particular section. Belbury (talk) 12:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 15:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spurt of IP vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing 128.223.223.183 (talk) 03:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Presistent vandalism. Ccai2053 (talk) 03:37, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent history of vandalism and addition of unsourced content to BLP article. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I only really saw BLP violations happening recently so I put gave this article six months of edit protection. If another admin disagrees with this please feel free to change it. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:27, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: LTA. Departure– (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JJMC89. Favonian (talk) 11:27, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Lots of IP disruptive editing MAL MALDIVE (talk) 06:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High volume of financial vandalism for a newly released film. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP's over sporadic period. Page has been protected before. Noorullah (talk) 08:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing KingArti (talk) 21:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. JustSomeoneNo (talk) 06:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. None, in fact. Favonian (talk) 11:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. JustSomeoneNo (talk) 06:09, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. None, in fact. Favonian (talk) 11:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. JustSomeoneNo (talk) 06:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. None, in fact. Favonian (talk) 11:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism(see hist) RaschenTechner (talk) 01:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 11:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – issue with unregistered users changing house name. a conclusion has been found in the talk tab of this article, but there is an issue with unregistered members editing it regardless. FransenVe (talk) 11:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A hapless IP this week and a reprobate sock the week before do not a persistent vandalism make. Hopefully, we will end up with a lasting consensus on this ridiculous question. Favonian (talk) 12:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Numerous IPs adding unsourced claims that the subject is dead or in hospital. Veverve (talk) 16:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive/promotional editing by three accounts in the past few hours. Suspected sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You may want to file a sockpuppet investigation. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  17:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. JustSomeoneNo (talk) 18:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protectedFavonian (talk) 18:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Unreasonably long history of IP vandalism. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Maybe they'll give up by then. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi protection: High level of vandalism from IP Users, especially the title changes from Holy Grail to either "Femboy" or "Ben Ashcroft". CricketXP (talk) 15:06, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Faced with the prospect of imminent block, the IP got the point. Favonian (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Recent disruptive IP edits, semi-protection or pending changes may be warranted. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:32, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Unexplained, persistent disruptive editing and removal of sourced content by the same anonymous user through different IPs (all of them already warned). GenoV84 (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 178.66.128.0/19 (talk · contribs). Partial block from selected articles. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Unexplained, persistent disruptive editing and removal of sourced content by the same anonymous user through different IPs (all of them already warned). GenoV84 (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 178.66.128.0/19 (talk · contribs). Partial block from selected articles. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Unexplained, persistent disruptive editing and removal of sourced content by the same anonymous user through different IPs (all of them already warned). GenoV84 (talk) 18:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 178.66.128.0/19 (talk · contribs). Partial block from selected articles. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: I wanna say that it was not produced by Paramount Animation, but other sources say otherwise. I do not believe it is due to the 2018 film Sherlock Gnomes' page saying it was Paramount Animation's first fully animated feature. Andy H Tisler (talk) 04:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Discuss your concerns on article talk page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from someone. CricketXP (talk) 14:56, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: An IP editor with a revolving address continues to make one change over and over. If it's possible to block the user by IP range then it would probably be a better solution than protecting the page, as I'm sure this is the doing of a single person, but I don't know what the standard approach is for this situation. --Iritscen (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Turns out that user has been doing the same thing to a bunch of pages, for some unknowable reason. Blocked the /64 range for six months. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

26 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are getting mad about his refereeing – 3 vandalisms in ten minutes. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:01, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected. Is on permanent pending changes status. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:16, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This needs a raise, incessant disruption by users/ips, reverted by numerous editors. Same person was blocked a month ago for this same behavior. Noorullah (talk) 19:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

The same page the user currently disrupted (and got blocked for) is also extended confirmed, the Third Anglo-Afghan War page.
Requesting an Administrator to check this out ASAP.
@Favonian Noorullah (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., will log as CT restriction Ymblanter (talk) 22:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: I hate to do this again, LTA. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 23:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JJMC89.. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by various blocked South Korean IP ranges. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:44, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 23:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 00:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Page is suffering from high editing activity, all of which are vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 00:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected for a longer period due to high page view count. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 23:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP disruption starting in 2005, increasing since 2006 and still ongoing(see hist). Requested protection: Indefinite semi-protection. RaschenTechner (talk) 00:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. The page doesn't get a lot of traffic but it does get abused often. If another admin disagrees with this please feel free to adjust the page protection accordingly. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA sockpuppeting and adding personal phone numbers. Alith Anar 16:14, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious target. Ormewood (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article does not meet the requirements for WP:CT/AP as it's a list. There is not a history of vandalism at this time. Lists for other presidents do not have a history of such protection. If another admin disagrees with this please go ahead and protect the page. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Repeated addition of unsourced content, removal of citations. Adakiko (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism Adumbrativus (talk) 23:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

