Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2025/04
- 2025
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 April 2025
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:TRCTheRaulChannelProductionsInc2021 from Brazil. The range Special:Contributions/2804:1A68:10E:BDAE:0:0:0:0/64 has been active recently. Special:Contributions/186.137.232.172 was blocked in January. Binksternet (talk) 18:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2804:1A68:10E:BDAE:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by IP from Shwapneel ahnaf 1999 (talk · contribs). MrOllie (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by IP from Shwapneel ahnaf 1999 (talk · contribs). MrOllie (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection Disruptive editing started again a day after year-long protection expired. Barry Wom (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unencyclopedic trivia. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Discospinster: I see you're currently active, please consider this request. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 17:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- I will keep an eye on the article to see if it keeps happening. ... discospinster talk 18:01, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's at 7rr at this point. protection requested. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:54, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- I concur; a page protection at this point is required. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Discospinster: ^ ^ ^ ^^ Sorry :P - FlightTime (open channel) 21:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Semi-protection, which seems sufficient since there aren't any autoconfirmed users apart from an extended-confirmed user. The only protection that would prevent them would be full protection, and I'm not sure anyone wants that. Please discuss on the talk page. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Discospinster: ^ ^ ^ ^^ Sorry :P - FlightTime (open channel) 21:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- I concur; a page protection at this point is required. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's at 7rr at this point. protection requested. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:54, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- I will keep an eye on the article to see if it keeps happening. ... discospinster talk 18:01, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 19:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:69B0:4AF0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Settlement demolished in 2005 is not a primary topic to current PIA conflict; gets very little editing attention. Daniel Case (talk) 20:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very few edits in a while. Clearly not a primary topic. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Again, little editing since October 2023; I don't think it's a primary topic. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Per others, minimal editing. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As per others. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 20:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Hasan al-Utrush and others
- Hasan al-Utrush (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Al-Mutawakkil II (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Muhammad ibn Zayd (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Yahya ibn Umar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Ibn Tabataba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Muhammad ibn al-Qa'im (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Yahya ibn Abdallah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since January, a person behind some IPs has had their eyes on these articles, wanting to a huge and unsourced genealogy tree. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs, some socks. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disrupting editing 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:9189:80E6:2B2B:B2F0 (talk) 17:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Apart from Special:Diff/1282870969, most of the IP edits are actually in good faith and are fine. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent vandalism from multiple users. ogusokumushi( ୧ ‧₊˚ 🎐 ⋅ ) 19:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has only been one edit this year. Joyous! Noise! 21:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- I assume that this request was actually supposed to be the article. Seems to have died down now, but will add to my watchlist for a while. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: User request within own user space. I would like it protected to prevent autoconfirmed users from editing this. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 21:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:00, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Not done. @Freedoxm: The only reason that user was able to vandalize your page is because you added a template allowing them to do so. If you want to prevent further occurrences, remove the template. Please don't request protection of your user page again, unless actual autoconfirmed users start vandalizing it (that one had six edits, so wasn't autoconfirmed). Sdrqaz (talk) 23:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP user claiming that the Autonomous administration of N&E Syria has joined the STG. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 05:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Too much vandalism and disruptive editing Sparkbean (talk) 17:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Isla🏳️⚧ 00:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 24.55.33.220 (talk) 02:10, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Insufficient frequency for semi-protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. 202.67.47.28 (talk) 13:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Biographies of living person 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:9189:80E6:2B2B:B2F0 (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to it expiring yesterday, there already has been so much reverting, I propose this goes indefinite, due to the popularity and vandalism of this page... Valorrr (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of previous editing behaviours stemming from previous protection; while I am sure only temporary will be given, WP:DUCK applies, as exampled as other American soap pages (ie: General Hospital, The Young and the Restless, et al.) that this will be an ongoing issue. livelikemusic (TALK!) 18:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent, ongoing addition of unsourced content and/or original research to article by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – CTOP/AI. JayCubby 01:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. 148.76.227.61 (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, I will go ahead and declined my request is no longer need no one answer by the way. 148.76.227.61 (talk) 03:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... 148.76.227.61 (talk) 03:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. 148.76.227.61 (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, I will go ahead and declined my request is no longer need no one answer by the way. 148.76.227.61 (talk) 03:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... 148.76.227.61 (talk) 03:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 22:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Minimal editing in the last year or so, and not a primary PIA topic. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated insertion of exceptional and unverified WP:BLPCRIME claims by POV-pushing IPs based in Canada. Borgenland (talk) 23:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Their loaded edit summaries say it all. Borgenland (talk) 23:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Appears to be related to misinformation such as [1] and [2]. Borgenland (talk) 03:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have warned the most recent of the IPs they've used over edit warring. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been protected since 2010 (15 years ago). I think we can try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Done Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Not much vandalism since page protection in 2013, I think we can try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Done Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_misinformation_and_disruption_by_183.99.45.103 4300streetcar (talk) 01:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2001:E60:0:0:0:0:0:0/34 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism and unsourced material. BattleshipMan (talk) 17:46, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2804:D49:6643:C500:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Biographies of living persons 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:9189:80E6:2B2B:B2F0 (talk) 18:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. All recent disruptors Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: An IP user ([3]) has been repetedly adding the Lê dysnasty to the list ([4], [5], [6]) and copying a citation already on the page as its source despite it not supporting this. The user has not reponded to the message I left on their talk page. DervotNum4 (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 14.161.34.194 (talk · contribs) blocked by Rsjaffe. from the page for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection needed on this article, IP user(s) have been edit-warring over the same block of text since January: [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] BOZ (talk) 21:59, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Please the protection must be this: "Auto-accept: require "autoconfirmed" permission". With this we're avoiding a lot of trouble.--2800:484:7382:B00:80DD:120A:300C:80B8 (talk) 02:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @Daniel Case. :) I will be back if they start targeting other articles. BOZ (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case, one of the IPs that was likely being used by the same person was blocked for a year as an LTA case: [14] Would it make sense for me to share the rest of the IPs with you in case anything further needs to be done here? They are either meatpuppeting or just one person who is able to hop IPs often. BOZ (talk) 04:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- I can't do it now but I can take a look later and see what ranges they might be on that might not have been blocked at the moment. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2800:484:7380:0:0:0:0:0/44 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks, actually (this includes the editor who posted upthread, interestingly.) Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- @BOZ
They are either meatpuppeting or just one person who is able to hop IPs often.
Definitely the latter. It's JeanCastì, who was blocked in 2023 and has since been using various sockpuppets and IP addresses.[15] Barry Wom (talk) 08:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)- Wow yeah, he's been at this for a while. I don't know if you would want to look at likely stale IPs but I could gather a list of ones I've seen fighting over the same edits for the last couple of years or so. The one Daniel blocked has been in use steadily since 2021 so he will undoubtedly return to it. I see that range was previously blocked in November 2021, and I see more block activity earlier this year. Looks like you have been dealing with them for a while as well Barry. BOZ (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- I doubt a trawl for the IPs he's used in the past would be of much use. His M.O. is to abandon IP ranges when they're blocked and move to others.
Wow yeah, he's been at this for a while.
He sure has - over eight years, in fact. The earliest incarnation I could track down was this one, blocked in 2017. Barry Wom (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)- Such a bizarre behavior, but I guess it's not uncommon for some reason. BOZ (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wow yeah, he's been at this for a while. I don't know if you would want to look at likely stale IPs but I could gather a list of ones I've seen fighting over the same edits for the last couple of years or so. The one Daniel blocked has been in use steadily since 2021 so he will undoubtedly return to it. I see that range was previously blocked in November 2021, and I see more block activity earlier this year. Looks like you have been dealing with them for a while as well Barry. BOZ (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- I can't do it now but I can take a look later and see what ranges they might be on that might not have been blocked at the moment. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. PC doesn't seem to be helping 24.55.33.220 (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, as I think that the frequency is fine for pending changes. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Daniel Case, could you please take a look? 4 revisions have been reverted today 24.55.33.220 (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Pulica226 (talk · contribs) blocked by ESKog. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Should probably be semi-protected until tomorrow. cyberdog958Talk 06:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 22 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:47, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: LTA (MAB) target. ~SG5536B 06:03, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator 331dot. Favonian (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Decent amount of joke edits on April 1st. While they did make me laugh, they don't belong here. I'm expecting there's going to be issues with this page throughout the day. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 12:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ahecht. Favonian (talk) 15:00, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 12:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 19:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: high level of vandalism; almost every edit is vandalism or a reversion of said vandalism. — AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 18:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 19:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sensitive topic, therefore lots of vandalism. Valorrr (talk) 15:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 19:52, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: It hasn't been vandalised or substantially updated for a decade TrixieLaBouche (talk) 08:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Over a period of nearly five years, you've had two edit requests rejected (Special:PermaLink/1199291245). Rather than open up the article for editing, I'd prefer that you make a new request with satisfactory sources. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Revise the sentences which says Yasuke is a samurai. There are so many historical documents proved and written him as a slave. Therefore, this page currently is not accurate and full of myth. Yusuke Matsuki (talk) 17:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined We will not short-circuit a matter under active discussion on the talk page, and especially not in a contentious topic. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
02 April 2025
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor is warring to include promotional-appearing material. They do not appear to have found the talk page, and semi-protection might encourage them to do so. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 06:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various new accounts and IP addresses since 14:25, 1 April 2025. Alith Anar 14:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP Vandalism Polish kurd (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing, mostly ip disruption. Article hijacking which I am assuming is vandalism as wo.e of the ip's have editited the actual article as well as this one. Knitsey (talk) 21:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 54rt678 (talk) 23:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IPs persistently adding WP:COPYVIO episode summaries. Revision deletion(s) may be needed as well. Magitroopa (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. JeffSpaceman (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content; unexplained content removal; prep for possible merge. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:52, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I want to do some bug testing regarding semi-protected pages crashing when I view them, but I do not want to damage already existing pages. The Phabricator link is at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T389872 Caleb's World11 (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive IP and latterly sock editing pro- and anti-the subject, who is a BLP currently in the news in the UK. Semi-protection needed. DeCausa (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Slow-motion edit war with an AC account (so protection will have to be EC) who keeps removing a sourced, cited and relevant fact from the article without explaining why and has ignored warnings. I am involved as, well, I only created the article a few years ago, so I can't do this myself Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also warned the user that is removing the content. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Have no clue why this articles is targeted from time to time. Moxy🍁 00:52, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. consarn (prison phone) (crime record) 11:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 02:50, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:57, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Polish kurd (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Tarlby (t) (c) 05:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent vandalism by nationalistic editing from either IP Addresses or fresh accounts. TansoShoshen (talk) 07:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was a week ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:57, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated insertions of unsourced BLP content. GraziePrego (talk) 10:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- List of analog television stations in the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 36.78.195.25 (talk) 12:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- List of television and radio stations in Naga, Camarines Sur (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 36.78.195.25 (talk) 12:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been repeatedly targeted by IP editors making unsourced/unexplained changes. Enough is enough, I say. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 20:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting lots of fake information added by IPs despite numerous warnings. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:27, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Senapatiji (talk) 🏴☠️ 08:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Saadi095 (talk) 09:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I am making this request in a preventative context. There have been no real issues on Wikipedia EN thus far. One recent IP edit should be presumed to be in good faith. But externally there are small examples of Delap being drawn into wider culture wars. Delap is more vulnerable than most, being 87 years old, female, and a Quaker. And the Just Stop Oil climate activist group is clearly a controversial organization. I leave this decision in the hands of moderators, with considerably more skill and experience than me in this area. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 08:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I can't justify protection based on an IP edit from over a week ago, sorry. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:57, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz: Thanks for considering my request. I try to monitor the page carefully in any case. My best wishes to all moderators. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 10:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @BusterD: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Relax, it's been PC'ed. Favonian (talk) 13:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism as the finale approaches this week. Requesting semi-protection up until Monday.Harshvardhan 1427 (talk) 08:37, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 08:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:16, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Revert the April Fools' edits. 176.216.237.145 (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Done I reverted it.☩ (Babysharkboss2) 11:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 13:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: It is a sensitive topic to the Sikh community and religion, as well as a reason for many young sikh boys being bullied. Protecting the page prevents any potential vandalism and helps people to understand that it is a sensitive topic which must be respected 80.94.198.98 (talk) 10:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No disruption for years. Lectonar (talk) 10:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP-hopping editor consistently adding unsourced and unrelated content. Danners430 (talk) 17:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:47, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 17:49, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vagrdyuy9, having nothing better do, has dedicated their last three accounts to harrass me on my talk page. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:07, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
03 April 2025
Reason: Ongoing edit war, and the Jogger is not offered with a CVT unlike the Sandero, so they're restoring an unsourced revision. 176.216.237.145 (talk) 09:49, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:45, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Likely not for the reason this IP wanted, but their own persistent block evasion is enough to warrant protecting the article. - Aoidh (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Has been getting a lot of edits, most seem to be unconstructive or blatant hoaxes. Scrimbler (talk) 17:52, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Slightly downgrading protection status in the abscense of a vandalism problem. 1101 (talk) 08:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Already unprotected by administrator Graham Beards. See Special:Permalink/1283646584 § Request to Unprotect Asthma Page. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: It was protected two years ago. Whatever dispute led to its protection is likely long gone. 174.88.141.200 (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Protecting administrator was asked on 30 March.
Unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: It was protected eleven years ago. There is no reason to believe that the vandals have been waiting eleven years to return to their mischief. 174.88.141.200 (talk) 23:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Protecting administrator was asked on 29 March; Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Decuw was last active in 2014.
Unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial figure that has recent vandalism, and some subtle vandalism from past edits that needs to be fixed. — AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 11:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Insufficient frequency for semi-protection, and for indefinite too. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of random IP vandalism of late. DaHuzyBru (talk) 13:06, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:05, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bagumba. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Sock-puppetry. Bored kittycat (talk) 13:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 14:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring across multiple IPs. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Liz. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: It is a contentions topic after the release of the new Direct. Dr. Precursor (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively.. I don't see disruption in the edit history that would warrant protection. - Aoidh (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Mellamelina (talk) 18:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death denial trolling. CRBoyer 02:14, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been protected since 2015, about a decade ago. Given the very low level of vandalism since, I think we can try pending changes for some time Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. The article is not stable and there has been recent disruptive editing by autoconfirmed accounts, though apparently in good faith. This is probably not a good time. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Very little vandalism since protection back in 2012. Given the recent success of the protection downgrading of shark, I think we can try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:49, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- FYI AlexiusHoratius. @Filmssssssssssss: Please notify protecting administrators if they are active and remain administrators (see top of page). Sdrqaz (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Done Switched to pending changes; it had been semiprotected for a while. Try this for a bit. AlexiusHoratius 01:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:12, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: First of all, the 1821-1823 Ottoman-Iran war page is still a page that needs to be added and expanded. Even with the smallest edits, it can take a long time to bother the authorities by tagging them and waiting for a response from them, so I think the protection should be reduced a little, dear Wikipedia. BEFOR01 (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- FYI ToBeFree. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hello BEFOR01, the page was extended-confirmed protected partially due to your edit warring, so I'd oppose lifting the protection on your request, sorry. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Newly split article, WP:PIA5 ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A few weeks of Persistent Vandalism. The Seal F1 (talk) 10:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalisme (POV-pushing). Terrum3 (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. I think they are socks but the vandalism has been persistent over the past few days. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 13:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Lamine304 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Plenty of vandalism just after a six month protection expired. Might need at least a year's semi. Entranced98 (talk) 21:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruption has continued since prior protection lapsed. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:50, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite creation protection (confirmed or extendedconfirmed): Same sockfarm (see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Twilightsparklesnelly) repeatedly creating this hoax article. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 17:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors keep adding the name of this person's husband to the lead as the first thing about her; I make it 8 times since last November. Another editor has explained on the article's Talk page that this is not appropriate, and linked the policy, but this has not stopped it. Tacyarg (talk) 18:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 23:34, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 00:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IP repeatedly claiming that the Ba'ath party of Syria still exists. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 01:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Anon disruption includes repeated style changes against consensus [16][17][18]. Repeated introduction of unreferenced changes reverted here, followed by most recent anon disruption: more unreferenced stuff inserted yesterday [19]. Article is covered by WP:GS/PAGEANTS. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – rotating ips vandalizing in the same way. Thewindbird (talk) 14:19, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2603:300A:2335:2600:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. 73.210.59.103 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) as well. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Community sanctions enforcement. General sanctions for post-1992 US politics, news channel has become heavily involved in American politics. Also a highly visible page. I would propose indefinite XCON protection or temporary XCON protection for at least 4 years (during the Trump administration). RaschenTechner (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No edits in a week. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated WP:NOTAFORUM discussions have been perpetuated by various IPs since before this article's move to mainspace. Such comments have not been helpful or constructive to the overall article and have grown quite tiresome to remove or respond to. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2605:B100:500:0:0:0:0:0/41 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. 74.14.134.105 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) as well. We should default to blocks where possible, especially since the threshold for talkspace protection is high. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP user. GnocchiFan (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection isn't for issues with single users/IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated BLP vios, see talkpage. Juicy details about someone's sex life are not encyclopedically relevant. And Crowder is not a reliable source. Polygnotus (talk) 02:07, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent proxy editing by IPs and most likely sockpuppetry/block evasion. StephenMacky1 (talk) 09:18, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 156.244.32.0/20 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a year. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism based on Trump's tarrifs. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 03:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some IP editors seem to have been making useful edits Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: 2 months have past, and the vandalism has reduced a lot since. I would like to edit this page to reorganize some information of the plot, and I would like this to be unprotect since some time has past. 2601:243:2100:5AC0:11B4:E735:A894:1595 (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- FYI Daniel Case. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined Your edit request to this effect has been granted. The lack of vandalism since protection is, of course, the point of protecting the article, so it's a circular argument—like saying that since the street was closed to vehicles, there haven't been any accidents so we should reopen it to vehicles. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-Protection: High level of IP vandalism by IP sockpuppet. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:39, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:46, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2804:D49:6643:C500:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The city was recently badly damaged by a large wedge tornado, and is seeing posting's for unsourced material. 2603:6011:C020:63D5:555A:EE97:4603:84A (talk) 03:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Http iosue (talk) 03:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Low-visibility page protected since 2012. Given the age and low-visibility, I think we can try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Is it really a good idea to unprotect an article about a disputed territory? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced either.
Declined * Pppery * it has begun... 04:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- I should note that up until a year-and-a-half ago it was under a contentious topic/discretionary sanctions regime. The protection is likely under the auspices of WP:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks, in which case the enforcement privilege has long lapsed. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 09:16, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
This is JUST GRAMMAR. Under Name appears this passage:
"president Donald Trump signed a January 20, 2025 executive order directing federal agencies to adopt the name "Gulf of America" for the gulf waters bounded by the U.S.[27][28][29][b] Major online map platforms and several U.S.-based media outlets voluntarily adopted the change.[33][34][35] Mexican president Claudia"
It contains the word "president" twice. In both cases, the context (a SPECIFIC president) requires capitalization (President). 162.231.238.136 (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – The relevant guideline is found at MOS:JOBTITLE. The article currently states:
United States president Donald Trump signed ...
, which is analogous to the style guide's:Mao met with US president Richard Nixon in 1972.
Favonian (talk) 10:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Strom Thurmond filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This speech is now the second-longest filibuster, being surpassed by New Jersey Democratic Senator Cory Booker on April 1st, 2025 in protest of republican bill (I believe). Fortgunz (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined The talk page is unprotected; you can make this request there. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
The author of the bill mentioned in this page was my father, Harvey F Barnard. The article has the tittle of my father's proposed bill wrong. It should be The National Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act. The current one mention in this Wikipedia article is not the bill written by Harvey. I have multiple documents to support this. I would like to speak to someone about making this change so the information is accurate. In addition my efforts as his daughter concerning his book and bill could be added to the page as well. Thank You DGerbrecht (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment:: The talk page is not protected. You should make a request there. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:24, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:NESARA is not protected. Favonian (talk) 07:01, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Following expiration of page protection a few hours ago, IPs have resumed removing all mention of subject's sexual assault case. Iiii I I I (talk) 06:09, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A user is reverting edits and adding biased content. strangely, he makes these edits by logging out and logging in. this is how many times he does this. Zemen (talk) 09:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 11:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Long history of vandalism and unconstructive changes from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 13:07, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥ 论 13:16, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – immediately continues after protection ended. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:15, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, especially the "also known as" section of the infobox. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 16:14, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Fathoms Below. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all recent IP edits are vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 14:10, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Example (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:45, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from several IP addresses. 109.252.189.56 (talk) 14:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – someone keeps on saying Set had help from LeBron James, not the goddess Nephthys. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 16:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism - someone keeps on trying to change his middle name to Mzee. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 17:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:32, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 19:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
+1 Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:05, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 19:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been protected since 2013, I think we can try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- This type of article (as with others you have brought here recently) are lightning rods for school vandalism. I don't understand the benefit of unprotecting articles such as this (and lion, rat, tiger etc.), it just eats away at admin and patrollers time.-- Ponyobons mots 16:24, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – I share the concern. Too many overcompensating, mammalian runts out there waiting to get even with the dinos. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
04 April 2025
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 81.9.126.17 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 17:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have already been 2 instances of vandalism in the one day since the last protection. Given Flagg has a very high profile I don't see this subsiding anytime soon. GPL93 (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism - people constantly trying to redirect it to another page. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 21:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary protection following a number of ip vandalism edits. GMH Melbourne (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Intermittent vandalism that is mostly blocked by the filter doesn't seem like enough to justify protection at the moment. Any admin can disagree though. Fathoms Below (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I heard your strong (talk) 01:17, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 211.194.175.63 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. Fathoms Below (talk) 01:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
"Israeli soldiers have summarily executed Palestinian civilians, often in front of their families." This is one citation that leads to another citation (why not list the original reference?) where it describes a single alleged incident that has been disputed. The original citation is careful to use the term 'alleged' and 'still under verification' and yet the wiki page does not say 'alleged' or 'accused of' - and goes on to add the word 'often', even though only one alleged incident is referenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.230.248.39 (talk) 02:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- From the source:
The facts below show that Israel has killed Palestinian
Remember to sign your posts by typing four swindles ~~~~ Tarlby (t) (c) 05:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
civilians in Gaza indiscriminately and en masse . . . Israeli military forces have shot civilians in front of their families,
shot civilians waving white flags . . . Not done. Make another request if further discussion is needed, taking into account the reply above. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:59, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Change the name of the campaign photo. Page currently displays "THE GOAT TAKES A W" when you enlarge. Please fix. Gaymaga (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. File:THE GOAT TAKES a W.png is the actual name of the file on Wikimedia Commons. This is Wikipedia, not Commons. Read Commons:Commons:File renaming and follow the applicable directions. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Part of the Israeli-Palestinian topic area, should be automatically extended-confirmed protected per PIA5. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Dangerous persistent Vandalism- Edits coming from fraternity members will change the tone of the page to appear biographical or from its own source, minimizing discussions on the issues. Noticed the change in narrative when recently hovering the page, concealing other underlying problems.Marugamirica (talk) 00:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No recent edits match your description. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. It is a hot topic and it is being heavily vandalized. hot topics like these usually have EC permissions required but I'm surprised that this doesn't even have SC permissions required 54rt678 (talk) 01:17, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Both recent vandals. And while this article does fall under a contentious topic (WP:CT/AP), that does not mean that we automatically ECP it (outside of most ARBPIA articles)). Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 14:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated LTA vandalism target over the past three months or so, including auto-confirmed page move vandalism. Aspening (talk) 06:35, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Done – Move-protected the talk page while I was at it. Favonian (talk) 08:59, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping Frost. Favonian (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to |partner=
by various users. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:18, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 11:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – this page is a mess. FMSky (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Main Page redirect (same reason as Main Article) Oreocooke (talk) 07:18, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. The basis for that page's protection is very flimsy; nowhere prominent links to it. Sdrqaz (talk) 11:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP and (new and autoconfirmed) user vandalism. 49.150.197.126 (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing in over a month. Sdrqaz (talk) 11:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- List of TV5 (Philippine TV network) original programming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous addition of unsourced information by IPs that violates WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Constant warnings yet they keep coming. CNMall41 (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 01:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Azyn (talk) 02:14, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Azyn: I see no heavy vandalism, I see you disagreeing over content with now multiple users. The incidents you repeatedly remove are adequately sourced, and pertinent to the article subject. The article doesn't neeed protection, it needs dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 13:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long term target, still a few good faith edits recently. Entranced98 (talk) 10:48, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Create new wikipedia Kellenfx (talk) 13:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done this page is not protected. Very new editors cannot create new articles directly, that is a limitation of Wikipedia's software and cannot be overridden by any administrator. For more information on writing your first article, please see Help:Your first article. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There is a high level of unregistered users that constantly add in skaters or characters that are unconfirmed for the game, leading to constant manual removal. As there are new announcements concerning the game almost daily, there will be constant vandalism until the game releases in July, thus semi-protection should do fine. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated BLP violations by IP editors. This page has been semi-protected four times for the same thing, might be worth considering a longer or indefinite semi-protection. Yhvr (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent sockpuppetry, too. Aintabli (talk) 15:47, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – All recent IP/new account edits are nonconstructive or vandalism, problem has increased slightly since PC expired. Entranced98 (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of POV promotion of caste status via removal of sourced content and replacment with unsourced content by IPs. Page is covered under WP:CT/IPA and WP:GS/CASTE. Chariotrider555 (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
05 April 2025
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 20:04, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – mostly from IP users. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The term end date in the infobox is constantly changed, sometimes as 23, sometimes as 26. This is not correct, because another date remains in the article text, the template shows another date. That's why it needs to be protected. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 00:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 23:46, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing by vandal who keeps listing shows that are not produced by Three Angels Broadcasting Network. Catfurball (talk) 23:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC) Their website for 3ABN Kids Network does not list secular kids shows. Catfurball (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2605:6DC0:E000:6B36:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 23:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per the first remedy of WP:ARBPIA5. JJPMaster (she/they) 02:37, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User talk page being targeted by IPV6 editors making personal attacks against Waxworker. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 22:18, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: 2001:d08::/34 (talk · contribs) (from User talk:Waxworker). Three months. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 02:12, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:E83A:0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor(s) repeatedly removing inauguration photo from article; no rationale provided, been going on for weeks. Fairly standard to have photo from most recent inauguration at top of article. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 22:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- anastrophe, I blocked and semi-protected, but simply reverting five times in a row is not very helpful. Please warn the editor appropriately and report to AAIV, where action can be taken more quickly. Drmies (talk) 22:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 10:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi or extended-confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry - LTA MAB 24.55.33.220 (talk) 03:36, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. postings were not done by that ip to their own talk page, now blocked with no talk access. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism with adding misinformation, in particular inaccurate episode titles. Harryhenry1 (talk) 07:48, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article of an extremist and fringe political party in the UK repeatedly targetted through an off-wiki campaign by party members to downplay and remove its extremist ties (yes, neo-Nazism). The party founder himself has been blocked for this [20].