See also related disruptive behavior at LG Cup (Go), Byun Sang-il, and Korea Baduk Association, by users such as 2A00:23CC:B5B2:7B00:B8F6:82A4:CE1F:1264 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 182.255.32.58 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 182.255.32.59 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (recently blocked), 182.255.32.60 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (recently blocked). Adumbrativus (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Partially related to the Arab-Israeli conflict: WP:CTOPS/A-I 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 03:01, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done This article does not qualify under WP:CT/A-I as the topic is about a unit and not about the conflict. If another admin feels otherwise please feel free to protect the page and let me know so I can make sure I don't make mistake going forward. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:58, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temperory Semi-Protection: High level of IP vandalism, despite many warnings Imsaneikigai (talk) 04:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There appear to be other IP editors who are adding material to the article. If this becomes a problem please feel free to return and rerequest. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Keeps getting vandalized and negative info being added without proper citations, positive info being removed. It was protected before, but it expired. A more permanent or long term protection would be better. Main editor doing now is @3517MountainPark, but also there was an IP editor before. I suspect it is the same person with different accounts. Other prior accounts this person used are @EncoreTalent and @MikeLFaraday. Sharamoscar (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – there is edit war happening between which language comes first. Constantly changing. Aadirulez8 (talk) 09:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic IP vandalism. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 12:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Lemonaka 14:47, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Possible promotional sock farm. Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:53, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism and Edit warring by probable sock puppet account of User:ParvatPrakash who was been already suspended. Addition of unreliably sourced content. Livingstonshr (talk) 16:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring by suspected sock accounts of ParvatPrakash and Goyama Livingstonshr (talk) 16:06, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:51, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Request for Semi-Protection Mejri Fares (talk) 17:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: a lot of vandalism Mejri Fares (talk) 17:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP edit warring (even if they're right and it constitutes fringe theory). mftp dan oops 18:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is longer than I would like but this appears to be an edge case with a very slow burning edit war. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Nswix (talk) 18:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:25, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Fathoms Below. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 00:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 00:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 01:06, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptions from IP editors and new accounts. (Not sure why this particular article has become a victim.) MaxwellMolecule (talk) 01:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Within 2 hours of being unprotected, the vandalism started right back up again, 8 reverts in the last 10 hours... Adolphus79 (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fancruft-related edit-warring by an IP. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level IP of vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 02:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. SamstackDMV (talk) 02:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Article is in AfD now. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:11, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued additions of blatantly false, unsourced claims by Vietnamese IP editors (same location as the December vandals) that JMEV is operating in other countries (this time they claim Mexico). Previous protection ended a few days ago. Zinnober9 (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:11, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – New user and IP sock farm hijacking redirect; sockmaster has not been identified. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:53, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:14, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JJMC89. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: LTA IP vandalism. Article last protected 7 August 2024. Same individual returned. Blocking IP won't work, they hop, but it will help. GreenC 05:39, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please be mindful of WP:3RR in the future. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the film's title reveal, there's constant vandalism. Good faith editors may instead place edit requests. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 06:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:11, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Sabina was a Turkish with Bosniak ancestry, she was not a Armenian. In all other languages it's correct but except English it got vandalized. "was an Armenian aviator" should be "was an Turkish aviator" Freestylee-sav (talk) 01:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 10:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 07:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism cluttering the edit history. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism by IPs flooding the edit history with 1-byte edits. Likely all the same person, given the habit of blanking talk page warnings with edit summary "Ok, I understand" (or variations) and then coming back later on a different v6 address. Seercat3160 (talk) 09:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated back and forth reverts by editors without edit summaries, discussion, or new sources. Recent protection expired. Adumbrativus (talk) 09:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This category should be protected until April 2 at the very least, when new information about the Nintendo Switch 2 will be announced by Nintendo. GSK (talkedits) 05:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent WP:BLOCKEVASION by the IPs of User:Caspidarya. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is not needed because it must edited to be corrected — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panekasos (talkcontribs) 04:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 10:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Recurring unsourced edits on a recently deceased person, particularly in place of death. Borgenland (talk) 12:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced content addition and vandalism spurred by a reported transfer. Entranced98 (talk) 13:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-confirmed protection for Malakai Black disruptive editing by IPs as developing information is coming out about the subject which right now is WP:OR and speculation. [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] If you have any questions let me know in the reply. Lemonademan22 (talk) 15:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism and edit waring, mainly from the same user who I suggest blocking Sushidude21! (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Comment. Authentic2024 (talk · contribs), who is the reason this request has been filed, is an hour-old account and has so far been solely dedicated to blanking sections of the page based on personal judgements. I have reason to suspect there may be a COI in this. Borgenland (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
@Sushidude21! It would also be nice if sources can be found other than Twitter, although that does not excuse the other editor from wholesale whitewashing the page. Borgenland (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-confirmed protection due to high level of disruptive editing coming from IPs and new editors relating to developing information on the subject, which right now is unconfirmed and WP:OR. [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] If you have any questions at all please let me know in the reply. Lemonademan22 (talk) 15:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Bntlyprce (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:11, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring to remove sourced content and add unsourced content and vandalism ( 'prostitute'). Adumbrativus (talk) 17:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:35, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism to replace actual name with 大, homophone of 大便 'feces', 'defecate'. Adumbrativus (talk) 17:42, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP edit warring over ungrammatical content and uncited additions, in addition to blanking {{cn}}. Not cut-and-dry vandalism, but rapidly up against 3RR with zero responses to direct attempts at engagement. This article has a history of edit warring and block evasion from IP editors, I don’t know if that’s what’s happening here. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 14:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant violations of the WP:NOTFORUM rule, as well as insertion of spammy comments in general. OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia states Bobby Orr's family was paid 10,000 dollars at signing. On page 69 of his book he states they were paid 1,000.00 dollars. 99.255.207.89 (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done The 10,000 figure never appears in the article, either as a number or written-out. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

27 January 2025

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is currently attracting a large amount of vandalism and WP:BLP violations from a number of IP addresses. Opolito (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:03, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing(see hist), high-risk page. And yes, there is enough disruptive activity to justify protection. RaschenTechner (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding Trump "Declare that all Americans are now legally female. Cassiopeia talk 02:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: I believe you want the talk page semi-protected (the article is already indefinitely semi-protected). I'll leave that for other opinions but a quick look makes me think there is not enough disruptive activity to warrant that? The meme is silly and if it really is added frequently, semi would be justified but it currently appears to be just a couple of IPs commenting reasonably (well it would be reasonable if the meme weren't silly). Johnuniq (talk) 02:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see the vandalism has been ongoing on the talk page for a few days. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Monophile/Archive and [124]. Protecting S Chacko and Shibu Chacko MBE might also be necessary. Badbluebus (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Creation protected indefinitely. I did all three. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 00:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An autoconfirmed WP:SPA is repeatedly adding copyrighted content to the page. I am involved and wish to avoid edit warring, but have been discussing with the editor on their talk page. The most obvious copyvio is with this page. This article has been subject to repeated COI and paid editing before, both disclosed and undisclosed. —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined, this is just one user, if they do not stop (and I do not think they got a copyvio warning yet) they must be blocked. Protection is not a solution in this case. Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IP editors to insert primary sources by 'independent researchers'. Very likely COI editing. MrOllie (talk) 22:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This is already EC protected, but it seems like that isn't enough. I think full protection for a short period may be in order. The talk page could stand more monitoring from uninvolved admins as well. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 00:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 18 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Move protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Article protected for a cooling off period to promote consensus on the talk page. Move protection added as a precaution due to the high number of pageviews this article has over the past 30 days. If any other admin belives this is too much please go ahead and revert or reduce the protections I've put in place. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 20:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Meme circulating on twitter and facebook has highlighted the pictoral example of static cling (the cat with Styrofoam peanuts), causing a significant amount of attention - and vandalism - to this page 162.220.159.92 (talk) 00:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High level of disruptive editing/BLP vios over the last few days. RachelTensions (talk) 02:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently lost a playoff game, the page is geting mocked by fans. Would benefit from a short protection (like a day) until people forget about it. win8x (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Okay yeah maybe 1 day was a little too less. Thanks! win8x (talk) 04:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The page was deleted for inactivity but is now active and we would like to make it undeleted. Girls Town Jerusalem (talk) 08:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

@Girls Town Jerusalem: You're in the wrong location. Try WP:Requests for undeletion - but I note that you will likely be blocked for username if you do. We do not allow usernames that imply shared or official use. In addition, if you are working for Girls Town Jerusalem, you are obligated to disclose that relationship per the Terms of Use. Finally, I have a feeling you wouldn't be able to edit this article or draft in the first place anyway. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I don’t see a deleted page at either of the links above. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done, nothing to do, because no page by that title, or any similar title, has ever existed on the English Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BlueboyLINY (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – from 25-27 Jan, 2025. (1) editors kept on adding Trump indicated all American are born female/ are female. (2) edit disagreement between IP editor and register editor. Cassiopeia talk 01:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If another admin believes that this requires additional protection please feel free to do so. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

After the "For other wikis, check the Meta oversight page..." sentence, add "If the wiki on which you are requesting oversight does not have a local oversight team, email the stewards using this form." I can't post this on User talk:Oversight, as that is a fully-protected redirect to the user page. JJPMaster (she/they) 14:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done The content was actually at User:Oversight/Emailnotice, whose talk page redirects to WT:Oversight, which is not protected, so this request should have been made there. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Salt the earth - Repeatedly re-created, target of a spammer sockmaster (Simodabir0). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Salt the earth - Repeatedly re-created via move from draft, target of a spammer sockmaster (Simodabir0). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WMF-banned user edit warring with proxies, see sulutil:IBARSKI KOLASIN as well for reference. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 20:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also left CTOPS notice, since the article is indef semi. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Random jokes about him having small hands 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 22:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-confirmed protection for one month due to disruptive editing from IPs. Honestly there are too many to link but here are the main culprits: [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] If you have any questions at all please let me know in the reply. Lemonademan22 (talk) 23:03, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 23:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruption (removal/alteration of sourced info) by IPs/new users. It's been really bad since december. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/CID since that was what I logged the previous protection under. Daniel Case (talk) 05:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 05:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Very High level of IP vandalism. It's also under a contentious topicXiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 15:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
I have, nonetheless, left a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: added spam and wrong information by non-related persons 2400:1A00:4B4A:EB60:E4C6:87FC:8526:9E9F (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. You may be WP:BOLD and make the edits yourself if you so wish. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism RowanJ LP (talk) 04:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Repeated addition of unsourced claims, and might be the target of malicious editing due to it being an ongoing contentious event WeaponizingArchitecture | yell at me 22:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Lexa the king (talk · contribs) blocked by Johnuniq. from the page for a week. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  08:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Previously protected but still the target of persistent vandalism. Glennznl (talk) 10:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Distributive Ip vandalism Myuoh kaka roi (talk) 09:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disagreement concerning sources and content is not vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 11:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 13:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:17, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: History of all types of problems. Huge potential for vandalism. JamesMdp (talk) 07:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Somebody just [08:46, 27 January] edited and added some random sentence! ("the kattan dynasty of the puralimala (kannur)was also believed to be the successors to cheras." Please check the article history or talk history to see the amount the trash discussions...pls give the article some protection.

JamesMdp (talk) 10:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent vandalism from new users. 70.19.93.148 (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit about 10 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: needs updating about TH 17 and other issues Elliott JV (talk) 12:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Please use an edit request. The talk-page of said article isn't protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Investph (talk) 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined In fact, you are the one causing disruption. If you keep this up, you will be the one blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: Investph (talk · contribs) (from Overseas Vietnamese). After looking closer at the history of the disruption by the OP to these articles, I've blocked them from both. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Investph (talk) 14:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined In fact, you are the one causing disruption. If you keep this up, you will be the one blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: Investph (talk · contribs) (from Vietnamese people in France). After looking closer at the history of the disruption by the OP to these articles, I've blocked them from both. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of disruptive editing, semi-protection requested. RaschenTechner (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit about 6 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 15:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

change "In one account detailing Rizal's 1887 visit to Prague" to "In one account detailing Rizal's 1887 visit to Vienna" Johlet2 (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined Please use an edit request, and provide sources if necessary. The talk-page of said article isn't protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute and persistent edit-warring among extended-confirmed users.

(213.109.192.23 (talk) 09:19, 27 January 2025 (UTC))

Note: A bit early imho...talk-page discussion is underway. I wouldn't protect atm. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
That one talk page section, is nearly 1000 words long – a great gray text wall of dispute and vexation. 213.109.192.23 (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Update: It has now become a full-blown edit war.@Lectonar @Ymblanter @Favonian (213.109.192.23 (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC))
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Do what you can to get other editors involved on talk and resolve this ... maybe post about it to WT:ICTF? Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent heavy IP vandalism Sushidude21! (talk) 10:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism, more on the way Sushidude21! (talk) 11:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended-Confirmed-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Morphing IP adding sourced, but very no-NPOV, writing to misrepresent the subject of a parliamentary vote. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent WP:NOTFORUM by various IP ranges dating back to January 2024 and earlier. With the recent season 2 premiere, this has become more constant. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'll leave a note about this on their talk page, thank you for bringing this up. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:42, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts. AnotherWeatherEditor (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 17:42, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP user constantly deletes inconvenient information,[134][135][136] semi-protection requested. Jet Jerry (talk) 17:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism by a single school IP DACartman (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dell Latitude E6400 (talk) 18:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spamming. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected for a longer period of time due to being used on other articles. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Widr. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 15:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right back to vandalism after page protection expired in November 2024. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edits that aren't NPOV or aren't appropriate for a biography of a living person Underdevelopedprefrontalcortex (talk) 21:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:21, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistant sockpuppetry by IP's. Catfurball (talk) 21:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism, more on the way Sushidude21! (talk) 11:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP edit warring. Boardwalk.Koi (talk) 11:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

The IP in question is also a sockpuppet - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Holiptholipt/Archive and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Holiptholipt. Brat Forelli🦊 14:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2800:2503:0:0:0:0:0:0/39 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing & addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's been over three months since Al-Kaf's controversial ruling in the World Cup Qualifiers, and unregistered users (the majority of which are from Indonesia) have still been vandalizing his page. Call me paranoid, but I believe the page should be indefinitely semi-protected. OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll see if vandalism is still an issue after the third round of the AFC World Cup Qualifiers are over. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
22:19, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

28 January 2025

Reason: Socks repeatedly copying all the reviews of movies he has appeared in - has been going on for months Arjayay (talk) 12:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 49.205.118.4 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. IP keeps changing things like commas and making insulting edit summaries. Ermenrich (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have given them a level 3 warning over their edit summaries. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Urgent Request for Protection for the Wikipedia Page of Espérance Sportive de Tunis

Reason: Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to request a protection of the Wikipedia page of Espérance Sportive de Tunis, particularly due to the anticipated surge in global attention surrounding the club's participation in the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup in the USA, which will take place in June 2025.