Autoconfirmed clearly does not work (see this edit for e.g. and the extensive canvassing by new confirmed users at Talk:Homeland_Party_(United_Kingdom)#Ideology or the whole Talk and article history really). An ECP is clearly needed and considering the extensive campaign here, going back years, temporary simply won't ebb it we need a permanent solution if WP:NONAZIS is any guide. Gotitbro (talk) 13:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs adding false information. MileyCytrus (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Highly visible page. Should be indef following his permanent removal. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 20:27, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because nothing is updated in current time. It’s unfair when the actress is nominated for awards or wins awards or stars in a drama and we can’t edit due to unnecessary heavy protection on the page.
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This page is a long-term abuse target, and as such merits this level of protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Another WP:ARBPIA relevant article. Thanks!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:48, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: see Talk:Daniel Tosh#Unprotection request. Kashingggz (talk) 01:08, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Notifying Eagles247, the protecting admin, as required by the bright yellow instruction at the top of this section. Favonian (talk) 10:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected Good rationale for unprotecting, thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recreation of article redirected through AfD discussion. Onel5969 TT me 14:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- This article is about a LRT station that was launched in January this year. The AfD discussion ocurred last year, in which I contended that, for the LRT line in question, related topics (such as this article) could be revisited in line with further developments. Thus, this allegation of disruptive editing is simply baffling, when in fact, the nom has so far refused to respond to discussions in the talk page. hundenvonPG (talk) 16:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Editors are extended-confirmed, so anything short of full protection won't help, and this appears to be the restart of a content/notability dispute. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary protection due to high level of IP vandalism. Some knucklehead(s) keep adding themselves to the "notable alumni" list from a bunch of different IPs. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:12, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request that... (A change be made following the text “Elon Musks acquisition of X was seen as controversial due to increase hate speech on the platform” to also include “Of which is a product of musks more conservative approach to moderation of which he claims “Allows free speech” Or any rendition of his rational reasoning to make this change to allow free speech as that was the big reason and why it’s so controversial. With this change it will become less bias and not only include what he did but also why he decided to do it). 2A02:C7E:3013:3E00:1F5:3768:49E4:443A (talk) 21:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – No target specified. Favonian (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
06 April 2025
Reason: IP is edit warring over the past few days since March 29 and removing cited content to push Fringe POV. Talk page discussion opened and IP provides no reason for their edit aside from that they don't like it. They can change IP address too. Edits are clearly disruptive and is aware of WP:BRD, but does not discuss actual issues in talk. Seems to be misusing BRD. Ramos1990 (talk) 03:01, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:1111:5940:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping user keeps incorrectly stating the breed's origin as being Ireland when it was developed in England (as explained in the article). IP clearly has no interest in discussion and the IP hopping (including 3 different countries) suggests LTA/vandal rather than a legitimate concern. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- This diff makes it clear there is no good faith behind the actions: [21] Traumnovelle (talk) 00:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:33, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some good-faith edits there too. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 24.55.33.220 (talk) 03:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason:Writing on behalf of Emily Wolfe and her management team. Reason for protection = Ongoing edit warring between multiple users regarding content disputes. Requesting extended confirmed protection to prevent further disruption. Runn3r0503 (talk) 20:02, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:57, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: high risk of vandalism due to olympic career and achievements. High risk of legacy being erased, forgotten, or destroyed without protection Koolboi919 (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined The only vandalism is by the OP. Bbb23 (talk) 22:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – They have been at this for a few weeks....let's force all to talk before there is multiple editors being blocked. Moxy🍁 03:28, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. None of this for a couple of days. Maybe someone took this edit summary to heart. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of self-published work from IP hopper. Lone-078 (talk) 06:19, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of self-published work from IP hopper. Lone-078 (talk) 06:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. It's coming off a year's semi. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 07:46, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced content additions and disruptive editing, primarily from IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 08:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- IPs are still persistently adding unsourced content, despite multiple reverts from other editors. Magitroopa (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Rasht (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sefid-Rud (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More articles targeted by socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Caspidarya. HistoryofIran (talk) 09:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Rasht, for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sefid-Rud, will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IRP). Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – External Operations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relevant to WP:ARBPIA - thanks in advance!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in over a month; group is long defunct and not really a primary topic in the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 17:26, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- I do not think this is an unambiguous ARBPIA case, and I do not see any recent disruption. I would decline at the moment but it is probably good to wait for a second opinion. Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined for now, given the above. I think that this article fits better with American politics 2 than with Palestine–Israel. I therefore think that this isn't strictly within the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 15:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 31.217.0.0/18 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing and persistent IP vandalism. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 192.253.210.0/24 (talk · contribs). And 45.248.151.125. @JacktheBrown: Thank you for your work combatting vandalism on this page, but please restore a past revision instead of undoing the edits individually because it really clutters up the history. Thanks, Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – an IP address is here edit warring in external links. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That link will hopefully be blacklisted soon; I sent it over to meta for cross-wiki spamming. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:53, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent removal of valid content by IP, despite warning. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Protection isn't needed for issues with a single IP/small range. Furthermore, per MOS:CITIZEN it makes more sense to simply say "Icelandic" in the lede; his dual citizenship is discussed in the body of the article. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection message says "pending resolution of RfC" however there is no RfC. 217.241.47.240 (talk) 00:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging Sergecross73 and Daniel Case, who both applied protection in January, and can clarify further. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- I can't. I wasn't aware of any RFC at the time of my protection. I have no ties to the article, but I do know it's a divisive subject, and that the disputes have been down since the protection was added, so I can't say I support lessening the protection. There seems to be editors actively maintaining it, so I'd recommend the WP:EDITREQUEST system instead. Sergecross73 msg me 18:32, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- The RFC seems to have ended well at the end of January. However, the question now becomes: Should we drop it to semi, or unprotect it entirely? Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- I support semi. Sergecross73 msg me 21:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- The RFC seems to have ended well at the end of January. However, the question now becomes: Should we drop it to semi, or unprotect it entirely? Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- I can't. I wasn't aware of any RFC at the time of my protection. I have no ties to the article, but I do know it's a divisive subject, and that the disputes have been down since the protection was added, so I can't say I support lessening the protection. There seems to be editors actively maintaining it, so I'd recommend the WP:EDITREQUEST system instead. Sergecross73 msg me 18:32, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 09:59, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there isn't any edit wars neither the page is controversial, it's just regular offensive77.111.101.22 (talk) 05:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- The page wasn't protected due to edit-warring. (It also falls into a contentious topic, but the protection was not under that CTOP.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of changes to the date of birth without proper sourcing, even ignoring whitespace instructions to provide sourcing for DOB changes. Prior protections expired and it appears the page went about a month before going right on back to the same problems it appears to have been protected for. This was originally at EFR, and I am referring here. EggRoll97 (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- (non-admin comment) -
Support – Thanks! twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 19:12, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- (non-admin comment) -
Strong Support – This has seriously gone far enough. Too many users trying to change the birthdates on her page, but none of them are even trying to find sources for the DOB changes.
- (non-admin comment) -
- Personally I would have preferred it if an edit filter could be setup to stop the unsourced DOB changes, so that those who want to make other changes to her page can do so. Which is why I requested that an edit filter be setup first.
- But as that apparently isn't an option, temporary semi-protection would be the next best thing. I think the page should be semi-protected for a longer period of time this time than last time. Since the 15-17 age debate is clearly still at an all time high. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 06:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA harassment. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 03:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism. One of his characters has been killed off. He has not died. MadScientist (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: sockpuppetry Magherbin (talk) 11:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:25, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Annh07 (talk) 11:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism following initial page protection. This page pretty much only receives vandalism due to the subject's social media presence and online antics. Requesting longer temporary protection or indefinite protection. DaHuzyBru (talk) 11:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ApexParagon (talk) 21:13, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ApexParagon (talk) 21:17, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We don't need to keep this open for the LTA. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:45, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ApexParagon (talk) 22:27, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:47, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:19, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Astara, Iran and other articles
- Astara, Iran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sefid-Rud (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Tati language (Iran) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mazanderani people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mazanderani language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All articles targeted by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Caspidarya. Could it be a 30 edits (or more) needed protection if possible? Because they easily bypass the 5 edits one by making a few random edits. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since August Tajik Sohrabs and their socks (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tajik Sohrabs) have targeted this article, engaging in WP:TENDENTIOUS editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from a variety of IPs signed, Willondon (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 13:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to |partner=
by various IP users and also registered users. Requesting a longer protection. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 19:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistently repeated vandalism. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 02:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit Warring. Valorrr (lets chat) 02:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various IPs from various ranges since August 2024. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:07, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Covered under WP:ARBPIA, thanks in advance!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:59, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Also relevant to WP:ARBPIA sanctions. Thanks!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:11, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by socks of Yamamomo kakijiroo (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yamamomo kakijiroo/Archive), promotional socks targeting Naver Corporation. Looks like they just noticed that semiprotection expired last week. MrOllie (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption from several new accounts today. Entranced98 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly sensitive template, prone to political whitewashing by IPs. The Banner talk 00:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. JayCubby 00:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Per recent protection of the article Palestinian Law. Both are related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 01:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing as well as possible socking (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agt2008fan for further context). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 08:25, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 12:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 12:59, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: people have been vandalizing it every since I published it it was my first draft and I wish it be protected Opproductions (talk) 12:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Your draft has zero chance of being published. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: It could be vandalized by Turkish people who hate Kurdistan regionKurdiz (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We don't preemptively protect articles because they "could be" vandalized. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism by different IP's who edit the same racist additions. Currently it is 182.0.205.13 Bklynculture (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Presumably the intended page is Bensonhurst, Brooklyn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and not the given redirect. I don't really see the need to protect the page just yet given the rate of disruption so far, and it will not stop the user responsible since they are actively disrupting a numerous other articles with fake demographic information their recent edits have now largely been reverted on known ranges If I were still active and had the time I would actively recommend holding off for the moment to gather more data and lock down some patterns and ranges using a known repeat target. However I don't have the time these years to actively monitor this or really any pages, and especially not in the coming month. If someone else wants to take this on fine, otherwise it can be protected but it's unlikely to reduce disruption to any significant degree. 184.152.65.118 (talk) 03:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined per IP. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dietricht Borgenland (talk) 05:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - it looks like just one sock account has targeted that page. That isn't really enough to warrant ECP which would otherwise be warranted. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dietricht. Borgenland (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Itacolomy (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Materialscientist (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Janhrach (talk) 08:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No vandalism since April 3. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Not all recent IP edits are clearly bad faith. Entranced98 (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP editors persistently re-adding unsourced and sometimes outright fake endorsements, and party policy positions three or more years out of date, which have been repeatedly reverted. Has been slow but ongoing since last protection was lifted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:47, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring. Oxiyam.Primal (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk per IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need semi-protection from possibly more drive-by editors who have no consensus for their edits. Drmies (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page per AP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing block evasion and addition of unsourced content; page recently unprotected but now subject to same disruptive editing after end of block. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:07, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editor(s). livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:07, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry; LTA harassment 24.55.33.220 (talk) 04:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist I'm just letting you know vandalism has came back to disruptive this page please protect this page. 47.21.51.146 (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist I'm just letting you know vandalism has came back to disruptive this page please protect this page. 47.21.51.146 (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced and unhelpful edits. Need to be protected for longer period than previous time. Mehedi Abedin 06:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Materialscientist: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed article title. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unsourced changes to date of birth, which has yet to be verified via a reliable secondary source. Mellamelina (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- The article is already semi-protected. Do you want to go to ECP for the duration? Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 19:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Quite a few problematic edits recently, including libel, vandalism, and NPOV violations. — W.andrea (talk) 19:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, disruptive editing, and too many additions of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Media Expert (talk) 20:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 21:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Because there is no reason for the semi-protection in the first place. 2601:243:2100:5AC0:FCC5:E5D5:2ECC:2C86 (talk) 03:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment:: Page history seems to say otherwise. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Sergecross73: Pinging the protecting admin. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- I watched over the page for over a decade. It's a magnet for problematic edits. I'm not opposed if someone feels strongly, but it almost certainly be re-upped again for bad edits. There are many editors who maintain it these days though, so there are people to assist. Sergecross73 msg me 13:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
07 April 2025
Not respecting race lap record information. Island92 (talk) 11:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Due to severe ethnic sabotage. Mohammadmehdimirzaii (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)- @Mohammadmehdimirzaii: I think that you're looking for w:fa:ویکیپدیا:درخواست محافظت صفحه.
Not done. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Mohammadmehdimirzaii: I think that you're looking for w:fa:ویکیپدیا:درخواست محافظت صفحه.
- (edit conflict)
Declined – Administrators on this (English language) Wikipedia have no authority on the Persian one. I concluded from your editing pattern that you meant the article on fa-Wiki, as neither the local redirect, کریم خان زند, nor its target, Karim Khan Zand, have been vandalized. The latter is, in fact, protected. Favonian (talk) 20:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – lots of vandalism. DB554 (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism restarted imeediately. Golikom (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent repeated block evasion from Miyanky445. Also disruptive editing. LucasKannou (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Izno. Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting semiprotection because the current pending changing protection is not deterring the sockmaster (MariaJaydHicky) from targeting this page. Looking back to when pending changes was enabled for this page (in 2019, roughly 80 or so edits ago, I counted only only two constructive edits from IPs; the rest are all IPs from MJH sock. I think this evidence shows that the collateral damage of enabling semiprotection will be minimal. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:22, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 21:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ProtobowlAddict talk! 23:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BBB Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:55, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated unsourced original research and misinformation from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 13:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There have been multiple bad faith edits made. By ip editors that includes links to pornography sites. Averytiredturkey3 (talk) 23:20, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack by BBB. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of vandalism by various IPs over the past 24 hours. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 01:22, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:32, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have a persistent hopping IP not giving up on adding trivia in the death section, it's really getting tiresome cleaning up behind them. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps removing sourced information. The Banner talk 15:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removing sourced information. The Banner talk 15:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: BLP, high profile, in the news because of criminal case, currently attracting significant vandalism. PatGallacher (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. Jfect22 (talk) 03:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:55, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit warring from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Politics and controversial. Valorrr (lets chat) 18:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. asilvering (talk) 23:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Users constantly deleting child from infobox along with note of child being stillborn by false claim 'fetus was never born', despite my note, and my extensive explenations in talk and giving several definitions of stillborn that shows the Tate's child fits into this category. I am afraid user try to implement their own agenda and create their own definitions what stillbirth is or is not , however they do not provide any source to their arguments, only their own beliefs. (see talk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sharon_Tate#Unborn_baby https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sharon_Tate#Why_no_section_listing_her_children_as_1?_Her_son,_who_was_even_named,_was_almost_9_months_(full_term)_and_was_buried_in_her_arms! ). Sobek2000 (talk) 01:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This needs an WP:RFC. Johnuniq (talk) 02:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 19:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unsourced information being added. The film has received attention with the release of the first trailer yesterday. GSK (talk • edits) 00:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:37, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Remove the articles for creation message from this page, because it is a redirect to User talk:Example, and it was clearly placed on error. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 00:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Done. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:43, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 80.249.92.149 (talk) 20:13, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined Please identify problematic edits here or on article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 01:50, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GSRUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: History of the Ancient clan of Nepal 47.54.223.188 (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 02:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edits by one IP editor who ignores page policy, using IPs 70.51.9.16 and 2605:b100:506:1bf3:60a6:78f0:39b5:14fe. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Problem seems to have resolved itself. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 21:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Materialscientist (talk) 02:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Valorrr (lets chat) 03:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 37.231.120.111 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple attempts by IP editors to whitewash article, remove sourced content. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 16:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:14D:4000:0:0:0:0:0/37 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 05:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been repeatedly targeted by bad-faith or coordinated edits removing reliably sourced, neutral content in order to delete information concerning Karin Taylor's career or personal life. Multiple attempts have been made to restore content that complies with WP:BLP and WP:RS, including material backed by the Wallstreet Journal, Forbes, Palm Beach Post, Jupiter Magazine,CBS12, and WPTV to name a few. These edits are repeatedly deleted. The pattern appears intended to discredit or smear the subject which violates Wikipedia's core policies on living persons. I am requesting temporary protection to prevent further abuse. Since this began leading up to a legal trial I am sure the sudden interest in editing this page and deleting this page will end when the trial is over. JupiterPR (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined I have blocked this account on username grounds as implying intent to edit promotionally. Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption of this page by repeatedly blocked user continued immediately after previous protection expired. silviaASH (inquire within) 07:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:50, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone keeps adding unsourced, unverifiable cast members. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:15, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP the last days. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There has been a rise in unsourced edits today due to speculation. Fats40boy11 (talk) 10:15, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:27, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Believe it or not this has become relevant to WP:ARBPIA due to Israeli authorities changing its colloquial name in tribute. Has received some off-site attention on twitter, if minimal, so might be worth a temp ECP enforcement even if it doesn't seem to merit indefinite. Thanks in advance!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- As this is only about the colloquial naming in Israel (which is just 1 sentence in the whole article), and we only had one disruptive edit so far, I do not really see a need to put this under any kind of protection for the moment. Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- We've had more ECR violations now.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - they've all been by IPs, and hopefully this will fall off the news cycle by then. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- We've had more ECR violations now.
Reason: Sensationalist media article about “de-extinction” has, and will continue, to encourage irresponsible editing. This needs to get hashed out on the Talk page. Strebe (talk) 16:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The calling code is missing in the page of iran and there are so many things that need to be edit on that page Please reduce the protection AstroidXD02 (talk) 07:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging Malinaccier who upped protection to ECP about a year ago. Looking at the log history, it seems that indef autoconfirmed protection should stay at a minimum, but given the amount of the article that is unrelated to the Arab-Israeli conflict, I'm not sure WP:PIA requires this page to be protected. signed, Rosguill talk 07:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Let's try moving to semi protection. Malinaccier (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Though this is a long term target, some edits are still good faith and the vandalism seems to be at a level that is manageable with PC. Entranced98 (talk) 13:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A long-term abuse IP has kept vandalising and adding unsourced information (actually misinformation) for 2 years now after being blocked numerous times. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request that... (Your edit request here) . Old Glasgowboy (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Broughty Ferry. In the page about notable residents it refers to Adolf Ei human having lived there and worked for DC Thomson. Unless all other historical records about Eichman are wrong, this needs correction. It looks as if there was meant to be another name in that sentence but unfortunately I dont know who that would be.
Done – Thanks! This bit of vandalism was the cause.
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent removal of info on porn of one character that, for better or worse (definitely worse), has reliable sources backing it up. consarn (prison phone) (crime record) 13:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- note: the current ip attempting to push the removal is pretty much in the mood to edit war over it. this might warrant permanent protection, but i won't make an argument for or against it consarn (prison phone) (crime record) 14:13, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit war in progress. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 14:13, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 15:08, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/KURD. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking since 13:23, 3 April 2025. Alith Anar 16:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 17:12, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 17:12, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 17:13, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
08 April 2025
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 10:37, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No further disruption since the user was last warned. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would also be ok with pending changes as well. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by Sdrqaz. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Reywas92Talk 19:12, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: HBOpromo (talk · contribs). Also 159.100.19.51, undoubtedly the same person. Favonian (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 19:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being vandalized again after recent protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:02, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by the IPs. Some1 (talk) 16:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and unauthorized changes to information by individuals not close to the family. Current edit to information made by koolboi919 is authorized and valid. 2600:4040:77D2:9500:C5FB:12:6140:891F (talk) 19:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by Bbb23. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism under changing IPs every few weeks, stretching back to December 2024 (diff, diff, diff, diff, diff). Iiii I I I (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 21:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The "Lucky Bisht" page was previously semi-protected due to persistent vandalism and disruptive edits by new and unregistered users. However, the protection has now been removed and the page is once again facing malicious edits. I request that the semi-protection (or extended-confirmed protection) be re-applied to preserve the integrity and reliability of the content.Spider1217 (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:20, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism. Post expiry of recent temporary protection. Senapatiji (talk) 🏴☠️ 01:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice (per IPA) on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Section to Edit: Legacy (currently underdeveloped) Proposed New Subsection Title: “Cultural and Academic Impact” Why: Although the Oasis (band) Wikipedia entry covers the band’s biography, discography, and commercial success in detail, the Legacy section lacks a comprehensive analysis of the band’s deeper cultural and academic significance. As one of the most influential bands of the 1990s, Oasis shaped not just music but also British identity, fashion, masculinity, and class politics. Since their emergence in the early 1990s, Oasis have been credited not only with defining the sound of Britpop but also with shaping post-Thatcher working-class identity in Britain. Scholars have interpreted their influence as extending far beyond music into cultural, political, and academic discourse. Music sociologist Andy Bennett describes Oasis as "the sonic voice of Northern pride in a time of cultural centralization" (Bennett, 2001). Their use of regional accents, lyrical themes, and public personas resonated with disaffected youth, especially in industrial cities. The band’s fashion—parkas, trainers, and mod haircuts—helped solidify a subcultural identity later studied in fashion sociology (Woodward, 2009). Academic analyses have also focused on their gender performance and stage dynamics. Neil Nehring suggests that Liam Gallagher’s performance style mixed rebellion and introspection, presenting a hybrid form of postmodern masculinity (Nehring, 1997). Meanwhile, Noel Gallagher’s songwriting has been the subject of literary analysis, with researchers noting his use of anthemic choruses and nostalgic lyricism as devices of collective memory (Shuker, 2001). Historian Keith Gildart contends that Oasis embodied the voice of post-industrial, working-class youth in Britain. Their music captured everyday realities and aspirations, fostering a deep cultural resonance that contributed to the band's enduring nostalgic value for a generation that came of age during significant social and economic transformation (Gildart, 2013). Their albums—especially (What’s the Story) Morning Glory? —are often cited in academic literature about emotional resonance and branding in music (Frith, 1996). The band's influence has also entered formal education. Oasis lyrics have been featured in cultural studies and sociolinguistics syllabi, often analyzed for their representation of urban vernacular and social class. This academic presence reflects a broader recognition of the band as more than entertainment: a cultural artifact worthy of critical inquiry. [1] Bennett, Andy. Cultures of Popular Music. Open University Press, 2001. [2] Shuker, Roy. Understanding Popular Music. Routledge, 2001. [3] Frith, Simon. Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Harvard University Press, 1996. [4] Nehring, Neil. Popular Music, Gender, and Postmodernism: Anger Is an Energy. SAGE Publications, 1997. [5] Gildart, Keith. Images of England Through Popular Music: Class, Youth and Rock 'n' Roll, 1955–1976. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. [6] Woodward, Sophie. “The Myth of Street Style.” Fashion Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, 2009, pp. 83–102.