As the club will be competing in this prestigious event, it is expected that there will be a significant increase in traffic to the page. Unfortunately, this may also lead to attempts to introduce false claims, misinformation, and vandalism. Given the importance of maintaining accurate and reliable content, I believe it is essential to safeguard the page from such disruptions.

Therefore, I respectfully request that the page be any protection you see fit for a reasonable duration before and after the event to preserve the integrity of the article. This will ensure that all information on the page remains correct and that readers receive reliable details about the club during a period of heightened interest.

Thank you for considering this request. I trust that the protection will help maintain the page’s accuracy and reliability, especially at this critical time.

Best regards, Mejri Fares (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I don't think this should be protected per WP:PREEMPTIVE, and there isn't much vandalism on that page. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. As noted above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Chronic vandalism especially by IPs, and irresponsible editing and vandalism by accounts. This is especially since this video about the "weirdest wikipedia article ever". I'm not sure if those type of youtubers care that they make a business out of a call to action to brigade Wikipedia with know-it-alls and vandals! Please permanently protect it. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 21:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it recurs, perhaps go to prolonged pending changes protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently announced album article, target of IP vandals continuously changing chronology convention. —IB [ Poke ] 16:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. If the issue gets worse please come back and rerequest. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Almost all edits to this page are vandalism and vandalism reverts. RaschenTechner (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism in past weeks. Cabrils (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High IP vandalism changing boxoffice figure without reliable source. RangersRus (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If this gets worse please feel free to come back and rerequest, the page has been off of page protection for less than a day. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
@Dr vulpes: It has already gone bad after 4 different IPs made bad edits. I already reverted twice the changes that are not sourced. Right now the IP stopped because of the edit it made with wrong boxoffice figure not mentioned in the source. RangersRus (talk) 21:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
@RangersRus I've gone ahead and updated the source for the new box office earnings. This was not vandalism, the IP editor probably didn't know how to add sources. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 20:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If the issue becomes larger please feel free to return and rerequest. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
no it's not Kajmer05 (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
100% disruptive editing lol anyway Kajmer05 (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
interesting XDDD Kajmer05 (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 185.226.91.6 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Article does not fall under the ArbCom remedies for WP:PIA please see 1.3 Definition of the "area of conflict". If there is continued disruption or vandalism of the article please return and request page protection again. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. For at least 3 weeks. Out of precaution, admittedly, since the Chiefs (and the Eagles) are heading to Super Bowl LIX. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A day or so ago this might have been justified, but that dispute seems to have cooled. And "Out of precaution, admittedly" is basically a request for pre-emptive protection, which outside of certain situations in ArbCom cases we don't grant. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Mastkodont is IP hopping and vandalizing this page since September. I suggest an indef semi of this page. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 23:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Other admins have put in IP bans. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting permanent pending changes protection. Over the years this article has been prone to vandalism, spam and promotional additions from new and anonymous users. These edits, however, have come in waves, and unfortunately they are sometimes unnoticed. Take for example the edits this month. I think this article would benefit from protection that does not restrict editing but subjects it to review, as many of the appropriate edits are from less experienced editors, but also many of the inappropriate ones. Yue🌙 00:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I do not like to protect a page indefinitely unless it's seriously needed. There does appear to be some problems here so let's see if this helps deal with it and if not we can revisit it in a few months. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonstop vandalism despite pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2804:7F0:96C2:C000:0:0:0:0/50 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Highly politicized article with inevitable potential for POV pushing, which has already seen some IP edits be reverted. (Yes, I'm aware there is a current deletion discussion and a current move request for this, but the deletion discussion seems decided on keeping it and the move request wouldn't prevent protection.). O.N.R. (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see much disruption from IPs ... on an article like this there's going to be a lot of well-intended edits that get reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring and vandalism Imconfused3456 23:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done Right now there are a lot of edits going on in that article so I'm going to hold off for right now but if it starts to go downhill feel free to ping me. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. QalasQalas (talk) 01:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 04:04, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock-puppetry from a blocked user, as well as on-going, high-levels of disruptive editing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  04:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism on the article. Galaxybeing (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 07:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: POV-pushing/NPOV-violating vandalism related to the handling of January 2025 Southern California wildfires. Requesting temporary semi-protection. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 07:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

(I'm at least glad this is happening to me and not to an actual Chinese person.) Remsense ‥  04:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That'll get past the Chinese New Year. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
@Rsjaffe what should I do for brand-new users that would be inclined to post on my talk during this time? Remsense ‥  04:28, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
You could put this at the top of your talk page: Template:User talk protected. Some people have more sophisticated systems, but for temporary protection, this seems ok. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Cabrils (talk) 04:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism by new user attempting to edit war. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 05:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Zgirard55 (talk · contribs). As no other users have edited the article disruptively, the page does not need to be protected at this time. — Newslinger talk 05:41, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mann Mann (talk) 08:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding unsourced content repeatedly while hopping IPs. Mike Allen 10:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Am assuming PIA5 decision applies here, but maybe I'm wrong?. CNC (talk) 02:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't think this qualifies under PIA5 decision. Dr vulpes (Talk) 09:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  03:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 08:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  03:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 08:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Constant disruptive editing and socking Sarsenet (talk) 06:27, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There does appear to be some disruptive editing but it was almost ten days ago. If this happens again feel free to request page protection again. Dr vulpes (Talk) 09:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: A user (apparently a self-confessed employee of the Azerbaijani state according to this COIN thread [137]) has repeatedly been removing sourced material from this article, either under a registered account or via IP address, now 5 times in the last 5 days. I think it may be useful if some form of long term page protection was applied as the material they are trying to remove is clearly being removed for political censorship reasons and attempts are unlikely to stop. Axad12 (talk) 06:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:40, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Any suggestion on what I should do if the activity continues after the protection ends? Axad12 (talk) 10:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
If it gets disrupted again, re-request protection. It's rather common procedure to escalate protections slowly. Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Okay, many thanks. Axad12 (talk) 12:19, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: I think a case could be made under WP:ARBPIA for indefinite / arbitration enforcement, but since it's not directly related I'm mostly making this request because I've observed some implicit canvassing around a particular section on the page - see these tweets - we're discussing the changes in question on the talk page, so some degree of elevated protection will help prevent additional edit warring. (I hope.). Smallangryplanet (talk) 07:51, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Thanks for bringing this up, I think this is more of an isolated incident but if things get worse please feel free to come back and request page protection again. If another admin disagrees with me please go ahead and protect the page. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:11, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pending changes protection is also appropriate. RaschenTechner (talk) 10:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recently frequently targeted by vandalism-only account and IP vandalism. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:48, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/İsmail Kendir/Archive and WP:AIV, edit-warring by obvious socks with snarky summaries in Turkish. Wikishovel (talk) 11:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This is new created page for a music publishing company, Please help to increase his citation. Davidstark12 (talk) 11:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I have moved this back to draft space. Not ready for mainspace. Lectonar (talk) 11:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP user keeps adding a phone number DACartman (talk) 02:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, would also be ok with pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wow, about half the edits for the past few years are vandalism or reverting vandalism. If this persists next year, consider longer protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant misuse of the talk page by different ips to send birthday greetings. Valenciano (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. May need permanent semiprotection, we'll see if this recurs. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs persistently restoring a speedy deletion tag that was declined by an administrator. Jfire (talk) 20:28, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism; this problem is plaguing the article for quite some time now; see its talk page. The current list is completely messed up again. Should restore the correct version and protect the page. Maxeto0910 (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

P.S.: Same applies to List of countries by merchandise exports and List of countries by service exports. Maxeto0910 (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Three Sixty! (talk, edits) 18:19, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing from multiple accounts. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 02:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The nature of the article brings a lot of disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts, and who don't even bother leaving edit reasons. The article has been reverted multiple times by multiple accounts over the past few days alone. Requesting extended or permanent protection. DA1 (talk) 02:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/IPA. IanDBeacon (talk) 12:59, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:47, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  02:57, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Hello, I would like to request protection for the Espérance Sportive de Tunis article, ideally until the end of July 2025. With the team participating in the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, many new fans will be seeking information about the club. Given the increase in traffic and interest, it’s likely that the article could face vandalism or unconstructive edits.

Protection would help ensure that the article remains accurate and reliable during this period of heightened attention. Since the tournament’s marketing will soon ramp up, having this protection in place could help avoid disruptions while maintaining the article’s quality. EL major (talk) 21:57, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

@EL major: Articles are not pre-emptively protected outside of the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 22:04, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
@Mejri Fares: Re-signing to fix ping. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 22:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your response and for explaining the policy on preemptive protection. I understand that protection is generally applied only when there is a demonstrated need, especially outside of sensitive areas like the Arab-Israeli conflict.
However, I still believe that the upcoming 2025 Club World Cup could attract attention that might lead to disruptive or biased edits. I will continue monitoring the article closely, but I appreciate your insight into the protection policy EL major (talk) 22:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  06:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥  06:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various United Kingdom IP ranges. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 07:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism claiming it closed and replaced by its 2018 predecessor. DankJae 12:27, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The possibility of vandalism on the page Iranian112 (talk) 13:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 13:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Ordinarily I'd have turned this down since it happened almost 20 years ago and isn't relevant to the current conflict, but the edit history argues more strongly for protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs have been changing his height for months based on one broadcast where he was listed as taller. Nswix (talk) 17:41, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wburrow (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Queen of Hearts. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

29 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:40, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page is about the leader of a large New Religious Movement. He also has a history of controversial views that some may want to deny or hide. As such, the page has a long history of non-constructive edits and deletions of well-sourced material. It seems like these edits happen regularly - about every month or so. A lot of these edits come from new users and IPs. Thus, it seems like indefinite Pending Changes protection would be a decent idea. Regardless, thanks for your time. CivilianArthur (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I am not seeing a pattern of active vandalism but if it occurs please feel free to return and request page protection again. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of Spam/Vandalism by IPs and newly created accounts AncientWalrus (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:03, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High volume of disruptions and addition of unsourced/poorly sourced info. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal(s). KH-1 (talk) 07:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Ongoing vandalism, needs attention.-KH-1 (talk) 12:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 49.130.128.0/23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Constant pov pushing and cast tamperingImsaneikigai (talk) 12:26, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Users keep on restoring a “poll” that doesn’t meet standards and isn’t the raw data also the link is to a twitter post. They didn’t even join in on the discussion in the talk page before making these changes nor why in the edit description itself even tho I gave my reasoning for why we should exclude it from the aggregation. Octilllion (talk) 12:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/RNE and/or WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not really seeing this getting out of control yet, though of course that could change. I will leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Oh, there is one already ... Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lead fixation among other general disruptions by drive by IPs on a recent political controversy. Gotitbro (talk) 17:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism, including twice in the past 24 hours. CTOP for gender. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2806:290:A800:18E3:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week, with edits RevDel'ed. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The last disruptive edit was on January 25th. RaschenTechner (talk) 20:41, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
What do you mean with "recent" disruptive activity? There clearly has been enough disruptive activity to justify protection(see hist) RaschenTechner (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Per the protection policy, we grant protection in response to recent disruption. The history shows the most recent disruption occurred over nine months ago. It would be like dispatching the fire department to ruins long charred, blackened and cold. Daniel Case (talk) 22:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
OK, I do see another disruptive edit more recently, but that was three days ago, and that's still not recent enough. Daniel Case (talk) 22:48, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. RaschenTechner (talk) 16:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Contentious topics are an exception. RaschenTechner (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Only in cases of new PIA articles, per ArbCom. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
It's more about which topics actually have an extended-confirmed restriction. Gender and Sexuality has not. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IShowSpeed became Mayor of Lima for 1 hour and now this page has had an uptick of vandalism ACanofTin (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Already done by administrator Dr vulpes. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Block evasion. Persistence sock-puppetry for months, possible sockmaster still engaged in edit warring for the very same subject for over a year. There has been a recent use of sock puppetry on this page, the user @Gybebaggy was blocked for sock puppetry, jointing a group of almost 10. The possible sockmaster is to be confirmed, but given the ongoing disruption insistence, the protection is needed. After the latest sock puppet was blocked an unknown user did the same change which the banned user was asking for. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baruch_Spinoza&diff=1272502522&oldid=1271763813

PepGuardi (talk) 01:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Roaming IP vandal. Part of an ongoing LTA attack on numerous Hong Kong skyscrapers. They've been doing this for years on and off. See also International Commerce Centre (protected) and Merdeka 118 (protected) GreenC 02:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High levels of spam, presumably because of media attention related to IShowSpeed Aurangzebra (talk) 03:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many IP and registered editors edit warring regarding the subject citizenship. Cassiopeia talk 03:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:12, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Albeit given recent events. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 02:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism IanTEB (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs since Jan 7. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 01:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 06:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors kept on adding rumors info. Cassiopeia talk 04:47, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:19, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: HorrorLover555 keeps removing correct information using many unreliable books