Derdache (talk) 01:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done - An edit this extensive should be discussed at Talk:Oasis (band), which is not protected. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 02:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The BLP violations amount to vandalism. JFHJr (㊟) 03:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have RevDel'ed some edits. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 04:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Immediate resume of same editing behaviours leading to previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:20, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A lot of other "Sonic" related article have semi-protection-we should add it to this one as there is a lot of vandalism and unsourced information, and to connect the protection of there 'Sonic" real articles. 2601:243:2100:5AC0:2C45:C2C7:B574:8AB1 (talk) 23:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last reverted edit was on good faith, and a week ago. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of recent BLP vandalism over the past 2 weeks by IPs. Chew(V • T • E) 06:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 07:15, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary as there has not been any edit wars or disruptive editing for 15 years. last year, I requested that this page be unprotected and an Admin promised, but I never heard back from them which upset me a lot and made me very angry. if you don't want to unprotect it, then provide a reason why, but don't leave me hanging. 70.53.89.38 (talk) 04:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- For what it is worth, I find it likely other things got shoved in the admin's lap; I agree this is a case for trying unprotection. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- JBW, as the administrator who indefinitely semi-protected this page on 5 November 2010, would you consider unprotecting it? — Newslinger talk 05:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- The previous unprotection request is at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/07 § Arash (singer). Although the request was approved, it looks like something slipped through and the article did not get unprotected. — Newslinger talk 06:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- In response to the earlier request I said, both here and on the talk page of the IP address that submitted the request, that I had removed protection, but in fact I hadn't. Evidently I made some mistake; I've now removed protection. JBW (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 06:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism post-expiry of recent temporary protection. Senapatiji (talk) 🏴☠️ 01:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 117.248.34.14 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. Also, the page has never been protected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 10:42, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: semi-protection Abel maleikia akilei macha (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined See Wikipedia:UPROT; User-pages are automagically semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to request semi-protection or extended protection for this article. There have been repeated edits attempting to alter the cultural and religious identity of Gabon, claiming it is a “Muslim country” and that certain ethnic groups from West Africa (such as the Hausa) are indigenous to Gabon.
These claims are historically inaccurate and do not reflect the recognized demographics of the country. Gabon is a predominantly Christian and animist nation, and while there has been economic immigration from neighboring countries, including from Muslim communities, this does not redefine the national identity or native heritage of the Gabonese people.
These edits appear to be part of a coordinated effort to reframe Gabon’s identity and history in ways that are not supported by sources or historical consensus. It could be considered a form of ethno-religious revisionism, which goes against Wikipedia’s standards of neutrality and verifiability.
I kindly request protection of the page to prevent further biased or disruptive edits.
Thank you.
Islam in Gabon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Gabon Hello,
I would like to request semi-protection or extended protection for this article. There have been repeated edits attempting to alter the cultural and religious identity of Gabon, claiming it is a “Muslim country” and that certain ethnic groups from West Africa (such as the Hausa) are indigenous to Gabon.
These claims are historically inaccurate and do not reflect the recognized demographics of the country. Gabon is a predominantly Christian and animist nation, and while there has been economic immigration from neighboring countries, including from Muslim communities, this does not redefine the national identity or native heritage of the Gabonese people.
These edits appear to be part of a coordinated effort to reframe Gabon’s identity and history in ways that are not supported by sources or historical consensus. It could be considered a form of ethno-religious revisionism, which goes against Wikipedia’s standards of neutrality and verifiability.
I kindly request protection of the page to prevent further biased or disruptive edits.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabonese Bantu (talk • contribs) 08:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Article is not protected, obviously, since you have edited it. Favonian (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Daily disruption by new, single purpose accounts. ATP is a neo-nazi group and these new accounts uniformly want to obscure that. RKT7789 (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Active politician, persistent vandalism. Requesting protection until 3 May (the day of the election) GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined Disruption isn't that great yet, and the article is at AfD; I wouldn't want to curtail edits, as this might hinder improvement of the article. Lectonar (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Government organizations can be vandalized due to the rearmament of Europe causing some unrest Lukasmajukaspvpa (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator SlimVirgin. And that was over 10 years ago, and she's been dead for some of those years. And I'm not lifting it. And I think this new user needs to have this concept explained to him as this isn't the only well-intended report of his that has to be declined. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. S0091 (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. For five years, it seems. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term problem of an IP randomly changing colors.... Let's lock this up again. Moxy🍁 19:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 07:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption by ips behind vpn, proxy or botnet. Shadow4dark (talk) 18:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and WP:BLP violations. TylerBurden (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already warned them for the first time. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kaan Morais (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- I Reply. Kaan Morais (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No IP edits in 7 weeks. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: a capital city that can be vandalized due to anger against laws/policies Lukasmajukaspvpa (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No edits in nearly a week. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:45, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:8804:1689:2B00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Seems pretty quiet apart from another IP over a week before (self-revert not factored into this decision). Sdrqaz (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Persistent violations of WP:NOTFORUM and nonsensical additions by multiple IPs since 2023. Koshuri (グ) 17:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 49.36.193.199 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bishonen. And Special:Contributions/2405:201:5506:2863:0:0:0:0/64. Those two blocks cover virtually all of the IPs over the years; talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and is complete no further edit will be needed for years Lukasmajukaspvpa (talk) 18:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Pls review Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a work in progress Moxy🍁 19:34, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined. It's already extended-confirmed protected. If there are issues from extended-confirmed editors, they should be blocked instead of the article being shut out to everyone. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Page is being attacked again immediately after previous protection expired 24.55.33.220 (talk) 21:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
09 April 2025
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 10:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2001:8A0:77B6:1700:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring vandalism and edit warring. Borgenland (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Most of the recent vandalism has been coming from one IP, whom I just warned for the first time. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tarlby (t) (c) 16:29, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- good reason I vouch to approve it Lukasmajukaspvpa (talk) 18:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And again this user gets involved. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced death. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 17:38, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Reason: High levels of reverts due to rumors of his death! Sawblade5 (talk to me | my wiki life) 18:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined since it appears those rumors have been confirmed and sourced. Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism due to player scoring twice in a Champions League quarter final. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 21:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:53, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Same disruptive editing from various sockpuppets and IPs since October 2023. The disruption is fairly spread out, but I think an extended period of PC protection is worth considering. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's lock this up before these two get blocked and thus can't work out any solution. Moxy🍁 19:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 00:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Disruptive editing by an IP. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 21:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the last semi expired just a couple of weeks ago and the article is covered by community sanctions. Daniel Case (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, long-term vandalism target that hasn't had a legitimate IP edit in almost exactly a year, and before that hadn't since 2022. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:58, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persisent BLP violations/vandalism. TarnishedPathtalk 00:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – POV-pushing. The article was protected a few years ago for the same reason. (CC) Tbhotch™ 01:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism especially from problematic user 82.42.38.65. See how many issues they made at their talk page [22]. DareshMohan (talk) 22:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked by Izno. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism especially from problematic user 82.42.38.65. See how many issues they made at their talk page [23]. DareshMohan (talk) 22:58, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked by Izno. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Many unregistered editors have begun making unsourced claims that this US Navy officer has been removed from her post for "insubordination." None of the sources provided in the article support that claim making this a WP:BLP violation. Temporary semi-protection seems like a reasonable action at this point. ElKevbo (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page under WP:CT/AP Daniel Case (talk) 01:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP edits aimed at revealing band members' identities. TheWarOfArt (talk) 19:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined per this admin's comment. Daniel Case (talk) 00:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I'd like to request that my user talk page be semi-protected for at least four to six weeks on account of continuing disruption by a block-evading IP user who is persistently leaving harassing and transphobic messages calling me a "male fetishist" who is "predating on little girls" for reading yuri manga (a content area they have been disruptively editing and subsequently retaliated against me for reverting their changes). The disruption itself has persisted on a roughly biweekly basis since early this March, and the talk page harassment has happened about three times the past five days now and shows no signs of stopping anytime soon. silviaASH (inquire within) 21:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 85.140.4.0/23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month; atop the existing block of 2A00:1FA1:C2F5:D77:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Nearly every edit in the revision history is IP vandalism. Requesting either indefinite autoconfirmed protection or pending changes protection. Cheers! Johnson524 21:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Warned the IP that has made the most disruptive edits. No one had done this yet. Tsk-tsk. Daniel Case (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 23:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Remsense: The edit summary explanations are not really sufficient here. Please try explaining on the editor's talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- I never know how best to deal with anonymous users who swap IPs between sessions. Both reverting and posting on talk feel pointless. Remsense ‥ 论 23:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- With /64s I think it's worth a try. Daniel Case (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I never know how best to deal with anonymous users who swap IPs between sessions. Both reverting and posting on talk feel pointless. Remsense ‥ 论 23:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations. GraziePrego (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined As noted when previously nominated, it's currently up for deletion, which creates a higher bar for protection so that people may continue to improve the article and possibly save it. I don't see that being crossed yet. Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 01:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2001:D08:0:0:0:0:0:0/34 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Page added to existing partial block on range. Daniel Case (talk) 01:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Pemilligan (talk) 01:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Valorrr (lets chat) 02:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent image additions by Indonesian-based IP editor. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:59, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: 114.10.139.0/24 (talk · contribs) (from Left- and right-hand traffic). One month. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Original research edits constantly being added. Limegreencoral (talk) 03:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Constant original research and unsourced claims being added. Limegreencoral (talk) 03:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Caspiane and others
- Caspiane (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Northern Iran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Semnani language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Ethnicities in Iran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mazandaran province (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More articles targeted by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Caspidarya. HistoryofIran (talk) 07:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 09:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attention seeking podcaster "changed" his name for a bet. His acolytes keep changing the page. The-Pope (talk) 10:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection for at least 1 month — vandalism. Note: This page was recently protected, but after the protection ended, vandalism immediately re-began. The Seal F1 (talk) 07:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts since January by Vietnamese users to change Vietnam's status from "lower-middle income" to "upper-middle income": diff, diff, diff, diff, diff, diff, diff, diff. Iiii I I I (talk) 08:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- As cited in the infobox, the World Bank classifies it as a "lower-middle income economy". Iiii I I I (talk) 08:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There are constant reversions to the page that are ignoring legitimate and official press releases/online posts. The reversions are ignoring visual evidence on contributions to games and closure dates. This is beginning to amount to legitimate vandilism. 86.1.196.187 (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Autoconfirmed editors are persistently adding uncited BO figures even after various notes placed throughout the article and multiple talk page warnings. Please check history for the similar disruptions this week. — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 13:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Has been attracting a high level of IP comments, some of which violate BLP. As these are apparently inspired by the recent release of the Netflix series, several weeks of semi-protection may be a good idea. Nickm57 (talk) 06:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 13:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Requires Extended-confirmed protection, Reason: There is a very persistent sockmaster Kairakairav (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) — who from past 4 years have been adding hoax and fanfics of her own fancy to the Mahabharata related articles including this series. Either she just trolling or a lunatic, with no responses, nothing, she just makes new accounts and starts her cycle. Recently the article was vandalized by following sockaccounts of hers—User:NairaRahi01, User:NairaRahi, User:NairaKairav01, User:NairaKuhu31, User:Naira Kairav Sirat and User: SubhadraArjuna. Seyamar💬📜 07:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Black Kite. BusterD (talk) 13:45, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Three weeks. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism followed by talk page harassment indicative of User:Jinnifer behavior. NJZombie (talk) 13:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. One month. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems an old vandal has popped back up, this page has a long history of being targeted by someone, who is blocked and IP hops. Nswix (talk) 13:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 14:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: ChatGPT
You said: Wikipedia page lock kaise kare ChatGPT said: Wikipedia par kisi page ko aap personally "lock" nahi kar sakte, lekin Wikipedia ke administrators (admins) kisi page ko protect kar sakte hain agar:
Us page par vandalisme (galat ya badle jaise edits) ho raha ho
Bahut zyada edit wars chal rahe ho
Page high-profile ya controversial ho (jaise Narendra Modi, Kashmir, etc.)
Lock hone ke types: Semi-protection – Sirf registered users edit kar sakte hain.
Extended-confirmed protection – Sirf purane aur trusted accounts hi edit kar sakte hain.
Full protection – Sirf admins edit kar sakte hain.
Agar aap chahte ho ki koi page lock ho: Page ke "Talk" section me jaake apni request likho.
Ya phir Wikipedia:Requests for page protection pe jaake request karo.
Reason achha aur valid hona chahiye (jaise vandalisme ka proof, recent edit history, etc.).
Agar tum chaho, to mujhe page ka naam aur reason bata do, main ek draft likh dunga jo tum wahan post kar sako.
You said: Samastipur ka page wikipedia page lock kar sakta hu aap likh kar do ChatGPT said: Sure! Yahaan ek draft diya gaya hai jo tum Wikipedia:Requests for page protection pe use kar sakte ho, ya Samastipur article ke Talk page par daal sakte ho:
Request for Semi-Protection: Samastipur
Hello,
I would like to request semi-protection for the Wikipedia page Samastipur. The page has recently seen frequent vandalism and non-constructive edits, which is affecting the quality and reliability of the content.
Examples of issues:
Repeated addition of incorrect or unsourced information
Unnecessary blanking of sections
Promotional or irrelevant content being added
To prevent further disruption and maintain the integrity of the article, I kindly request temporary semi-protection.
Thank you. Sahil99906 (talk) 08:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined OP, you have repeatedly tried to insert pictures here; removing them is not vandalism....people just disagree if they areneeded or helpful. So please use the article talk-page to hash things out. Lectonar (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request for Semi-Protection: Samastipur
Hello,
I would like to request semi-protection for the Wikipedia page Samastipur. The page has recently seen frequent vandalism and non-constructive edits, which is affecting the quality and reliability of the content.
Examples of issues:
Repeated addition of incorrect or unsourced information
Unnecessary blanking of sections
Promotional or irrelevant content being added
To prevent further disruption and maintain the integrity of the article, I kindly request temporary semi-protection.
Thank you. Sahil99906 (talk) 08:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined OP, you have repeatedly tried to insert pictures here; removing them is not vandalism....people just disagree if they areneeded or helpful. So please use the article talk-page to hash things out. Lectonar (talk) 13:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Lado85 (talk) 09:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit about 2 weeks ago. That's far from being a "high level" of vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Hello respected administrators,
I would like to request semi-protection for the "Samastipur" Wikipedia page.
Reason: This page has recently seen repeated instances of vandalism and addition of false or promotional information. As a result, the reliability and quality of the article are being compromised. Protecting the page will help maintain the integrity of the information and prevent further disruptions.
I kindly request you to review the edit history and consider applying semi-protection to prevent unregistered or new users from editing the article.
Thank you for your attention and support.
Sincerely,
Sahil99906 (talk) 11:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined OP, you have repeatedly tried to insert pictures here; removing them is not vandalism....people just disagree if they areneeded or helpful. So please use the article talk-page to hash things out. Lectonar (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism as well as some new users, likely related to the current events surrounding the Trump tariffs satkara❈talk 15:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Seconding this - there's lots of good editing going on too as the subject is in the news, which is made more difficult by the ongoing vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flood of vandalism today, hot topic in the news for reasons that are attracting disruption. Entranced98 (talk) 15:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Not strictly within the Arab–Israeli conflict area. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 19:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: israeli-palestinian conflict. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 20:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: As soon as protection expired the page has been under one purpose ip attacks [[24]], [[25]], [[26]], I am asking for indefinite semi protection Theonewithreason (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Disruptive edits continued [[27]], diferent ip same geolocation, obvious the same person. Theonewithreason (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip hopper repeatedly adding HBO promo logo to the article. Knitsey (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
10 April 2025
Reason: IP inserting reverse TCP attack link (you click on it, your computer doesn't fight it because you clicked on it), requesting increase in page protection Snokalok (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I removed it, the IP reinserted it from a different address, I removed it again, they inserted it again. I am now convinced that this is a malicious attempt to insert malware. Snokalok (talk) 16:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Pls. see also the IP activity at The_White_Lotus_season_3. Two IPs have attempted to link to a download at the top of the article. Patrick (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- and 1923 (TV series) Snokalok (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 1923 has one IP at the moment, so leaving it for now. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- and 1923 (TV series) Snokalok (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Pls. see also the IP activity at The_White_Lotus_season_3. Two IPs have attempted to link to a download at the top of the article. Patrick (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 17:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Hi, I am Sandra Bongjoh. I have a page on wikipedia that is already visible on google and in addition to it my page on wikipedia will have more sources to prove me as a famous person but the sources will not appear right now. I would like to know if you can put a lock to prevent vandalism on this page, and I will be the only person editing the page. (Redacted) Bye, I am looking forward to hearing from you soon, Stay safe and healthy, Sandra
50.222.21.178 (talk) 15:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- No such page exists. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not free webhosting; pages are not "owned" the the subjects. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High IP vandalism since February; a few months of protection would be great. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 22:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Frequency is too low for semi-protection, unfortunately. Also blocked Special:Contribs/2600:1700:3BDA:D010:0:0:0:0/64. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Borgenland (talk) 02:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Mikeblas. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editors and multiple ip's vandalising the article. Knitsey (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Plenty of tests/vandalism in the last month or so, though a few of the recent IP edits look to be good faith. Perhaps a case for PC? Entranced98 (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I am also ok with PC as well Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unconstructive addition of cast members since prior protection lapsed. (This is some of the worst repeated vandalism I have seen on recent Marvel articles in such a short timeframe.). Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:42, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: Redirect was protected years ago. It now leads to a broken anchor. RanDom 404 (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Bearcat: as protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I think the section should be restored, which would fix the problem of the broken anchor. The section was deleted by a sock, then never restored before the article was protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected. Bearcat has edited since the ping, so he should be aware of this request. Whether the section should be restored or whether the redirect should be taken to RfD if the section isn't restored is an editorial decision and shouldn't be an administrative one. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: No longer needs protection. @HangingCurve:. RanDom 404 (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- HangingCurve is no longer an admim. @RanDom 404: Why do you think the article doesn't need protection anymore? Lectonar (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't an article, it's a redirect. A case could be made for turning it into a disambiguation page because there are two articles beginning with "Camp Rock 2". ~Anachronist (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected as the reason for protection no longer applies: this was protected because a sequel hadn't been confirmed yet. The sequel was released 15 years ago now, so whether a disambiguation page is created is an editorial decision. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't an article, it's a redirect. A case could be made for turning it into a disambiguation page because there are two articles beginning with "Camp Rock 2". ~Anachronist (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: The subject of the article died last year, and this article no longer needs semi-protection because BLP no longer applies. The subject's article is not controversial, and has not had editing conflicts. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 22:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected. Interest in the subject is far lower than it was when she was CEO of YouTube, based on page views. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:TRYUNPROT. The article has been indefinitely semi-protected since 2020 after a history of disruption. As the article has been protected for several years now it might be worth testing to see if protection is still warranted or not, without prejudice against a return to protection should disruption resume. Already asked the protecting admin JzG about it and he was unsure if protection should not be removed or if it should, so consider this also a request for a second opinion. If there are any lingering concerns about disruption, rather than full unprotection the protection could instead be lowered to pending changes to see if that could address any possible disruption. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected. Conversation with JzG was at Special:Permalink/1284663924. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and unncessary changes from 5 random 2600 IP's, like crosby, he is a generational talent and should be given special treatment Gymrat16 (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I don't understand why you've made this revert and generational talents don't get special protections under the protection policy, unfortunately. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: No edits since 2018 so protection could be lowered at least. Could use a retarget to List of films about the Titanic, the primary subject. RanDom 404 (talk) 13:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- @RanDom 404: I suppose you mean Titanic (film), which has no edits since 2018 since it is fully protected. Also, it is already a redirect to Titanic (disambiguation)#Films. Why would we need to unprotect the redirect? Lectonar (talk) 13:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected. No valid reason given. If there's a WP:RM discussion that was recently closed about it, reply and we can reconsider. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done because there's nothing to do. It's already been at ECP for months. It just never displayed the protection icon. I just fixed that. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to frequent vandalism / edit warring. MSD50 (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last human edit was a week ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding large chunks of unsourced and AI content. ProtobowlAddict talk! 22:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. The two ip addresses adding this info have been blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:34, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Problematic edits from 5 different IPs in this week. –RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️ (talk • stalk) 23:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under GENSEX Daniel Case (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding false information. GSK (talk • edits) 21:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fairly transparent abuse of multiple accounts and IP addresses going on this BLP. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:19, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: (Indefinite Semi-protection) There are practically no good edits from the IP. A controversial topic. The Seal F1 (talk) 08:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS under GENSEX. Daniel Case (talk) 10:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! The Seal F1 (talk) 12:19, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Cross-wiki target of HoY/Piermark. Phạm Ngọc Phương Linh (T • C • CA • L • B) 11:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:13, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This doesn't receive a huge amount of traffic or vandalism but it is highly relevant to the WP:ARBPIA CTOP and should probably be protected. Thanks in advance!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and accounts adding false information. I suspect some WP:LTA is going on, but currently have no concrete proof. GSK (talk • edits) 22:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. All recent socks. Daniel Case (talk) 10:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 03:41, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relevant to WP:ARBPIA sanctions. The attack he was involved in (Pisgat Ze'ev stabbings) is ECP, his page should be as well. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 13:21, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 13:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:45, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relates to a CTOP. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Israel claims 85% of Qunietra. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Much of the article is ARBPIA related and thus liable to bias and disruption. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 17:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: For the past four months, almost every single edit to this page has been reverted as unconstructive. Departure– (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Frequent vandalism, especially changing the lead paragraph's wording. I would suggest a period of one to two weeks. GN22 (talk) 16:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. -- there appear to be useful IP edits interspersed in here, the frequency of vandalism is not particularly high (two edits from one IP yesterday, nothing the day before, a small amount the day before that). Better approach is to block the requisite IPs,
which I'll do now for the most recent one(The IP's /64 was already blocked.) ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Averytiredturkey3 (talk) 18:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Releasing tomorrow, the film's lead actor has a strong fan base who are vandalising this article. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- (+1) — Yeah, this article should be protected immediately. Please protect it, someone. The Seal F1 (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP keep editing UK, Éire, DACH and Italia's launch date to mid 2025 without source John123521t c 16:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous addition of non-notable artists. Jalen Barks (Woof) 16:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Actually, this might need extended confirmed as it could relate to a CTOP. Jalen Barks (Woof) 17:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 20:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
11 April 2025