Not done I have already protected the article if you have a complaint about an editor and edit warring you should go here WP:AN3 Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: @Dr vulpes: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: HorrorLover555 keeps removing correct information using many unreliable books Clearly this is a false accusation, as I have followed the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia, as those sources they are continuing to restore have been disputed. This is clearly something that needs to be discussed at Talk:Triumph Tour instead of going back-and-forth over. HorrorLover555 (talk) 07:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of materials, with a reference that don't support the IP user's edits.[138][139][140] Hotwiki (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Anonymous and registered users have persistently vandalized the page. Namnewstyle (talk) 10:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

 Requesting immediate archiving... Duplicate request. BusterD (talk) 12:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing persisting after past protection expiration. Sarsenet (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Meant to select temporary semi-protection in Twinkle, my bad! Sarsenet (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: I ShowSpeed became Prime Minister of Serbia for hour and now this page has had an uptick of vandalism 2409:40D4:107C:67B:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 08:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 11:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse at B-52s articles from Special:Contributions/73.109.165.4 and Special:Contributions/2601:601:C83:1320:0:0:0:0/64. They keep removing the historically correct apostrophe from the band's name. The protection should also extend to the following pages: Give Me Back My Man, Mesopotamia (EP), Private Idaho, Dance This Mess Around, Rock Lobster, Roam, Love Shack, Whammy!, Summer of Love (The B-52's song), Channel Z (song) and Party Out of Bounds. Binksternet (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. /64 Selectively blocked from ten articles. Didn't know there was a max. BusterD (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

ARBPIA articles

Reason: In a recent case, the arbitration committee decided
"All articles whose topic is strictly within the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area shall be extended confirmed protected by default, without requiring prior disruption on the article."
The committee later clarified that this applied only to articles wholly or mostly in the topic, and not to pages which have only a minority of their content in the topic.

I have made a list of those articles which are identified as included in ARBPIA by a talk page template but are not EC-protected. If you protect any, please remove them from the list. (I am involved, so I can't protect them myself.)

In principle all of these should now be EC-protected, but there are rather a lot (over 2000). Is there a tool that allows mass protection of articles given in a list? I can provide the list in another format if it helps. Zerotalk 08:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

@Zero0000 I think I can do this it shouldn't be that hard but it'll be a little bit hacky. Feel free to hit me up on my talk page and I'll see what I can do tomorrow as for right now the format is fine, but if you could get it to me in a .csv it would save some time. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Discussion between Zero0000 and Dr_vulpes continues on the latter's talk page. Favonian (talk) 15:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: This page has been persistently vandalized by anonymous and registered users. Namnewstyle (talk) 10:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I see other IP contributions which are constructive. BusterD (talk) 12:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruptive edits by Anonymous IP Address. Gunther :  Talk  11:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This was a longer than normal protection since the page has been protection quite a few times over the last year. Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism after protection expired. Annh07 (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs engaged in disruptive editing. Karst (talk) 13:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Forgot to note that this was a longer than normal page protection due to the page receiving a high amount of traffic and being a BLP. Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated target of IP and new account vandalism. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 14:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longer than normal protection period due to high traffic and BLP. Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of Permanent, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Has been protected several times at one year each. Unfortunate vessel name. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:30, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired two days ago. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated addition of copyrighted material copied and pasted from their website Dormskirk (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Some IPs keep restoring an inappropriate external link. StephenMacky1 (talk) 14:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. IPs are blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:11, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: vandalism Tahomaru (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:BALKANS. El_C 19:47, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Done. El_C 19:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Done. El_C 19:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Done. El_C 19:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recently-created article has already received vandalizing BLP-violating edits due to recent comments about Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man by the article's subject. –WPA (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Continuous vandalism of IP Address, and might have a edit war ROY is WAR Talk! 05:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It looks like things have calmed down a bunch for now but if there is a pick up in vandalism please feel free to return and request page protection again. Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:48, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated insertion of unsourced or improperly sourced data by user Abdallah413, who refuses multiple requests to make his case on the subject's talk page Arlo3415 (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Several combatants have been sent off for edit warring. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked after protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: vandalism by IP account alleging the President of Romania Klaus Iohannis launched a self-coup. Bird244 (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment)  Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP-hopper from Romania over the past ten days. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Both IPs blocked for 1 month. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP-hopper from Romania and an IPv6 range from the UK. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Romanian IPs blocked 1 month, UK IPv6 2 weeks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Large volume of unsourced IP BLP editing after a controversial event. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 21:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:48, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sporadic IP disruption of the result. Would be better if this page was protected. Noorullah (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