Reason: Persistant disruptive editing by IP's asking for health information. Catfurball (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Talk pages have a high barrier for protection. The most recent user was warned; if they persist, report to WP:AIV. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined. Pending changes is managing the current frequency well (approximately disruption every six days, and note the three-week gap in March). Sdrqaz (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. @Filmssssssssssss: You requested this in February for the same reason and it was declined. Unless something actually changes, please don't request again as it may be perceived as admin-shopping. Article is also not strictly within the conflict topic area, so I agree with the original declination. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: User request within own user space. I wish for my page to be edited, when it looks constructive so I request pending changes... Valorrr (lets chat) 19:42, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. @Valorrr: Pending changes doesn't exist on user pages. If you want non-autoconfirmed editors to edit your userpage, add {{unlocked userpage}} to it. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumed after four years of protection expired - virtually all IP and new account edits are nonconstructive/vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. @Entranced98: You may want to check over the recent edits. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations. JeffSpaceman (talk) 22:39, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: New user and IP editor are adding non-free screenshot to the article. 0x0a (talk) 07:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, the image has been deleted on Commons Ymblanter (talk) 21:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 11:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Looking at the history, this page is often vandalized by trolls of extreme right. So, a protection (more or less long) would be necessary because it is extremely tiring and difficult for high-ranking contributors to watch every day and every time. Grenouille-e (talk) 20:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. @Grenouille-e: You should make this request at d:Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard, as we don't have power on Wikidata here. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Contentious topic restriction. Related to the Syrian civil war. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 20:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. @Freedoxm: You were told last month to stop requesting pre-emptive protections, unless the extended-confirmed restriction is in place. The Syrian Civil War doesn't have one. Please stop. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Contentious topic restriction. Related to the Syrian civil war. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 20:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. @Freedoxm: You were told last month to stop requesting pre-emptive protections, unless the extended-confirmed restriction is in place. The Syrian Civil War doesn't have one. Please stop. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent COI and SOCK editing. guninvalid (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm IP disruption going back months. FMSky (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of vandalism by the IPs. Some1 (talk) 00:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:44, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Like in many biographies of famous footballers, masses of IPs inserting "he is the greatest" or similar- FMSky (talk) 17:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 12:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Highly visible page. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 23:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 00:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalising the template. Vestrian24Bio 10:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected until 1 January 2026. Anarchyte (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sush150 (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 12:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit-warring, improperly ref changes and substandard formatting e.g. addition links to example.com. Dl2000 (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 12:25, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Permanent extended confirmed protection: Although it's under Russo–Ukrainian War restrictions, this article should also fall under the Arab–Israeli conflict scope due to RT's coverage of the Israel–Hamas war and the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict. 184.144.90.165 (talk) 12:16, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Binksternet (talk) 12:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing resumed after block lift. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 12:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Skitash (talk) 16:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. WP:GS/SCW&ISIL does not mandate protection. Anarchyte (talk) 12:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Stale, and image reverts look like a content dispute. Anarchyte (talk) 12:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 12:38, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 22:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined. Stale. Anarchyte (talk) 12:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 12:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suspected LTA or socking as of late. JayCubby 18:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Not indef, Twinkle did something I didn't want it to. JayCubby 20:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Anarchyte (talk) 12:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. M.C. (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined PC is working as intended. Anarchyte (talk) 12:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: For a few weeks, general IP harassment. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Tell me if I'm missing something but I'm not seeing the harassment...? There was one nonconstructive edit this morning [28] and a mildly provocative warning from an IP a few hours ago [29] but I'm not seeing anything that warrants protection, especially when you have had multiple good-faith interactions with IPs on your talk page recently. Giraffer (talk) 22:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Stale regardless of discussion above. Anarchyte (talk) 12:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 21:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. No demonstrated need at the moment. Anarchyte (talk) 12:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 12:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing, along with many comments irrelevant to discussion of the article, from IPs/new users. ApexParagon (talk) 03:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is a high bar for talk page protections. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been recently created and is being subjected to disruptive editing / vandalism. Please semi-protect it to prevent further edits from unregistered users. Harajaru345tyu (talk) 09:07, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Special:Diff/1285044894 isn't vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: "This page created and is being subjected to disruptive editing / vandalism. Please semi-protect it to prevent further edits from unregistered users." Harajaru345tyu (talk) 09:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Last disruption was nearly a month ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA-30/500 enforcement. 184.144.90.165 (talk) 12:37, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Not a primary article in the conflict. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recently persistent vandalism from IP users, who always adding awful, hate speech word like "This is an awful game. Don't ever play it.". CricketXP (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That was a week ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of anonymous vandalism, frequent edit-warring. 130.132.173.150 (talk) 00:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: I was going to decline this, because this hasn't occurred this month. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unprotected Fermant25 (talk) 10:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected No reason for unprotection provided. Ponyobons mots 16:07, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Since somebody deleted ALL links to my books in your first draft, please ADD at least just a link to you mentioning that I wrote over 25 books (which is main focus of my last 30 years) with the link NeverGiveUpYourDream.US (leading to my Amazon author page) THANK YOU! (Is this conflict of interest? GoodKindandHappy (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done We're not going to re-instate this edit (which is what you're basically asking us to do), as it was reverted off as spam. We're also not going to link to an Amazon page for much the same reasons. We are an encyclopaedia project, not a publisher's bio. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request temporary protection due to multiple disruptive edits/rollback by IP user 95.24.57.XX, user was warned to use the talk pages to gain support for his edits but didn't reply or stop the reinstating the edits Alawadhi3000 (talk) 21:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistently unconstructive editing, including sockpuppetry and otherwise unrelated disruption. JeffSpaceman (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Constant vandalism and edit warring from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
No protection: No longer necessary. Not the article, but this redirect. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 17:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Question: Why is it no longer necessary? What benefit is there to unprotecting a redirect? Ponyobons mots 17:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- There's been no vandalism since the redirect was created as a result of the page move. That is why I am requesting it. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 17:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done The article itself is contentious and extended confirmed; I don't see any benefit to opening the redirect up to disruption, and there is no downside to maintaining the protection.-- Ponyobons mots 17:33, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- There's been no vandalism since the redirect was created as a result of the page move. That is why I am requesting it. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 17:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- History of vehicle registration plates of the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Semi-protection has expired almost three days ago. Time to renew the semi-protection to prevent vandalism from IPs. Jon2guevarra (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Hundreds of recent IP and likely sock edits to a former FA. Have reverted to last good version. Seasider53 (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Leon103102 – see SPI. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 15:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequent for semi-protection Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism --Altenmann >talk 20:11, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Article repeatedly vandalized by IP editors. The leading sentence probably needs a bit of toning down, but before that happens, something should be done. APenguinThatIsSilly("talk") 23:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, as this seems to have resolved itself due to slow responses by administrators (in other words, the request was probably valid at the time, but is now stale). Sorry about that. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism, which adding unrelated "A shining example of European democracy' file without a proper reason. CricketXP (talk) 12:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, as it seems to have died down now. The file has also been deleted. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated removal of reliable sources by WP:SPA user Hebrew 28. Rift (talk) 17:09, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The reliability of said sources seem disputable, especially for a biography of a living person. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and page deletion because of it MusicGene (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Issues of notability should be resolved at WP:AfD. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
12 April 2025
Reason: High level of vandalism, I have warned the editor on various occasions while asking discuss it in the talk page and I have provided sources(used on the article) on why he was incorrect. Replayerr (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined As far as I am concerned, this is a content dispute. If the user refuses to engage at the talk page but keeps reverting, sanctions should be sought against the user. Protection is not going to help. Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. This article was semi-protected for a year, and was recently unprotected. However ever since it was unprotected at the start of March, nearly every single edit has been an IP being unconstructive and someone reverting the edit. It'd make it much easier for the constructive editors if we could do this early on rather than later to limit IPs and new editors, considering this article is about a high-profile actress; we did have to this for Tom Holland very recently. 750h+ 14:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed protection: Persistent removal of academic sources, misusing quotes, and erasing scientific data. Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry, creating new accounts that surprisingly happen to be there, acting as multiple persons.[30].
Turnopoems who started the RFC agreed that the whole disputed content should be removed (as it's spammed throughout the article multiple times, anyway), until a consensus is reached. But surprisingly a newly made account (April 2025) also kept removing the scientific data, and not the whole paragraph, acting as a sockpuppet, removing only the academic sources and keeping the primary and nationalistic ones. Fragrant Peony (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Fragrant Peony, pages can't be extended-confirmed protected unless semi-protection has been proven inefficient or they're part of a contentious topic... WP:CT/HORN would be a stretch, though, I think. If this is sockpuppetry, page protection wouldn't really solve the issue anyway. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 16:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. as the main article for what should be designated a contentious topic area. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent POV editing. ZLEA T\C 19:16, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at WP:RUSUKR. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by IPs after the 1 year protection has expired already. It has been protected multiple times before. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of repetitive text by IP Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 01:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Mainly known for being a pro-Israeli influencer in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Most edits and content are around that, and many IP and non-EC users are editting into this conflict. Likely should be ECP protected. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 01:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Please also see discussion here Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Description_of_Meir_Kahane_at_page_on_Lizzy_Savetsky. The article probably is probably more than 50% ARBPIA content. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 01:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article seems to have a long history of BLP violations and subtle vandalism by IPs. Perception312 (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Constant vandalism and reversions of the origin of Ika language without proper sources. Bernadine okoro (talk) 00:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:43, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit warring by IPs. Gamapamani (talk) 03:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:41, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism recently, with the user using multiple IPs. See edit history. JDiala (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. Ymblanter (talk) 03:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by different IPs over the past 2 weeks. – notwally (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of the same editing patterns that lead to the previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:52, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:50, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 16:06, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:46, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism and disruptive edits despite previous temporary page protection. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:45, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spamming by IP users on a surname page. Gotitbro (talk) 18:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 04:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
The Wikipedia page for Whitney Houston should be locked, because people have been removing important information that should still be there.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.135.76.170 (talk) 02:37, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request to protect page This page has been repeatedly deleted, moved, and redirected to other unrelated pages. Even after being restored or recreated, it is often redirected again without proper discussion or consensus. These actions have happened multiple times and are disruptive to users and editors who are trying to improve or maintain the content. I kindly request that the page be protected from being moved or redirected further, at least temporarily, until there is a clear consensus. Thank you for your consideration. RaSriAiem (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruptive edits in a month. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi Protection: All of IPs edits are unconstructive, and im tired of kept on reverting their edits. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 00:59, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:25, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, edit warring Blowwhite (Talk) 07:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 16:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Kajmer05 (talk) 17:54, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request Semiprotection. The LTA that targets the Fire Emblem series is back. Will probably need to be a substantially long duration, see page log - 6 months minimum, 1 year preferable. SnowFire (talk) 04:35, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There has been repeated removal of stable, well-sourced content by an IP editor and a cluster of newly registered accounts, all with a single-purpose focus. The accounts seem to make minor edits to obscure their intent, while the IP handles the actual deletion of content. This appears coordinated. Warnings have been issued, and discussion has been attempted on the talk page without engagement. J Pratas (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- The accusation that I am in any way coordinating with anyone is a false and unfounded aspersion. There is a credible accusation of sock-puppetry but it has nothing to do with me (obviously), and semi-protection would not solve it. Also, certainly the least engaged actor on the talk-page is J Pratas, who is dismissive of all opposed arguments, no matter how straightforward they are. There is administrative attention needed for behavioral issues at that page, but this is not it. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
These are the 3x deletion
1 [[31]]
2) [[32]]
3) [[33]]
Some of the newly created accounts were just investigated for Sock puppet account - Wikipedia and came out as “Likely” — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPratas (talk • contribs) 19:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- The first edit literally corrected your grammar and spelling, you don’t need consensus on that. And how do I prove to you that we aren’t the same person? Benji1207 (talk) 02:43, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've changed the request from Aristides Sousa Mendes as I don't think that that was the intended article. No opinion on the request itself. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, sorry but I do not see any need for protection at this point. If there are issues, they can be resolved at the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately user J Pratas appears to be an unstable individual with an unhealthy chokehold on this article, such that he won't allow other editors to contribute and immediately reverts their work. What can be done? Cocoa57 (talk) 00:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- See WP:SEEKHELP for suggestions. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:08, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- -Ymblanter - The same stable sourced content has now been deleted for the 4th time, always by the same IP.it the content was stable and sourced it shouldn't be eliminated 4x times without discussion Aristides de Sousa Mendes: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia J Pratas (talk) 23:45, 11 April 20 25 (UTC)
- Unfortunately user J Pratas appears to be an unstable individual with an unhealthy chokehold on this article, such that he won't allow other editors to contribute and immediately reverts their work. What can be done? Cocoa57 (talk) 00:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection requested due to persistent disruptive editing during the past week. Msoul13 (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time. Ymblanter (talk) 04:02, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warring over infobox image. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 06:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP users since February 2025. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. Favonian (talk) 09:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Continuous vandalism by IP Isi96 (talk) 04:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 08:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed protection Persistent vandalism 211.209.169.174 (talk) 08:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Daniel (talk) 09:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 10:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 21:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 10:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Been going on since April 6th. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This Ip user[34] keeps adding first party references that don't even mention every content they've added such as editors, cinematographer, cast members and character names. Hotwiki (talk) 18:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Also unreferenced edits like this[35]. The Ip user is not communicating through their edit summary and their talkpage. Hotwiki (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 10:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced and biased information by IP editors. Rajeevs91 (talk) 04:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 10:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of birthdate. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 08:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed protection requested due to disruptive editing and edit warring. The same thing has happened over at Dragon Age: Veilguard with the user BMWF, and the protection solved the problem. Vestigium Leonis (talk) 07:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD (talk) 10:35, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Restore move protection that has been in place for years, no one should move this page without discussion CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 10:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Move protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 10:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's a popular page after all. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Whoops, it was supposed to be full protection! CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 12:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's a popular page after all. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism by various socks with Korean username since 2018. While, those socks may have been blocked, they will always be back with another account(s) continuing the same vandalism as they did since 2018, in turn flooding the revision history with bunch of unnecessary reversion records. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:35, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 12:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP user adds honours to his beloved team (Olympiacos) before season's end is carried out, as he does in every Greek/English sports article. For example, Greek Volleyball Cup. Abudabanas (talk) 12:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 12:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:50, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – EAKI78 - Contact 14:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
+1 Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Relativity ⚡️ 17:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
+2 Reason: Persistent vandalism. JeffSpaceman (talk) 17:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 18:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator SilverLocust. since February. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: Hardly any disruption on this page; original reason for protection is no longer valid. Admin who protected this page has not edited since 2020. CutlassCiera 23:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined The page is only pending changes protected, and the majority of IP edits during the protection period have been reverted, so I think the pending changes is justified. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Add the missing info to the biography: He also established a non-profit program focusing on promoting hope, dreams, and a positive life attitude at NeverGiveUpYourDream.US GoodKindandHappy (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment: The talk page is not protected. And you've already been warned about this. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Favonian (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mike Allen 15:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HanTsî (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. Favonian (talk) 21:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Subject has been deceased for over five years at this point. The administrator who protected the page is unfortunately deceased. CutlassCiera 00:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Worth a try, given the very low frequency of reverts (one per year). We'll see if opening the article to non-autoconfirmed users has a significantly detrimental effect.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Protected more than 10 years ago because one user wanted to have some unnecessary text added. This person might have grown up by now and the article is not about a controversal topic. The admin is no longer active. If this request is rejected, please at least remove the so called "Official website" link from the article since it is not official, as explained at [36] 88.70.205.107 (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Last two reverts go back five years ago and last five human edits go back six months.
Unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last vandalism was a week ago, and the perpetrator (1.46.214.200) was blocked at the time. Favonian (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last vandalism was a week ago, and the perpetrator (1.46.214.200) was blocked at the time. Favonian (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incessant IP vandalism over a single issue. Anwegmann (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. Favonian (talk) 22:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. Favonian (talk) 22:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
13 April 2025
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. FMSky (talk) 17:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- I was also in the process of submitting a request via Twinkle; given the experience of the editors involved, it probably needs WP:ECP or WP:FULL. Per the discussion at User talk:Sergecross73#Longterm EW, it appears this edit war has been going on & off since November 2024 so not sure if this also needs to go to ANI. Sariel Xilo (talk) 18:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Since it kept going past when FMSky & I flagged the issue here, I decided to also make a report at: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vestigium Leonis & User:BMWF reported by User:Sariel Xilo (Result: ). Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: I think this can be handled at WP:ANEW now that it's being discussed there. @ToBeFree: Just letting you know this is here. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oh! Thank you very much! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots more vandalism and unsourced changes recently. Entranced98 (talk) 22:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current sporting event, IP vandalism, spam. Just needs a couple of days. Nswix (talk) 23:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Annh07 (talk) 14:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2a02:586:a500:3f93::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:48, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Autoconfirmed user blanked the entire page. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 18:10, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 00:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of vandalism after expiry of previous protection. William Avery (talk) 18:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:RUSUKR. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 17:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. High level of vandalism Top5a (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Top5a (talk) 01:15, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow-motion vandalism by IP has returned. Good day—RetroCosmos talk 03:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Disruptive editing. Parksfan1955 (talk) 06:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Permanent block evasion and disruptive editing. User:Atanasp123 who has been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts, continues to disrupt this article trough different IPs from Manchester, UK, despite numerous warnings on their talk-pages. Jingiby (talk) 06:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- this ip is turkish 212.156.30.110 (talk) 06:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- i dont know who he is 212.156.30.110 (talk) 06:28, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:28, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – CTOPS area; has seen recent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 10:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/A-I. Favonian (talk) 10:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring to restore redirected article, consensus to protect (if that helps) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison MacInnis. Toadspike [Talk] 07:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Last revert was eight days ago, and the AfD closed today. If there are attempts to restore the article after the close, protection would be in order. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing - continued genre-warring sockpuppetry after page protection expired. HorrorLover555 (talk) 11:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Never ending attempts by IPs (probably the same person) to change the result from "British victory" to "Persian victory". This article was already protected for months not that long ago due to this. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism on the page. Reverted many times. RangersRus (talk) 12:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
+1 Reason: (Repeating) Some anon accounts seem to lack neutrality while treating this page (hyping up the reviews and/or box office numbers) Metamentalist (talk) 14:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism / edit warring from IP hopping editor. MrOllie (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unsourced edits- supposed season 2 finale/series finale has aired today, neither of which are sourced. Multiple IPs are already coming with entirely unsourced edits claiming the season/series to have ended- despite there being no sources added to confirm this to be accurate.
Unfortunately, this will likely be going for sometime, so multiple months (possibly a year?) of protection may be needed here. Magitroopa (talk) 16:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A longer protection based on the above would likely violate WP:NO-PREEMPT. Favonian (talk) 16:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper regularly removing referenced info despite being reverted by several users. Valenciano (talk) 16:31, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 12:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:69b0:4af0::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: For years this page has continuously been restored without reliable sources, and in violation of WP:NTOUR. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor hopping across IPs to repeatedly remove referenced content. — MarkH21talk 17:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing; including the persistent pattern of including unsourced statements that aren’t substantiated upon request, instead the ‘need for citation’ template is removed. User in question has been warned multiple times for this specific behaviour on his talk page in regards to several other articles. GoldenDragonHorn (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi-protection would be pointless as both "combatants" are auto-confirmed. @MrHappy2020: These two entries at the article talk page do not look like the start of a discussion. Favonian (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotional editing has continued after protection was lifted. Insanityclown1 (talk) 19:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 20:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
14 April 2025
Reason: Continued edits by an unregistered user that bloat the article with unsourced lists and information. Paleface Jack (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Recent problematic edits are all from the 2804:7f20:11a:ea01::/64 range. They have been often reverted, but very rarely warned, making it controversial to block them. I know it's difficult to "catch the attention" of ever-changing IPv6 addresses, but an attempt should at least be made. Favonian (talk) 15:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Warned them in the most recent edit. Hopefully that works. Paleface Jack (talk) 20:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins,
I would like to request **semi-protection** (or full protection, if needed) for the article Ranjit Singh Ahir.
The article is being repeatedly **vandalized** by anonymous or new users. Most notably, someone changed the name and details to "**Hare Krishna Singh**", which is completely incorrect and misleading. The subject of the article is *Ranjit Singh Ahir*, a known freedom fighter from Bihar who was active in the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
Such repeated disruptions are affecting the authenticity and reliability of the article. To prevent further misinformation, I kindly request that the page be protected.
Thank you for your time and support. ShyamRay011 (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined AI-generated protection requests are not accepted. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 21:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:27, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, resumed soon after protection ended. Pemilligan (talk) 00:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent target of disruptive editing. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 01:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But I will leave a CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism by LTA 113.172.156.207 (talk) 23:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Obscene page title, basically all edits to that page are vandalism and reverts. This has been going on for a long time. RaschenTechner (talk) 04:22, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 07:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs adding Hebrew vandalism to the article. Entranced98 (talk) 08:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A random user, Etzedek24, who never edited this site, deleted the entire section of the high school's "Scandals and Controversies." without providing sufficient reasons or comments. This incident section has existed for years. Feather943 (talk) 08:44, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined @Feather943: This can't be solved via protection. OP, try talking to the user you mentioned above directly. I see you already posted something on article talk. In the end it boils down to the question if a controversy/scandal section is needed in the article or not; in my humble opinion, it's much too detailed, and the 2025 incidents aren't specific to the school, but cover more ground, so to speak. Lectonar (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Koshuri (グ) 09:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user continually changing cited information. RickyCourtney (talk) 11:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A random user, Etzedek24, who never edited this site, deleted the entire section of the high school's "Scandals and Controversies." without providing sufficient reasons or comments. This incident section has existed for years. Feather943 (talk) 08:44, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined @Feather943: This can't be solved via protection. OP, try talking to the user you mentioned above directly. I see you already posted something on article talk. In the end it boils down to the question if a controversy/scandal section is needed in the article or not; in my humble opinion, it's much too detailed, and the 2025 incidents aren't specific to the school, but cover more ground, so to speak. Lectonar (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Koshuri (グ) 09:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user continually changing cited information. RickyCourtney (talk) 11:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism by LTA 113.172.156.207 (talk) 23:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism by LTA 113.172.156.207 (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 13:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
+1 Reason: Persisted vandalism by IP-jumpers. Cyrobyte (talk) 13:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism by LTA 113.172.156.207 (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Current indef semi-protection appears sufficient. Favonian (talk) 13:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please make it stop. •Cyberwolf•. talk? 14:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator BusterD. Favonian (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Entranced98 (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t 愛 c) 17:01, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please make it stop. 2409:4085:1ECD:AF95:B880:28BC:F46F:36A0 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:46, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persisten IP vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 16:17, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. qedk (t 愛 c) 16:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 19:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t 愛 c) 19:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Headline news now with Trump defying the Supreme Court. We're getting non-constructive IP address edits plus some bordering on vandalism.
Requesting temporary semi-protection. Bob drobbs (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t 愛 c) 19:52, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Featured on a Google Doodle and today a series of joke edits. Temporary protection would save us hassle. Johnjbarton (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t 愛 c) 19:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism - one user has already been blocked for this but I have a feeling there's more to come and want to stop it before it does. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 19:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t 愛 c) 19:57, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: IP disruptive editing and use of Social Media as Source by same IP range of users. Mr.User200 (talk) 22:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- For the record the same IP have just reinstated content sourcing with social media. Mr.User200 (talk) 18:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Maine and Rochester IPs are part of the User:Beyond My Ken/Bad copyediting IP group. The involved IPs are Special:Contributions/74.47.32.111, Special:Contributions/2603:7080:9301:A7D:0:0:0:0/64 and Special:Contributions/45.53.96.0/19. Binksternet (talk) 02:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Nonconstructive edits and vandalism from IPs today. Entranced98 (talk) 15:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:04, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator QEDK. Favonian (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
15 April 2025
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. High level of vandalism. Copyright free images keep being removed. Persistent general page vandalism and unnecessary reverts. Anonymous-anon-x (talk) 06:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have warned them once already. Daniel Case (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism, person was re-elected and is making headlines in news hence prone to further vandalism. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: To Prevent From Data Change Frequently Shubh123456 (talk) 09:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-confirmed protection for Chad Gable due to high level of IP vandalism. [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] Lemonademan22 (talk) 22:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/PW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Global Saskatchewan
- CFRE-DT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- CFSK-DT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing resumed after block lift; prepping for possible merge. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:12, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs have returned since the previous protection expired. Vestrian24Bio 12:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some users are adding in information without consensus. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I consider myself WP:INVOLVED and would rather not personally apply protection to this page. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry from many years. IPs are also adding poorly sourced content. Has been protected 3 times but temporarily, so temporary protection is of no use now. saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 13:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IPA Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Several users keep adding unsourced information about the series ending after the page is currently protected. Edit approval maybe required. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 19:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism from IP hopping editor, section blanking for spurious reasons. MrOllie (talk) 21:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: User request within own user space. some one took it off •Cyberwolf•. talk? 01:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/KURD. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Reported this to AIV - the IP behind this is now partially blocked. Entranced98 (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 03:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism like [48]. Put a page protection for 30 days. see page's history to gain more insights on vandal ip attacks on this page. —⚰️NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 19:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Related to Anti-Zionism. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 21:43, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And kind of tangential to PIA. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: An IP address in Pakistan (175.107.211.119) has been vandalizing the page repeatedly for about a week. I've been reverting them, but can it perhaps get temporary protection for a couple of weeks, with the hope they'll get bored? Etoile ✩ (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Request retracted as the specific IP has been blocked from the page. A peculiar message was left on my talk page almost immediately after, but I have no idea if this is from that user. Etoile ✩ (talk) 23:46, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: If left unprotected, this Wikipedia will be 100% vandalized over the next two weeks before the Canadian election. 67.193.169.85 (talk) 02:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article was only created two weeks ago. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because sockpuppet is no active anymore and not much vandalism on this page it has been protected by MelanieN on July 7, 2020 plus she no longer administrator I just checked the tool username information according to unprotection request who ever is inactive or no longer administrator it can be appeal, if who ever active then we will have to contact who protect by username administrator so I'm requesting to be unprotected. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- The last time it was unprotected (right before the aforementioned prot by MelanieN), it had to be reinstated because of sockpuppetry even after seven years. Discounting that history, this unprotection request segues into the nonsensical. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Or maybe we could try pending changes either way. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- PC reviewers don't check why the page is protected. They approve the changes only if they perceive them as valid. (CC) Tbhotch™ 03:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
@Pppery you didn't add the comment reason for declined why did you declined this request obviously there's no reason for declined unless you said per above like other comment from Tbhotch or Jéské Couriano tell me the reason for declined why? 2603:7000:8100:29F1:5468:438C:FBE0:8493 (talk) 06:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Both IPs are block evaders – and blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Reducing protection would allow for constructive contributions from more editors and help improve the article collaboratively. Wikimaster23456 (talk) 03:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined This is an WP:ARBECR protection that cannot be reduced. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Plenty of vandalism and BLP issues, especially within the past day. Entranced98 (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP 2601:283:4600:36c0:1937:bca:aded:5635, also using other IP's in same range is persistently adding unsourced names to text, is edit warring, had not replied to Talk page warning(s) and has now started "shouting" comments to their constant reversions. Several editors have reverted these unsourced additions, which have been reverted back by IP(s). David J Johnson (talk) 19:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WaggersTALK 10:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I would like request the removal of page protection for Julian Bunetta. This page was salted in March 2020 following a successful AfD, and from the comments there, it seems like he failed WP:MUSICBIO at the time and that the content was lacking. While I'm sure that as true at the time, Bunetta's rise in profile, the significant increase in coverage about him, and his recent Grammy nominations made him seem a little overdue for a page, so I've been working on putting that together for the last month or so. I created a draft in my userspace that includes a plethora of sources and information about his life and career, and I think it warrants the removal of creation protection.
As an extra note, I also plan to make a discography page for him due to the volume of his work if this protection is lifted, so the existing discography section would split out to that page and expanded to include non-singles. Sock (tock talk) 00:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected – Go ahead, Sock. I'll probably regret those words. Favonian (talk) 11:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent unsourced changes over the past few days, given the subject of the page passed away recently. Along with multiple conflicting reports on the individual's age. Packerfan386beer here 13:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WaggersTALK 12:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The information is outdated and due nature of protection information can be updated GlobalAirport (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- The talk page is not protected. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Amravati_Airport is not protected. Favonian (talk) 10:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because vandalism in this article has died down. 2600:1700:6180:6290:9166:760B:763B:2730 (talk) 23:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment:That's kind of what protection is for. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Needs a better rationale. Favonian (talk) 10:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been protected since 2017 (8 years) as of 2025. Given that there hasn't been much vandalism, I think we could try pending changes. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 23:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Have you considered that the vandalism might have stopped because of the protection? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Request by block evading sock of LTA. Favonian (talk) 10:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request for Full Protection – Caste system in Nepal
Hi, I'd like to request full protection for the article "Caste system in Nepal" due to ongoing issues with frequent disruptive edits. This page has become vulnerable to unsourced additions, biased language, and attempts to promote or uplift specific castes, which affects the neutrality and integrity of the content.
Given how sensitive caste-related topics are — especially in Nepal's context — the article is at high risk of edit wars and POV-pushing. To maintain a balanced and factual tone, I believe full protection is necessary until a stable version is agreed upon through proper discussion.
Protecting the page would:
Prevent further vandalism and bias
Encourage contributors to use the talk page for consensus
Ensure all edits are well-sourced and neutral
I deeply respect the efforts of the editing community and hope this step helps maintain Wikipedia’s standards on such an important and sensitive topic.
Thank you for your consideration. 🙏 2400:1A00:B1C0:5697:AD4B:A7C1:3FB6:6555 (talk) 08:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP/User vandalism stretching for months, consistently prominent. Needs a long duration limit. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 10:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see about a dozen disruptive edits this year...this is far from a high level of vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 10:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:57, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit per week can be handled without protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of edits by contributors without due diligence. Kskarthicksundar (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 11:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive behaviour by IP 60.50.34.200, along with accusations of racism. hundenvonPG (talk) 11:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been protected since 2008 (17 years) as of 2025. Given that there hasn't been much vandalism, I think we could try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Color articles are perennial targets of vandalism. By a quaint coincidence, a request for unprotection of the Red article was just made – by an IP sock of an LTA. Favonian (talk) 11:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring – WP:HEADLINE, WP:OR, and WP:POV violations. Medxvo (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. WaggersTALK 12:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent IP/new editor disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. WaggersTALK 12:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-constructive edits and vandalism from non registered IPs. Thegreatrebellion (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined - report was good at the time but activity has calmed down following the original surge from the subject's death WaggersTALK 12:57, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple users, referred to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slomzy0932 and subsequently blocked, have attempted edits to this article, particularly regarding genres. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. WaggersTALK 12:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple users, referred to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slomzy0932 and subsequently blocked, have attempted edits to this article, particularly regarding genres. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oops, requesting this to be semi-protected, not extended confirmed protected. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP unreferenced & non-constructive edits. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Eight reverts of IP adding unsourced content, long plots, and vandalism in April alone. More from the previous month. CNMall41 (talk) 05:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Dear administrators, I would like to kindly request semi-protection for the article Vachirawit Chivaaree. The page has recently been targeted by repeated unconstructive edits and minor vandalism from anonymous users. While I’ve done my best to monitor and revert the changes, the disruptions have started to affect the stability and readability of the article. Applying semi-protection would help maintain the quality of the article and reduce the need for constant cleanup. Trusted and confirmed users would still be able to contribute constructively. Warm regards, Yuzy (talk) 07:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article has been frequently protected in the past, disruptive editing always returns. This article (along with similar articles for other band members) are frequent targets of BLP policy violations from people adding themselves as the subject's "spouse" or "partner". Recommend protection along with Hyunjin and Bang Chan who also receive similarly frequent disruptions of the same type. RachelTensions (talk) 13:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced WP:OR. Skitash (talk) 13:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and newly created accounts are vandalizing the article. This is a current issue and also Contentious article. GrabUp - Talk 17:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t 愛 c) 17:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. GrabUp - Talk 13:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of low-grade edit warring/disruptive editing by multiple IPs, at least one of whom probably has a COI. There are also CIR issues with some edits. Patrick (talk) 13:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- This is only on my watchlist because I manually fixed something flagged by an anti-vandalism script. Now activity there is about 80% of my watchlist. I suspect people just need a week or so for all the reviews and box-office data to come in. In any case, I don't know or care about the movie itself and am done trying to patrol the chaos. When you get to it, consider looking at the diff and restoring to the version by the last user who included an edit description or is working from an account. At least one person is clearly using the article for promotional purposes contrary to its sources. Thanks for all your work here, Patrick (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, always adding unreferenced and false information. Allyriana000 (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Per WP:GS/PAGEANT Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism like [49]. Put a page protection for 30 days. see page's history to gain more insights on vandal ip attacks on this page. —⚰️NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 16:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by PJparty2415 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Keeland567 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Gommeh (talk/contribs) 17:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 19:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An IP user with what I think is a dynamic IP has been persistently making bizarre unexplained edits (with edit summaries that seem completely unrelated to the content). Sesquilinear (talk) 19:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was over three months ago; and while I wouldn't argue this doesn't come under ARBPIA I similarly wouldn't argue this is a primary topic within it (as while it was the first international Zionist program, as the article notes it was replaced in the early 1950s with the Jerusalem Program), nor does it appear to have any nexus with the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: User request within own user space. Per BusterD's comment in Special:Diff/1285477831, it was protected because of WP:DE, but there appears to be no good reason for non-extended-confirmed users to edit my user page. That user also said I can request any administrator to change the protection level if I choose to do so. Z. Patterson (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Just linking to WP:UPROT here...I for one do not see the need for protection at the moment. Lectonar (talk) 11:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. The absence of a reason for non-EC editors to edit a user page does not, to me, by itself constitute a reason to so protect that page. We seem to have established a high bar for that level of protection to a user page; I would consider it only in cases of demonstrated long-term abuse by AC accounts. This is not being argued here. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of disruptive editing from IP accounts and may continue. Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 06:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2404:AB80:B:1CC:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adolescent IP editors from a similar location vandalizing on the same article issues. Zefr (talk) 19:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
16 April 2025
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 16:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- It is not disruptive. The version you restored is a bloated, repetitive mess, which is a real disservice to those seeking guidance. 41.32.39.128 (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 41.32.39.0/24 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism and disruptive editing for the past month PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 16:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Continued IP vandalism since this decline. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 23:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: request was declined earlier due to a lack of vandalism. page has since seen an explosion in vandalism PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 23:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Privacy Sir Barron Giraffe (talk) 19:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, I do not see anything which would require protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. LightlySeared (talk) 21:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of false information. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 00:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Valorrr (lets chat) 17:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The only dispute I can see occurred around 10 days ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandslism. --Altenmann >talk 03:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: VPN utilizing vandal. Parksfan1955 (talk) 06:35, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Pending changes could work too since this is a talk page. Parksfan1955 (talk) 06:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protection isn't available for talk-pages.Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Extensive vandalism. Martinevans123 (talk) 06:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I am requesting 6 months of ECP for Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory, and for Talk:Origin of SARS-CoV-2. All COVID topics are already considered contentious topics (WP:CT/COVID), and both of these article main pages are already protected by ECP.
The talk pages, however, have suffered under a truly withering barrage of endless requests that we depart from the standard of scientific consensus, and treat the concept of a laboratory leak as highly plausible. In the last two weeks alone, 11,000 words have been written at Talk:Origin of SARS-CoV-2 (33 single-spaced pages in word), with IP addresses and SPAs all asking editors to change the article.
The pattern of discussion in each new talk page topic is the same: an editor with relatively few edits proposes a change to the article emphasizing a potential laboratory leak [50], discussion quickly descends into accusations and fruitless argument [51], and thousands of words are written before the discussion is closed [52]. Then, hours later, another and similarly pointless topic is opened with the same agenda [53].
Editors are complaining of burnout, and you can see why. ECP on the talk pages would not impede article improvement, but would significantly reduce the strain and stress on editors working in this publicly contentious area. -Darouet (talk) 19:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- P.S. I'm not sure if this is the right location to post but Tryptofish suggested that any competent administrator can decide to apply ECP to these talk pages given that COVID is already deemed contentious (WP:CT/COVID). Tryptofish your input also welcome. -Darouet (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- I actually said uninvolved, rather than competent, and I'm sure y'all are competent.
Anyway, my advice came out of the discussion at User talk:Bon courage#These covid pages are exhausting, where it sure sounds to me like those talk pages are, indeed, needlessly exhausting. This is a matter of CTOP, and I hope no one minds that the request ended up here rather than at WP:AE, but it does very much seem to me that it would be a good idea for an admin, acting under CTOP authority, to grant this request. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if protection is the answer as much as not feeding the trolls. The regular editors are under no obligation to answer or engage in these discussions to the extent they seem to be doing. I would also suggest following the lead of many other talk pages of contentious articles and putting a FAQ up top basically saying, we are not discussing this issue here anymore without some change in the facts underlying consensus. Because I think protection here goes beyond the scope of what CTOPS authorizes, and when we have applied ECP to other talk pages (something we do not do lightly).
- Now, if ArbCom itself were to specifically authorize this here, that would be different. Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Tryptofish: right, thanks for the clarification and further explanation!
- Daniel Case, my sense is that editors fear that an erroneous "consensus" will form to dismantle these articles if they restrict their involement, so, they remain involved, and as I noted above, the pace and consistency of these continued efforts are withering. The talk pages have also noted that there are calls on social media to recruit people to edit Wikipedia's articles on these topics.
- Sadly, and this is my own deficiency, I am wholly incompetent to approach Arbcom: I've been editing Wikipedia for a while and everything about Arbcom - its processes, how to understand its decisions, etc - remain wholly mysterious to me. -Darouet (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Well, the problem is that there is nothing going on on these talk pages that rises to the level of disruptive editing sufficient to justify protection IMO. New editors civilly propose information, civilly discuss it with existing editors ... what's disruptive about that? It's how, by our own standards, these things are to be handled. No regular reverting, no profane IP outbursts at Wikipedia or certain editors, no repeated reposting of rejected edit requests ... all things that we have experienced on other CTOPS talk pages that we have protected (save Talk:Taylor Swift, where too many people have arrived from, I suppose, searching on "talk to Taylor Swift" and assumed that that page had a direct connection to her phone).
- Yes, there has been a little pushing and shoving, particularly between one five-day-old account (a likely SPA, it seems to me from their POINT-y behavior) and one regular editor on those two pages whose brusque responses aren't helping matters). But that's not enough to justify the bluelock, or even (at this point) a gray one.
- Any admin's decision to unilaterally ECP that talk page right now is likely going to be portrayed as some sort of censorship effort ... and you know what? That perception would be legitimate IMO—established editors, generally tending towards sources that support one side of this more than the other (Although I should say the lab-leak article does, to me, fairly represent the point of view that there was a lab leak, which is the most important thing to worry about here), ask that access to the talk page be limited to similarly established editors because they're afraid the article might have to be changed by our own rules, via an unprecedented use of administrative power. How would that not look suspect?
- For now I really think the best measure would be to have some sort of FAQ template on the talk pages, listing all the sources proposed for use and why we're not considering them reliable enough to use in the article, so we can just point to that instead of rehashing those reasons in the talk discussion (We might also take more affirmative steps to identify where on social media these coordinated efforts are originating from so that we can more clearly identify them as such when those users get here).
- If we want to ask ArbCom if we can do this to repel a possibly offwiki-coordinated sealioning effort, then in addition to any evidence of offwiki activity we would need piles of diffs (or at least links to the sections on the talk pages). My talk page has been freshly archived, so there's space. You can also email me if you think it's better off keeping that confidential. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'd note arbcom specifically declined making ARBECR a remedy admins could impose on a case by case where it doesn't already apply and that would be a lesser page level restriction. Nil Einne (talk) 06:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- I actually said uninvolved, rather than competent, and I'm sure y'all are competent.
- 1. Discussion is mostly civil, related to an expert survey, German intelligence, the CIA statement, the French press release, and the DIA analysis, in that order. Are editors expecting not to have to discuss these sources?? Consensus building is how this place works...
- 2. This request for protection has not been mentioned on the talk page--is it going to be? Or is the talk page too problematic to discuss how problematic the talk page is?? SmolBrane (talk) 03:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose A remedy against repetitive request is long well known: keeping archives and referring the newbies to them without long chat. One can even partially violate a no-edit rule for archive by allowing anchors to perennial topics. Another way is Q&A page. If the IP persists despite the 'rtfm' advise, simply do not engage, because consensus is already established. --Altenmann >talk 03:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined I agree with the opinions above that: 1) the disruption doesn't rise to the level where protection of a talk-page would be considered necessary, 2) the discussions are, for the overwhelming part, held in a civil manner, 3) an ecp-protection would probably be seen as cutting off discussion(s) bordering on censorship. In some ways, this talk-page looks like the talk-page of a controversial topic should ideally look: mostly friendly, hassle-free discussions and exchange on how to proceed. Yes, it can be exhausting, but only to the regular looker (who will need patience to answer the same questions over and over again)....for most people dropping in and leaving remarks it isnt. So, having an FAQ section on talk-pages (see Talk:George Floyd as example) is mostly helpful, and can be used to point new users in the right direction without too much effort. Lectonar (talk) 07:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Risk of vandalism, since it is about Zionism. Edward Mike005 (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandals --Altenmann >talk 08:11, 16 April 2025 (UTC) Yesterday I asked to protect it. It was protected for 1 day. and now all hell broke lose again. Please really protect the page. --Altenmann >talk 08:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism nionstop --Altenmann >talk 08:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:36, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page faces consistent vandalism despite existing level of page protection. Evident by >90% of the last 500 edits having to be reverted. Existing level of page protection is not sufficient. Carolina2k22 • (talk) 00:39, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- It looks like the page is not protected at all now. --Altenmann >talk 03:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending changes protection working as intended: disruptive edits are made but don't go "live". Lectonar (talk) 07:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 09:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 11:06, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been repeatedly edited by those seeking to insert their political biases as "facts." Some have issue with this figure because of certain politics she represents, and so they seek to discredit the information on the page. This has resulted in a constant back-and-forth between those who want only factual information in the article and those with an axe to grind and wishing to dishonestly present their own editorializing and punditry as factual.