30 January 2025

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:12, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:05, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The template is attached to protected Wikipedia pages and was discreetly vandalised by guest users. (Please refer to the template version history) N niyaz (talk) 22:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Hamas_history&diff=next&oldid=1260178724 N niyaz (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Please enforce WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Seems Semi was circumvented. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:27, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:57, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent, on-going addition of unsourced information. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not sure this is going to solve it, and further protection will probably be necessary, but we'll have to start here. Chetsford (talk) 01:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Recurring vandalism. Borgenland (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 01:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High profile page with many IP edits making changes without edit summaries and disregarding Wikipedia policy. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 22:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last IP edit was over a week ago. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 01:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 01:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations (and plain-old vandalism) by IPs.  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:57, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 02:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: The main article is currently semi-protected due to vast numbers of IP editors editing it to comment on the BLP subject's sexuality, or their perception of his sexuality. They've now transitioned to just editing the Talk page with that, with six such incidences of vandalism in the last three weeks (the Talk page is otherwise dead). Chetsford (talk) 23:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 01:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Part of a LTA against Hong Kong buildings. As we protect one, they move to the next. Since August 2024. See also: Shanghai Tower (protected), International Commerce Centre (protected), Merdeka 118 (protected), Lotte World Tower (protected). -- GreenC 04:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Ripe targets for WP:ANI or WP:SPI. guninvalid (talk) 04:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Is this WP:HKGW again? I noticed one of the IPs (219.76.25.193) appears to be a HKGW one (past New Kowloon editing history) and the other range-hopping ISPs match up with HKGW (Hutchison, HKT)- Smartone is a new one though, perhaps they got a new data plan? Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 05:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. for one month. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-Protection: Persistent targeting by IP account listing Euromaidan revolution as a coup. Bird244 (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP users constantly vandalize the article. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 03:53, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced / disruptive edits from Mutia ti la Union updates sock group, removing sourced information and adding unsourced nonsense. Ravensfire (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism over first sentence characterization. guninvalid (talk) 04:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Added CTOPS notice (WP:CT/AP) to an already busy talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Anonymous accounts keep replacing the article with terms like "illegal alien" which is inaccurate and dehumanizing. Who the law affects is also under dispute in the talk page and I think it should be edit protected for the time being so we can reach a consensus on what terms to use. LaggyMcStab (talk) 22:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP and invoke WP:CRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection for two weeks, i.e. a few days after Chinese New Year ends. Annual uptick in unsourced and vandal edits due to the festival starting, including racist vandalism. Don't need another year of admins having to revert and hide a dozen revisions. Yue🌙 22:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JBW. for at least one more day. Let's see how things go when this protection ends. Daniel Case (talk) 06:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated addition of uncited birthdate (BLP issue). May need full protection since it's both IPs and logged-in editors. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 23:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: People don't need to be editing this page. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 06:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zinderboff (talk) 02:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zinderboff (talk) 06:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/RNE. IanDBeacon (talk) 06:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The "R" in RNE stands for "recent", suggesting that the elections needs to have actually been held before we can invoke it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in a couple of months. Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Seems semi was circumvented here as well. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. All recent socks, indef, by various admins. Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: PSA Airlines is the airline involved in the January 29th mid-air collision near National Airport in DC. NeutralhomerTalk04:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC) 04:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And the report didn't suggest why protection might be necessary. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page is frequently subject to vandalism and spam edits by unauthorized users. Due to the high-profile nature of the individual, these disruptive changes are undermining the integrity and accuracy of the content. Requesting semi-protection to restrict editing to only registered users or full protection to ensure that the content remains accurate and reliable. Pkvranchi (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In fact, you've made the majority of the edits, and I suspect you're the article subject, seeking the sort of pre-emptive protection we almost never grant. Daniel Case (talk) 06:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding unsourced contain since 29 Dec 2024 (at least a month). Cassiopeia talk 09:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 11:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: An IP has repeatedly removed the entire list of skyscrapers and replaced it with just the "International Commerce Centre". I have had to undo their revisions each time in order to continue my own research. 175.35.204.14 (talk) 09:53, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing after protection expired: persistent addition of unsourced content. Annh07 (talk) 09:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Previous three month protection expired a week ago, and IP vandals are back. Please protect for a year. Thanks! Chrisahn (talk) 11:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple disruptive edits and ridiculous mass reverts from sockpuppets of a banned and locked user, who is ignorantly and angrily lashing out on people of quote-unquote "having bias towards VY Canis Majoris as the largest star" even despite my criticism and as well as List of largest stars still having stars with larger radii. Furthermore, this user has been cherry-picking unreliable and biased info like for NML Cygni and UY Scuti in particular such as old radii and status as the largest which likely just came from older Wikipedia revisions (and WP isn't a reliable reference). Just because a ref states a star as the largest star known doesn't mean it should be blindly considered as 100% as the largest depending on other sources and especially the reliable value estimate of the said star (see also an archived discussion). It can be said this sockpuppet creator may be just attempting to rudely force his takes on others rather than discuss in talk page in a civil way. Same goes for other pages this user recently edited like NML Cygni, Red supergiant, Talk:List of largest stars, Stephenson 2 DFK 1, Orders of magnitude (length), and List of star extremes. I apologize if my English was bad. Thanks. RegardsZaperaWiki44(/Contribs) 19:59, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been no edits at all on this page since September. Did you pick the right page? Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
No. Just realized something: Whoops! I was referring to the main page, not the talk one. My bad, my mistake. RegardsZaperaWiki44(/Contribs) 09:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator JBW. Problem resurfaced. Favonian (talk) 13:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations vis à vis the recent plane-crash in DC. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations vis à vis the recent plane crash in DC. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:19, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations vis à vis the recent plane crash in DC. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: P Muffiactor (talk) 12:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:09, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Sean Duffy is the new US Secretary of Transportation; a small section on his position on climate change keeps being changed or partly deleted by IPs. One deletion was explained by climate change "not [being] a proven fact", and another edit replaced the term "climate change denial" with "thoughtful discourse regarding climate change". WikiFouf (talk) 13:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. This board doesn't operate to protect specific subject content; we apply protection when the page is under active attack. I see normal editing processes at work. I see several new accounts and ip users making useful contributions at this time. High activity is expected when a public figure is 1) in Congress for confirmation and 2) when their department responds appropriately to accidents. BusterD (talk) 14:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Change the phrase 'subgroup of Igbo' to 'distinct ethnic group'. 102.91.4.56 (talk) 07:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Ukwuani people is not protected. Remember to include reliable sources for your claim. Favonian (talk) 12:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by Jordanian IP-hopper. Sjö (talk) 15:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 17:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Chetsford (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content due to the subject being in the news regarding a potential transfer. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:34, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Within the scope of WP:ARBPIA, target of frequent vandalism. Smallangryplanet (talk) 16:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Chetsford (talk) 17:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism. Recent death of controversial person.BabbaQ (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 17:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged arb enforcement. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged as Arb enforcement. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level disruptive IP editing. Prodrummer619 (talk) 17:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Chetsford. Favonian (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: As recent 1d semi-protection has expired, linkspam by IPs is back [141]. It seems to continue despite original editor having been indeffed. AncientWalrus (talk) 19:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it recurs, may need significantly longer protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting semi-protection under WP:CT/GG due to persistent and ongoing mispronouning and other anti-trans edits from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. I will be RevDel'ing anything that hasn't been already. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent vandalism (short descriptions) by variety of accounts/IPs Fram (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Some level of IP vandalism regarding his international goals. IDontHaveSkype (talk) 20:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism again. Already protected twice in this month, requesting for a longer one. 🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔📝) 20:34, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent POV pushing and disruption by apparent socks since November 2024.