Given the extended period of time this conflict has gone on for and the lack of reprieve the page has gotten, the chance of this continuing is high without page protection. 2600:4040:7A76:B400:4816:BEF7:53AB:6B20 (talk) 11:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:36, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 11:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What did Wordsworth ever do to Bristol? Favonian (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced and irrelevant addition of the same sentence diff. Previously protected for the same reason. Iiii I I I (talk) 05:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated recreation Bored kittycat (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Creation protected Deleted and protected against recreation. Lectonar (talk) 13:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article was semi-protected in September 2013 due to an edit war over using an image in the infobox. 12 years later, I think the protection isn't needed anymore as there is currently a fair use photo on the infobox and there's been no edit war against it nor any edits to the article in over seven months. I think we should try unprotecting it. Kaptain Yummy (talk) 00:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected Protecting admin no longer admin. Lectonar (talk) 13:07, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit Wars 126.216.23.73 (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 94.54.0.67 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 126.216.23.73 (talk) 09:30, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 94.54.0.67 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistently being targeted for vandalism by an anon user Mark and inwardly digest (talk) 13:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Request to reduce the protection level of this page from fully protected to semi-protected. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kushwaha Reason: There is no current high level of vandalism or edit wars. Semi-protection would allow more constructive editing from autoconfirmed users, while still preventing vandalism from unregistered users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhaskar sunsari (talk • contribs) 02:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – The current protection was made according to WP:GS/CASTE and cannot be reduced by request at this noticeboard. You have already made edit requests at Talk:Kushwaha. That's where the matter will be decided. Favonian (talk) 11:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, first by IPs and then by a (obviously related) newly-created account. Similar situation persisted at Samia Suluhu Hassan, until the article's current protection. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 17:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, first by IPs and then by a (obviously related) newly-created account. Similar situation persisted at Samia Suluhu Hassan, until the article's current protection. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 17:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I requested protection for this article on 9 April. It was declined on 11 April. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 18:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of promotional wording. Likely the same person using multiple IPs. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit every other day isn't enough disruption to warrant protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism, mainly by IPs. SteeledDock541 (talk) 13:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same protection needed at Nucci (rapper). Binksternet (talk) 13:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:08, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Despite numerous protections, the most recent being for three months, the same disruptive editor has returned to attempt to force their opinion of the subject being considered one of the greatest professional wrestlers of all time into the article with the same source that never backed their claim to begin with. NJZombie (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: Since the article’s three-month protection ended, they’ve made the same disruptive edit three times, using two different IPs and a registered account three more times in about 10 days. How much more disruptive activity needs to happen? NJZombie (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 12:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Article that was temporarily undeleted for deletion review. ApexParagon (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined No disruption yet, and normally not necessary because of the hint on the "live" page. Lectonar (talk) 13:32, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 13:33, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism 111.96.185.12 (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent (over years) editing of uncited information from within the fandom (?), I don't know if it'd just be possible to have a filter that triggers from IP edits adding in "therian" but that'd probably solve a lot of the issues. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 15:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced/unexplained date changes. Waxworker (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Several new sources found for subject including an award from Forbes 30 Under 30. Also, a fellow of the FRSA[1]. KingMud (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- @KingMud: This would be much easier for an admin to action if there is an existing draft on the subject. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Based on their recent edits, there is: Draft:Modestas Mankus Zinnober9 (talk) 17:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
References
Not unprotected at this time. The topic has gone through AFD twice, and was deleted both times. Recreated multiple times by sockpuppets that have since been blocked. Given the history of this topic, it would require a thorough review, especially for a draft that is nothing more than a stub. I have put a submission template on the draft so it can be submitted for review. The approving reviewer can contact any admin to perform the page move. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: page has been protected since 2011, little to no history of vandalism since. Maybe we could try pending changes? Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:05, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected. There is little or no history of vandalism because protection is working as it should. See more detailed reply below. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been protected for almost 20 years (2007). Given that it has been this long with very little to no vandalism, I think we can try pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected. I suspect this experiment would quickly fail, like your proposed unprotection of rat, which failed within minutes of the protection being reduced to PCP, which was ineffective. There are good reasons why some articles are protected indefinitely. Just because time has passed is not a reason to create instability and more work for others with experiments. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:39, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant and repeated alterations with no sources, both past and present. Don’t want to request permanent protection without trying temporary protection first. Editors are across multiple different IPs which makes engaging difficult, although this has been tried. Danners430 (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:57, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:05, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Tarlby (t) (c) 19:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request for temp increased protection: UKSC Issued a ruling on the 16 April 2025, being widely covered by national media, has lead to rushed edits effecting the lead paragraphs of the article. including speculation on the political stances of the supreme court. Knowledgework69 (talk) 20:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with the semi-protection Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Another list article with rampant unsourced edits from various IP editors. Danners430 (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:57, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing resumed right after unprotection. — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. While certainly longer protection than most recently imposed is called for, there is no reason I can see to raise it to ECP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: The page transferred its userspace protection. The protecting admin is inactive. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected – Favonian (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
17 April 2025
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruption from Special:Contributions/146.135.76.170. Binksternet (talk) 05:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Binksternet
User(s) partially blocked: 146.135.76.170 (talk · contribs) (from Whitney Houston). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:07, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 205.155.62.162 (talk · contribs) blocked by Mz7. Really more of a case for WP:AIV. Favonian (talk) 19:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent edit warring by IPs. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2806:2F0:62A0:EF4C:2558:ECDD:8:7A4C (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 07:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring and persistent vandalism. I just came across the subject myself on contentious geopolitical news analysis articles. So should be semi-protected for a few months at the least. DA1 (talk) 16:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- @DA1
User(s) blocked: User:2A06:5900:404E:6000:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Block has expired but vandalism has not resumed. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ARBPIA. Longhornsg (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not much editing recently, and while about the Israeli military no apparent relevance to current conflict, so IMO not a primary topic. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of unconstructive edits from IP users. Geoff | Who, me? 23:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 06:50, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Imwin567 (talk) 05:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Persistent IP disruption, please use semi- or pending changes protection. RaschenTechner (talk) 06:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring. Snokalok (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Snokalok is being disruptive by not providing any reasoning for their edits. How am I supposed to know why my edits are wrong? Please temporarily block Snokalok until they have read the guideline regarding edit summaries.2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6CE7:AB53:24D9:B09E (talk) 22:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not the only editor who's reverted you, and you would do well to learn about npov Snokalok (talk) 04:46, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Snokalok is being disruptive by not providing any reasoning for their edits. How am I supposed to know why my edits are wrong? Please temporarily block Snokalok until they have read the guideline regarding edit summaries.2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6CE7:AB53:24D9:B09E (talk) 22:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Protection seems like a good idea given the situation in the UK. The IP above is edit warring and pretending not to know why their edits are wrong. They are very lucky to have avoided a warning template. Snokalok is evidently much nicer than I am when dealing with trolls. DanielRigal (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- How is the edit wrong? Not a single reason was ever provided to me 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6CE7:AB53:24D9:B09E (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- changing "a" definition to "the standard" definition, even though other dictionary definitions for "woman" exist ApexParagon (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- But only one can be the standard definition 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:FDD0:7625:4BA3:2D8A (talk) 03:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Fwiw, one ruling in one country doesn't automatically change the standard definition. Lectonar (talk) 06:49, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- changing "a" definition to "the standard" definition, even though other dictionary definitions for "woman" exist ApexParagon (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- How is the edit wrong? Not a single reason was ever provided to me 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6CE7:AB53:24D9:B09E (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: 90% of edits to this page are reverted, all of them are by unregistered editors. Stumbling9655 (talk) 06:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Literally months go by without any edit at all. Lectonar (talk) 06:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stickymatch 06:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Favonian (talk) 09:27, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ZLEA T\C 07:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:15, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Favonian (talk) 09:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – WP:BLP violations of a WP:AP2, requires arbitration enforcement. I am WP:INVOLVED. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No auto-confirmed users that wouldn't be able to get through extended-confirmed protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and sockpuppetry – They got blocked but came back with a different IP. Koshuri (グ) 10:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:16, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Favonian (talk) 10:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recent high level of IP PoV-pushing on previously stable article. Article is obviously related to an area (the Holocaust) that attracts a lot of 'controversy'. Shimbo (talk) 10:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected Also reverted back to a clean and grammatically correct version. Lectonar (talk) 10:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long-term edit warring on concert's figures between 2 extended-confirmed editors. Both has been notified on exceeding 3RR. A discussion was opened in the talk page on February 2025 but there isn't consensus as of today. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Then we need some more eyes on it; WP:3O might be another venue to try. Lectonar (talk) 07:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Noted, reporting done as one of the involved logged out to restore their prefered revision. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Excessively being edited and vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined I just see normal editing activity, nothing excessive stands out. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined I just see normal editing activity. Lectonar (talk) 08:07, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined I just see normal editing activity. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs addition of content against consensus and edit warring. Vestrian24Bio 02:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not heavy enough to warrant semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Some specific IP user tries to turn this redirect into an article. Too soon until Supercard of Honor (2025). Needs protection until 3 May (the end of ppv/event). Mann Mann (talk) 03:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Please seek a consensus for your replacement of the article with a redirect. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Barely any activity in general. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: important page you need to be protected 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:29, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Barely any activity in general. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism 14.192.214.209 (talk) 08:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Barely any activity in general. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of caste-based content disputes and risk of IP vandalism on a sensitive social topic. Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. OP, please be so kind and read our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 10:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA Rgalo10. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 03:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if any of the socks are getting autoconfirmed and I can bump that up to ECP. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. 75.99.71.90 (talk) 06:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if any of the socks are getting autoconfirmed and I can bump that up to ECP. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:19, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism edits and unsourced content additions have returned since protection expired last week. Large number of past protections, could be a case for longer term semi. Entranced98 (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry from multiple IPs. –HirowoWiki (📝) 14:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blocked and revdeled. Lectonar (talk) 14:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Extremely high level of IP vandalism. This page needs a permanent protection. Temporary protection has been tried multiple times but to no great success. As soon as the protection period ends, IP users vandalize the page, undermining its credibility. The attempts to keep the list as accurate as possible citing credible sources and references has been of no use due to vandalism. So, I think this page should be protected permanently, or else this page will have no credibility at all. It will be waste of efforts we put to make Wikipedia better. Sneshik (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit about 4 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 13:15, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: persistent vandalism 81.179.128.1 (talk) 12:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined OP was the one disrupting, and hs been blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism on this page with candidates for the election being listed as "Skibidi Toilet" etc. Latest revision as of 14:51, 17 April 2025 by the user ScottishFinnishRadish contains the vandalism I am reporting. Atharva210 (talk) 15:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- My bad, username is ScottishFninishRadish Atharva210 (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hold on a second, this person ScottishFninishRadish is impersonating the actual ScottishFinnishRadish of the arbitration committee, can anyone point me in the correct direction in what action must be taken Atharva210 (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Impersonator was globally locked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing edit war. 101.165.220.96 (talk) 13:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Protected to prevent edit warring and ensure accuracy on a high-profile political figure 101.165.220.96 (talk) 13:42, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
a: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Protected to maintain stability on a politically sensitive and disputed topic 101.165.220.96 (talk) 13:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Simply impossible to communicate with an IP hopper to get them to the talk page. Moxy🍁 22:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ECP not necessary to stop IP disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent disruptive edits and edit warring over caste-related content. Semi-protection requested to prevent further vandalism and maintain neutrality. Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined Only about 10 edits overall, none of them disruptive. Have you got the right page? Lectonar (talk) 14:07, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- sorry i made mistake the actual page was lohar(caste) not lohar i hope you understand and check this page Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism came back. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging Daniel Case, who changed the protection to pending changes, to see whether they want to restore previous protection level. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. <sigh> This is why we can't have nice things. Daniel Case (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. 4 years since last time it was recreated. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. ApexParagon (talk) 02:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war behavior over what (if any) sales data should go in the article; this is spillover from another video game article where a similar issue is occuring between the same editors (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Content dispute at Talk:Forspoken regarding sales & Talk:Forspoken#Dispute resolution options). The discussion at Forspoken (which is under WP:FULL) is leaning towards a project wide RfC on sales data. Unfortunately, it seems like this article needs either WP:ECP or WP:FULL while that discussion percolates. Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done for now. The user is already pblocked for edit warring on another article. If the issue persist, report them to WP:ANEW. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 15:58, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 04:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page keeps getting vandalised by IPs. Nobody (talk) 05:13, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Star Mississippi 17:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP users keep adding the words "beautiful" and "young" into the premise section, which appears to be a directly copy from a PR release. These Ip users also don't explain why those two words need to be included. Hotwiki (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given Elon Musk's current controversial work with the Trump administration, this page has been the target of repeated vandalism recently. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism going on lately. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 21:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
18 April 2025
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by blocked user Colonialmid. Ekdalian (talk) 08:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And users blocked. Reevaluate when protection expires of need for longer or permanent protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. Iranian112 (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:50, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
[[54]]
Reason: Repeat users keep erroneously changing the information on this group which is not current to the information on the actual group's business pages. Thank you. Gaming222 (talk) 23:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... We can't do anything for es wiki articles. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rogue vandal targeting page across many IP addresses even after blocks. Alxeedo ゐ talk 04:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Izno. Favonian (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Isla🏳️⚧ 08:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Done – Favonian (talk) 09:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Battle For Dream Island has the requisite number of prominent secondary sources (3) which have written on the subject. This is enough cause for the creation of a Wikipedia article, as explicitly stated under Wikipedia's criteria for article notability and creation. Gisrhgver (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
The channel package was shutdown TheMaxChannel528-24 (talk) 23:46, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself.
Requesting immediate archiving... * Pppery * it has begun... 03:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Koshuri (グ) 04:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. There has been no IP vandalism as the pages has been semi-protected for quite a while. An auto-confirmed user has gone off the rails, but they will either stop or be stopped. Favonian (talk) 09:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Proxy sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch™ 08:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Already done by administrator ESkog. Favonian (talk) 13:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, despite warnings same individual keeps adding unsourced and horribly formatted list of obscure siblings of Reggie. - Roxy the dog 10:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP socking. JeffSpaceman (talk) 22:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 14:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 118.243.130.111 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 118.243.130.111 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 118.243.130.111 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I keep getting targeted by an LTA with page move vandalism. Aspening (talk) 12:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Done – Favonian (talk) 13:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits on a controversial topic, as soon as the article protection expires. Requires autoconfirmed protection. Preferably indefinitely. Barseghian Lilia (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated disruptive edits and caste-based content disputes. Requesting semi-protection to prevent further vandalism and ensure stable, neutral information. Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2025 (UTC) and sorry i made mistake the actual page was lohar(caste) not lohar i hope you understand and check this page
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A lot of disruption and POV pushing by dynamic IPs over the last couple of months. Per WP:BALKANS, long-term protection seems necessary. Griboski (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- List of TV5 (Philippine TV network) original programming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued additions from IP addresses that are unsourced. Seems to be a revert needed every couple days for the last month. CNMall41 (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. Iranian112 (talk) 22:36, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A user edited with pictures of modified cars which misleading the info. I think we should put the pictires of cars in stock condition or at least nearly stock that match with information text. Celica21gtfour (talk) 00:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion using WP:LOUTSOCK. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Aoidh. Favonian (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 17:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request that the term "Shudra varna" be removed from the article in reference to the Kushwaha community. This label is not universally accepted and lacks sufficient, reliable, and neutral citations from academic or government sources. Including such a classification without proper verification can misrepresent the community and promote caste-based bias.
If there is strong, verifiable evidence that supports this classification from peer-reviewed or official documents, please provide it. Otherwise, the term should be removed to maintain neutrality and avoid any caste-based suppression on Wikipedia.
I have already added this concern to the talk page, but received no response so far. Thank you. Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – You've already made a request at Talk:Kushwaha. That's where the matter will be decided. Favonian (talk) 14:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- But there is no reply yet 🥲 Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 16:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter. If the talk page can be edited by the requestor, then this place is the wrong venue and it needs to be taken to the talk page. We're not going to short-circuit a discussion because the requestor is impatient. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- But there is no reply yet 🥲 Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 16:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- List of Indian states and union territories by Human Development Index (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: high level of IP vandalism Justchecking0316 (talk) 13:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High-level of IP vandalism 41.109.196.51 (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing, disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
19 April 2025
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of poorly sourced/unsourced information. BOVINEBOY2008 09:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 10:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive IP editing. HorrorLover555 (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, if the IP continues they must be blocked Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; a lot of misinformation being added to the page as well. Since the film is still in theaters, the vandalism is likely to continue. (59.102.7.153 (talk) 04:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC))
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This should be semi-ed for a couple of months. The most recent IPs are now rangeblocked; see the deleted edits by the last one. Longterm socking, no doubt. Drmies (talk) 04:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 01:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – This article is prone to BLP violation. Some IP users and registered editors who are not familiar with BLP keep adding unreliable sources for her ethnicity/background. They add Kurdish while Moghbeli herself and her family never claimed such background. Actually, in all sources she just identifies as Iranian/Persian and American. This has been discussed on the talk page but some users still violate BLP like this.[55][56]. Mann Mann (talk) 04:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/KURD Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HanTsî (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Surge of IP vandalism related to contract dispute. Requesting semi for 30 days until this dies down. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 18:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content by anonymous editors stemming from previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Alxeedo ゐ talk 01:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism to BLP from a moving IP address, request period of temporary semi protection JP (Talk) 12:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 41.109.196.51 (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS under PIA although it also comes under KURD. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article is newly created and currently under development. Requesting temporary protection to prevent unsourced edits or disruptive changes while citations and structure are being finalized. Kagamid (talk) 18:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: We're getting non-constructive edits from ip addresses, some bordering on vandalism.
This story is still global headline news. The 4-day semi-protection just expired and we're already having issues again[57].
Can it get a 2 week extension? Bob drobbs (talk) 22:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. for 2 weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Polish kurd (talk) 22:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 23:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should take care of this one through the election and then some. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 23:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page per BLPGROUP. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP-hopper edit warring to introduce non-existent images. As they're not static, there's no one address to take to WP:ANEW. Hopefully a brief protection will deter them or make them look at one of their talk pages. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been semi-protected since 2021 due to a brief spell of vandalism from an obsessed Ariana Grande fan. It hasn’t really been vandalised since and I would like to see it unprotected. Frankster04 (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Wbm1058: (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected wbm1058 (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of misinformation being added to her page, evident from the fact that the subject of the article itself has been banned from WP for vandalism, so instead she asks her supporters to add bogus information onto her page such as the fact that she's leftist/centrist and that she enjoys gelato. A majority of these edits are performed by IP addresses. ~eticangaaa (talk) 03:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Still not seeing a lot of reverting. Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of repeated IP vandalism (over a period of over 3 years) 38.42.65.129 (talk) 10:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
+1 Reason: High level of IP vandalism for 3 years. Multiple IPs (47.229.171.222, 172.56.169.121, 212.114.251.53, 12.245.61.70, 32.142.50.118, 50.207.235.195, 97.68.255.154) have launched a persistent campaign over years 38.42.65.129 (talk) 13:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it hasn't been vandalized much since last September or so. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Controversial topic, has been highly edited Wcamp9 (talk) 12:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like little vandalism, and the editors on the page taking care of it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 1.236.144.49 (talk · contribs). for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war by lableakers. Ixocactus (talk) 21:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:3A20:D7E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 00:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since March, and not a primary topic in the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of meatpuppetry and IP vandalism following viral article and social media post about edits to the page Richessehonk (talk) 02:03, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing a lot of it following the most recent blockings. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 80.82.62.98 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Because there is no need for the protection in the first place. 2601:243:D01:1F20:8026:3D95:F6C0:F7B2 (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Here's the history before its protection. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like the protection is serving its purpose quite well. The IP should use the WP:EDITREQUEST system if they wish to make changes. Sergecross73 msg me 23:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected per all the above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer nesscary because it has been 3 months since someone did disruptive editing on the page back in January, and I would like to see this un-protected like the other "Sonic" films by Paramount.
- This is incorrect, it is protected due to extensive disruption. Strongly against this. Sergecross73 msg me 20:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Have you considered that the lack of disruption might be because of the protection? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected per above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Have you considered that the lack of disruption might be because of the protection? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs since 22:09, 17 April 2025. Alith Anar 02:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP-hopping vandal --Altenmann >talk 03:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Favonian (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shadow4dark (talk) 05:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Yuri Gagarin IP proxies. (CC) Tbhotch™ 07:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Favonian (talk) 09:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:25, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- This article is part of a weird attack blue links at Yuri Gagarin. (CC) Tbhotch™ 07:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Yuri Gagarin IP proxies. (CC) Tbhotch™ 07:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: Removal of PC. The page is indef, so it is redundant. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Done – Favonian (talk) 10:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:52, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Hotwiki (talk) 10:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Hotwiki (talk) 10:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
20 April 2025
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, and sockpuppetry. Richessehonk (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. While this is my independent assessment, I also note there have been no edits to the article since Daniel Case declined the previous request Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 17:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent campaign by multiple IPs. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs protection again - this time for an extended temporary period. Article subject is in the news and a spate of vandalism edits from IPs, new accounts, etc. has recurred. Geoff | Who, me? 23:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 23:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: War of edits by a member with an IP address. Incall talk 10:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Incall:
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Abecedare (talk) 23:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits per IP range (debating on spelling) 2600:6C5A:557F:D058:FC51:A35B:329D:9634 (talk) 23:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Abecedare (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Baratiiman (talk) 02:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk page per WP:CT/IRP Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A few days semi-protection is hopefully enough to let the IP-hopper read the argumentation that I give for the removal of its unsourced edits. IP is now cranky and moving towards PAs. The Banner talk 11:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption from an IP hopper, claiming "Indian victory" and pushing Ahir (social group) bravado. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. since the disruption puts it under WP:GS/CASTE. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 13:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple-IP vandalism from several separate ranges in the last hour. Seems to be a continuation of vandalism from earlier this week. BilCat (talk) 03:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IPs are yet again claiming that Jalali never left the now nonexistent Ba'ath party of Syria. Since this isn't the first time it should be under semi indefinitely. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 04:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- FYI this isn't the first time it was protected. After the protection autoexpired IPs restored that misinformation. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 04:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Both a registered user and several IP addresses keep removing cited information from this article. The issue revolves around a section where Centrica announced their support for the project in the early days. Through edit summaries, and on the registered users' talk page (Jamessutcliffe), I have asked they they do not remove the information, but update the article to state that Centrica supported it at the start, but now do not because of whatever the reason is that they have changed their minds. At least three other users (Bored kittycat, TheM1sty, and im really bad at this) besides myself, all agree the information should be retained and amended in the prose to reflect the now lack of support.
Thanks for considering this. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 14:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-Protection: That IP sockpuppet is at it again, adding unsourced material. That page will need protection from them. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor keeps removing information from lead without participating in talk page discussion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IPA Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing (removal of sourced content). Requesting longer protection than last time - less than 6 hours after the most recent protection expired, the disruptive editing recurred. DH85868993 (talk) 00:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism occurring in real-time as he won championship today. 66.182.122.10 (talk) 00:24, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. ~SG5536B 00:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GSRUSUKR, recent unsourced edits by non-ECP editors that had to be reverted. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 02:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sush150 (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 12:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Rylès HADJAR (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Edit wars normally do not ver indefinate protections. Maybe protect the page for a year and see what happens. 70.53.89.38 (talk) 01:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism Farcazo (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: genre warring by several MariaJaydHicky's IP socks. --Blueberry72 (talk) 21:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit war in the UK section. The section keeps being replaced with the assertion that "There are no clothing laws in the UK". First instance at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clothing_laws_by_country&diff=1285216953&oldid=1256740048 CiceroYuletide (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I've warned them both if it continues report to WP:ANEW. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:56, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All recent history is WP:LTA/BTSZ. Leijurv (talk) 03:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP users. Red Shogun412 (talk) 03:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism by new and unregistered/IP users. See the page revision history for many obvious examples. Iltjp (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced teams. Vestrian24Bio 04:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Various IPs continually change active team despite hidden note to not do so without a reliable source. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 06:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: High level of IP vandalism and edit war. The IP in question is also a suspected sock. Peja mapping (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. Iranian112 (talk) 10:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. Iranian112 (talk) 10:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism for 3 years. Multiple IPs (47.229.171.222, 172.56.169.121, 212.114.251.53, 12.245.61.70, 32.142.50.118, 50.207.235.195, 97.68.255.154) have launched a persistent campaign over years. Moderator said it didn't have enough recent activity to justify protection but it was most recently vandalized on April 3rd by 97.68.255.154. It's sneaky vandalism like "as he was unable to be accepted by a real university" that is going unnoticed by editors and moderators for months. Or when editors do catch it they don't catch all of the vandalism. 38.42.65.129 (talk) 11:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think the moderator saw the most recent vandalism. He said the last case of vandalism was in September so there was "not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection." But there have been multiple edits vandalizing the page since then in February and in April. 38.42.65.129 (talk) 11:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'll watchlist the article to keep an eye on it but there isn't the frequnecy of editing to justify protection at this point. Thank you for fixing it! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. Iranian112 (talk) 11:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. Iranian112 (talk) 11:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring – IP persistently removing content while a discussion regarding it is ongoing at Talk:Guts World Tour. HorrorLover555 (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Redirect could use page protection. One IP already got blocked as a proxy and I expect more disruption from proxies. There has been also sockpuppetry. StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 12:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I don't know if categories are generally brought to RfPP, but just check the page history on this and there's many, many IP edits trying to replace this with the content of unrelated pages. Seemingly a bot effort. ⫷doozy (talk▮contribs)⫸ 13:06, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive IP editing; consistently changes language to nonsensical (and incorrect) in-universe perspective despite warnings. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandalism from same IP range has resumed after expiration of previous protection. MrOllie (talk) 13:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 13:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Likely by the same person. The article was blocked last year for the very same reason. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure if this should have permanent protection, but edit history suggests that there is persistent edit-warring/vandalism/disruptive editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of recent IP vandalism. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 15:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Second this. IP disruption has continued, even after IPs got blocked. StephenMacky1 (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden surge in unsourced changes and vandalism from IP users. Yuvaank (talk) 17:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All additions since September have been WP:FORUM and forms of disruption. ZLEA T\C 18:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page has recently gained popularity and has already been partially blanked, [[58]] X4VIER.OneTap (talk) 20:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zinderboff (talk) 20:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism came back. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:56, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Sorry to rewrite this, but the previous request was ignored. This page is being targeted by several Turkish IPs, clearly sockpuppets of MariaJaydHicky Blueberry72 (talk) 22:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring vandalism by unregistered users. Although not highly frequent, the edits are disruptive and persistent enough to warrant semi-protection. Sid Prayag (talk) 23:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection -- Since February, multiple IPs are used to evade a block for sockpuppetry (1, 2), always to edit this specific article (the last three IPs who edited the article all belong to the same blocked user). The edits had previously resulted in multiple discussions at AN/I, due to wrong/misleading information being added, often in ways that are very hard to recognize. I hope that a protection for, say, a few months may deter them from trying again. Renerpho (talk) 23:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- The article has been semi-protected for a week in February, for the same reason. The user has since returned. Renerpho (talk) 23:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – SPAs refspamming the article with links to fraudulent sites masquerading as official telco SIM registration portals. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Various IPs and IDs claiming to be Tanoli keep on changing the content to prove themselves to be Pashtun without bringing forth any verifiable sources. McKhan (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
There is a grammar and spacing mistake in the paragraph. It should say: "Karwal is a Sikh affiliation" but it says: "Karwal is an Sikh affiliation". there is an extra space before "an" and it says "an" instead of "a". Can someone fix this? 70.53.89.38 (talk) 01:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Done —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 11:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The name of the minor accused of the Killing of Austin Metcalf who has not been convicted keeps getting added to multiple locations on Wikipedia. It has been reported at WP:BLPN, but keeps getting added. -- Jax 0677 (talk) 14:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: there is an ongoing discussion on the article talk page as to whether his name should be included. StAnselm (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The ongoing discussion is entirely appropriate and we should expect good clash in such discussion. That said, the community has valid BLP issues with mentioning minors AND those accused of crimes. On this page relatively new editors aren't showing the sort of restraint 5P-compliant wikipedians should expect. BusterD (talk) 11:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IP addresses. Referentis (talk) 07:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Referentis (talk) 07:13, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Quinlan. Favonian (talk) 11:24, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Over the past week, not a single useful edit has been made by the IP there. A few months of Semi-protection would be nice. The Seal F1 (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:46, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary Semi protection: – Persistent IP vandalism. Koshuri (グ) 10:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary Semi protection: – Persistent IP vandalism. Koshuri (グ) 10:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Referentis (talk) 10:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unconstructive IP editing. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Sean.hoyland (talk) 11:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/A-I. Favonian (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LTA from several IPs, they keep IP hopping when they get blocked. jolielover♥talk 13:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
+1 Reason: Persistent IP sockpuppetry. JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP Vandalism. The Seal F1 (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Moodaaa (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 11:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Well, yes, he was blocked, but take a look at the history of the article. Almost all edits from an IPs are vandalism. The Seal F1 (talk) 12:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP regularly adding a remark that there are more children than can be proven at all. Even the Clare County Library (where Pecker Dunne lived in his later years) has no info about the extra children. The Banner talk 14:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Golem08 (talk) 15:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism 89.211.83.185 (talk) 10:37, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Legitimate, referenced content in the 'Personal Life and Death' section is being removed repeatedly by both registered and unregistered users. Semi-protection may be sufficient. Akkeri (talk) 00:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Some context here:
- User talk:MH6961610 Akkeri (talk) 01:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: We are witnessing a small wave of IP attacks that are messing up the text on the basis of false excuses or without any basis. The article's subject itself being sensitive and controversial, perhaps a page protection of some duration would help cool miscreants' heels. - The Gnome (talk) 11:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP disruptive edits, including this clear vandalism. Mr.User200 (talk) 13:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
21 April 2025
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of WP:COMMENTARY. Vestrian24Bio 16:42, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unconstructive edits by IPs. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:55, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason : Temporary semi-protection - After the new White House publication, a lot of new, somewhat POV-pushing new editors have come to try to push the lab leak theory against community consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildfireupdateman (talk • contribs) 16:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and disruptive edits by IPs. Sid95Q (talk) 16:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by IPs. ApexParagon (talk) 23:24, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The actor has got significant roles ever since the last deletion and can have a standalone article in Wikipedia Iamaninnocentsoul (talk) 13:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- A draft that's ready to go would make an argument for undeletion more compelling. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know all the shows of this actor. I can't request a refund of the earlier drafts because they seem to be created by socks. So can the deleted version of this article be restored to draftspace? Iamaninnocentsoul (talk) 15:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Socks need not apply. Favonian (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article of an extremist political party in the UK (splinter of an out and out neo-Nazi group); repreatedly targetted by party members to downlay this very fact (see Talk:Homeland Party (United Kingdom)/Archive 1#Ideology, including the party founder himself). Jad previously requested a PP as well but there now appears to be a renewed effort to disregard consensus by COI editors (new single-purpose accounts) who participated in the dicussion themselves in the Talk page. Asking for a midterm ECP, as I don't see the targeted disruption stopping anytime soon (going on for over an year now). Gotitbro (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it's calmed down. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP number and regular user in an edit war. Talk page is getting acrimonious (mostly but not solely on the IP side). Erp (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Both editors notified of CTOP, re-report if it continues. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: In the lead-up to the 2025 Philippine Senate elections scheduled for May 12, 2025, the article has been repeatedly targeted by anonymous users introducing politically motivated edits, unsourced claims, and biased language. These disruptions compromise the neutrality and reliability of the article, particularly as political campaigning intensifies and public attention increases. This request is consistent with Wikipedia’s protection policy, which permits page protection in cases of persistent vandalism or disruption during high-profile events such as national elections.[1]
The 2025 Senate race is highly competitive, with 12 seats up for election and multiple high-profile candidates generating substantial public and media interest.[2] Political discourse surrounding these candidates has already led to disinformation efforts on various platforms, which can spill into Wikipedia edits.[3]
Given these circumstances, semi-protection is requested to prevent further disruption and ensure that the article remains a stable and reliable source of information during this politically sensitive time. Enzoeditwikicom (talk) 14:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- this explanation sounds like it’s written with AI, so… it’s because new users keep adding unsourced candidates to the article, and keep adding Heidi to the senate slate section even though she’s not on the slate. ApexParagon (talk) 23:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Wikipedia:Protection policy". Retrieved 2025-04-20.
- ^ "2025 Philippine Senate election". Retrieved 2025-04-20.
- ^ "Philippines: Senate race 2025 sparks online propaganda surge". Retrieved 2025-04-20.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Accepting the reason for the sake of argument, as some of the editors who have been reverted are extended confirmed this would need full protection which I don't believe is justified. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Iranian112 (talk) 16:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant IP disruption. - SUN EYE 1 16:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, mostly from ip accounts and new accounts. LastJabberwocky (talk) 18:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: persistant IP vandalism/disruptive editing dating back months from a sockpuppet master. Several IP blocks futile as new IPs come to continue the vandalism. Currently has two IPs blocked, has returned to continue disruptive editing PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 20:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: persistant IP vandalism/disruptive editing dating back months from a sockpuppet master. Several IP blocks futile as new IPs come to continue the vandalism. Currently has two IPs blocked, has returned to continue disruptive editing PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 20:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: persistant IP vandalism/disruptive editing dating back months from a sockpuppet master. Several IP blocks futile as new IPs come to continue the vandalism. Currently has two IPs blocked, has returned to continue disruptive editing PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 20:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: persistant IP vandalism/disruptive editing dating back months from a sockpuppet master. Several IP blocks futile as new IPs come to continue the vandalism. Currently has two IPs blocked, has returned to continue disruptive editing PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 20:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: persistant IP vandalism/disruptive editing dating back months from a sockpuppet master. Several IP blocks futile as new IPs come to continue the vandalism. Currently has two IPs blocked, has returned to continue disruptive editing PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 20:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: persistant IP vandalism/disruptive editing dating back months from a sockpuppet master. Several IP blocks futile as new IPs come to continue the vandalism. Currently has two IPs blocked, has returned to continue disruptive editing PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 20:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: persistant IP vandalism/disruptive editing dating back months from a sockpuppet master. Several IP blocks futile as new IPs come to continue the vandalism. Currently has two IPs blocked, has returned to continue disruptive editing PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 20:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 23:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP block evasion and nonsense stuff also blanking the page. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 03:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:50, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: simi-protected is overkill 54rt678 (talk) 23:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I'd argue protection should be increased since every edit this month has been various back and forth edit wars. If this is occurring at semi-level, I don't want to think about the instability at unprotected. This is not a calm and stable article and for that alone it should not be lowered. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post here only if you receive no reply. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Valorrr (lets chat) 00:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of anonymous IP vandalism / disruptive editing. Danmakusaur (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism came back <sigh>. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: Ping Daniel Case for your review. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Another place where we can't have nice things, apparently. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA has made auto confirmed socks to bypass the semi protection so recommend temporary extended protection. Isla🏳️⚧ 01:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Question: Do you want ECP HirowoWiki? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, but temporary extended confirmed protection due to sockpuppetry or multiple IP addresses. –HirowoWiki (📝) 03:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:40, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Edit warring. Koshuri (グ) 04:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Captainllama (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Rajasabh7788 (talk) 06:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GSRUSUKR, recent IP vandalism SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Thewindbird (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP block evasion and nonsense stuff also blanking the page. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 03:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- It has been vandalized more than I can count. Targeted by LTA. Annh07 (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have tried several brief protections but vandal keeps coming back. No other activity on talk page for a long long time, so I’ll protect one week as a last resort. If another admin objects, feel free to remove the protection without consulting me. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target since a year-long protection expired. Entranced98 (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Thewindbird (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 17:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Due to the semi-protection level of the primary article on Pope Francis, there is a potential risk of increased vandalism attempts on this related page. Tigeryfan (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Multiple editors have added a name, unsourced, to this article that has necessitated WP:REVDEL. This started in 2018 and two more editors have done so today. I would provide diffs but... revdel. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 15:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection due to persistent vandalism and edits without citation. See history for examples. UniqueDataDiver (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
22 April 2025
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: Ping AlexiusHoratius for your review. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Looks like one editor who came back as an IP after being blocked. Blocked the IP, please repost if vandalism resumes. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Now that Francis has died, a vandal keeps adding the number of phrases and the list to move the goalpost to the next pope. Please revert his edits to how it stood as of yesterday and prior, and protect page. I tried to submit this under the standard page protection request but it said error. 164.119.5.96 (talk) 18:36, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined - We don't entertain requests from socks. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by mostly unregistered users. Vasil3fonov (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Selfisekai (talk) 03:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- + Support, Vandalism continues to be reverted. Armeym (talk) 06:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- + Support, vandalism likely worsened by recent internet memes Wik206 (talk) 07:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Many IPs have vandalized the page. I know that it is rare for talk pages to be semiprotected, but that is basically where most of the edits come from. Dr. Hyde, muahahaha jekyllthefabulous (speak, or you shall die) 05:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption. We aren't there yet. Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason:Vandalism on his bithdate. I checked article’s history, many IP trying to input his birthdate without any source. Recently, someone referenced a birthdate post of him stating his real birthdate on his verified social media. So i think this is the best source. We should protect the article for stop IP vandalism as they are still changing birthdate without source. Afstromen (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has lately been afflicted by users trying to make this dish look specifically Armenian. Largoplazo (talk) 15:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping user has been vandalizing this page for multiple days in a row. TheM1sty (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed within 10 hours of expiration of previous protection. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP Hopping user keeps vandalizing Soviet Union/ Military related articles. TheM1sty (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: So request unprotection. 2A06:5902:381F:2E00:8D06:5B41:2700:1722 (talk) 08:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined No reason given. Lectonar (talk) 08:50, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent ip vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 06:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 15:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent COI editing. Annh07 (talk) 10:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:51, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Blocked user keeps making unsourced disruptive edits via IPs. Jetstreamer Talk 12:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Blocked user keeps making unsourced disruptive edits via IPs. Jetstreamer Talk 12:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of distruptive IP edits RIDH-1 (talk) 17:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Duplicate request. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring BLPCRIME violations. Borgenland (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Duplicate request. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Came back after six months of protection. Entranced98 (talk) 12:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resume of disruptive editing by anonymous editors following previous protection ending. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption resumed immediately when protection expired yesterday. Please protect until after the election on April 28. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unsourced IP vandalism, see last 5 edits [59]. AntEgo (talk) 15:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment: @AntEgo: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Enforcing WP:GS/AA. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple IP addresses persistently adding unsourced edits. Sush150 (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:16, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring. Wiqi55 18:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Permanent extended confirmed protection. Contentious topic, India/Pakistan conflict. WP:CT/IPA Ecrusized (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as a CTOP action. A start at least, and we'll see how it goes. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:51, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP editing of the article without giving references. Changing key biographical changes about the formation of the band. Seaweed (talk) 16:37, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Firefangledfeathers: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Now done. Good bot. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Meena • 21:37, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content, and addition of promotional content by IPs. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 21:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No prior protection history. BusterD (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs since 00:07, 17 April 2025. Alith Anar 21:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A few days after its protection template expired, the socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vagrdyuy9 came back. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued abuse by Zjholder and his sockpuppets. Ghent123 Communicate 00:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slowly moving content dispute with reverts being made repeatedly by both IPs and extended confirmed editors. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Copake Mitsubishi MU-2 crash (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA Block evasion misuse closing the AFD. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 04:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Pickersgill-Cunliffe. BusterD (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Strange and WP:POINTed edit warring from a shifting IP. Grayfell (talk) 05:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing — The edits are often POV-pushing, poorly-sourced, or borderline defamatory and require frequent cleanup. Axeia.aksaya (talk) 13:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse by sock-hopping anonymous editor (of a previously blocked one). livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been the subject of constant vandalism. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. BusterD (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Continuously targeted/edited by ban-evader (see SPI:Rubbaband Mang and WP:LTA/HABS). They're able to come up with seemingly near-infinite IP addresses to get around the game of SPI whack-a-mole, so requesting this as a far stronger means of stopping them. The Kip (contribs) 15:27, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No prior protection history. BusterD (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: See Demidov request. This page in particular has been targeted by the user since the start of the season. The Kip (contribs) 15:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: See above. The Kip (contribs) 15:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No prior protection history. Please reread the protection policy linked everywhere on this page. BusterD (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continues vandalism. TheM1sty (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. BusterD (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: See above. The Kip (contribs) 15:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism from different IPs, likely same person. loserhead (talk) 16:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. BusterD (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 176.65.138.112 (talk) 16:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism even after the conclusion of discussion being that the king was a Brahman and his descendants bhumihar Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 124.18.248.14 (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of IP vandalism. Cambial — foliar❧ 11:16, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Isaidnoway (talk) 13:01, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP addresses persistently adding non-constructive categories, such as Category:Fake news, Category:Media bias and Category:Media bias controversies. Referentis (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP addresses persistently adding non-constructive categories, such as Category:Fake news, Category:Media bias and Category:Media bias controversies. Referentis (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism lately, currently some vandalism from some different IP addresses, enlarging the image for no apparent reason. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 19:16, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: See above. The Kip (contribs) 15:29, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No prior protection history. Happy to see a discussion started on talk page. BusterD (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @BusterD: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:33, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of WP:SPA edit-warring. This is a part of a series of edit-wars on law firm pages stemming from a canvassing campaign begun by a law student on TikTok that got them banned for sockpuppetry. GuardianH 03:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending-changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 18:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too frequently edited for pending changes. Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Restarted IP vandalism. Page that was protected until a few days ago following a request in March. I request protection again for the page following the restart of vandalism by anonymous users. MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – We now have four drafts of this, prior deletion discussion, SOCKS, and bludgeoning. Enough is enough. CNMall41 (talk) 20:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of vandalism by unregistered users for weeks. Helper201 (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Receiving good faith edits from IPs so keeping it pending. Parksfan1955 (talk) 20:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. BusterD (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Personal attack and harrasment by IPs again and again. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 12:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing — The edits are often POV-pushing, poorly-sourced, or borderline defamatory and require frequent cleanup. Axeia.aksaya (talk) 13:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
23 April 2025
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unwanted edits are happening. The page was protected before. Need protection for longer time. Mehedi Abedin 21:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Black Kite. semi one month— rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: There are far less transclusions on this template (under 200 as opposed to over 700). - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected. Per Wikipedia:High-risk templates § Criteria, as it has 180 transclusions. If it goes above the semi-protection threshold, the bot will take care of that. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Months have passed since his death and funeral, so request unprotection. ScarletViolet 13:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected (FYI BD2412). Based on this comment, the intention of this action (note the log summary) was to unprotect the page, not to extend the move protection to cover editing as well. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 02:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The socks of Vagrdyuy9 are spamming it again, which had led to the article's protection earlier. HistoryofIran (talk) 09:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page has seen an increased level of vandalism and likely sockpuppet edits following Coachella and American media coverage. It would be best for the page moving forward to be locked for some time until the interest falls back off. Ruralexpat (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism Dr. Precursor (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Continued edit warring from IP users. SleepyRedHair (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months by User:Ad Orientem, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. - Aoidh (talk) 02:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Replayerr (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. May consider WP:ANI. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:50, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 00:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Article was protected since 2008. The article doesn't have that much page views, unlike Satan. We can try to unprotect this one. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 21:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected. Average of 1,100 views per day in 2025, in comparison to Susan Wojcicki's 2,000 (the last article I unprotected with a similar view count, which has been successful). This article has 762 watchers, so any vandalism should be removed quite swiftly, though I'll review a few months down the line. May need pending changes in the future. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Sdrqaz: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
✔️ Already done only move protection will be remain in place due to move page vandalism❗️ 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Let’s add the number of active editors (118,057), as already done on the Main Page and WP:MP/DAT. 2604:3D08:9476:BE00:852C:66B4:224C:1E39 (talk) 23:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Done, thanks! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 02:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing by multiple and changing IPs. Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Instead, one IP was blocked and has since been re-blocked. Per the pattern of use of multiple IPs (per the article's edit history), activity has simply resumed from a different IP. Page protection seems more suitable to address the IP-hopping and has been effective against the users activities at Ulster Scots dialect. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems to be the only way to stop it for now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:07, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism by block-evading Tokyo-based IP editor. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 09:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection as the article is newly created and already experiencing disruptive and unsourced edits related to a recent incident. Thanks. Aliyiya5903 (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'd probably go for ECP given that the article is covered by the scope of WP:CT/IPA. Aydoh8[contribs] 04:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Also the page is already semi-protected but the DE is still continuing. Aydoh8[contribs] 04:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – User:185.250.191.198 blocked for repeated vandalism on this page and Memed, My Hawk.
User is bypassing ban with a new IP. Blocked April 10 for sockpuppetry Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/185.250.191.198/Archive.
See these edits, all by the same sockpupeteer: [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76]. ElENdElA (talk) 08:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: We have GD fans who get information and really want to edit this article. So why not? Srihan123 (talk) 09:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined "Why not" isn't a compelling rationale for lowering the protection. The article has a long history of disruptive editing, and it seems to be a magnet for problems. The current level is only semi-protected, which is a low bar, and editors can always use the talk page to request changes. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High IP vandalism changing boxoffice figure not shown in the sources. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 12:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incessant IP vandalism. Anwegmann (talk) 22:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 02:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
IP vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 09:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Khagan15 (talk · contribs). Two obvious IPs blocked as well. Favonian (talk) 11:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This only came out of semi-protection on the 22nd and already on the 23rd has been subject to vandalism/BLP violations twice. TarnishedPathtalk 06:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:07, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent hijacking of section on Salman Khan by IPs. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:23, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and misplaced edits due to the town being part of a recent news event (See 2025 Pahalgam attack). Would be better to have a temporary protection for a few days until this dies down. M2 (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 04:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:15, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- User talk:TokihikoH11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:TokihikoH11 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Hello, I will not comeback ever, this account is now abandoned. Please sysop protect my talk page [abuse by LTA:Nate Speed under IP] and if possible my user page too.
Thank you in advance. TokihikoH11 (talk) 06:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Referring to the talk page. Not going to preemptively protect the user page. Sorry to see you go. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:21, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Firefangledfeathers: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. Not so good bot. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:42, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:11, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Favonian (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Favonian (talk) 17:25, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. randomdude121 15:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Kool 101 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Hot FM (Malaysia) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Eight FM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Fly FM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Molek FM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP sockpuppetry – High IP vandalism changing any information not shown in the sources. Please protect page. 2001:448A:1020:5990:3109:CDEB:A1E0:6D5C (talk) 13:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The move removed its protection. Contentious topic. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Done Also added move protection.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruptive editing and edit warring. POV statements in lead about Alawite involvement with Assad regime. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 17:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, not seeing vandalism by new or unregistered users Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – LTA Creating abuse. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 00:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined protection/blacklisting are unlikely to be effective here Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – IP LTA Creating abuse. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 00:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- See also User talk:IanDBeacon/Sandbox 15, User talk:IanDBeacon/Sandbox 16, User talk:IanDBeacon/Sandbox 17, User talk:IanDBeacon/Sandbox 18. I suggest salting any page that contains "User talk:IanDBeacon/Sandbox" in the title. ApexParagon (talk) 01:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- I would agree with that. I'm not certain whether it would be filtered or logged as disallowed, but it appears similar to the content found on
User talk:IanDBeacon/Sandbox X
. It seems to be a case of attempting to misuse it, as the message appears to be copied and pasted or contains inappropriate material. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 01:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- I would agree with that. I'm not certain whether it would be filtered or logged as disallowed, but it appears similar to the content found on
Declined protection/blacklisting are unlikely to be effective here Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users consistently adding information with only primary sources, not making any attempts to find reliable third-party sources to prove notability. –WPA (talk) 03:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:59, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: GENSEX topic area. GnocchiFan (talk) 07:18, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wanted to add that there seems to be edit warring happening in the lead from IP accounts right now. LunaHasArrived (talk) 13:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- I also suspect many of these brand new accounts are sock puppets. Protection is needed HenrikHolen (talk) 13:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 13:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 18:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gianakos-Safos Collection (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 13:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 18:15, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CNMall41 (talk) 07:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit warring by new accounts, possible socks[77][78][79] of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tajik Sohrabs or meatpuppetry. Mann Mann (talk) 07:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined let's let the SPI play out Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry Mann Mann. I see there's no active SPI. Could you please file one? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of LTA ongoing, courtesy of WP:LTA/REVERSI. Magitroopa (talk) 07:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined page deleted Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – revert vandalism from multiple ips. they are/should be blocked but this would help as a safeguard. loserhead (talk) 18:24, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2a00:1370:81a8:419f::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Jake Wartenberg. Pending changes protection appears to be coping. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am aware that talk pages are rarely protected, but I think it is justified in this case. There has been a string of users coming along to propose the same change of pronouns on this page over and over, and occasionally sprinkling in transphobic rhetoric as well. GraziePrego (talk) 03:42, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/GG. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Fairly frequent unsourced additions and vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 13:13, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. The combination of featured article and school curricula seems to indicate that this is called for. Favonian (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism recently, adding fake candidates and endorsements and removing sourced content. Day Creature (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. •Cyberwolf•. talk? 19:21, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption. Loafiewa (talk) 10:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. qedk (t 愛 c) 20:13, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring - requesting page protection to try and get people to use the talk page instead, since reverting edits isn't working. Gommeh (talk/contribs) 16:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:11, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Hellonerds12321 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. 24 hours for edit warring. 205.155.62.160's leave of absence rather longer. Favonian (talk) 17:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harald Malmgren (2nd nomination) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: https://old.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/1k5ysjv/former_ambassador_harald_malmgrens_wikipedia_page/
Canvassed, there seems to be some no-good stuff going on. JayCubby 16:11, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeatedly recreated by an IP and a user. Bored kittycat (talk) 14:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined I'll put it on my watch list. Blocking draft creation isn't as critical as article creation, and this acts as honeypot for the spammer, who otherwise may try an alternative spelling if blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. The same person appears to keep making disruptive edits under changing IP addresses, at a too broad a range that makes an IP block inadmissible. DracaenaGuianensis (talk) 14:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: 2600:1000::/21 (talk · contribs) (from Kerianne Flynn). One month. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps on changing sourced content [80] [81] and makes up fake 2025 estimates suing 2011 census data [82]. The page was protected before for the same type of census related vandalism/disruptive edits, so likely the person. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: 2409:40f2::/34 (talk · contribs) (from Ballari). One month. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 191.112.8.180 (talk) 20:28, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 20:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Entranced98 (talk) 10:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of repeat vandalism. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Following a brief respite, the vandals are at it once again, intensely too. A look at the history page should suffice. Can we have the page protected for a period of time, please? -The Gnome (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Edit-warring / content dispute. Left guide (talk) 20:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- In addition to today's activity, the back and forth edit-warring over the same piece of content dates back to April 8. [83][84][85][86][87] Left guide (talk) 21:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
The page is not authentic and a subject of deletion: The protection is no longer necessary because the page should be deleted because of lack of sources and no citations in front of great false claims. Thereby, I request that the protection should be reduced and hence the page should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaurya Singh Sikarwar (talk • contribs) 18:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Raja Kam Dev Sikarwar is not protected. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
24 April 2025
Indefinite semi-protection: GENSEX topic area. GnocchiFan (talk) 07:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:30, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- I have, nonetheless, put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – This article has been edited by three users who say they are respectively the subject of the article and two of his colleagues. they have added unsourced information, and four times this month they have added copyrighted information which has been or is being revdelled. The article has been raised at CoIN and there is discussion on the article's Talk page and on the user pages of the three accounts. We don't seem to be getting anywhere, so I would be grateful if page protection could be considered. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: Sockpuppet investigation opened — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined Let's defer to that for now. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There's currently a dedicated campaign to "dox and desysop" [sic] me being run on flying saucer fan sites due to my nomination of Harald Malmgren at AfD. This has spilled over to my Talk page and, while many of the threats and insults are actually quite creative and I enjoy reading them, I'm going to be OOT for a few days and am worried about a backlog when I return. Plus, a lot of well-meaning (but unsolicited) good samaritans are reverting many of them which requires extra time and effort. I'm, therefore, hoping for a week or so of semi-protection, if possible. Thanks. Chetsford (talk) 23:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to reduce the protection level early if you'd like. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 21:08, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined This article does not need to be protected. As an unreferenced BLP, it needs to be deleted. I will therefore be prodding it when I'm done here. Daniel Case (talk) 21:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – incorrect information being added and vandalism. - FitIndia Talk (Admin on Commons) 21:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. All recent disruptors. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This article has been previously temporarily protected. This article is on the Department of Government Efficiency, a highly controversial subject in the United States -- it should be semi-protected. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 21:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And that's close to an argument for pre-emptive protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 21:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already warned them once. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ahecht. 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ahecht. 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being targeted due to a trending Reddit post [88]. Alxeedo ゐ talk 23:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry for delay. Chetsford (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unhelpful IP edits. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry for delay. Chetsford (talk) 09:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection High level of genre warring and reverting back and forth of cast members listed in the infobox. Most of the issues seem to be coming from IPs and new or rarely used older accounts. NJZombie (talk) 04:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I suspect we'll eventually need to protect this longer but will have to start here for now. Chetsford (talk) 09:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: An anonymous account persists in committing edits that have been reverted. Selbsportrait (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced and promotional material, removal of existing reference. Tacyarg (talk) 08:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs adding citation needed tag to sourced content without explanation. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 15:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unhelpful IP edits. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring, multiple IPs from Greater Washington DC. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/70.183.0.0/21 and Special:Contributions/198.24.31.113. Continuing the disruption of Special:Contributions/2600:4040:207B:A700:B1B4:8050:CBC:99F, Special:Contributions/2600:4040:2885:5C00:59F9:1294:DD2E:BF2, Special:Contributions/50.144.192.106, Special:Contributions/98.160.51.12, Special:Contributions/198.24.31.86 and Special:Contributions/198.24.21.128. Binksternet (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 03:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one problematic edit in last 30 days. Chetsford (talk) 09:54, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP users. Vasil3fonov (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Extended confirmed is overkill for the level of vandalism on this page. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 12:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined No, as this falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics/American politics; furthermore, also see Talk:Elissa Slotkin, where a requirement of being extended-confirmed to be able to edit the article is stipulated. Lectonar (talk) 12:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The subject of this article recently made a "deathbed confession" that he touched a UFO or something. The article has been the subject of extensive off-WP canvassing and advocacy by UFO enthusiasts on X (e.g. [89] and Reddit (e.g. of five different Reddit threads [90]). The results has been a steady stream of problematic edits by WP:SPAs. A week or two of semi-protection would allow a bit of breathing room. Chetsford (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bishonen. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:41, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism stemming from previous protection log. livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We already tried one month and three months. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:45, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Edit-warring / content dispute. Left guide (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined duplicate request, and page is already protected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. randomdude121 08:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: edit wars and unsourced changes after the end of the last protection (April 6)--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 10:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:37, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined - duplicate request. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Sjö (talk) 10:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Recent spate of disruption, and this is covered by general sanctions that place the whole topic area under an extended confirmed restriction. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:19, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. The general sanctions (or are they community sanctions?) seem to conflict with the arbitration sanctions (or is it a contentious topic restriction?) and I can't be bothered to figure out which one applies nor where it is required to be logged. This is a regular admin action. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous editors. User:Jgstokes (talk)—We can disagree without becoming disagreeable. 13:17, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:15, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. randomdude121 17:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Favonian (talk) 17:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:19, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: recent vandalism Oneequalsequalsone (talk | contribs) 13:45, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 15:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 15:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 15:12, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Last year, I requested protection (see further discussion here); that request was ultimately denied and I let it go, believing that yes, they were frustrating edits, but that it would be better to err on the side of assuming good faith. However, once again an IP editor (from a newly-used IP) has made disruptive edits:
- Removed references
- Removed references without explanation
- Adding information that is blatantly inaccurate (i.e. "end of the 2025 NBA playoffs" wouldn't occur until June)
Recently, other IP editors have just simply caused more work to be done through edits that have:
- switched a cropped image to the uncropped version
- caused baffling grammatical errors (i.e. "marking their first [season] as..." -> "marking their name [season] as")
Also, even before the massive amounts of IP edits that have been made since 2024, there has historically been vandalizing by IP editors on this page across several years; examples include: 2017 (1); 2018 (2); 2019 (4, 5); 2022 (6, 7); 2023 (8). The nature of this list being the win-loss records of NBA teams probably attracts some NBA fans to inflate or deflate a team's win-loss record based on their feelings about that team, which is something I've seen over on the analogous NFL list from my time editing that one.