WP:CT/EE is a contentious topic. Badbluebus (talk) 21:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

31 January 2025

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Removal of tags and addition of poorly sourced budget by multiple sock IPs, here, here, and here. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: A user keeps amending this page to include a note under the “Side Slam” section stating, “Bryan Beal of Berkeley Heights Township Wrestling performs a version called The Beal Bomb.” Neither this wrestler (Bryan Beal) nor the promotion (Berkeley Heights Township Wrestling) hold any form of notoriety in professional wrestling; searching for both “Bryan Beal wrestler” and “Berkeley Heights Township Wrestling” in popular search engines yields no results. This is clearly someone trying to amend the article to include their name to show off to friends or something. I’ve removed the reference a number of times now, and each time it is reverted. The latest reversion even admits the above (“BK Heights Township wrestling is a local house show.”) A local house show does not, to me, seem to satisfy Wikipedia’s requirements of notoriety and therefore warrant inclusion in the article. Martin Bean (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

This is school vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OK, probably a past school vandal, who at some recent point has gotten access, briefly it seems, to a US State Department computer and uses a Nepal-based VPN ... probably blocked at home. Daniel Case (talk) 22:58, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection to stop repeated disruptive edits from a long-term disruptive IP editor who is abusing VPNs. He's used at least nine different IPs since January 26. This editor has some sort of obsession with this particular article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP Users, especially adding the "fact" that it has long names without good reason.CricketXP (talk) 14:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IP appears to restore changes by 13enedict. They also referred to a talk page discussion recently started by 13enedict (with no other responses). Mellk (talk) 14:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

13enedict now appears to leave a comment on my talk page, stating that they will restore the changes if they do not hear from me. Since this looks like WP:LOUTSOCK and they are only focused on this particular article, it might be sufficient to only block them? Mellk (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
I actually do agree this needs page or at least the section of Early Life needs protection. It is currently in an inaccurate state and User:Mellk is refusing to discuss. 13enedict (talk) 14:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unsourced content from IP range Special:Contributions/36.71.136.0/22. The article is about Malaysian record label, but they keep change to "Malaya-Hong Kong-Singapore number one and largest oldest oldies record label owned by Hup Hup Sdn Bhd", as well as their problematic edits without any improvement. 183.171.120.157 (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. For two weeks. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 16:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@Binksternet: Be careful when reverting !
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. C F A 17:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longer period than usual because there's little reason for this to be edited by non-clerks/CUs. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Frequency is too low for semi-protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. will log ctops — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:19, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. will log ctops— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Athlete embroiled in controversy, already seeing vandalism. Nswix (talk) 22:58, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP hopping vandal harassing and misgendering me on my talk. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 00:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of edit warring with a particular user removing well sourced content Expectopatronum30 (talk) 11:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Constant edit warring and removal of sourced historical information. Nabhas Chandra (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Stormbird (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 48 hours for violating 3RR in a contentious topic area. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Since this was just a case of one user, it really would have been better reported to ANEW, where the same thing would have happened, but probably faster. Daniel Case (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continually changing figures. Mellk (talk) 17:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/A-A. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Dr vulpes. Indef ECP, even though no one had edited the article in over two months/ Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits. Simione001 (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: BLP violations in awake of allegations. 2601:586:5301:5C00:21AB:D3DE:2532:5472 (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IPs have been consistently and deliberately disrupting the article which uses British English by replacing "Jamiroquai are" to "Jamiroquai is" and in one case "Jamiroquai be". [147] [148] [149] [150] I fear that this disruption may persist. OO 23:37, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Editing by numerous socks. LTA. Note blocked editors on page history. See wp:Sockpuppet investigations/Trinsely for new list. Adakiko (talk) 00:33, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by possible socks (User:I7amirr, User:Truthtruth1111111, User:Tru1091) since last October. Badbluebus (talk) 02:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, including unconfirmed cast members and characters. The Media Expert (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@The Media Expert: DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Seems to be limited to edits from 70.29.21.238 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Blocks should be preferred to protection; not blocking because they haven't edited in over a day. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Not by me. With two users/IPs, protection should not be necessary for now. Request again if they come back, please. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy🍁 23:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@Moxy: User(s) blocked: ToadGuy101 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. Blocks should be preferred over protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Sounds more than logical thank you so much for your time. Moxy🍁 01:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Always vandalism from IPs, nothing much to edit here. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 01:14, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit was nearly four weeks ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP disruption surely by @Satoshi Nakamoto34: soon after the user account's block from the article yesterday. MŠLQr (talk) 17:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2400:ADC7:92F:8E00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Sitewide rather than from the article as the history shows other disruption earlier in the month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article's at AfD and, while it looks like it will be kept, until that decision is made I don't think we should make it too hard to edit. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit in the last month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Subject has little bearing the present conflict, and article likewise gets minimal editing. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. BangJan1999 22:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Autoconfirmed SPAs trying to remove maintenance tags [151][152][153] [154] [155] [156]. Badbluebus (talk) 23:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: QuantumThread (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks after this was reported to ANEW. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism over several days (January 16-23rd) by IP user whose entire edit history is vandalism (193.115.194.132) Godsoftware (talk) 01:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:06, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you! Godsoftware (talk) 02:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, rsjaffe, that IP hasn't edited in over a week. I don't see how that block is preventative. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:24, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Thankyou for pointing out my error. Missed that it was stale. Unblocked.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:52, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 02:24, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2001:E68:540F:0:0:0:0:0/49 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Page added to my pre-existing partial block on the range. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA User:Lam312321321 using two sock accounts and an IP to restore content to this article, in the past few days. Belbury (talk) 09:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:18, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Hamasien (talk) 09:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Chetsford. Semi-protected. EC protection not warranted at this point. Favonian (talk) 10:14, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: About half the January edits are new accounts or IP editors arbitrarily changing the subject's nationality or ethnicity to Kurdish. This is supported by no reliable source and no source cited in the article. The protection likely doesn't need to be permanent as this has not been a major issue for the article in the past. Rjjiii (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note: to my great surprise this article has never been protected before. Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Benison (Beni · talk) 10:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:43, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: To avoid vandalism Authentic gme (talk) 10:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again by multiple IP's after recent protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:45, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Creation protected Actually only recreated once, but I have no high hopes that this won't be recreated again. Lectonar (talk) 14:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page requires better protection due to possible and expected vandalism, bot attacks and spread of misinformation. Please consider semi or fully protecting this page. Thank you! Sremsky (talk) 14:18, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Government corruption and misinformation. Changing the leaders of the protests falsely to "Ustase" and blaming the protests on Croatia. The correct leaders of these protests are Students. The current president party is paying people to change the wiki page along with national television programs to lie and divide the people. Focus of the protests is demanding justice - regardless of the political party / current party in power.

Please lock this page. 193.221.198.106 (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Dr vulpes. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

+2 Reason: Untruthful edits made for the purpose of provoking the ones organizing the protests 188.90.120.19 (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:14, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CT/GG. Leonidlednev (TCL) 17:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS (vandal has also been indeffed). Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)