I previously nominated this list for featured list status in 2022, but withdrew the nomination at the time. I think the list is currently a lot closer to FL than it was when I withdrew that nom, but the IP edits have created a lot more work to then have to clean up. Considering that in 2024, there were more unregistered edits to this list than from 2015-2023 combined, and that already in 2025, there have been more unregistered edits than in any year prior to 2024, I do not have confidence that these unregistered edits will slow down or make things easier to maintain. So, I am once again kindly requesting any form of page protection. Soulbust (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Since I made this request, unregistered edits have once again:
- removed information and the accompanying reference, without explanation
- reverted back to wording that is not grammatically correct
- removed valid wikilinks for no reason
- removed valid references without explanation 2, 3
- changed to ordering of a list to have it go from an alphabetical organization to having no logical organization, for no discernible reason
- again added inaccurate date information
- Please add a page protection to aid with this issue. Soulbust (talk) 09:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2401:E180:8000::/33 (talk · contribs). This editor has been disrupting related articles as well and has been blocked before, so I have blocked them for three months. I don't think that protection is warranted otherwise. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Zinderboff (talk) 01:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:38, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Zinderboff (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:41, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term sock farm (WP:Sockpuppet investigations/StayCalmOnTress). While the accounts are usually AC, they also use IPs and hoping semi might slow them down some. The last protection ended in February. I also considered requesting EC protection but not sure what the bar is. S0091 (talk) 17:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Getting pretty tired of this sockfarm. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:37, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting vandalized by 2 IP users. Gonna eatpizza (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- The vandalism for this page goes further back than just the 2 IPs today. Administrators need to consider this. Jalen Barks (Woof) 18:15, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – No investigation found for what I can simply call "Starship vandal". Jalen Barks (Woof) 18:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's no public investigation per WP:DENY, but the vandal is being tracked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive WP:FORUM, WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:DENY editing by IPs. Too bad a lot of well-meaning editors fell for dignifying them with replies. Borgenland (talk) 07:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined. The bar for protecting discussion pages is quite high, and there don't seem to have been that many disruptive off-topic comments since this request was made. Removing unconstructive posts is probably a better approach here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page should be protected to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content. Since it may be a high-profile or frequently visited page, allowing unregistered users to edit it increases the risk of vandalism, misinformation, or unverified changes. Editedit446 (talk) 09:54, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) This looks like a request for pre-emptive protection. Apart from today's featured page (the article that appears on the Main Page), that is not done. Protection is applied only when a page is disrupted so frequently that reverting and blocking individual editors is insufficient to manage the problem. QwertyForest (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined - duplicate request. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:59, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting this is upped from indefinite pending changes to indefinite semi-protection. It would benefit reviewers from reverting numerous unsourced edits per week, and would bring it in line with List of EastEnders characters, where unregistered editors request for an edit to be made with a source. – Meena • 11:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined - as far as I can see there are more reviewed revisions accepted than reverted, other than maybe in the last few days. Those accepted edits would have been lost if the page was semiprotected instead; see WP:BATHWATER. I think this request is premature. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this needs protection until, perhaps, August when the new season begins. Spartathenian (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC). Spartathenian (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protecting until the next season starts seems extreme for this level of vandalism, but if it continues then pending changes might be more appropriate over a longer term. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:46, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request permanent semi-protection. Continued vandalism from IPs who insist "Shazaam" exists (and other minor vandalism/bad edits). It was already protected earlier back in December 2023, but I believe the one-year expiry was a mistake because the vandalism has continued. Koopinator (talk) 18:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. The expired protection was pending changes, not semi. Pending changes should be less disruptive to good faith users in response to this sort of occasional, drive-by disruption stemming from internet memes. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There hasn't been any kind of substantive edit of any sort to the page in nearly three years. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:17, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs (hopper?) and one newly-registered editor continually trying to add the same unsourced quote. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Tag-teaming to edit war is still edit warring; the IP range and the new account have been blocked for a few days. I don't think that protection is needed, but please make a new request if problems continue. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection of ALL pages in the category. Persistent, disruptive, edit-hopping LTA. An edit filter might work as well. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 16:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined - that's over a hundred articles, we're not going to go through them all. If this is a persistent and widespread problem you should post at WP:ANI along with diffs of the disruptive edits or links to specific pages being targeted. An edit filter may indeed be appropriate but we need more information. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – SOCKS and LOUTSOCKing continue to try to bludgeon this in the mainspace. CNMall41 (talk) 16:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Question: @CNMall41: why do you keep removing the article? Was there a deletion discussion I can't find? Or a sockpuppet investigation? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- It was created by a now blocked UPE editor and the IPs have come back to remove the redirect and create the page after the user was blocked. If necessary, I can just go AfD. Let me know either way.--CNMall41 (talk) 17:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. We can't create protect a redirect but this achieves the same result. I've also blocked one of the IPs for a year. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:15, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- It was created by a now blocked UPE editor and the IPs have come back to remove the redirect and create the page after the user was blocked. If necessary, I can just go AfD. Let me know either way.--CNMall41 (talk) 17:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 83.234.223.246 (talk) 16:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined, requester blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Somewhat persistent removal of content related to the Israel-Hamas conflict. Gommeh (T/C) 17:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined. Please see WP:BLPEDIT and WP:DOLT. The content in question is indeed questionable, I have removed it. I expect to see a discussion about what to include on the talk page, along with a better variety of sources. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Page keeps being vandalized. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined for now, this sock was blocked two days ago. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple vandalism instances and edits that are misinformation/irrelevant. Oorthinnai (talk) 18:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined. You are the only person to have edited the article in the last month. There is no ongoing vandalism that requires page protection. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
25 April 2025
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP block came right back, still no edit summaries. Should I also post this elsewhere to get the IP hopper looked at?. Sesquilinear (talk) 00:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Of the last 500 edits, 1/3 were reverted. Multiple attempts at briefer protection in the past. Do doot do do do.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to create a new article about Սերժ Առուշանյան, an individual I believe meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The article will include reliable, independent sources and follow a neutral point of view. Mariam Arushanyan (talk) 19:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Mariam Arushanyan: You'll have to follow the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process instead. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – per the above. Please observe that contributions in other languages than English are not accepted. Favonian (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits have resumed soon after the previous protection expired. Yuvaank (talk) 20:37, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:45, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of ip vandalism 91.156.24.251 (talk) 21:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Your request for protection on Shanagha, Kurdistan has been granted by Discospinster 54rt678 (talk | contribs) 22:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Two days. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated changes to date of birth without a reliable source. Mellamelina (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. For one month. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing by AscendedGoblin Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:15, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @Allthemilescombined1 Looking at their edits, they appear to be in good faith. If you have a disagreement with AscendedGoblin (talk · contribs), please discuss with them on the talk page. Otherwise, protection is unsuitable for this reason. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 00:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- They completely misrepresented what their sources said. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Let's just see how an admin sees this, protecting the article to prevent one specific editor from editing the page is unneeded. According to WP:PP, page protection should only be applied when disruption cannot be solved my other methods. I can see that you made no effort to communicate with AscendedGoblin (talk · contribs). I recommend doing that first. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 00:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- I would certainly appreciate an admin weighing in. I have left a message on the disruptive editor's Talk page. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- and the article's talk page. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- WP:SYNTH as I mention on the article's talk page. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- and the article's talk page. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- I would certainly appreciate an admin weighing in. I have left a message on the disruptive editor's Talk page. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Let's just see how an admin sees this, protecting the article to prevent one specific editor from editing the page is unneeded. According to WP:PP, page protection should only be applied when disruption cannot be solved my other methods. I can see that you made no effort to communicate with AscendedGoblin (talk · contribs). I recommend doing that first. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 00:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- They completely misrepresented what their sources said. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ARBPIA related, will log. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 00:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Was just about to list this. Fully support this request. Soulbust (talk) 00:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ESkog. Two days. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This seems like an IP block evasion. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 03:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Fathoms Below. For three months. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably from some sort of offwiki coordination. CutlassCiera 23:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:16, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: Article was protected in 2019 for sockpuppetry/vandalism. I have found no evidence that this vandal is still active, and the article seems unlikely to become a vandalism magnet again over five years later. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging protecting admin El C. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- The timing — within a day? Indirect is too insulary. Anyway, as I keep saying, any admin is free to take over this set of protections, so long as they're confident they could be around to keep an eye on em. Otherwise, you'd have to wait until I am available enough to test in more of a trickle. Either option is all the same for me. El_C 13:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected, and will add to watchlist. Will have a look at the other listed articles at some point ... Sdrqaz (talk) 04:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High traffic page, likely to see high degree of short-term vandalism. — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum ♠ 00:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Permanent extended confirmed protection. Contentious topic, India/Pakistan conflict. WP:CT/IPA Ecrusized (talk) 21:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2.51.207.6 (talk) 22:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- "Example Article Name" is already protected from editing (WP:SALT). Are you trying to protect another page? Justjourney (talk | contribs) 23:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Please file again with the name of a page you want to be protected, IP. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We don't protect talk pages for disruption that is months apart. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite Extended Confirmed protection needed URGENTLY. Recently was edited to display a massive Turkish flag on Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day. ⛿ WeaponizingArchitecture | yell at me 04:00, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done as I think this is referring to the template itself. A previous request was declined yesterday. The account who carried out that disruption was blocked. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rapid vandalism from rotating IPs. Seercat3160 (talk) 05:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:49, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Favonian (talk) 08:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP is currently using unapproved bots to mass make edits that are promotional. M.C. (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 125.195.120.32 (talk · contribs). Also 2601:19b:4081:d4d0::/64. Favonian (talk) 09:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: On 25 April 2025 at 06:50 (UTC), an IP editor (39.62.182.231) removed referenced content related to the 2025 Pahalgam massacre, in which 28 civilians were reported killed. Requesting protection for said page to prevent disruptive editing involving removal of well-sourced material and maintaining NPOV stance. Given the sensitive nature of the topic and recent activity, I request temporary semi-protection to prevent further vandalism. CtrlFreak578 (talk) 10:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will be logged under WP:CT/IPA. Favonian (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥ 论 14:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Isabelle Belato. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by spambot. Gommeh (talk) 15:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gommeh (talk) 15:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gommeh (talk) 15:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gommeh (t/c) 16:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP rapidly undoing edits on BLP page without stated rationale. Given Farrell's prominence following the death of the pope, recommend pending changes for the time being. ThaesOfereode (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 58.107.145.16 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. randomdude121 16:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. randomdude121 16:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping user keeps vandalizing the page. TheM1sty (talk) 16:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing BLP vandalism from IP editors. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with this one and see whether we need to increase the protection level. Ymblanter (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: No need to move (highly visible page. GloryToCalifornia (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment: @GloryToCalifornia: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism from account Able Cunningham 108.198.76.47 (talk) 14:45, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Able Cunningham has been indefinitely page-blocked from the article. Bishonen | tålk 15:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent low level vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts, as a result of high view count. Article is rarely edited, except by vandals. Dracophyllum 21:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
26 April 2025
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 54rt678 (talk | contribs) 21:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Almost nothing but vandalism from IPs for years. Entranced98 (talk) 12:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Another IP just enlarged the image again. This really needs to be protected as soon as possible. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 22:14, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 00:07, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. Zinderboff (talk) 23:19, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 00:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 23:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 00:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Many users over the past couple of years have added test edits and/or began drafting on this page. Since this page is easily accessible through the article wizard, I suggest it be protected. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 02:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 00:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism from different IPs—Myasuda (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 00:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs, possibly a single person, repeatedly adding deliberate spelling mistakes. Belbury (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 09:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Confirm. Remsense ‥ 论 01:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Many nonconstructive edits and some low effort vandalism, though some IP contributions are constructive. Similar disruption has been going back many years since this page is quite highly visible. Entranced98 (talk) 10:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if the disruptive editing continues. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:58, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator SuperMarioMan. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing vandalism Syler.mi4 (talk) 10:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:30, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – As he is the head of the government, this article is at risk of vandalism. Already some IP is trying to vandalize it. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 10:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Not to mention that vandalism goes against BLP... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Sean.hoyland (talk) 11:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Propaganda and psychological warfare in the Gaza Wars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This article is related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, and thus should be under extended confirmed protection for ARBPIA enforcement. ApexParagon (talk) 01:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:37, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recently, the article was vandalized by an editor with an Oversimplified reference. It's likely that the page will be vandalized again by someone else seeking to do the same. Ulysses S. Grant III (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Chetsford. Until 8 May. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent insertion of gossip and rumours on the private life of that person, in general by IP users. Thank you. -Mushy Yank. 18:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High-level of IP vandalism 175.107.226.0 (talk) 22:25, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- By yourself, yes.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The disruptive editing (by the same IP) restarted as soon as the page protection expired. M.Bitton (talk) 23:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 00:49, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partially blocked 2605:8d80:500::/40 (talk · contribs) from editing article for 6 months. — Newslinger talk 00:49, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The vandalism appears to have originated from a single IP address, 98.149.67.4 (talk · contribs). — Newslinger talk 01:02, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Lado85 (talk) 06:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please consider giving the IP user 152.206.240.61 (talk · contribs) the appropriate user warnings about Wikipedia's verifiability requirements. — Newslinger talk 01:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page is a little bit controversial and has a chance of IP vandalism and there is a risk of factual information being manipulated by biased and unreliable sources as previously done by some autonomous users . Rajasabh7788 (talk) 12:16, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No edits in 2025. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible page, history of disruption, no reason for this to be edited without consensus. RaschenTechner (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- I mean the redirect "UK" RaschenTechner (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Last malicious case was 8 months ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Have Kurdish Users that support other parties and want to vandalize this page . Kurdiz (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Last disruption was 20 days ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unverified additions disguised as grammatical fixes in the edit summary. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:22, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of recent vandalism. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 00:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:41:C200:1:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from IP editors Rubik's Cube 3x3 talk 00:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 35.39.104.0/22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and potential socking. ProtobowlAddict talk! 03:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: LibellCentral (talk · contribs) blocked by Lofty abyss. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. related to post-1992 US politics. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 03:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Again, and previously declined. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry from someone changing the name of "Clark's pancake house" to "Phineas and Ferb's pancake house". Not only is it wrong, but they remain adamant in their "belief" that the wrong name is the right name... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP addresses. JeffSpaceman (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page was created not to long ago and already have vandalism and the person was connected to Gangster Disciple and had ongoing conflicts with Black Disciples and King Von which have page protection. I believe it should have one week of protection to see if it’s really needed. Momentoftrue (talk) 22:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Yelover911 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. That seems to cover the bad-faith disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:57, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unverified additions disguised as grammatical fixes in the edit summary. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:24, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has become the topic of a Reddit post leading to edit warring. EoRdE6(Talk) 00:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 01:09, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: A blocked user and multiple IPs have persistently vandalized it. That's why I requested indefinite semi along with filing an WP:AIV report to block the former. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 03:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. And it is also pretty inconsistent that they say not to edit it if you are not extended confirmed, but yet it is not an extended confirmed article 54rt678 (talk | contribs) 20:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Bananas1208 (talk · contribs) blocked by Joyous!. That was a single case four days ago. Parts of the article are under the extended-confirmed restriction, not the entire article. The Carter article is considered to have related content. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- but there were also other users who also vandalized this article and I think that there are many users who are doing it.I think you need to reconsider and give it extended protected 54rt678 (talk | contribs) 04:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion by Kelonwatopdog. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelownatopdog for the details. --A.S. Brown (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:34, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Favonian (talk) 07:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IP hopping vandal. Parksfan1955 (talk) 06:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Favonian (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors and newly registered account with "Jihadist" as part of their username, giving advice on dosages of medicine, using sources that are 36, 50 and 65 years old, when professional medical help should be sought or is required. Also adding unsourced claims about side effects and reactions to medicine. Isaidnoway (talk) 07:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Should be protected under Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Armenia_and_Azerbaijan - Politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, or both—broadly construed and explicitly including the Armenian genocide—are placed under an extended confirmed restriction. Was recently vandalized by an editor to display a massive Turkish flag on the Memorial day for the Armenian Genocide - Such gross oversights should be prevented in the future, and the general sanction agrees. ⛿ WeaponizingArchitecture | yell at me 16:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thanks for requesting this. — Newslinger talk 09:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion by Kelonwatopdog. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelownatopdog for the details. --A.S. Brown (talk) 22:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:55, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, adding nonsensical content despite countless reversions. Consistent and ongoing for years. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 04:41, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:58, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of edits to remove "discredited" from the lead, often by IP editors, sometimes claiming that it is unsourced. The statement is sourced both in body and lead, and consensus for it has been established. Could editing be restricted to registered users, who have a greater chance of having read e.g. MOS:LEAD? UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you -- though this has been going on for a long time, so I'd be surprised if we don't see it return after those two weeks are up. I suppose the process at that point would be to bring the article back here? UndercoverClassicist T·C 08:10, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Correct. Going straight to a long-term protection for an article that has never been protected before is "frowned upon". Favonian (talk) 08:13, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you -- though this has been going on for a long time, so I'd be surprised if we don't see it return after those two weeks are up. I suppose the process at that point would be to bring the article back here? UndercoverClassicist T·C 08:10, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: White washing pov edit warring by an IP Spartaz Humbug! 10:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: As I pointed out in Talk, there have been a few bad faith edits that have been reverted, though some of the content was worthy of inclusion in the article, but not in the lead, per MOS:LEADBIO.--UrbanVillager (talk) 12:07, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined Looks like they've stopped now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suggest protection until the end of May, after the season has finished and all the positions have been confirmed. Thanks. Spartathenian (talk) 12:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC).
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edit warring over notability template without any evidence to assert notability. Talk page discussion from the IP editor seems WP:NOTHERE. -1ctinus📝🗨 16:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism (look at the History). Grenouille-e (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Grenouille-e: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Alshahid sahi was blocked for making repeated unsourced edits, many to add a specific name as owner[91], then they sockpuppeted as 143.44.184.235 to continue making the same edit[92], and now another puppet has appeared in Al-shahid s sahi with the same edit[93]. SPI investigation is here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 05:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 10:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Al-shahid s sahi (talk · contribs). — Newslinger talk 10:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Please, protect my user discussion page, I've become a frequent target for at least one LTA. Thanks in advance, Karol739 (talk) 08:24, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 11:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We have multiple IP addresses and new users adding and changing the article, which one mixed with other good edits it takes time to weed out. FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Newslinger talk 10:29, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kurdiz (talk) 09:42, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Newslinger talk 10:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
WP:ECP protection Continued disruption by throw-away accounts and IPs. See protection log, this page has a long history of page protection. Azuredivay (talk) 15:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Article was protected since 2012. The article doesn't have that much page views also. We can try to unprotect this one! 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 01:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Connormah, as the administrator who originally protected this article in 2012, would you like to handle this unprotection request? — Newslinger talk 09:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected Done! Connormah (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Add OceanHero search engine in the list and also add it to the Social and environmental focus section. Infinity Ultron (talk) 08:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined. The selection criteria of the list, indicated in the source comments, is: "Entries in these lists should be "notable". They should already have a stand-alone Wikipedia article based on in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources (see also WP:GNG and WP:WTAF)." OceanHero does not appear to be a notable search engine, and there is not yet a standalone Wikipedia article about OceanHero. Also, please note that the article's corresponding talk page (Talk:List of search engines) is not protected, so you may submit future edit requests on that talk page. — Newslinger talk 10:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: People from other countries and specially from Pakistan are making false edits and put neutrality of this page on crisis. I might not edit this page anymore but please protect this page as Extended Confirm Portection. It is going really out of hand and can not control the level of Vandalism. Hypothetical Painter (talk) 12:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Per WP:CT/IPA. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Now I can sleep & study properly. Jai Hind
Hypothetical Painter (talk) 16:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Now I can sleep & study properly. Jai Hind
- Seconded. An account even used LLM to create an edit. Juxlos (talk) 15:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism issues recently. Entranced98 (talk) 14:13, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Highly controversial topic from countries with massive numbers of rather inflamed accounts. One even used LLM to generate POV content. Same as the border skirmishes article, need indefinite ECP. Juxlos (talk) 15:34, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Sohom Datta. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:58, 26 April 2025 (UTC)